ECONOMIC AND TECHNICAL
A. LICHENS AS FOOD.
a. FOOD FOR INSECTS, ETC. Some of the earlier botanists made careful observations on the important place occupied by lichens in nature as affording food to many small animals. In 1791 Jacques Brez wrote his Flore des Insectophyles, and in the list of food-plants he includes seven species of lichens. The “insects” that frequented these lichens were species of the genera Acarus (mites) and Phalena (moths). A few years later Persoon noted that lichens formed the main food supply of many insects, slugs, etc. Zukal, quoting from Otto Wilde (Die Pflanzen und Raupen Deutschlands, Berlin, 1860), gives a list of caterpillars that are known to feed on and destroy lichens.
A very considerable number of small creatures feed eagerly on lichens, and traces of their depredations are constantly to be seen in the empty fruit discs, and in the cortices eaten away in patches so as to expose the white medulla. It has been argued by Zukal that the great formation of acid substances in lichens is for shielding them against the attacks of animals; Zopf on the contrary insists that these substances afford the plants no real protection. He made a series of experiments with snails, feeding them with slices of potato smeared with pure lichen acids. Many snails ate the slices with great readiness even when covered with bitter acids such as cetraric, or with those which are poisonous for other animals such as rhizocarpic and pinastrinic. The only acid they refused was vulpinic, which is said to be poisonous for vertebrates. The crystals of the acids passed unchanged through the alimentary canal of the snails, and were found in masses in the excreta. They were undissolved, but, enclosed in slime, their sharp edges did no damage to the digestive tract.
Stahl however upholds Zukal’s theory of the protective function of lichen acids against the attacks of small animals. Some few snails, caterpillars, etc., that are omnivorous feeders consume most lichens with impunity, and the bitter taste seems to attract rather than repel them; but many others he contends are certainly prevented from eating lichens by the presence of the acids. He proved this by soaking portions of the thalli of certain bitter species for about twenty-four hours in a one per cent. soda solution, which was sufficiently strong to extract the acids. He found that these treated specimens were in most cases preferred to fresh portions that had been simply moistened with water.
Even the omnivorous snail, Helix hortensis, was several times observed to touch the fresh thallus and then creep away, while it ate continuously the soda-washed portion as soon as it came into contact with it. Calcium Oxalate, on the other hand, formed no protection; omnivorous feeders ate indifferently calcicolous lichens such as Aspicilia calcarea and Lecanora saxicola, whether treated with soda or not, but would only accept lichens with acid contents, such as Parmelia caperata, Evernia prunastri, etc., after they had been duly soaked.
Experiments were also made with wood-lice (Oniscus murarius), and with earwigs (Forficula auricularia), and the result was the same: they would only eat bitter lichens after the acids had been extracted by the soda method. Stahl therefore concludes that acids must be regarded as eminently adapted to protect lichens which otherwise, owing to their slowness of growth, would scarcely escape extinction.
The gelatinous Collemaceae, as also Nostoc, the alga with which these are associated, are unharmed by snails, etc., on account of their slippery consistency when moist, which prevents the creatures from getting a foothold on the thallus. These lichens however do not contain acids, and if, when dry, they are reduced to powder and then moistened, they are eagerly eaten both by snails and by wood-lice. Peltigera canina, on account of a disagreeable odour it acquires on being chewed, is avoided to a certain extent, but even so it is frequently found with much of the thallus eaten away.
Hue in his study of Antarctic lichens, comments on the abundance and perfect development of the lichens, especially the crustaceous species, which cover every inch of rock surface. He ascribes this to the absence of snails and insects which in other regions so seriously interfere with the normal and continuous growth of these plants.
Snails do not eat lichens when they are dry and hard, but on damp or dewy nights, and on rainy days, all kinds, both large and small, come out of their shells and devour the lichen thalli softened by moisture. Large slugs (Limax) have been seen devouring with great satisfaction Pertusaria faginea, a bitter crustaceous lichen. The same Limax species eats many different lichens, some of them containing very bitter substances. Zopf observed that Helix cingulata ate ten different lichens, containing as many different kinds of acid.
