Part 19

About this time he ceased performing divine service, which he said he had never before known himself incapable of performing, notwithstanding he had been a preacher so many years. He likewise now suffered me to rake his fire, rub his feet with a flesh-brush, and occasionally help him to bed. In the mornings likewise he had his fire made for him, which he always used to do himself, and generally before any of the family was stirring.

In the last fortnight in January he was troubled with alarming fits of indigestion; his legs swelled nearly to his knees, and his weakness increased very much. I wrote for him, while he dictated, the concluding section of his New Comparison, and the Preface and Dedication. The finishing this work was a source of great satisfaction to him, as he considered it as a work of as much consequence as any he had ever undertaken. The first alarming symptom of approaching dissolution was his being unable to speak to me upon my entering his room on Tuesday morning the 31st of January. In his Diary I find he stated his situation as follows: “Ill all day--Not able to speak for near three hours.” When he was able to speak he told me he had slept well, as he uniformly had done through the whole of his illness; so that he never would suffer me, though I frequently requested he would do it, to sleep in the same room with him; that he felt as well as possible; that he got up and shaved himself, which he never omitted doing every morning till within two days of his death; that he went to his laboratory, and then found his weakness very great; that he got back with difficulty; that just afterward his grand-daughter, a child of about six or seven years old, came to him to claim the fulfilment of a promise he had made her the evening before, to give her a fivepenny bit. He gave her the money, and was going to speak to her, but found himself unable. He informed me of this, speaking very slowly a word at a time; and added, that he had never felt more pleasantly in his whole life than he did during the time he was unable to speak. After he had taken his medicine, which was bark and laudanum, and drank a bason of strong mutton broth, he recovered surprizingly, and talked with cheerfulness to all who called upon him, but as though he was fully sensible that he had not long to live. He consented for the first time that I should sleep in the room with him.

On Wednesday, February 1, he writes, “I was at times much better in the morning: capable of some business: continued better all day.” He spake this morning as strong as usual, and took in the course of the day a good deal of nourishment with pleasure. He said, that he felt a return of strength, and with it there was a duty to perform. He read a good deal in Newcome’s Translation of the New Testament, and Stevens’s History of the War. In the afternoon he gave me some directions how to proceed with the printing his work in case he should die. He gave me directions to stop the printing of the second volume, and to begin upon the third, that he might see how it was begun, and that it might serve as a pattern to me to proceed by.

On Thursday, the 2d, he wrote thus for the last time in his Diary: “Much worse: incapable of business: Mr. Kennedy came to receive instructions about printing in case of my death.” He sat up, however, a great part of the day, was cheerful, and gave Mr. Cooper and myself some directions, with the same composure as though he had only been about to leave home for a short time. Though it was fatiguing to him to talk, he read a good deal in the works above mentioned.

On Friday he was much better. He sat up a good part of the day reading Newcome; Dr. Disney’s Translation of the Psalms; and some chapters in the Greek Testament, which was his daily practice. He corrected a proof-sheet of the Notes on Isaiah. When he went to bed he was not so well: he had an idea he should not live another day. At prayer-time he wished to have the children kneel by his bedside, saying, it gave him great pleasure to see the little things kneel; and, thinking he possibly might not see them again, he gave them his blessing.

On Saturday, the 4th, my father got up for about an hour while his bed was made. He said he felt more comfortable in bed than up. He read a good deal, and looked over the first sheet of the third volume of the Notes, that he might see how we were likely to go on with it; and having examined the Greek and Hebrew quotations, and finding them right, he said he was satisfied we should finish the work very well. In the course of the day, he expressed his gratitude in being permitted to die quietly in his family, without pain, with every convenience and comfort he could wish for. He dwelt upon the peculiarly happy situation in which it had pleased the Divine Being to place him in life; and the great advantage he had enjoyed in the acquaintance and friendship of some of the best and wisest men in the age in which he lived, and the satisfaction he derived from having led an useful as well as a happy life.

