Part 60

pp. 13, 14.

Footnote 48:

Surely this cannot be the same as the T. Honckenii of Bloch?

Footnote 49:

This character, though mentioned in the description, is not, however, represented in the figure. See Freycinet’s Voyage (Zoologie),pl. 47. f. 2.

Footnote 50:

Hist. des Poiss. tom. 5. p. 356.

Footnote 51:

Ab ιλος limus, et κοιτη cubile.

Footnote 52:

One of these is gone in this specimen, but the socket in which it was implanted is obvious.

Footnote 53:

A φυκος fucus, et κοιτη cubile.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

TRANSCRIBER’S NOTES

● Fixed typos; non-standard spelling and dialect retained. ● ERRATA was corrected. ● Renumbered footnotes and moved them all to the end of the final chapter. ● Enclosed italics font in underscores. ● Enclosed blackletter font in =equals=. ● The caret (^) is used to indicate superscript, whether applied to a single character (as in 2^d) or to an entire expression (as in 1^{st}).