Other creatures such as mites, wood-lice, and the caterpillars of many butterflies live on lichens, though, with the exception of the caterpillars, they eat them only when moist. Very frequently the apothecial discs and the soredia are taken first as being evidently the choicest portions. All lichens are, however, not equally palatable. Bitter observed that the insect Psocus (Orthoptera) had a distinct preference for certain species, and restricted its attention to them probably because of their chemical constitution. He noted that in a large spreading thallus of Graphis elegans on holly, irregular bare spots appeared, due to the ravages of insects—probably Psocus. In other places, the thallus alone had been consumed, leaving the rather hard black fruits (lirellae) untouched. In time the thallus of Thelotrema lepadinum, also a crustaceous lichen, invaded the naked areas, and surrounded the Graphis lirellae. The new comer was not to the taste of the insects and was left untouched.
Petch says that lichens form the staple food of Termes monoceros, the black termite of Ceylon. These ants really prefer algae, but as the supply is limited they fall back on lichens, though they only consume those of a particular type, or at a particular stage of development. Those with a tough smooth cortex are avoided, preference being given to thalli with a loose powdery surface. At the feeding ground the ants congregate on the suitable lichens. With their mandibles they scrape off small fragments of the thallus which they form into balls, varying in size from 1·5 mm. to 2·5 mm. in diameter. The workers then convey these to the nests in their mandibles. It would seem that they carry about these balls of food, and allow the ants busy in the nest to nibble off portions. Lichen balls are not used by termites as fungi are, for “gardens.”
Other observations have been made by Paulson and Thompson in their study of Epping Forest lichens: “Mites of the family Oribatidae must be reckoned among the chief foes of these plants upon which they feed, seeming to have a special predilection for the ripe fruits. We have had excellent specimens of Physcia parietina spoiled by hidden mites of this family, which have eaten out the contents of the mature apothecia after the lichens have been gathered. One can sometimes see small flocks of the mites browsing upon the thallus of tree-dwelling lichens, like cattle in a meadow.” The Oribatidae, sometimes called beetle-mites, a family of Acarinae, are minute creatures familiar to microscopists. They live chiefly on or about mosses, but Michael is of opinion that a large number frequent these plants for the fungi and lichens which grow in and about the mosses. In Michael’s Monograph of British Oribatidae, four species are mentioned as true lichen-lovers, Leiosoma palmicinetum found on Peltigera canina and allied species; Cepteus ocellatus and Oribata parmeliae which live on Physciae, the latter exclusively on Physcia (Xanthoria) parietina; and Scutovertes maculatus which confines itself to lichens by the sea-shore. Another species, Notaspis lucorum, frequents maritime lichens, but it is also found on other substrata; while Tegeocranus labyrinthicus, though usually a lichen-eating species, lives either on mosses or on lichens on walls. Zopf reckoned twenty-nine species of lichens, mostly the larger foliose and fruticose kinds, that were eaten by mites. Lesdain in his observations on mite action notes that frequently the thallus round the base of the perithecia of Verrucaria sp. was eaten clean away, leaving the perithecia solitary and extremely difficult to determine.
J. A. Wheldon found the eggs of a species of mite, Tetranychus lapidus, attached to the fruits of Verrucaria calciseda, Lecidea immersa and L. Metzleri, calcicolous lichens of which the thallus not only burrows deep down into the limestone, but the fruits form in shallow excavated pits (Fig. 126). The eggs of this stone mite are found fairly frequently on exposed limestone rocks, bare of vegetation, except for a few crustaceous lichens. “There is usually a single egg, rarely two, in each pit apparently attached to the old lichen apothecium. The eggs are very attractive objects under a lens; they measure ·5 mm. in diameter, and are disc-like with a central circular depression from which numerous ridges radiate to the circumference, like the spokes of a wheel. When fresh, they have a white pearly lustre, becoming chalk-white when dry and old.” Wheldon’s observations were made in the Carnforth and Silverdale district of West Lancashire.
