Part 37

Range.--From Norway and Switzerland eastward through Siberia and all the way across North America, but unknown from Iceland, Greenland and the Arctic islands west of Greenland; in North America, from the Arctic Life-zone south to Central British Columbia, Montana and into parts of the Upper Austral Life-zone as in the eastern half of the continent.

The southern extension of range in the Appalachians (to North Carolina) is not duplicated in the Rocky Mountains of western North America probably because the region there suitable for rixosa south of Central British Columbia and Montana is occupied by the almost equally small Mustela erminea muricus and related subspecies which seem to fill the ecological role that rixosa plays where it occurs. The small size of females of M. erminea cicognanii in New England may similarly account for the absence of rixosa there.

Characters for ready recognition.--Differs from both Mustela erminea and Mustela frenata by tail a fourth or less of length of head and body and without a black tip (at most a few black hairs at extreme tip in rixosa), and from M. frenata and from M. erminea in regions where it and rixosa occur together, by basilar length of skull less than 32.5 in males and less than 31.0 in females.

Characters of the species.--Size small: Total length less than 250 in males and 225 in females; tail a fourth or less of length of head and body, and without a black pencil and at most with a few black hairs at extreme tip; caudal vertebrae 11 to 16, normally 15 in M. r. rixosa, and 11 in one M. r. eskimo examined; skull with long braincase and short precranial portion, thus essentially same shape as in M. erminea but the largest males of M. rixosa always with a lesser basilar length that even the smallest females of M. erminea or M. frenata of the same geographic area. In fact no specimens of M. frenata have skulls so small as the largest M. rixosa, and skulls of equal size of M. erminea and M. rixosa, for example, M. erminea muricus of Colorado and M. rixosa eskimo of Alaska, differ in that when the skulls are viewed from directly above those of rixosa have the mastoid processes more prominent, or the braincase is higher in relation to its width or both differences together prevail. Stated in another way, comparison of skulls of equal size of rixosa and erminea shows that in the latter the braincase is more nearly flat and is wider above and in front of the mastoid processes; therefore, the greatest breadth of the braincase equals or exceeds the mastoid breadth, whereas the reverse is ordinarily true of rixosa.

Geographic variation.--In the Old World four subspecies are currently recognized (see Allen, 1933:316) and the same number is here recognized in North America. Length of the tail, length of head and body and hind foot, breadth of the rostral part of the skull in relation to its length, and position on the side of the head of the line of demarcation between the dark color of the upper parts and the white underparts, are the features in which geographic variation has been detected. The general impression is that the amount of geographic variation is much less than in Mustela frenata and only slightly less than in Mustela erminea of the same geographic area.

Nomenclature.--It is exceptional for a species which occurs in both the Old-and New-World to take its specific name from New World material, especially if the name was proposed as recently as 1896; most circumboreal species take their names from descriptions of European specimens. Although the least weasel, Mustela rixosa (Bangs) 1896, seems now to be an exception, it may yet turn out that the first available name was based on European material. Zimmermann (1943) shows that the least weasel actually was named on the basis of European material long before 1896 and concludes that the name Putorius minutus Pomel, 1853, based on a specimen from France, is the first available name.

Because Putorius nowadays is relegated to subgeneric rank under the generic name Mustela, we have for consideration the name-combination Mustela minuta (Pomel). Unfortunately for Zimmermann's conclusion, Mustela minuta Pomel is not available because it is preoccupied by Mustela minuta Gervais [= Palaeogale minuta (Gervais), 1848-1852--see Simpson, 1946: 2, 12], a name applied to another species of small mustelid from the Oligocene or lower Miocene deposits of Europe.

Some other early names thought by Zimmermann (1943:290) to have been based on the dwarf weasel of Europe are judged to be nomina nuda and therefore are to be ignored.

The name Mustela minor Nilsson 1820 was thought by Miller (1912:402) to be a renaming, and hence a synonym, of Mustela nivalis Linnaeus. If that is the case the name does not apply to the dwarf weasel. If the name Mustela minor Nilsson was instead based on the dwarf weasel, the name might still be unavailable, depending on rulings on secondary homonyms, because the name might be preoccupied by [Lutra] minor Erxleben 1777 which is a synonym of [Mustela] lutreola Linnaeus 1766. Two names seemingly available for weasels, and in use for them today, which might replace rixosa as the name of the species, are, first, Mustela boccamela Bechstein, 1801, of Sardinia [= Mustela nivalis boccamela of Miller, 1912, 405] and second, Putorius numidicus Pucheran, 1855, of Morocco and Algeria [= Mustela numidica of Allen, G. M., 1939, 183]. As they stand in the current literature, Mustela numidica is a species distinct from the dwarf weasel and the other name, Mustela nivalis boccamela, is an insular subspecies of the mouse weasel. Zimmermann (1943:292), however, implies that M. numidica may belong to the dwarf weasel group when he says "Ob auch iberica BARR.-HAM. als Unterart zu minuta POM. zu stellen ist, soll hier nicht untersucht werden, ebensowenig die von CABRERA vermutete Zugehörigkeit der grossen nordafrikanischen M. numidica PUCH. zur 'iberica-Gruppe'." The answer to this problem requires a taxonomic, rather than a nomenclatural, decision. Whether either M. numidica or M. boccamela are conspecific with the dwarf weasel I cannot at this time ascertain for want of adequate specimens. Because these two names, M. boccamela, and M. numidica, are assigned to kinds of weasels which are currently regarded as specifically distinct from the dwarf weasel, and because all the other names which certainly have been assigned to Old World populations of the dwarf weasel before 1896, so far as I know, are nomina nuda or are preoccupied, the next available name, Mustela rixosa (Bangs, 1896), is here employed.

