CLIMATE.
Heat and Moisture are the main governing conditions of plant growth. In a preceding chapter the relations of soils and plant growth to water have been considered; in the present one the relations of both moisture and heat to soils and plants will be discussed; and to do this intelligibly to those not making a specialty of such studies, it becomes necessary to introduce, first, a summary consideration of the subject of climate.
Climatic conditions control, and to a great extent determine, the industrial pursuits of every country; all the more so as the rapid communication and transportation by means of modern appliances now brings every part of the globe in competition with every other. The question is not now what it may be intrinsically possible to do under certain climatic and geographical conditions, but whether these things can be done with a reasonable prospect of profit and commercial success, in competition with other countries offering more or less of similar possibilities. While it is true that the cost of labor frequently enters most heavily into such problems, yet favorable or unfavorable climatic or soil-conditions may in many cases turn the scale. Thus the high price of labor and fuel on the Pacific coast of the United States would at first blush seem to render competition with Europe and the East in the production of beet sugar commercially impossible; yet exceptionally favorable climatic and soil-conditions concur to turn the scale in favor of California at least, so as to have placed that state at the head of the sugar-producing states of the Union. A general understanding of the climatic conditions which concern the United States more or less directly, is therefore needful to an appreciation of their agricultural possibilities.
Climatic Conditions.—The factors usually mentioned as constituting climate are temperature, rainfall and winds. Since the latter two factors, however, are themselves merely the result of heat conditions, it is proper to discuss from the outset the origin and mode of action of heat.
TEMPERATURE.
The temperature of stellar space outside of the atmosphere is known to be very low. The increasing cold as we ascend to greater heights, is a fact familiar to all. Langley has calculated upon the basis of observations made at the summit and foot of Mount Whitney in California, that the temperature of space lies near 200° Cent. (360° F.) below the freezing point of water; and this would be the temperature near the Earth’s surface, were it not for the surrounding atmosphere. The latter absorbs but a small amount of the sun’s direct heat rays (which are of high intensity), as they penetrate it to the Earth’s surface. But as the earth’s surface is warmed, the heat rays of low intensity which it emits cannot pass back through the atmosphere to the sun or to outer space; they are “trapped,” as it were, by the dense air resting near the earth’s surface, which is then warmed partly by the radiation from, partly by direct contact with, the soil. It is to the existence of our atmosphere, then, that the possibility of our animal and vegetable life in their present form is due; and a decrease of the trapping effect on the sun’s heat rays makes itself quickly felt when ascending, either in balloons or on high mountains. Moreover, it is well known to mountain climbers that at great elevations the sun’s heat is extremely intense at noon; even though the temperature may fall to the freezing point at night, owing to the failure of the thin air to prevent the radiation back into space of the heat absorbed during the day. On the high plateaus of the Andes and of Asia, therefore, very extreme climates prevail, on account of the great range of temperature between day and night.
Ascertainment and Presentation of Temperature-Conditions.—The proper understanding of the temperature conditions of any locality or region is by no means a simple matter. Shall we study the daily, monthly, or annual changes of temperature, or the means deduced from either or all of them, in order to gain a clear insight into the climatic conditions that control crop production and health conditions?
The Annual Mean Temperature not a Good Criterion.—Since one and the same figure may result equally from the averaging of two widely divergent data, and from such as are close together, it is clear that the mean annual temperature cannot be a proper criterion of the agricultural adaptations of a country. Thus an average temperature of 60° F. might result, equally, from the averaging of 65 and 55 degrees, or from taking the mean of 15 and 105 degrees; yet the respective cultural adaptations would be widely different.