A minute organism, Hymenobolina parasitica, first described by Zukal and doubtfully grouped among the mycetozoa, feeds, in the plasmodium stage, on living lichens. The parasitic habit is unlike that of true mycetozoa. It has recently been recorded from Aberdeenshire.
b. INSECT MIMICRY OF LICHENS. Paulson and Thompson give instances of moth caterpillars, which not only feed on lichens, but which take on the coloration of the lichens they affect, either in the larval or in the perfect moth stage. “One of the most remarkable examples of this protective resemblance to lichens is that of the larva of the geometrid moth, Cleora lichenaria, which feeds upon foliose lichens growing upon tree-trunks and palings, and being of a green-grey hue, and possessed of two little humps on many of their body-segments, they so exactly resemble the lichens in colour and appearance as to be extremely difficult of detection.” Several instances are recorded of moths that resemble the lichens on which they settle: perfect examples of such similarity are exhibited at the Natural History Museum, South Kensington, where Teras literana, Moma orion, and other moths are shown at rest on lichen-covered bark from which they can hardly be distinguished.
Another curious instance of suggested mimicry is recorded by G.E. Stone. He spotted a number of bodies on the bark of some sickly elms in Massachusetts. They were about 1/8 of an inch in diameter “with a dark centre and a drab foliaceous margin.” They were principally lodged in the crevices of the bark and Stone collected them under the impression that they were the apothecia of a lichen most nearly resembling those of Physcia hypoleuca. Some of the bodies were even attached to the thallus of a species of Physcia; others were on the naked bark and had every appearance of lichen fruits. Only closer examination proved their insect nature, and they were identified as belonging to a species Gossypina Ulmi, an elm-leaf beetle common in Europe where it causes a disease of the tree. It had been imported into the United States and had attacked American elms.
It is stated by Tutt that the larvae of many of the Psychides (Lepidoptera) live on the lichens of trees and walls, such as Candelaria concolor, Xanthoria parietina, Physcia pulverulenta and Buellia canescens, and that their larvae pupate on their feeding grounds. Each species makes a “case” peculiar to itself, but those of the lower families are usually covered externally with grains of sand, scraps of lichens, etc. The “case” of Narcyria monilifera, for instance, is somewhat raised on a flat base and is obscured with particles of sand and yellow lichen, giving the whole a yellow appearance. That of Luffia lapidella is roughly conical and is held up at an angle of 30° to 45° when the larva moves. The “cases” of Bacotia sepium are always upright; they measure about 5·5 mm. in height and 2·75 mm. in width and present a hoary appearance from the minute particles of lichen with which they are covered, so that the structure is not unlike the podetium of a Cladonia.
c. FOOD FOR THE HIGHER ANIMALS. It has been affirmed, especially by Henneguy, that many lichens, if deprived of the bitter principle they contain, by soaking in water, or with the addition of sodium or potassium carbonate, might be used with advantage as fodder for animals. He cites as examples of such, Lobaria pulmonaria, Evernia prunastri, Ramalina fraxinea, R. farinacea, and R. fastigiata, all of which grow abundantly on trees, and owe their nutritive quality to the presence of lichenin, a carbohydrate allied to starch.
Cladonia rangiferina (Fig. 127), the well-known “reindeer moss,” is, however, the lichen of most economic importance, as food for reindeer, cattle, etc. It is a social plant and forms dense tufts and swards of slender, much branched, hollow stalks of a greenish-grey colour which may reach a height of twelve inches or even more; the stalks decay slowly at the base as they increase at the apex, so that very great length is never attained. In normal conditions they neither wither nor die, and growth continues indefinitely. It is comparatively rare in the northern or hilly regions of the British Isles, and is frequently confused with the somewhat smaller species Cl. sylvatica which is very common on our moorlands, a species which Zopf tells us reindeer absolutely refuse to eat.
The true reindeer moss is abundant in northern countries, more especially in forest regions and in valleys between the tundra hills which are more or less sheltered from the high winds; it is independent of the substratum and flourishes equally on barren sand and on wet turf; but grows especially well on soil devastated by fire. For long periods it may be covered with snow without injury and the reindeer are accustomed to dig down with horns and hoofs in order to reach their favourite food. Though always considered as peculiarly “reindeer” moss, deer, roebuck and other wild animals, such as Lemming rats, feed on it largely during the winter. In some northern districts it is collected and stored as fodder for domestic cattle; hot water is poured over it and it is then mixed with straw and sprinkled with a little salt. Johnson has reported that the richness of the milk yielded by the small cows of Northern Scandinavia is attributed by some to their feeding in great measure on the “reindeer moss.”
