Part 24

B. influenzæ is a frequent finding in the sputum of patients with chronic bronchitis, pulmonary tuberculosis and other chronic conditions in the respiratory tract. Boggs recovered this bacillus from two cases of bronchiectasis, Richards and Gurd had a similar case and Tedesko reported several. The literature is filled with references to the finding of B. influenzæ in cases of chronic bronchitis. Those reported by Lord, Madison and Tedesko quoted above will serve as examples. The frequent positive cultures in cases of pulmonary tuberculosis so often referred to in reviews of the literature and the significance of these findings, as pointed out by Scheller, are important as bearing on the much debated subject of the effect of influenza on this disease. These types of chronic infection by the influenza bacillus should be more generally recognized as they undoubtedly will become more numerous following this last epidemic if we can judge from the experience of the past.

Infections of the Pleura

The recovery of B. influenzæ from the pleural cavity is not uncommon as is shown in the above review. The findings of MacCallum, Cole and others during the spring of 1918 are particularly interesting. Beall in 1906 reported a case of empyema with large quantities of green pus in which B. influenzæ was found in pure culture.

Sinuses of the Head

Infection of the accessory sinuses of the head has long been recognized as occurring in influenza. Frankel found B. influenzæ in 4 from 40 infected antra. Lindenthal, who was particularly interested in the question of sporadic influenza, found the bacillus in one or more of the head sinuses in six of eight carefully studied cases. He considered that the B. influenzæ remained in these areas during inter-epidemic times and from hence caused the sporadic outbreaks of influenza. Howard and Ingersoll reviewed the literature up to 1898 and grew B. influenzæ from one of three acute antral diseases. They did not find it, however, in 12 chronic cases. Clemens believed the influenza bacillus to be present in the sinuses rather frequently in cases where it was overgrown or difficult to culture from the lower respiratory secretions. Moszkowski grew it in one case from the pus of the antrum. Tedesko recorded several positive results and many others are reported in the literature.

The two cases reported by Lacy (1918), the findings during the present epidemic by Stone and Swift of B. influenzæ in 13 of 28 sphenoidal and 6 of 12 ethmoidal sinuses cultured at necropsy, those by Spooner, Scott and Heath, of B. influenzæ in four frontal sinuses and in eight sphenoidal, and the recovery by Wolbach of B. influenzæ in cultures from the sinuses in certain cases where the lung cultures were negative, emphasize the importance and frequency of the infection by this organism in these cavities. Keegan, who laid particular stress on lung punctures and autopsy examinations, pointed out that in throat cultures the probability that the influenza focus is often not in the pharynx but in some recess of the nasal cavity.

H. E. Robertson in the spring of 1918 reported the infection of the sinuses in seven cases of tracheo-bronchitis with patches of broncho-pneumonia and the growth of B. influenzæ from sphenoid, ethmoid or frontal sinuses of all these cases. He also found this organism in the sphenoid of six cases dying with various diseases as well as in two accident cases with death under 24 hours. The importance of these results was laid stress on by the author, not only on account of the probable toxic absorption and the general menace of spread, but, more particularly, because such individuals, acting as carriers, could furnish foci for the spread of epidemics.

Eye and Ear

Infections of the eye by the influenza bacillus are quite common. This subject is fully discussed by Axenfeld (text-book, “The Bacteriology of the Eye”). Giani and Picchi found it in the eye in 66 per cent. of influenza cases, in 90 per cent. of epidemic conjunctivitis, and in the normal eye of 5.8 per cent. Wynekoop, in 1903, reported having found this organism in cases of conjunctivitis in 1899. Guiral, in the recent epidemic, found influenza bacillus constantly present in the secretions in cases of what seemed to be Week’s conjunctivitis. Ulceration of the cornea was rather common. One such case is mentioned in which there was no pain in the eyes, but general symptoms of influenza. The middle ear is also sometimes infected. Between the report of Kossel in 1893 and that of Stone and Swift in 1918, who found the middle ear and mastoid to contain B. influenzæ in 8 of 17 cases, there have been many references in the literature to this complication by the influenza bacillus. The evidence indicates, however, that in the middle ear, as in the pleural cavity, the secondary bacteria are far more often the important ones.

Meninges

Influenzal meningitis seems to stand by itself as a manifestation of the pathogenic effects of B. influenzæ. The literature is too voluminous to review in this place, but the evidence would seem to point to a more invasive and pathogenic type of this organism, if not to a separate member of the group.