On Sunday he was much weaker, and only sat up in an armed chair while his bed was made. He desired me to read to him the eleventh chapter of John. I was going on to read to the end of the chapter, but he stopped me at the 45th verse. He dwelt for some time on the advantage he had derived from reading the scriptures daily, and advised me to do the same; saying, that it would prove to me, as it had done to him, a source of the purest pleasure. He desired me to reach him a pamphlet which was at his bed’s head, Simpson on the Duration of future Punishment. “It will be a source of satisfaction to you to read that pamphlet,” said he, giving it to me. “It contains my sentiments, and a belief in them will be a support to you in the most trying circumstances, as it has been to me. We shall all meet finally: we only require different degrees of discipline, suited to our different tempers, to prepare us for final happiness.” Upon Mr. ---- coming into his room, he said, “You see, Sir, I am still living.” Mr. ---- observed, he would always live. “Yes,” said he, “I believe I shall; and we shall all meet again in another and a better world.” He said this with great animation, laying hold on Mr. ----’s hand in both his.

Before prayers he desired me to reach him three publications, about which he would give me some directions next morning. His weakness would not permit him to do it at that time.

At prayers he had all the children brought to his bed-side as before. After prayers they wished him a good night, and were leaving the room. He desired them to stay, spoke to them each separately. He exhorted them all to continue to love each other. “And you, little thing,” speaking to Eliza, “remember the hymn you learned; ‘Birds in their little nests agree,’ &c. I am going to sleep as well as you: for death is only a good long sound sleep in the grave, and we shall meet again.” He congratulated us on the dispositions of our children; said it was a satisfaction to see them likely to turn out well; and continued for some time to express his confidence in a happy immortality, and in a future state, which would afford us an ample field for the exertion of our faculties.

On Monday morning, the 6th of February, after having lain perfectly still till four o’clock in the morning, he called to me, but in a fainter tone than usual, to give him some wine and tincture of bark. I asked him how he felt. He answered, he had no pain, but appeared fainting away gradually. About an hour after, he asked me for some chicken broth, of which he took a tea-cup full. His pulse was quick, weak, and fluttering, his breathing, though easy, short. About eight o’clock, he asked me to give him some egg and wine. After this he lay quite still till ten o’clock, when he desired me and Mr. Cooper to bring him the pamphlets we had looked out the evening before. He then dictated as clearly and distinctly as he had ever done in his life the additions and alterations he wished to have made in each. Mr. Cooper took down the substance of what he said, which, when he had done, I read to him. He said Mr. Cooper had put it in his own language; he wished it to be put in his. I then took a pen and ink to his bed-side. He then repeated over again, nearly word for word, what he had before said; and when I had done, I read it over to him. “That is right; I have now done.” About half an hour after he desired, in a faint voice, that we would move him from the bed on which he lay to a cot, that he might lie with his lower limbs horizontal, and his head upright. He died in about ten minutes after we had moved him, but breathed his last so easy, that neither myself or my wife, who were both sitting close to him, perceived it at the time. He had put his hand to his face, which prevented our observing it.

The above account, which conveys but a very inadequate idea of the composure and chearfulness of his last moments deserves the attention of unbelievers in general, particularly of Philosophical Unbelievers. They have known him to be zealous and active in the pursuit of Philosophical truths and to be ever ready to acknowledge any mistakes he may have fallen into. By the perusal of these Memoirs they have found that he gradually, and after much thought and reflection abandoned all those opinions which disgrace what is usually called christianity in the eyes of rational men and whose inconsistency with reason and common sense has most probably been the cause of their infidelity and of their total inattention to the evidences of christianity. These opinions he abandoned, because he could not find them supported either in the Scriptures or in the genuine writings of the early Christians. They must be sensible that the same desire for truth and the same fearless spirit of enquiry and the same courage in the open avowal of the most obnoxious tenets would have led him to have discarded religion altogether had he seen reason so to do, and there is little doubt but that he would have been subject to less obloquy by so doing than by exposing the various corruptions of christianity in the manner he did. They have seen however that in proportion as he attended to the subject his faith in christianity increased and produced that happy disposition of mind described in these Memoirs. The subject is therefore well deserving of their attention and they should be induced from so fair an example, and the weight due to my father’s opinions, to make themselves fully acquainted with the arguments in favour of christianity before they reject it as an idle fable.