When Cladonia rangiferina is scarce, a few other lichens are made use of, Alectoria jubata, a brownish-black filamentous tree-lichen being one of the most frequent substitutes. Stereocaulon paschale, which grows in large dense tufts on the ground in mountainous regions, is also eaten by reindeer and other animals; and Iceland moss, Cetraria islandica, is stored up in large quantities by the Icelanders and used as fodder. Willemet reports it as good for horses, oxen, cows and pigs.
It is interesting to recall a discovery of prehistoric remains at the Abbey of Schussenried on the Lake of Constance and described by F. Keller: under successive beds of peat and crumbly tufa, there was found a layer, 3 feet thick, containing flints, horns of reindeer and bones of various animals, and, along with these, masses of reindeer moss; a sufficient proof of its antiquity as a fodder-plant.
d. FOOD FOR MAN. Lichens contain no true starch nor cellulose, but the lichenin present in the cell-walls of the hyphae has long been utilized as a food substance. It is peculiarly abundant in Cetraria islandica (Fig. 128), which grows in northern countries, covering great stretches of ground with its upright strap-shaped branching fronds of varying shades of brown. In more southern lands it is to be found on high hills or on upland moors, but in much smaller quantities. Commercial “Iceland moss” is supplied from Sweden, Norway or Iceland. In the last-named country the inhabitants harvest the lichen preferably from bare stony soil where there is no admixture of other vegetation. They revisit the locality at intervals of three years, the time required for the lichen to grow to a profitable size; and they select the wet season for the ingathering of the plants as they are more easily detached when they are wet. If the weather should be dry, they collect it during the night. When gathered it is cleansed from foreign matter and washed in water to remove as much as possible of the bitter principle. It is then dried and reduced to powder. When required, the powder is put to macerate in water for 24 hours, or it is soaked in a weak solution of soda or of carbonate of potassium, by which means the bitter cetraric acid is nearly all eliminated. When boiled it yields a jelly which forms the basis of various light and easily digested soups or of other delicacies prepared by boiling in milk, which have been proved to be valuable for dyspeptics or sufferers from chest diseases. The northern nations also make the powder into bread, porridge or gruel. Johnson states in his account of “Useful Plants” that considerable quantities of Iceland moss were formerly employed in the manufacture of sea biscuit, and that ship’s bread mixed with it was said to be less liable to the attacks of weevil than when made from wheat flour only.
An examination of the real food value of the mucilaginous extract from “Iceland moss” has been made by several workers. Church states that for one part of flesh formers, there are eight parts of heat-givers reckoned as starch. Brown isolated the two carbohydrates, lichenin and isolichenin. The former, a jelly which yields on hydrolysis a large quantity of a reducing sugar, dextrose, ferments with yeast and gives no phloroglucin reaction; it is unaffected by digestion and probably does not form glycogen. Iso-lichenin is much less abundant and resembles soluble starch, but on digestion yields only dextrins—no sugar. It may be concluded, judging from the chemical nature of the mucilage, from the resistance of its constituents to digestion and from the small amount present in the jelly, that its nutritive value is practically nil.
It has been stated that “reindeer moss” in times of food scarcity is powdered and mixed with “Iceland moss” and rye to make bread in North Finland. Johnson confirms this and cites the evidence of a Dr Clarke that: “to our surprise we found we might eat of it with as much ease as of the heart of a fine lettuce. It tasted like wheat-bran, but after swallowing it, there remained in the throat and upon the palate a gentle heat, or sense of burning, as if a small quantity of pepper had been mixed with the lichen.”
The Egyptians have used Evernia prunastri, more rarely E. furfuracea, in baking. In the eighteenth century fermentative agents such as yeast were unknown to them, and these lichens, which were imported from more northern lands, were soaked in water for two hours and the solution then mixed with the flour to give a much appreciated flavour to the unleavened bread.
In India a species of Parmelia (near to P. perlata) known in the Telegu language as “rathapu” or rock-flower has been used as a food, generally prepared as a curry, by the natives in the Bellary district (Madras Presidency), and is esteemed as a delicacy. It is also used medicinally. The collecting of rathapu is carried on during the hot weather in April and May, and forms a profitable business.