Invasion of the Blood Stream

The evidence in clinical influenza would suggest at times a bacteremia in addition to the severe toxemia, which is such a constant feature of the disease. Simultaneously with the discovery of B. influenzæ, Canon reported finding bacilli of similar morphology in blood smears, but was unable to grow them, and it would appear at least doubtful that he was dealing with the influenza bacillus. Meunier is probably the first who grew this organism from the blood. He recovered it from 8 blood cultures out of 10 in cases of broncho-pneumonia following measles, and in one other case of broncho-pneumonia. A very full discussion of this question is to be found in Canon’s book on “The Bacteriology of the Blood in Infectious Diseases.” Of particular interest are the results of Ghedini, who made a careful study of 28 influenza patients. B. influenzæ was grown from the blood in 18 of these at the height of the fever, while in the 10 negative cases the disease was milder or the blood was taken only after the temperature had fallen. The amount of blood used was 20-30 c.c., and it was cultured in lecithin broth. In practically all of his cases several cultures were taken, and in a number of the positive cases negative results were obtained both before and after the acme of the fever. He also grew the bacillus from 8 of 14 spleen punctures of these patients. Madison (1910) reported the recovery of this bacillus from the blood of a patient with a primary broncho-pneumonia who recovered. This author also used about 30 c.c. of blood. Thursfield, in 1910, also reported two cases of B. influenzæ bacteremia in which the organisms were recovered at the height of the temperature. One had influenza, the other phlebitis, and both recovered. Tedesko and several others have found it in the heart’s blood in many cases, more especially in broncho-pneumonia after measles.

During the present epidemic the positive cultures of this bacillus from the blood have been rather infrequent. J. S. Fleming had 2; 2 are quoted in the report of the Influenza Committee of the Advisory Board to the D. G. M. S. (Peters and Cookson); Medalia had 2 during life and 19 of 34 at autopsy; Orticoni, Barbie and Leclerc in 5 of 10 blood cultures in one series, and 7 of 19 in another; Stone and Swift 2 at autopsy; McKeekin, in Australia, influenza-like bacilli in 4; Blanton and Irons three times in the heart’s blood, one of these pure; Spooner, Scott and Heath twice in the heart’s blood at autopsy, and Wollstein and Goldbloom from the heart’s blood in one child. In the majority of these findings the bacillus was not found in pure culture. Abrahams and his associates found the B. influenzæ along with a pneumococcus and M. catarrhalis from the heart’s blood in one case. In our positive blood culture there was evidence of the same mixture being present.

Before drawing sweeping conclusions against the invasion of the blood by B. influenzæ it must be remembered that the quantity of blood used has been generally only about 10 c.c., and often much less, the difficulty of observing growth if the culture is pure has been largely overlooked, the use of more favorable media than blood agar and the possible inhibitory action of influenzal blood, as suggested by Wittingham and Sims, Rivers and others, has not been considered, and further that sufficient care has not been exercised to obtain blood at the most favorable period in the disease. It may be recalled that the problem is quite similar to that of demonstrating the organisms in the blood in patients with streptococcus viridans bacteremia.

All the available evidence, however, points to the invasion of the blood in influenzal infections as being a very fleeting one. Unless this is true, it would be surprising in the many hundreds of blood cultures which have been taken in the concentrated study of patients during the recent pandemic, if more successful cultures had not been obtained. General infections with localization of B. influenzæ in different parts of the body are here of interest—such as that reported by Slawyk and others. Whether the strains causing meningitis, and which apparently more frequently invade the blood, are really different members of the hemophilic group or only forms with a higher invasive power is still, I believe, an open question.

Endocarditis

In endocarditis the B. influenzæ is probably, after streptococci, the organism most frequently isolated from the blood. Rosenthal from heart’s blood at autopsy, Schlangenhaufer, Jehle two cases, Horder (1907) six cases, and who believed he was the first to isolate B. influenzæ from the blood, Tedesko in a number at autopsy, Spat, F. J. Smith, Saathoff, Libman four cases, Sacquepee, McPhedran, Mann, Rainaford and Warren three cultures from two patients, and a number of others all bear witness to its frequency.

Other organs of the body are sometimes found to contain B. influenzæ. Adrian, Schultes, Basile and Tedesko have all recovered this organism from the diseased appendix. Several years ago a bacillus, considered, to be B. influenzæ, was grown from the pus of an appendix abscess in our laboratories. Wright found it in pyelonephrosis. Klieneberger found influenza-like bacilli in cases of cystitis. Menko reported the bacillus from orchitis, and Cohn found numerous influenza-like bacilli in the discharge from urethritis. Meunier found it in pure culture in a case of osteoperiostitis. Huyghe, Besancon and Griffon recovered it from infected joints, as did Pacchioni in a general infection. Weil found it in the pus about the hip joint one month after an attack of influenza. This short review serves to illustrate that the influenza bacillus, although generally limited to infections in the respiratory tract, is, nevertheless, capable of infecting other parts.