Extremes of Temperature are Most Important.—It is, on the contrary, rather the extremes of temperature, more particularly of cold, but frequently also of heat, together with the total amount of heat available during the growing season, that determines such adaptation so far as temperature is concerned; for no culture plant can be successfully grown where the temperature during winter even occasionally falls for more than a few hours below the point which it can resist; and for each plant there is a certain aggregate requirement of heat to carry it from germination to fruiting. Even different varieties of one and the same plant differ materially in the latter respect, so that it is very important that in the selection of varieties to be grown, this factor should be taken into consideration. It cannot be too strongly urged that the comparison of annual means of temperature, so commonly made by promoters of colonization schemes, must not be taken as a guide either in the estimate of cultures in which the immigrant may desire to engage, or by those in search of a climate adapted to their health-conditions.
Seasonal and Monthly Means.—The statement of the mean temperatures of the conventional four seasons—spring, summer, autumn and winter—afford a much clearer conception of climatic adaptations; provided always that the extreme temperatures be considered at the same time. With the same understanding, the monthly means are still more instructive; but here again, it is most essential that the distribution and amount of rainfall in each be regarded at the same time, since the most desirable temperature is of no avail without the moisture required for vegetation.
In some cases, e. g., that of California, it becomes necessary for practical purposes to regard the “season,” and not the calendar year, as the unit or reference for crop production. There the crops depend upon what rainfall may occur from October to May, there being no summer rains of agricultural significance, and outside of irrigated lands, almost all vegetation save that of trees being in abeyance. In India, there are two distinct growing seasons (“kharif” and “rabi”), corresponding to the two “monsoon” seasons; and no matter how much rain may fall during one, almost total failure may occur in other tropical and arid sections of that country.
The Daily Variations are of interest chiefly with respect to health conditions, since most plants are more adaptable in this respect than the average man.
RAINFALL.
Distribution Most Important.—The summary statements of the annual rainfall are almost equally as deceptive as are those of annual mean temperature, since quite as much depends on the manner in which it is distributed through the year, as upon its absolute amount; and also upon the manner of its fall. Thus Central Montana has the same aggregate annual rainfall as the country surrounding the Bay of San Francisco, viz. about 24 inches; but while in the Franciscan climate this amount of rain falls during one-half of the year, and that the growing season, enabling crops to be grown without irrigation, in Montana the rainfall is distributed over the entire season, so that irrigation is absolutely essential for the successful production of crops. This so much the more as, while the winter snowfall is very light, the rains of summer are largely torrential, running off the surface in muddy floods and giving little time for absorption into the soil. Farther west, in Washington, where grain crops are largely grown without irrigation, the sowing of winter grain is impracticable because the dry summer is immediately followed by the very light snowfall of winter, which falls on dry ground. Fall-sown grain would thus simply lie dormant in the ground through the winter, with great liability to injury from stress of weather in early spring, apart from the depredations of birds and rodents. Hence grain is always sown there in spring only.
These examples may suffice to show that summary statements of either temperature or rainfall by yearly means are of little practical interest to the farmer. What he needs to know is whether or not sufficient rains to mature a full crop are likely to fall during the time that the growing temperature prevails; and what are the minima and maxima of temperature—heat and cold—that his crops will be called upon to endure.
WINDS.
The third climatic factor mentioned, the winds, though proverbial for their unreliability and inconstancy, are not only very incisive in their action, but also to a considerable extent of very definite local or regional occurrence and significance. Moreover, their occurrence, direction, temperature and moisture-condition can, in regions whose climatology has been reasonably well studied, be foretold with sufficient accuracy to be of great use to the farmer.
Heat the Cause of Winds.—As already stated, the primary cause of all winds is heat, substantially on the principle according to which draught is created in our domestic fires. The hot air rising creates an indraught from all directions, especially from that which it can most readily come; viz., from the ocean, or from level lands, rather than across mountain chains. Hence the sea-breeze in the after part of the day, when the land has become heated; while the sea, requiring a much larger amount of heat to change its temperature to a similar extent, remains relatively cool. But at night the earth cools more rapidly than the sea, by radiation; hence toward evening the sea-breeze dies down, and toward and after sunset the land-breeze takes its place.