A note has been published by Calkins, on the authority of a correspondent in Japan, that large quantities of Endocarpon (Dermatocarpon) miniatum (Fig. 56) are collected in the mountains of that country for culinary purposes, and largely exported to China as an article of luxury. The local name is “iwataka,” meaning stone-mushroom. Properly prepared it resembles tripe. It is possibly the same lichen under a different name, Gyrophora esculenta, which is described by Manabu Miyoshi as of great food value in Japan where it is known as “iwatake.” It is a greyish-brown leathery “monophyllous” plant of somewhat circular outline and fairly large size, measuring 3 to 13 cm. across. Fertile specimens are rare, and are smaller than the sterile. It grows generally on the steep declivities of damp granitic rocks and is common in various districts of Japan, being especially abundant on such mountains as Kiso, Nikko, Kimano, etc. The face of the precipices is often thickly covered with the lichen growth. The inhabitants collect the plants in large quantities. They dry them and send them to the towns, where they are sold in all vegetable stores; some are even exported to other countries. These lichens are not bitter to the taste, nor are they irritating as are other species of the genus. They are on the contrary quite harmless and are much relished by the Japanese on account of their agreeable flavour, in spite of their being somewhat indigestible. Though only determined scientifically in recent times, this edible lichen has long been known, and the risks attending its collection have frequently been described in Old Chinese and Japanese writings.
Other species of Gyrophora including G. polyrhiza (Fig. 129) and Umbilicaria, black leathery lichens which grow on rocks in northern regions, have also been used as food. They are the “Tripe de Roche” or Rock Tripe of Arctic regions, a name given to the plants by Canadian fur-hunters. They have been eaten by travellers and others in desperate straits for food; but though to a certain extent nutritious, they are bitter and nauseous, and cause severe internal irritation if the bitter acids are not first extracted by boiling or soaking.
Of more historical interest is the desert lichen Lecanora esculenta, supposed to be the manna of the Israelites, and still called “bread from heaven.” Eversmann wrote an account of its occurrence and qualities, and fuller information was given by Berkeley: when mixed with meal to a third of its weight it is made into bread and eaten by the desert tribes. It grows abundantly in North Africa and in many parts of Western Asia, on the rocks or on soil. It is easily broken off and driven into heaps by the wind; and has been reported as covering the soil to a depth of 15 cm. to 20 cm. with irregular contorted lumps varying in size from a pea to a small nut (Fig. 130). Externally these are clear brown or whitish; the interior is white, and consists of branching interlaced hyphae, with masses of calcium oxalate crystals, averaging about 60 per cent. or more of the whole substance.
A still more exhaustive account is given by Visiani, who quotes the experience of a certain General Jussuf, who had tested its value in the Sahara as food for his soldiers. When bread was made from the lichen alone it was friable and without consistency; when mixed with a tenth portion of meal it was similar to the soldiers’ ordinary bread, and had something of the same taste. The General also gave it as fodder to the horses, some of them being nourished with the lichen and a mixture of barley for three weeks without showing any ill effects. It is also said that camels, gazelles and other quadrupeds eat it with advantage, though it is in any case a very defective food.
A remarkable deposit of the lichen occurred in recent times in Mesopotamia during a violent storm of hail. After the hail had melted, the ground was seen to be covered, and specimens were sent to Errera for examination. He identified it as Lecanora esculenta. In his opinion two kinds of manna are alluded to in the Bible: in one case (Exodus xvi.) it is the sweet gum exuded from the tamarisk that is described; the other kind (Numbers xi.), he thinks, plainly refers to the lichen. He considers that its nutritive value must be very low, and it can only be valued as food in times of famine.
B. LICHENS AS MEDICINE
a. ANCIENT REMEDIES. An interesting note has been published by Müller-Argau which seems to trace back the medicinal use of lichens to a very remote age. He tells us that Dr Schweinfurth, the distinguished traveller, who made a journey through the valley of the Nile in 1864, sent to him from Cairo a piece of lichen thallus found in a vase along with berries of Juniperus excelsa and of Sapindus, with some other undetermined seeds. The vase dated from the 18th Dynasty (1700 to 1600 B.C.), and the plants contained in it must thus have lain undisturbed over 3000 years. The broken pieces of the lichen thallus were fairly well preserved; they were extremely soft and yellowish-white and almost entirely decorticate, but on the under surfaces there remained a few black patches, which, on microscopical examination, enabled Müller to identify them as scraps of Evernia furfuracea. This lichen does not grow in Egypt, but it is still sold there along with Cetraria islandica and some other lichens as foreign drugs. Dr Schweinfurth considered his discovery important as proving the use of foreign remedies by the ancient Egyptians.
b. DOCTRINE OF “SIGNATURES.” In the fifteenth century A.D. there was in the study and treatment of disease a constant attempt to follow the guidance of nature. It was believed that Providence had scattered here and there on plants “signatures,” or resemblances more or less vague to parts of the human body, or to the diseases to which man is subject, thus indicating the appropriate specific.