Immunity—Phagocytosis

Phagocytosis of the B. influenzæ has been very frequently noted in the study of sputum smears. It has been observed, moreover, that this phenomenon occurs most frequently when the patient is on the road to recovery (Pfeiffer, Martin, and others), and it may indicate an important reaction on the part of the body to this organism. Tunnicliff in a recent report, however, did not find the opsonic index to be raised above the normal in her patients, and Tunnicliff and Davis had difficulty with a spontaneous phagocytosis of this bacillus. This difficulty was to a large extent absent in her later study.

Agglutination

Agglutination tests have been used by many investigators in attempts to determine a specific reaction in the sera of persons suffering from influenza. Such reactions develop, as we know, against secondary infecting bacteria, so that unqualified conclusions cannot be drawn that agglutinins in the sera of patients against B. influenzæ indicate the etiological importance of this organism. Vagedes using a dilution of 1-50 found 8 positives among 27 patients tested. Lord found the test most inconstant. Ghedini obtained useful results by using serum in dilutions 1-20 to 1-30, and had 17 positives from 28 influenza cases. He found agglutinins present three to four days after the height of the infection, and noted that the sera became practically normal after three to four weeks. Fichtner, although he obtained agglutination with sera of influenza patients in high dilutions (1-100 and 1-750), found his controls were often agglutinated, and consequently drew no conclusions. Wollstein (1906) did a series of agglutination tests, using various strains of B. influenzæ. The sera of patients she found very unsatisfactory, but by immunizing rabbits with this organism she obtained sera with titres up to 1 in 400. She could find no differences among the various strains studied. Somewhat similar results were obtained by her in 1915 working with strains from the meninges and the respiratory tract. Odaira carried out a rather extensive series of tests, using immunized rabbit sera and a special method of making his bacterial emulsions. He was able to distinguish B. influenzæ from both B. pertussis and the so-called Cohen’s bacillus of meningitis. Friedberger’s dog bacillus, however, could not be differentiated from B. influenzæ by this means. A. Fleming during the recent epidemic had good results with the sera of 21 patients. He incubated at 50° C. for two hours. He also used sera of immunized rabbits and got marked agglutination against the homologous strain, but varying results with other strains. He noted some strains agglutinated readily, while others did not. Eyre and Lowe noted an increase in agglutinins in the sera of people vaccinated against the influenza bacillus. Couret and Herbert could distinguish two types and a possible third among their strains. Park and his co-workers found numerous types by means of agglutination. Absorption of agglutinins was found helpful by these last two workers. There are so many factors capable of altering the sensitiveness of bacteria to agglutination, as in the well-known experiments of Neufeld, that we must recognize that much work is still to be done before we can properly interpret the results of these agglutination tests.

Binding of Complement

Complement fixation tests were carried out by Odaira but his results were much less satisfactory than those he obtained by means of agglutination. Rapaport made an extensive study of this test, using the sera of patients in various stages of convalescence. Three hundred and fifteen convalescents showed 54.5 per cent. positive while 300 controls only gave 9.5 per cent. positive results. Most of the positive cases were in patients three to five days after their illness, but the reaction was found in convalescents after from 1 to 45 days. Sera from acutely ill patients at times showed negative or slightly positive reactions but these same sera after keeping for some days and retesting often gave strongly positive results. This would appear to be a promising field for investigation.

Anaphylaxis

Hypersensitiveness was noted by W. F. Robertson in chronic infections with B. influenzæ. Wollacott in a letter to the British Medical Journal suggested that the severity of the recent outbreak of influenza may possibly be due to the development of a state of anaphylaxis. There would seem to be at least some evidence in favor of such a view in the fact that the severe outbreak was preceded by epidemics of a milder form of influenza and that the influenza bacillus was probably widely spread during this time. Greenwood, as quoted above, noted that primary cases always precede the mass attack. Of course, the term anaphylaxis has been used to explain almost everything. Nevertheless, the theory is interesting. The skin tests which we did for hypersensitiveness were, as I have noted above, negative but there is a possibility that the failure of the reaction may indicate a higher resistance or even an antitoxin, now that the bacillus can be classed as a toxicogenic one. Anti-influenza sera have been produced by a few investigators (Latapie, Wollstein) but have not found any practical application during this pandemic. Vaccination is discussed elsewhere in these studies.

Experiments on the Human