Remarks.--This species may have a wider geographic range in northeastern North America than is now known. Strong (1930:7) writes that the Naskapi Indians of the interior country of Labrador between Hamilton Inlet and Ungava Bay "have only one name for weasel, mé-tah-kwut, but they say there are three kinds in their territory, a large, an intermediate, and a very small weasel. The latter suggests the least weasel . . . which has not been recorded from northern Labrador."

In the northern part of the range of the species, the winter pelage is white and the summer pelage is brown. In the southern part of the range, that is in the range of the subspecies allegheniensis, the winter pelage is either brown or white and the time of the molt into winter pelage is irregular; each of eleven individuals from Pennsylvania, Michigan and Ohio, taken in December, January, February and March is mostly white but retains some considerable part of the brown pelage of the previous coat on top of the head and usually also along the midline of the entire dorsum. These eleven animals include individuals of each sex. Of each sex, some are adults and some are subadults. Therefore, the delayed or incomplete fall molt, at present, cannot be correlated with either sex or with any particular age. No wild-taken specimens of M. erminea or of M. frenata of the same region show this delayed or incomplete molt.

Possibly this delay or incompleteness of molt is the result of the same cause that lies behind the birth of some M. rixosa in midwinter. As listed below, several litters of young have been found in midwinter. In fact it appears that in the United States, young may be born in every month of the year although, according to existing information, more litters are produced in spring and in winter than in summer and autumn. Many juveniles and young of allegheniensis examined in study collections clearly were born in spring but about as many seem to have been born in midwinter as at any other time (in the light of present knowledge) and this is in contrast to what we know of the two other species of American weasels since their young, so far as known, are born in spring.

One instance is worthy of detailed comment. An adult female, no. 783 Ohio State Museum, taken on January 31, 1931, at Vinton, Meigs County, Ohio, bears the following notation on the attached label "nest plowed out of ground. Very small young escaped--marked like parent. was nursing." The enlarged mammae on the dried skin substantiate the statement that the female was nursing young. She has a brown mask continuous from one ear through the eye, across the forehead and through the other eye to the opposite ear. On each side of the body a stripe of brown 5 to 10 mm. wide extends from the upper part of the foreleg back to the thigh and base of the tail, uniting there with its opposite and covering the tail. There are a few spots of brown on the shoulders, and rump and one on the middle of the back. Otherwise the specimen is white. One implication of the statement on the label that the young which escaped were marked like the parent (presumably this female parent) is that this female is a partial albino. I am more inclined, however, to the view that there was an unseasonable activity of the particular glands of internal secretion the hormones of which promote embryonic growth and that these glands, or others controlled by them, were in some way responsible for an abnormal progress of molt, or for a reversal of molt in that one molt began before the previous molt had been completed.

Excepting this one specimen, no. 783 from Vinton, Ohio, all of those in transitional pelage indicate that the direction of the molt pattern is the same as in M. frenata and M. erminea. That is to say, the autumnal molt begins on the midventral line and the molt in spring begins on the mid-dorsal line. Furthermore, the normal progress of each molt appears to follow the same pattern that has been described above for Mustela frenata.

A possible explanation of unseasonal molt in the southeastern area of occurrence of the species Mustela rixosa, and a possible explanation of the abnormal molt of the female from Vinton, Ohio, is that the species has only relatively recently invaded the area, and has had insufficient time to adjust the physiology of its molting mechanism to the longer periods of daylight that obtain later in autumn and earlier in spring than farther north. In the other two species of American weasels, the change in length of periods of light, it will be recalled, is known to indirectly control both molt and some changes in the sexual cycle. Wright (1942B:109) has shown that molt in spring precedes by one or two months the birth of young in M. frenata, that the two phenomena are correlated in a way that is statistically significant, and recognizes that progressively longer periods of daylight may be the causal stimulus. The suggestion made above that M. rixosa does not live in New England or in the Rocky Mountains of the western United States because each of the two areas already is inhabited by weasels of almost equally small size, is in line with the idea that rixosa is a recent immigrant to America, or more precisely that rixosa arrived later than erminea.

Natural History.--Habitat and Numbers.--Soper (1946:136) recounts that near the junction of the Antler and Souris rivers, Manitoba, this species occurs "both in the river valleys and on the upper prairies," and later (1948:55), with reference to the Grand Prairie of the Peace River region of Alberta, writes that the least weasel "inhabits both parklands and mixed wood forest environments."

