Part 38

"In the six days that the weasel was kept in captivity it was fed 10 house mice having a total weight of 118 grams. As no food was given on one day, the amount of food eaten is probably slightly below the actual capacity of the animal. Since the weasel weighed only about 32 grams, the average amount of food eaten a day was slightly in excess of one-half the weight of the animal."

Polderboer (1942:146-147) found in three dens, in Iowa, bits of Reithrodontomys (harvest mice) and Peromyscus maniculatus (deer mouse), and in the digestive tract of one least weasel there was a bone fragment and a few hairs of a deer mouse. In the account, given beyond, of a nest, Criddle (1947:69) records the Pennsylvania meadow mouse (Microtus pennsylvanicus drummondi) and the Gapper red-backed vole (Clethrionomys gapperi) as prey at Treesbank, Manitoba. The same author, concerning the same place, earlier (1926:199-200) wrote that in 1922 the meadow mouse, Microtus minor, "went into winter quarters in great numbers and its homes were well stocked with provisions . . . all went well until the middle of February, 1923. Then, within a few days, each was taken possession of by a least weasel (Mustela rixosa) and the inhabitants were quickly destroyed. One dwelling was occupied by one of these weasels for about two weeks during which time I observed that it had dragged several mice over the snow to its temporary home. This residence was examined in April, and in it were discovered six dead Microtus minor, one Evotomys, the head of another, and at least six or eight remnants of small rodents including Microtus drummondi, these last remains being chiefly indicated by the hair-lined nest of the weasel.

"The homes of 27 other vole communities examined at this time were all found to have been entered by weasels, the inhabitants having been killed and partly eaten. Moreover, the weasels had made the homes temporary centers from which they raided other rodent habitations in the vicinity. Thus from being an abundant animal this vole was reduced to insignificance in the course of a few weeks, while all other kinds of mice had suffered severely from the same enemy."

An instance of predation on Peromyscus, revealing some of the methods of capturing prey, is recounted by Seton (1929 (2):636-637) who quotes a letter to him from George L. Fordyce, of Youngstown, Ohio, as follows: "While out in the field this morning (Dec. 26), walking along the bank of a ravine at the edge of our golf course, I saw a Field-mouse run out of the bushes into the rough grass that is just outside of the fair-green of the course. In another instant, what I thought at first to be a white Mouse came out at the same place. The Mouse ran into a wheel track, and disappeared under the grass, coming out about 6 feet from where it went in. The white animal followed through the same course, and when it came out, I saw that it was a small Weasel, very little larger than the Mouse, and that it was following the trail of the Mouse by scent.

"For a time the Mouse ran in circles, and zigzagged about, often . . . within 4 or 5 feet of the Weasel; but the latter seemed so intent on the trail, that it did not notice the Mouse to one side. After a time the latter started toward the open golf course; and when the Weasel reached the point where the trail was straight, it sighted the prey, made a sudden dash forward, and, although 25 feet behind, overtook the Mouse while it was going 3 or 4 feet.

"For a few seconds, they seemed to fight, until the Weasel got the Mouse by the throat, and started for the bushes, dragging the body. When it came to within about three feet of me, I moved a little to see what it would do. It dropped its victim, and ran into the ravine. The Mouse had a drop of bright red blood in the center of its white throat. I waited near by for 15 or 20 minutes, thinking the Weasel might come back, but it did not show up again; even an hour later, the Mouse had not been disturbed."

There are two suggestions, but no proof that I know of, in the literature that the least weasel eats insects. Abbott (1884:27-32--1st ed., 1884) gives considerable information on the food (some insects included) of the "little weasel" which he describes (op. cit.; 27) as having "a little pointed tail of a uniform brown color." Although this suggests Mustela rixosa, Abbott mentions on the next page (page 28) that a specimen of the smaller weasel measured six and a half inches from the tip of the snout to the base of the tail and that the tail itself measured two and a fourth inches to the tip of the last caudal vertebra. These measurements indicate that Mustela erminea was involved. Because of the uncertainty as to the species of Mustela involved, Abbott's interesting data on food, nest and behavior are not recorded in the present work. Seton (1929 (2):636) says that of several least weasels brought to D. Nicholson at Morden, Manitoba, most of them decayed so quickly that they could not be saved as specimens. To Seton this indicated that insects were an important part of the food of the weasels.