A striking case in point is the regular wind which in summer blows through the “Golden Gate,” a gap in the Coast Range connecting the Pacific Ocean directly with the great interior valley of California, along the bays of San Francisco, San Pablo, and Suisun. The great interior valley and adjacent mountain slopes becoming intensely heated during the rainless summer, the ascending air is replaced by a steady indraught from the sea, which is bordered by a belt of cold water causing fogs along the coast. The fogs are quickly dispelled on reaching the edge of the valley near the middle of its length; whence steady breezes blow northward and southward, up the valleys of the Sacramento and San Joaquin respectively. These winds, popularly often, but erroneously, called trade-winds, are really “monsoons” similar in their origin to those of India, which, when coming from the sea cause rains, but when from the heated land itself are hot and dry; as in the case of the sirocco of Italy and North Africa, the terral of Spain and the northers of California.
The principle of this local change of winds, together with the rotation of the earth, the absorption of moisture by air, and the fact that the latter becomes cooler when it expands on rising and warmer when it is compressed by descending, serves to explain all the major phenomena usually observed in connection with winds. The air of the equatorial belt, heated throughout the year, necessarily rises and creates an indraught from both north and south; but since the air thus flowing in has a lower rotary velocity than the earth’s surface at the Equator, it lags behind and so gives rise to northeast and southeast winds, respectively, between the two tropics and the equatorial belt. These regular winds, from the aid they give to commerce in passing from continent to continent, are known as the trade winds. On the other hand, the air that has risen from the hot equatorial belt, cooling by expansion as it rises and flowing northward and southward from the Equator, on descending as it mainly does into the temperate zones, has a higher rotary velocity than the land-surface and so tends to give rise to southwest and northwest winds in the northern and southern hemispheres respectively. At sea, on coasts and in level inland regions to windward of mountain chains, such winds are often quite regular during a portion of the year.
Cyclones.—But local disturbances arising from heated land areas or mountain slopes, as well as wide atmospheric changes whose causes are not fully understood, give rise to waves of alternating high and low barometric pressure, largely converting rectilinear or slightly curved wind-motion into whirls or “cyclones” ranging from a thousand to over two thousand miles in diameter. These in the case of low-pressure waves or centers, toward which the air flows from the outside, revolve in the direction contrary to the movement of the hands of a clock, and commonly produce rain in their east portion. A high-pressure wave or center, from which the air naturally flows toward the outside, will usually bring about an “anti-cyclone” area with fair, and in winter cold (“blizzard”) weather, the direction of the whirl being, in this case, the reverse, or in the same direction as the hands of a clock. Both cyclones and anti-cyclones move in North America from west to east, mostly entering from the Pacific Ocean off the northwest coast and traversing the continent with a slight southeast (or in the case of cold weather almost south) trend, with a velocity of twenty to thirty miles an hour; until upon reaching the region of the Great Lakes they generally turn northeastward and pass into the Atlantic Ocean from the New England and Canada coasts.—It is upon these general facts, roughly outlined here, that the weather forecasts are in the main based; taking into consideration, of course, the local or regional conditions, topography, etc., which modify the application of the general rules.
This designation is popularly and incorrectly applied to the comparatively limited, but very violent and destructive rotary storms or whirlwinds which originate locally on the heated plains of the Middle West of the United States, and are almost always accompanied by violent electric phenomena. These should properly be called tornadoes. At sea such whirlwinds give rise to waterspouts, in deserts to sand storms.
In the southern hemisphere, the air-movements substantially correspond to those observed in the northern, so far as not modified by mountain chains; as is especially the case in South America.
INFLUENCE OF TOPOGRAPHY.
