THE HIRING OF FOREIGN SOLDIERS AND EMPLOYMENT OF INDIANS IN THE CIVIL WAR 72-84
The policy of the British Ministry in employing foreign soldiers and Indians in the war with the Colonies deprecated by all classes in England and America and throughout Europe 72
Violent opposition in Parliament to the hiring of foreign troops; exasperation in the Colonies (in a note) 73
Unreliable and bad character of the Hessian mercenaries 74
Remarks upon the bad policy of employing them, and their bad conduct, by the royal historian (in a note) 74
The employment of Indians still more condemned and denounced than the hiring of foreign troops 74
Employment of Indians by both the French and English during the war of 1755-63, between France and England 75
At the close of the war the French authorities recommended the Indians to cultivate the friendship of England 75
Both Congress and the English sought the alliance and co-operation of the Indians; misstatements of the Declaration of Independence on this subject (in a note); the advantages of the latter over the former in conciliating the Indians 75
The employment of the Indians in every respect disadvantageous to England 76
English Generals in America individually opposed to the employment of the Indians in the military campaigns 76
Failure, if not defeat, of General Burgoyne's army by the bad conduct, and desertion, of his Indian allies 76
But Washington and Congress, as well as the English Government, sanctioned the employment of the Indians in the war, and the first idea of thus employing them originated with the first promoters of revolution in Massachusetts 77
Omissions of American writers to state that the aggressions and retaliations of the Congress soldiers and their coadjutors far exceeded in severity and destruction the aggressions and retaliations of the Indians on the white inhabitants 77
Many letters and biographies of actors in the Revolution show that very much of what was written or reported during the Revolution against the English Loyalists and Indians was fictitious or exaggerated 78
Proceedings of the Provincial Congress of Massachusetts (before the affairs of Concord and Lexington) to enlist and employ the Indians against the British 79
General Washington, under date of July 27th, 1776, recommends the employment of Indians in the revolutionary cause 80
The Americans have no ground of boasting over the English in regard to the employment of Indians and their acts during the war 81
Efforts of General Burgoyne to restrain the Indians, who were an incumbrance to his army, and whose conduct alienated great numbers of Loyalists from the British cause 82
The conduct and dread of the Indians roused great numbers to become recruits in General Gates' army, and thus rendered it far more numerous than the army of General Burgoyne (in a note) 83
American invasion and depredations in the Indian country the latter part of 1776, as stated by Dr. Ramsay 84
The invasion unprovoked, but professedly as a "precaution" to "prevent all future co-operation between the Indians and British in that quarter" bordering in Virginia, North and South Carolina, and Georgia 84
Complete destruction of Indian settlements; their country a desolation 84
The Loyalists of America and Their Times · The Wunder Library — complete classics, free to read, with narration.