In summary: Least weasels are known to eat harvest mice, deer mice, meadow mice and red-backed mice; it is suspected that they eat also insects.

Reproduction

Polderboer (1948:296) has taken six specimens in "northeastern Iowa . . . January and December--all males in winter pelage. None of these males showed signs of sexual activity; in all, the testes were retracted and diminutive in size. . . . A male least weasel in brown pelage was taken November 17, 1945, at Marion, Iowa. This specimen had large testes that had descended into the scrotum. The testes, when removed, were about the size of medium-sized garden peas. Microscopic examination of the testes and the vasa deferentia showed mature sperms to be present. . . ."

On July 1, 1917, in Clay County, Nebraska, a nest with four young was found (Swenk, 1926:321). On July 29, 1939, an adult and five young were plowed out of the ground in Allegan County, Michigan; one of the two young males weighed 40.5 grams two days after capture (Allen, 1940:459-460). On August 12, 1932, ten young with the mother, were found in Roseau County, Minnesota (Swanson and Fryklund, 1935:125). September appears to have been the month of birth of a specimen, no. 8472 in the Carnegie Museum, taken on November 24 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. In October, a young least weasel is recorded from Pennsylvania (Winecoff, 1930:313). Early December was the time of birth of a specimen, approximately 10 weeks old, no. 88077, University of Michigan, taken on February 21 in Allegan County. On December 25, 1927, in Washington County, Pennsylvania, "five full-sized, though young . . . animals were caught under the same pile of corn fodder" (Sutton, 1929:253). The first week of January seems to have been the time of birth of a juvenile, no. 88080, University of Michigan, taken in Livingston County, Michigan, on March 27, 1943, since the specimen is approximately seven weeks old. On January 15, 1929, in Washington County, Pennsylvania, four young with the eyes yet unopened were obtained from a nest (Sutton, 1929:254). On January 25, 1928, young, the eyes of which may not yet have been open, were taken from a den in Washington County, Pennsylvania, by Winecoff (1930:313), who records other young having been taken in the same month as well as in February. On March 10, a female from North Portal, Saskatchewan, gave birth to four young (Dunk, 1946:392). On April 18, 1916, four young, half grown, were taken in Nebraska (Swenk, 1926:317). On April 2, 1929, three young were found in Roseau County, Minnesota, according to Swanson and Fryklund (1935:125) who remark that: "The Pennsylvania and Minnesota records show that least weasels may be born any time from July to early February in the northern states." Now, with all of the above records available, it turns out that November, May and June are the only months in which young least weasels have not been reported. Of course some of the young, for which the ages were not specified, were born in preceding months. Even so, the data now available suggests that, in the United States, young least weasels may be born in every month of the year. The number per litter is 3, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, and 10, yielding an average of 5.

The rate of growth of the young has not been studied enough to allow of judging if it differs significantly from that of other species of the genus. Allen (1940:459-460), however, tells us that of the three young females and two young males captured on July 29, 1939, in Allegan County, Michigan, one male that was killed on July 31, 1939, weighed 40.5 grams. The male remaining alive increased from 46 grams (August 5) to 62.5 grams on September 20, having eaten 63 mice while in captivity. The females in the period of August 5 to September 4 increased in weight as follows: 41 up to 49 grams; 44 to 50 grams; and 47 to 58 grams, having eaten, by September 26, 60, 64 and 65 mice.

Concerning a nest in which young were found, Sutton (1929:254) writes that on January 15, 1929, near Burgettstown, Washington County, Pennsylvania, an animal was seen to enter a small hole in a creek bank. After the observer dug in a distance of approximately six inches an adult, female least weasel was seen and obtained. Back of the animal, the hole, which turned sharply downward, was full of water. The weasel first seen was a female nursing young. A chamber, to the side of the hole, filled with dead grass, comprised a nest containing four young with the eyes yet unopened. Several nests occupied by adult least weasels or by least weasels that were old enough to shift for themselves have been found. Polderboer (1942:145-147) in the winter of 1939-40, on a 144 acre farm in Butler County, Iowa, found four least weasels living, singly, in burrows dug by moles and pocket gophers. The nests therein made by mice were used by the least weasels. Winecoff (1930:312-313) mentions one den in Pennsylvania that contained the remains of only mice, "and not a hint of a feather." Above, in the account of food of the least weasel, Criddle's (1926:199-200) account of the havoc wrought by least weasels among the meadow mice (Microtus ochrogaster minor) has been given. In this account he mentions the fur-lined nests of the weasels that had appropriated the homes of the Microtus. Criddle's (1947:69) later account of a nest at Treesbank, Manitoba, is as follows: "A Nest of the Least Weasel.--When a least weasel finds its way into a locality that has a large number of mice in it, it selects for its home one of their nests that has been made in a well concealed place. This it immediately starts to improve by lining it with hair plucked from its victims before eating them; and as long as sufficient numbers of mice remain in the district the weasel continues adding their hair to the nest, so that the thickness of its walls give one a good idea of the length of time it has been in use. The nest is not only used for sleeping in, as most of the food is consumed in it. Frozen mice are taken in to be thawed out and the weasel carries those it has recently killed in to prevent them getting frozen, or perhaps to have them warm for its next meal.