At most times, wherever found, the least weasel is regarded as rare. Not only mammalogists regard it as rare and as a desirable catch, but Indians likewise value it, probably because of its rarity. For example, Osgood (1901:69-70), who caught a female least weasel at Tyonek, Alaska, writes that: "The natives regard the capture of one of these rare animals as a piece of great good fortune. One old Indian who frequently visited our cabin told us that his brother who had caught one when a small boy had in consequence become a 'big chief'; and he assured me that since I had caught one I must surely be destined to become a man of great wealth and power."

Swenk's (1926:313-330) account of the species in Clay County, Nebraska, shows, however, that the animal was far more abundant in 1916 and 1917 than subsequently and inferentially than it was before 1916. Clearest proof of multiannual fluctuation is provided by P. O. Fryklund's (Swanson and Fryklund, 1935:120-126) receipt of weasels from Roseau County, Minnesota. From 1895 to 1932 he had approximately equal opportunity to receive least weasels each year. Those which came to his attention were distributed by years as follows: 1895-1927, 7 individuals in all; winter of 1927-28, 3 individuals; winter of 1928-29, 59 individuals; 1929-1930, 84 individuals; 1930-1935, 3 individuals. "These records indicate a very definite increase in the abundance of least weasels in the Roseau region the two years from the autumn of 1928 to the spring of 1930. Mr. Fryklund has handled 166 least weasels in his 40 years in Roseau County, and of these, 143 were taken in the two years mentioned."

The maximum home range of the least weasel is two acres and a weasel seldom travels farther than ten rods from its burrow according to Polderboer (1942:146) who, in the period December 20, 1939, to January 2, 1940, studied four least weasels and one long-tailed weasel on a 144 acre farm in Butler County, Iowa.

Behavior

Of the voice, Llewellyn (1942:441) records that his captive specimen taken in Virginia uttered a shrill shriek when seizing prey or when teased. When excessively annoyed the weasel also emitted musk.

The sense of smell is used in hunting as was witnessed by George L. Fordyce; he observed a least weasel following the scent of a Peromyscus and saw the least weasel overtake and kill the mouse (Seton, 1929 (2):637).

At a nest in a clover stack, in Manitoba, Criddle (1947:69), on December 27, 1946, found the least weasel "to have been rather remiss in its sanitary habits as its pile of dung was almost, or quite, touching the nest and only just to the side of its entrance." There were 117 voids.

Enemies

The great-horned owl, barn owl and long-tailed weasel are to be counted as enemies since Nelson (1934:252) found the fur, skull and other fragments of the skeleton of a least weasel in one of 26 pellets of the great-horned owl in Wisconsin; Handley (1949:431) found the skull and other skeletal remains of a least weasel in one of 22 pellets of the barn owl in Virginia; and Polderboer, Kuhn and Hendrickson (1941), in Iowa, found the remains of a least weasel in the den and scats of a Mustela frenata. A domestic cat in Michigan killed a least weasel (Dearborn, 1932B:277).

Food

Mice are killed by the least weasel biting into the back of the head and neck according to Allen (1940:460) who reported upon the growth of five young, from Michigan, that he had in captivity. He further states that a weasel was able to kill a mouse in 30 seconds. One large Microtus introduced into the cage slept with a weasel for several days and ate parts of the mice that the weasel killed but then the weasel killed this mouse! Llewellyn (1942:440-441), in writing of a captive from Virginia, says: "When a live mouse was placed in the cage, the weasel sprang upon it almost instantly. Grasping the mouse by the back of the head, the weasel bit its victim through the skull several times in rapid succession and held on with its sharp teeth. The sound of the teeth piercing the bone was distinctly audible at a distance of several feet. During this interval the weasel hugged the mouse closely with its fore legs and pressed it firmly to its belly through a kicking motion of the hind legs. The hold on the back of the head was not relinquished until the mouse was dead. The killing took only a few seconds. Upon releasing the mouse the weasel usually came to the front of the cage and inspected the observer for an interval of several seconds after which it returned to its prey and began its meal at once. Sometimes the blood would be licked from the wound in the back of the head or perhaps an ear would be chewed a bit and the blood licked off, but never did the weasel 'cut the throat' of its prey and 'suck the blood.'

"The weasel ate the head and brain first, beginning at the back of the head and working forward. Just before reaching the nose the process was reversed and eating then proceeded from the base of the skull toward the tail of the mouse. The tip of the nose, maxilla with teeth, and the tail seemed to be the parts least preferred; they were not eaten when an abundance of food was present. At no time did the weasel place its front feet on the mouse in an attempt to hold it. A second or third mouse was killed immediately upon being placed in the cage even though the first one had not been consumed. The weasel, however, usually returned to the partially eaten mouse and finished it before starting on a new one. Upon completing a meal, especially if the meal had been particularly bloody, the weasel rubbed its chin on the bottom of the cage, scooting along and appearing more snakelike than normal. Whenever I attempted to remove a mouse, or partially eaten one, from the cage, the weasel hung to the mouse tenaciously, and often allowed itself to be lifted up in this manner.