Those Other Animals

Part 1

Produced by David Edwards, Barry Abrahamsen, and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive)

------------------------------------------------------------------------

THOSE OTHER ANIMALS.

G. A. HENTY.

WITH PORTRAIT OF THE AUTHOR

AND TWENTY-TWO ILLUSTRATIONS BY HARRISON WEIR.

LONDON:

HENRY AND CO., BOUVERIE STREET, E.C.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Whitefriars Library of Wit and Humour.

-------

FIRST SERIES.

The following Vols. are now ready, 2s. 6d. each.

ESSAYS IN LITTLE. By ANDREW LANG.

SAWN OFF: A Tale of a Family Tree. By G. MANVILLE FENN.

A LITTLE IRISH GIRL. By the Author of “Molly Bawn.”

THREE WEEKS AT MOPETOWN. By PERCY FITZGERALD.

A BOOK OF BURLESQUE. By WILLIAM DAVENPORT ADAMS.

IN A CANADIAN CANOE. By BARRY PAIN, B.A.

SECOND SERIES.

Price 3s. 6d. each.

THOSE OTHER ANIMALS. By G. A. HENTY. With Illustrations by HARRISON WEIR. [Ready.

IN CAMBRIDGE COURTS. By RUDOLPH C. LEHMANN. With Illustrations by A. C. PAYNE. [October.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

● Transcriber’s Notes: ○ The symbols “++” placed in an illustration caption indicate that the caption was created by the transcriber. ○ Text that was in italics is enclosed in underscores (italics). ○ Additional Transcriber Notes are located at the end of this book.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

TO THE READER.

-------

Part 2

MAN, being essentially a creature of habit, has come to look upon what he is pleased to consider as the inferior creation from one point of view only, and that in most cases the narrow and selfish one of his own interests; thus his views are frequently lamentably prejudiced and erroneous. The natural result has been that, while we condone the failings of those creatures we make useful to us, we ignore the virtues of other and much more estimable ones. Thus, we admire the Bee because we benefit by his labours, while we have not a good word to say for the Wasp, who is, in point alike of industry and intelligence, the Bee’s superior.

An attempt has been here made to view some of the animal creation from a broader point of view, and to endeavour to do justice to those whose good points have been hitherto persistently ignored, and to take down others from the pedestal upon which they have been placed, as it would seem, unfairly and unreasonably. If some of the conclusions at which we have arrived are not in accordance with those propounded by men of science, we can only say that we are sorry for the men of science.

It has only to be added that some of these essays were first presented to the world in the columns of the Evening Standard.

G. A. H.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONTENTS.

-------

PAGE

THE ELEPHANT 1

THE CROCODILE 7

THE CAMEL 13

THE DONKEY 19

THE DRAGON 25

THE TORTOISE AND TURTLE 30

THE SHARK 36

THE SNAKE 41

FROGS 47

DADDY LONG-LEGS 54

THE APHIS 59

GEESE 65

SLUGS 72

THE PIG 78

CATERPILLARS 84

THE DOMESTIC FOWL 90

THE SPARROW 96

FLIES 101

THE PARROT 107

THE COCKROACH 113

Part 3

MICE 118

CATS 124

THE LADYBIRD 130

THE DOG 136

SHEEP 143

THE BEE AND THE WASP 150

THE BEAR 156

THE SPIDER 162

THE GNAT 167

THE ANT 173

THE BEAVER 179

THE SQUIRREL 184

THE FLEA 189

THE MOSQUITO 195

THE COW 200

THE OCTOPUS AND CUTTLE 206 FISH

THE BACILLUS 212

------------------------------------------------------------------------

THOSE OTHER ANIMALS.

----------

THE ELEPHANT.