"On January 27, 1946, my son Percy called my attention to a nest that he had just uncovered in a clover stack that we were using. This nest had originally been made by a Drummond's vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus drummondii, and taken from it by the least weasel, Mustela rixosa, the tracks of which had been noticed about the stack yard since the first snow in early November.

"The nest had evidently been in use for at least three months and the continual additions made to its walls had been so great that they were nearly an inch thick of hair matted together so closely that it appeared to be felt. The hair alone weighed nearly 22 gm., so that with this for protection the weasel must have been warm and comfortable through the severest winter weather.

"In the nest were two red-backed mice, Clethrionomys gapperi, one of which had the base of its skull eaten out. No hair had been removed from either of them, but a Microtus lying in a side tunnel some feet away had the long hair plucked from its back and sides. In and close about the nest were found forty-three front parts of mice skulls which had evidently been discarded because of the sharp teeth in the maxillaries. Seven full stomachs and eleven hind feet of adult Microtus with parts of leg bones were disclosed in, or under, the weasel's bed and a few small bits of skin with hair attached were scattered among the plucked hair of the nest.

"This weasel seems to have been rather remiss in its sanitary habits as its pile of dung was almost, or quite, touching the nest and only just to the side of its entrance. It was composed of 117 voids all of which contained much hair and broken bone.

"Six other mouse nests found in the same stack, or others adjoining it, had been thinly lined with hair. One of these had two mice in it, a red-backed with its brain eaten out and a Microtus with some hair plucked from its neck. Another nest contained the front part of a skull with teeth and the hind feet and tail of a red-back. Besides the mice found in the nests seven others were discovered tucked away in side tunnels. One of these mice had most of the hair plucked from its back. Whether all these mice and nests belonged to the same weasel or not I am unable to say, but it is usual for them to have several nests in the area surrounding the one that is used as their headquarters or home."

=Mustela rixosa eskimo= (Stone)

Least Weasel

Plates 14 and 15

Putorius rixosus eskimo Stone, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1900:44, March 24, 1900.

Putorius (Gale) vulgaris, Coues, Fur-bearing animals, p. 102, 1877 (part).

Putorius rixosus Bangs, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 10:21, February 25, 1896 (part); Merriam, N. Amer. Fauna, 11:14, June 30, 1896 (part).

Mustela rixosa eskimo, Miller, U. S. Nat. Mus. Bull., 79:96, December 31, 1912; Swenk, Journ. Mamm., 7:327, November 23, 1926; Hall, Univ. California Publ. Zoöl., 30:421, March 19, 1929.

Type.--Female, age in question, no. 848 in Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia; Point Barrow, Alaska; July 25, 1898; obtained by E. A. McIlhenny. Type not seen by me.

Range.--Alaska and Yukon Territory. See figure 28 on page 180.

Characters for ready recognition.--Differs from M. r. pygmaea of eastern Asia in longer tail, averaging 11 rather than 16 per cent of length of head and body, and in study skins reaching only to heel instead of to point between heel and toes; from M. r. rixosa in shorter tail averaging 16 rather than 19 per cent of length of head and body and not extending beyond outstretched hind feet in study skins; white of underparts extending dorsally as a reëntrant angle from upper lip to behind eye, rather than delimited dorsally by a boundary between white and brown color that extends straight across cheeks from upper lip to side of body well below eye and ear; breadth of rostrum measured across lacrimal processes more, instead of less, than 85.5 per cent of orbitonasal length; from M. erminea of same region by basilar length of skull less than 32; tail less than 50 and lacking black pencil.