penetrate far from their source. The fastest of them would not probably penetrate one centimetre in soft tissues.
We must now return to the phenomenon of ionisation. Ionisation is revealed to observation most conspicuously when it takes place in a gas. The + and - electric charges on the gas particles endow it with the properties of a conductor of electricity, the + ions moving freely in one direction and the - ions in the opposite direction under an electric potential. But there are effects brought about by ionisation of more importance to the medical man than this. The chemist has long come to recognise that in the ion he is concerned with the inner mechanism of a large number of chemical phenomena. For with the electrification of the atom attractive and repulsive forces arise. We can directly show the chemical effects of the ionising ss-rays. Water exposed to their bombardment splits up into hydrogen and oxygen. And, again, the separated atoms may be in part recombined under the influence of the radiation. Ammonia splits up into hydrogen and nitrogen. Carbon dioxide forms carbon, carbon monoxide, and oxygen; hydrochloric acid forms chlorine and hydrogen. In these cases, also, recombination can be partially effected by the rays.
We can be quite sure that within the complex structure of the living cell the ionising effects which everywhere accompany the ss-rays must exert a profound influence. The sequence of chemical events which as yet seem
250
beyond the ken of science and which are involved in metabolism cannot fail to be affected. Any, it is not surprising that as the result of eaperinient it is found that the radiations are agents which may be used either for the stimulation of the natural events of growth or used for the actual destruction of the cell. It is easy to see that the feeble radiation should produce the one effect, the strong the other. In a similar way by a moderate light stimulus we create the latent image in the photographic plate; by an intense light we again destroy this image. The inner mechanism in this last case can be logically stated.
There is plainly a true physical basis here for the efficacy of radioactive treatment and, what is more, we find when we examine it, that it is in kind not different from that underlying treatment by spectral radiations. But in degree it is very different and here is the reason for the special importance of radioactivity as a therapeutic agent. The Finsen light is capable of influencing the soft tissues to a short depth only. The reason is that the wave length of the light used is too great to pass without rapid absorption through the tissues; and, further, the electrons it gives rise to--i.e. the ss-rays it liberates--are too slow-moving to be very efficient ionisers. X-rays penetrate in some cases quite freely and give rise to much faster and more powerful ss-rays
See The Latent Image, p. 202.
251
than can the Finsen light. But far more penetrating than x-rays are the y-rays emitted in certain of the radioactive changes. These give rise to ss-rays having a velocity approximate to that of light.
The y-rays are, therefore, very penetrating and powerfully ionising light waves; light waves which are quite invisible to the eye and can beam right through the tissues of the body. To the mind's eye only are they visible. And a very wonderful picture they make. We see the transmuting atom flashing out this light for an inconceivably short instant as it throws off the ss-ray. And "so far this little candle throws his beams" in the complex system of the cells, so far atoms shaken by the rays send out ss-rays; these in turn are hurled against other atomic systems; fresh separations of electrons arise and new attractions and repulsions spring up and the most important chemical changes are brought about. Our mental picture can claim to be no more than diagrammatic of the reality. Still we are here dealing with recognised physical and chemical phenomena, and their description as "occult" in the derogatory sense is certainly not justifiable.
Having now briefly reviewed the nature of the rays arising in radioactive substances and the rationale of their influence, we must turn to more especially practical considerations.
The Table given opposite shows that radium itself is responsible for a- and ss-rays only. It happens that
252
Period in whioh 1/2 element is transformed.
URANIUM 1 & 2 { a 6 } x 109 years.
URANIUM X { a ss } 24.6 days.
IONIUM { a 8 } x 104 years.
RADIUM { a ss } 2 x 102 years.
EMANATION { a } 8.85 days.
RADIUM A { a 8 } minutes.
RADIUM B { ss y } 26.7 minutes.
RADIUM C { a ss y } 13.5 minutes.
RADIUM D { ss } 15 years.
RADIUM E { ss y } 4.8 days.
RADIUM (Polonium) F { a } 140 days.
Table showing the successive generations of the elements of the Uranium-radium family, the character of their radiations and their longevity.
253
the ss-rays emitted by radium are very "soft"--i.e. slow and easily absorbed. The a-ray is in no case available for more than mere surface application. Hence we see that, contrary to what is generally believed, radium itself is of little direct therapeutic value. Nor is the next body in succession--the emanation, for it gives only a-rays. In fact, to be brief, it is not till we come to Radium B that ss-rays of a relatively high penetrative quality are reached; and it is not till we come to Radium C that highly penetrative y-rays are obtained.
The Birth-Time of the World and Other Scientific Essays · The Wunder Library — complete classics, free to read, with narration.