Lichens among other plants in which any “signature” could be detected or imagined were therefore constantly prescribed: the long filaments of Usnea barbata were used to strengthen the hair; Lobaria pulmonaria, the true lung-wort, with its pitted reticulate surface (Fig. 72), was marked as a suitable remedy for lung troubles; Xanthoria parietina being a yellow lichen was supposed to cure jaundice, and Peltigera aphthosa, the thallus of which is dotted with small wart-like tubercles, was recommended for children who suffered from the “thrush” eruption.
The doctrine reached the height of absurdity in the extravagant value set on a lichen found growing on human skulls, “Muscus cranii humani” or “Muscus ex cranio humano.” There are a number of lichens that grow indifferently on a variety of substances, and not infrequently on bones lying in the open. This skull lichen, Parmelia saxatilis (Fig. 131) or some other, was supposed to be worth its weight in gold as a cure for epilepsy. Parkinson tells us in all confidence “it groweth upon the bare scalps of men and women that have lyen long ... in former times much accounted of because it is rare and hardly gotten, but in our own times much more set by, to make the ‘Unguentum Sympatheticum’ which cureth wounds without the local application of salves ... but as Crollius hath it, it should be taken from the sculls of those that have been hanged or executed for offences.” Ray says that the same gruesome plant “is celebrated by several authors as useful in haemorrhages and is said to be an ingredient of the famous ‘Unguentum Armarium,’ reported to have been invented by Paracelsus.” Another lost ointment!
c. CURE FOR HYDROPHOBIA. Still another lichen to which extraordinary virtue was ascribed, was the very common ground species Peltigera canina (Fig. 54), a preparation of which was used in the cure of rabies. Dillenius has published in full the prescription as “A certain Cure for the Bite of a Mad Dog” which was given to him by a very celebrated physician of that day, Dr Richard Mead, who had found it effective:
“Let the patient be blooded at the arm, nine or ten ounces. Take of the herb called in Latin Lichen cinereus terrestris, in English Ash-coloured ground liverwort, clean’d, dry’d and powder’d half an ounce. Of black pepper powder’d two drachms.
“Mix these well together and divide the Powder into four Doses, one of which must be taken every Morning, fasting, for four Mornings successively in half a Pint of Cow’s Milk warm. After these four Doses are taken, the Patient must go into the cold bath, or a cold Spring or River, every Morning fasting, for a Month. He must be dipt all over but not stay in (with his head above water) longer than half a minute, if the Water be very cold. After this he must go in three Times a Week for a Fortnight longer.”
Lightfoot, some forty years later, refers to this medicine as “the once celebrated ‘Pulvis antilyssus,’ much recommended by the great Dr Mead.” He adds that “it is much to be lamented that the success of this medicine has not always answered the expectation. There are instances where the application has not prevented the Hydrophobia, and it is very uncertain whether it has been at all instrumental in keeping off that disorder.” Belief in the efficacy of the powder died out before the end of the century but the echo of the famous remedy remains in the name Peltigera canina, the dog lichen.
d. POPULAR REMEDIES. Lichens with very few exceptions are non-poisonous plants. They owed their repute as curative herbs to the presence in the thallus of lichenin and of some bitter or astringent substances, which, in various ailments, proved of real service to the patient, though they have now been discarded in favour of more effective drugs. Some of them, on account of their bitter taste, were frequently used as tonics to replace quinine in attacks of fever. Several species of Pertusaria, such as the bitter P. amara (Fig. 132), and of Cladonia as well as Cetraria islandica (Fig. 128), were recommended in cases of intermittent fever; species of Usnea and others, as for instance Evernia furfuracea, were used as astringents in haemorrhages; others were given for coughs, Cladonia pyxidata (Fig. 69) being supposed to be specially valuable in whooping cough.