Many unbelievers have, no doubt, borne with great patience severe calamities; they have suffered death with great fortitude when engaged in a good cause, and many have courted death to serve their friends or their country. It must however be allowed that there is no great merit in meeting death with fortitude when it cannot be avoided, and likewise that the above cases cannot be absolutely calculated upon, as there is no sufficient motive to account for their conduct. But upon a truly practical christian there is the greatest dependance to be placed for acting well in all the situations in which he may be found, his highest interest being connected with the performance of the greatest duties; and even supposing that many persons, who are not christians, from favourable circumstances attendant upon their birth and education, and from a naturally happy temperament of body and mind, may, and, it must be allowed do acquire a habit of disinterested benevolence and may in general be depended upon to act uniformly well in life, still the christian has a decided advantage over them in the hour of death, as to consider death as necessary to his entering upon a new and enlarged sphere of activity and enjoyment, is a privilege that belongs to him alone.

APPENDIX, NO. 1.

Of the discoveries in factitious Airs before the time of Dr. Priestley, and of those made by himself.

Dr. Priestley has given a general though brief account of what had been done by his predecessors in this department of experimental Philosophy, and Sir John Pringle in his discourse before the Royal Society on occasion of presenting Dr. Priestley with the Copley Medal in 1772 has entered expressly, and more fully into the history of pneumatic discoveries. The same subject was taken up about three years after by Mr. Lavoisier still more at large, in the introduction to his first Vol. of Physical and Chemical Essays, of which a translation was published by Mr. Henry of Manchester in 1776. It is unnecessary to detail here what they have written on the history of these discoveries. It may be observed that no mention is made by any of these gentlemen of an experiment of Mr. John Maud, in July 1736, who procured (and confined) inflammable air from a solution of Iron in the vitriolic acid. Inflammable air had been procured from the White Haven coal mines, and exhibited to the Royal Society by Mr. James Lowther, but I do not recollect any notice of its having been collected from a solution of metals in acids, and its character ascertained before Mr. Maud’s experiment; for Hales, though he procured both inflammable and nitrous air, did not examine their properties. But it is much more extraordinary that neither Sir John Pringle who was a Physician, or Mr. Lavoisier who was so much occupied under government, respecting the Theory of the formation, and the practice of manufacturing Saltpetre from Nitre beds, should not have known, or have noticed the five treatises of Mayow on chemical, phisiological and pathological subjects, published a century preceding. Mayow is quoted by Hales, by Lemery, and by Brownrigg, but though they appear to have read his work, it is evident that they knew not how to appreciate, or to profit by it. Haller also refers to him, and he is respectfully quoted by Blumenbach: but his book nevertheless long remained in comparative obscurity. From their time Mayow has been neglected until his writings were noticed by Dr. Forster, in 1780, and again announced as almost a discovery in the chemical world, by Dr. Beddoes in the year 1790. His doctrines touch so nearly on the subsequent discoveries of Priestley, Scheele, Lavoisier, Crawford, Goodwin, &c. that it seems absolutely necessary to discuss his pretensions, before those of his successors can be accurately admitted. As I am acquainted with Dr. Beddoes’s pamphlet on Mayow, from the analytical review of it only, (V. vi.) and have no opportunity here of consulting it, I shall take up Mayow’s book, and give an account of his tenets, from the work itself.

In the beginning of his first vol. of experiments: it is an abridgment of Sir J. Pringle’s discourse.

Discourses p. 4.

Martyn’s abridgment of the Philosophical transactions v. 9. p. 396. I think Maud’s experiment in 1736 likely to have suggested those of Mr. Cavendish in 1766.

Vegetable Statics v. 2. p. 234.