-------

IT must be admitted that it is hard upon the citizens of the United States that the elephant is not found in the Western Continent. The Americans have an especial fondness for big things. They are proud that they possess the biggest Continent, the largest rivers, the longest railways, the loftiest trees, the most monster hotels, and the tallest stories of any people in the world. It is, then, extremely hard upon them that they have not also the biggest quadrupeds. Two good-sized quadrupeds, indeed, they had—the bison and the moose—but they are fast disappearing. As they were not the very biggest, the citizens of the States had no interest in preserving them. Had the elephant been there, he would, doubtless, have been religiously protected as a subject of national glorification. The elephant is not thought so much of in the countries where he resides. In India he has been utilised, but in Africa is prized only for his flesh and his tusks. He is considered to be a highly intelligent animal, and in books for children is generally spoken of as the sagacious elephant; but in proportion to his size he is rather a poor creature in the way of intelligence, and the brain of the ant, tiny as it is, contains more real thinking power than the skull of the elephant.

It can hardly be doubted that he owes much of the respect in which he is held by man to the peculiar formation of his proboscis. A large nose is generally considered as a sign of ability in man, but even the largest human nose is, since the change of fashion abolished its usefulness as a snuff-box, incapable of any other function than that of an organ of smell, and as a convenient support for a pair of spectacles. It is practically fixed and immovable, at least for all purposes save that of expressing the emotions of scorn and disdain. Man has, then, never recovered from the astonishment and admiration experienced by the first discoverer of the elephant at finding a beast capable of using his nose as a hand—of conveying his food to his mouth with it, and of utilising it in all the various work of life. This peculiarity has been more than sufficient to counterbalance the many obvious defects in the appearance of the elephant—his little pig-like eyes, his great flat ears, his short and stumpy tail, and the general hairless condition of his leathern skin. Then, too, mankind, even in the present day of advanced education, are worshippers of brute strength, as is evidenced by the attraction of the feats performed by strong men; and the elephant possesses enormous strength. This, however, is positive rather than relative, for he is a poor creature indeed in comparison with the flea, or even with the beetle, both of which can move weights enormously exceeding their own. Even the donkey could, bulk for bulk, give the elephant points.

The elephant is but a chicken-hearted beast. In spite of his size and strength he is easily scared, and a hare starting up at his feet has been frequently known to have excited in him an uncontrollable panic. Now and then one can be trained to await quietly the charge of an angry tiger; but this is rather because of the confidence that the animal feels in the shooting of the men he carries than in his own powers, and after having been once mauled he can seldom be induced to repeat the experiment. Naturally, the elephant is timid in the extreme; the slightest noise startles him, and, except in the case of a solitary bull rendered morose by being driven from the herd by younger rivals, he will seldom unless wounded face man. He is, like most animals, capable of being taught something; but when it is considered that he lives a hundred years, while the dog lives but ten or twelve, he would be stupid indeed if he did not in all that time come to some understanding as to what was required of him; but even at his best, a well-trained dog is a vastly more intelligent animal. This, indeed, might only be expected, for the elephant’s brain is smaller in proportion to its bulk than is that of almost any other creature, being little larger than that of man; and while the brain in man is of about one-twenty-fifth of the size of the body, that of the elephant is but one-five-hundredth part. We should, therefore, pity rather than blame the creature for the smallness of his capacity. It may be said that Baron Cuvier, who made the habits of the elephant a subject of attentive study, came to the conclusion that at the best he was no more intelligent than a dog.

The elephant should have been admired by Dr. Johnson on the ground that he is a good hater. Although his brain is not capable of holding many ideas, his memory of an injury is particularly retentive, and if he has to wait for years, he will get even at last with any one who has played him a trick. In old times the elephant was trained to war. Gunpowder had not been invented, and the elephant was therefore practically invulnerable; but even then his utility was problematical, and if pricked by an arrow or javelin, he was as likely as not to turn tail, and to spread confusion and death in the ranks of the troops that marched behind him. His courage, in fact, is beyond all comparison less than that of the horse, who seems to enjoy the clamour of battle, and will carry his rider unflinchingly through the heaviest fire. As a beast of burden the elephant has his uses, and in countries impassable to wheeled vehicles he is very valuable, especially in the carriage of pieces of artillery that could not be transported by any other available means. Upon a level road, however, he possesses no advantage whatever over smaller animals, which will not only drag larger weights in proportion to the food they consume, but will do so at much greater speed.

Continue reading Those Other Animals free in the Wunder reader →