Rains to Windward of Mountain Chains.—The surface features or topography of the regions traversed by the air currents or winds may materially modify both their direction and their physical condition, especially as to moisture and temperature. Mountain chains may deflect them, or, causing the air currents to rise on their slopes, and thus to cool by expansion, the moisture these bring with them from the sea may be partially, or sometimes almost wholly, deposited in the form of rain or snow; chiefly on the windward slopes. Then, continuing across the range, the air deprived of most of its moisture cannot readily yield up more; hence the scarcity of rain—“arid climate”—under the lee of mountain chains; as in the Great Basin between the Sierra Nevada and Cascade ranges on the one hand and the Rocky Mountains on the other, and also on the Great Plains under the lee of the latter. The abundant rainfall between the Mississippi river and the Atlantic coast is due to the moist winds coming from the warm waters of the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean sea, whose access is not interfered with by any cross-ranges of mountains. But the Great Plains lying between the Mississippi and the Rocky Mountains are not within the sweep of the Gulf winds, whose trend is SW to NE; while they are equally out of reach of moisture from the Pacific, all that having been successively deposited on the intervening mountains; hence their deficient rainfall.
Northward of the temperate zone the rainfall generally decreases as we approach the arctic regions; except where the influence of warm ocean currents to windward creates comparatively local exceptions, as in the case of Norway and Alaska.
The general Distribution of Rainfall on the globe is well shown in the annexed diagram, which is copied by permission of the author from his treatise on the “Evolution of Climates,” and represents the mean deduced from data given in the Atlas of Meteorology by J. G. Bartholomew. It is a composite curve derived from the consolidation of four curves showing the distribution of rainfall, viz., on the meridians of 20°E.L.; the west coasts of Europe and Africa; the 30th meridian W.L., in the Atlantic Ocean; and the west coasts of North and South America, projected on the plane of the 100th meridian W.L. The latter curve corresponds with remarkable closeness to the mean curve here given. “It is not intended that these curves should include the rainfall upon meridians on which the distribution in belts is interrupted by continental influences, and by the irregular oblique belts of rain on the east coasts.” But it presents an admirable generalization upon which, as a basis, the local disturbances may be studied.
“The Evolution of Climates”; by Marsden Manson, July, 1903; also Amer. Geologist, Aug.-Oct. 1897.
It will be noted that the maximum of rainfall in the tropical rain-belt lies several degrees to northward of the equator, owing doubtless to the greater land area in the northern hemisphere. There is thus, on the whole, a narrower belt of deficient rainfall or aridity between the tropical and northern temperate rain-belts, than in the southern hemisphere. The southern temperate rain-belt touches only the extreme ends of South America, Africa and New Zealand; elsewhere on the ocean it has not been sufficiently observed as yet. The zones of rainfall and aridity are, however, known to be subject to seasonal oscillations of several degrees in latitude, owing to the obliquity of the plane of the ecliptic, which shifts its position upon that of the equator.
Ocean Currents.—Since water as a fluid is subject to the same circulatory motions which cause winds, it is to be expected that ocean currents should exist corresponding to those of the air, as characterized in general above. But as water warms so much more slowly than air, its circulation would be comparatively insensible were it not for the effects produced by the air currents upon the surface of the sea, combined, as in the case of the winds, with the effects of the rotation of the earth. Without going into the details of the ocean currents in the tropics, it may suffice to say that owing partly to the moving and warming effects of winds, partly to the natural circulatory motion of the water, two great warm currents flow from the tropics northward, materially modifying what would otherwise be the climates of the coasts they touch.
The Gulf Stream.—The current most generally known is the Gulf Stream, flowing partly from the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea, partly from outside of the same along the chain of the Lesser Antilles, along the southeast coast of the United States (Florida, Georgia and South Carolina); but owing to its greater rotational velocity it is soon, like the winds of the same latitudes, deflected from a northward to a NE. course, which carries it away from the American coast, to impart some of its warmth, (probably mainly through the winds that blow over it), to Great Britain and Ireland, Scandinavia, and Western Europe generally; while the northern American coast is left to be bathed by the icy polar current flowing from the Arctic through Baffin’s Bay, which carries icebergs far to the south in the way of the transatlantic traffic between the Eastern States and Europe, and causes a difference in climate that is well exemplified in the comparison of the climate of New York with that of Naples, both lying in the same latitude; and similarly of the bleak coast of Labrador with that of Great Britain.