Mem. de l’Acad. Royale 1717 p. 48. On ne dit pourtant point trop sous quelle forme ce nitre se contient dans l’air, et Mayou, Auteur Anglois et grand defenseur du Nitre-Aèrien voulant èclaircir cette difficultè, suppose l’air impregnè par tout d’une espece de nitre metaphysique, qui ne merite pas trop d’ètre refutè, quoi-qu’il l’àit cependant ètè suffisamment par Barchusen et par Schelhamer. Le fondement de l’opinion du Nitre aèrien, c’est comme le rapporte Mayou lui mème, qu’apres avoir enlevè à une terre tout le Nitre qu’elle contenoit, si on l’expose ensuite à l’air pendant un certain tems elle en reprend de nouveau: il est vrai que si l’observation ètoit parfaitement telle qu’elle vient d’ètre rapportèe, on auroit une plus grande raison qu’on n’en a, de supposer dans l’air une très-grande quantite de nitre, et de mettre sur le compte de ce nitre aèrien un grand nombre d’effets auquels il n’a certainement aucune part.

The experiment of Lemery mentioned in Dr. Watson’s Essay on Nitre, is in p. 54 of the Mem. de l’acad. royale for 1717 not for 1731.

It sometimes happens to men whose genius far transcends the level of their day, to be from that very circumstance neither understood nor believed by their contemporaries. Until the discoveries of modern chemistry, who would have given Sir Isaac Newton credit for his conjecture that the Diamond was an inflammable substance? The fact which Lemery sneers at, the reproduction of nitre in the earth, is established beyond contradiction by the authors quoted by Dr. Watson (Chem. Ess. v. 1. p. 318-321) and in Bowle’s account of the nitre earths in Spain, and in Andreossi’s memoir on the Saltpetre of Egypt. Though it is far from improbable that after lixiviation these earths may again become gradually impregnated with putrefying animal or vegetable matter to serve for the future crops of nitre.

Philosophical transactions v. 55 p. 232.

Dr. Priestley in his preliminary account of the discoveries and theories on respiration (Exp. on air v. 3 p. 356. abridged edit.) quotes Haller’s great work on Physiology. Haller quotes Mayow in three or four places; but it is no wonder the quotations did not strike Dr. Priestley with any curiosity to examine Mayow’s book, for Haller certainly did not understand his theory. For instance Lib. 8. § 13. Nitrum aereum. Si ad verum sensum nitri aerei hypothesis revocata fuisset parum utique ab eà differt quam novissimè proposuimus. Nitrum quidem ipsum incautiosius olim Physiologi in aere obvolitare scripserunt, et ex pluvià et nive colligi; idemque passim ex rupibus efflorescere (Sprat ex Henshaw p. 264 major cal. hum.) exque plantis et stercoribus educi (Fludd Niewentydt, 563-4. Mayow de nitro aereo. Lower de Corde c. 3. Thurston 52. 53. Besse Analyse tom 1 et en lettre en reponse à M. Helvet. 114.) id nitrum aiunt in pulmonibus ad sanguinem venire, et ab eo ruborem illum elegantem, et fermentationem (Mayow, Thurston penult. ess. T. 3 p. 265) et calorem sanguinis accedere aut vicissim sanguinem condensari.

Certainly the id nitrum, is not Mayow’s. M. Rosel seems first to have ascertained the existence of nitre in plants. A late experiment of Dr. Priestley’s, of which he gave an account in a letter to Dr. Wistar, seems to make it probable that there may be nitre in snow.

Blumenbach’s Physiology, Caldwell’s translation, Philadelphia, 1795. § 162. Speaking of the theories of animal heat, “But all these hypotheses are embarrassed with innumerable difficulties; whereas on the other hand the utmost simplicity, and an entire correspondence with the phenomena of nature combine in recommending and confirming that doctrine in which the lungs are considered as the focus or fire place where animal heat is generated, and the deplogisticated part of the air which we breathe as the fuel that supports the vital flame. That justly celebrated character Jo. Mayow sketched out formerly the leading traces and the first great outlines of this doctrine which in our times has been greatly improved, extended and farther elucidated by the labours of the illustrious Crawford.”

Dr. Darwin however is certainly right in supposing that heat is evolved in many other processes of the animal economy, beside inspiration.

See the translation of Scheele by Dr. John Reinhold Forster 1780 p. XIII.