The Japan Stream.—On the eastern Asiatic Coast, a warm current originating in the Sunda seas, flows off the coasts of the Philippines and of China and bathes the Japanese islands; hence it is known as the Japanese Current, or Kuro-siro. It is partly this current which, failing to pass into the Arctic through the shallow waters of Behring strait, renders the coast climates of the northwest coast of America so much milder and moister than is that in corresponding latitudes on the east coasts of both continents. Alaska corresponds to Norway in its moist, foggy and relatively mild coast climate; British Columbia, Washington and Oregon participate in the benefits of the tempering influence of the return current of the Kuro-siro. But as this return (“Alaska”) current passes southward into the warmer seas off the California coast, its influence is reversed; it becomes a cold current in the warm waters of the Pacific, and the warm, moist air of the ocean being carried by the westerly winds across this cold stream which flows along the shore of California, in summer dense fogs are formed, which render navigation difficult and produce a coast climate whose average summer and winter temperatures (e. g. at San Francisco) may differ by only a few degrees, viz., 15.5 and 13.0° C. (60 and 56° F.); so that a change of clothing from season to season is hardly called for. The Alaska Current leaves the immediate coast of California off Pt. Conception near Santa Barbara, gradually losing itself southwestward, but still tempering the tropical heat in the Hawaiian Islands. Hence the coast climate is much warmer and less foggy in southern California; but throughout the State in the interior valleys, screened from the coast winds by the Coast ranges, the temperature in summer may rise several degrees above 100° F. for days together; although, owing to the dryness of the air, the heat is not oppressive.
Contrasting Climates in N. W. America.—An even more striking contrast, showing the effects of the warm ocean and air currents, when intercepted by mountain chains, exists on the Pacific coast farther northward, as already mentioned. In Oregon and Washington first the low Coast ranges, and then the higher Cascade mountains, obstruct the eastward progress of the westerly ocean winds. The result is a very heavy rainfall to coastward of and within the Coast ranges, and an almost equally heavy precipitation on the western slope of the Cascades. Standing on the crest of the latter in summer, one may see to westward a rolling sea of clouds, causing almost daily rains; while to eastward the eye ranges over brown or whitish, dusty plains or rolling lands, almost destitute of tree growth and quivering with heat, under a deep blue sky untroubled by clouds for months.
A somewhat similar contrast is seen in the Hawaiian islands, which are in the sweep of the subtropical northeast trade winds, and on their windward (eastern) slopes have abundant rains; while on the leeward slopes an almost arid climate prevails, calling for extended irrigation.
Continental, Coast and Insular Climates.—From what has been said above, the striking differences of climate caused by the position of any region with reference to the sea or other large bodies of water on the one hand, and to mountain chains on the other, can be readily understood; provided of course that the direction of the winds and the trend of the mountain chains be properly taken into consideration. Western coasts in the temperate and subtropical regions will have a relatively even, temperate and moist climate as compared with the interior of continents, from which the tempering influence of the sea is cut off by mountain chains. Where no such chains intervene the coast climate may extend far inland. The latter case is that of Europe, where the prevailing westerly winds, warmed by the Gulf Stream, temper the climate as far east as the borders of Russia, and northward to Norway; while to southward the warm waters of the Mediterranean and Black seas temper both heat and cold in Spain, southern France, Italy and the Mediterranean border generally. But to eastward, in Russia and Siberia, the climate becomes “continental” to an extreme degree, with very cold winters and very hot summers. The same is true of interior North America, wherever the continental divide cuts off the tempering influence of the westerly winds; Montana, the Dakotas and the Great Plains states generally being examples. The climate of the Mississippi valley, as stated before, is tempered by the winds blowing from the Gulf of Mexico, but with occasional irruptions of the continental climate (sometimes reaching as far east as the South Atlantic coast) in the forms of cold “blizzards,” from which the coast climates of the Pacific and of western Europe are practically free. The Atlantic coast of North America (including the coast of the Gulf of Mexico), moreover, not unfrequently suffers from the violent cyclonic storms that originate in the Antilles and follow more or less the direction of the Gulf Stream.
Islands, differing from continents mainly in their extent, and having a relatively large proportion of coast, naturally have climates controlled essentially by the surrounding ocean. The insular or oceanic climates are therefore, as a rule, more temperate and even than are those of the nearest mainland. It is often said that the climate of western Europe is “insular”; and owing to its position under the lee of the Gulf Stream, this is eminently true of Great Britain.
Subtropic Arid Belts.—Where the surface features of the land in relation to the ocean and prevailing winds do not interpose special obstacles, we find to poleward of both tropics a climatic belt of greater or less width, in which the annual, or at least the summer rainfall is too small to maintain annual herbaceous vegetation throughout the season, even when the temperature is favorable. These two “arid” belts are best defined in Africa, where the northern one is represented by the Sahara desert, lower Egypt and Arabia, while the southern one is exemplified in the Kalahari desert, to northward of the Cape of Good Hope. The northern belt is continued into Asia Minor, Palestine, Syria and Persia, and is again manifest in northwestern India; but to eastward is stopped by the influence of the great Himalaya range. The plateau countries beyond, in Central Asia, are extremely arid, largely by reason of their high elevation.
In Australia the southern arid belt is very strongly defined. In North America, the arid belt is characteristically defined on the Pacific Coast. It embraces all but the southernmost point of the peninsula of Lower California, with about two-thirds of the State of California; thence eastward across Sonora and Arizona to New Mexico and western Texas. But here the influence of the mountain ranges and high plateaus obscures the subtropical belt as such, the arid climate continuing, east of the great Pacific ranges, through Nevada, Utah, Wyoming, Montana, Idaho, and eastern Oregon and Washington nearly to the line of British Columbia on the north, and with gradually decreasing aridity, into Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, and the Dakotas.
In South America the rainless seaward slopes of southern Peru and northern Chile indicate the southern arid belt; but here, the great chain of the Andes intervening, the dry pampas of Argentina, and the Gran Chaco of southwestern Brazil, like the Nevada basin, though arid would naturally be referred to the moisture-condensing influence of the Andes chain, under the lee of which they lie. From this cause the region of deficient rainfall, which on the western coast ends to northward of Santiago de Chile, is east of the Andes continued much farther poleward, as in North America; reaching into Patagonia.
Utilization of the Arid Belts.—While, as already explained, the distribution of the rainfall through the year is nearly as important as its total amount, yet it is evident that even with the minimum of twenty inches of total precipitation as the measure for crop production, a very large proportion of the land of the arid region cannot, even with the most elaborate system of water conservation, be supplied with sufficient water for ordinary crops, and must be otherwise utilized, mainly for pasture purposes. This is rendered practicable to a much greater extent than might be expected, because the rapid transition from the rainy to the permanent dry season cures the standing herbage into hay, which affords good grazing during the rainless season. Moreover, the use of drought-resistant, browsing forage plants, both shrubs and trees, serves to supplement materially any deficiency in the supply of “standing hay,” especially in case the rains should toward the end be unduly delayed. The same is true of the dried pods and seeds of native herbage, which in some cases (bur clover, lupins, etc.,) afford highly nutritious additions to the leafy forage.
See Rept. of the U. S. Commissioner of Agriculture for 1878, pp. 486-488; Bull. Nos. 16 and 42, Wyoming Expt. Station; Bull. No. 150 Calif. Expt. Station; Bull. No. 51, Nevada Expt. Station; South Dakota Station Bulletins Nos. 40, 69, 70, 74; Kansas Expt. Station, Bulletin No. 102; New Mexico Expt. Station, Bulletin No. 18; Montana Expt. Station, Bulletin No. 30; and others.
Soils, Their Formation, Properties, Composition, and Relations to Climate and Plant Growth in the Humid and Arid Regions · The Wunder Library — complete classics, free to read, with narration.