One of the most frequently prescribed lichens was the tree lung-wort (Lobaria pulmonaria) (Fig. 72). It was first included among medical plants by Dorstenius, a Professor at Marburg; he gives a good figure and supplies directions for its preparation as a cure for chest complaints. The doctrine of “signatures” influenced practitioners in its favour, but it contains lichenin which acts as an emollient. In England, it was taken up by the famous Dr Culpepper, who, however, believed in astrology even more than in signatures. He says: “it is of great use with many physicians to help the diseases of the lungs and for coughs, wheesings and shortness of breath which it cureth both in man and beast.” He adds that “Jupiter seems to own the herb.” A century later we find Dr John Hill, who was a physician as well as a naturalist, stating that the great tree lung-wort has been at all times famous in diseases of the breast and lungs, but by that time “it was not much used owing to change in fashions.”
The only lichen that has stood the test of time and experience as a real remedy is Cetraria islandica, and even the “Iceland moss” is now rarely prescribed. The first mention in literature of this famous plant occurs in Cordus as the Muscus with crisp leaves. Some years later it figures among the medicinal plants in Sibbald’s Chronicle of the Scottish Flora, and Ray wrote of it about the same time as being known for its curative and alimentary properties. It was Linnaeus, and later Scopoli, who gave it the important place it held so long in medicine. It has been used with advantage in many chronic affections as an emollient and tonic. Cramer in a lengthy dissertation gathered together the facts pertaining to its use as a food, a medicine and for dyeing, and he gives recipes he had himself prescribed with marked success in many different maladies. It has been said that if “Iceland moss” accomplished all the good it was alleged to do, it was indeed a “Divine gift to man.”
The physiological action of cetrarin (acid principle of the lichen) on living creatures has been studied by Kobert and his pupils. It has not any poisonous effect when injected into the blood, nor does it work any harm when taken into the stomach even of small animals, so that it may be safely given to the most delicate patients. Nearly always after small doses peristaltic movements in the intestines are induced which indicate that as a drug it might be of service in the case of enfeebled organs. In larger doses it may cause collapse in animals, but if administered as free cetraric acid it passes through the stomach unchanged to become slowly and completely dissolved in the intestine. The mucous membrane of the intestine of animals that had been treated with an overdose, was found to be richer in blood so that it seems as if cetrarin might be of service in chlorosis and in assisting digestion.
Cetrarin has also been proved to be a nerve excitant which might be used with advantage in mental maladies.
C. LICHENS AS POISONS
Though the acid substances of lichens are most of them extremely irritating when taken internally, very few lichens are poisonous. Keegan writing on this subject considers this quality of comparative innocuousness as a distinctive difference between fungi and lichens and he decides that it proves the latter to be higher organisms from a physiological point of view: “the colouring matters being true products of deassimilation, whereas those of fungi are decomposition or degradation waste products of the albuminoids akin to alkaloids.”
The two outstanding exceptions to this general statement are the two Alpine species Letharia vulpina and Cetraria pinastri. The former contains vulpinic acid in the cortical cells, the crystals of which are lemon-yellow in the mass. Cetraria pinastri produces pinastrinic acid in the hyphae of the medulla and the crystals are a beautiful orange or golden yellow.
These lichens, more especially Letharia vulpina, have been used by Northern peoples to poison wolves. Dead carcasses are stuffed with a mixture of lichen and powdered glass and exposed in the haunts of wolves in time of frost. Henneguy, who insists on the non-poisonous character of all lichens, asserts that the broken glass is the fatal ingredient in the mixture, but Kobert, who has proved the poisonous nature of vulpinic acid, says that the wounds caused by the glass render the internal organs extremely sensitive to the action of the lichen.
Kobert, Neubert and others have recorded the results of experiments on living animals with these poisons. They find that Letharia vulpina either powdered or in solution has an exciting effect on the mucous membrane. Elementary organisms treated with a solution of the lichen succumbed more quickly than in a solution of the acid as a salt. Kobert concluded that vulpinic acid is a poison of protoplasm.
He further tested the effect of the poison on both cold- and warm-blooded animals. Administered as a sodium salt, 4 mg. proved fatal to frogs. The effect on warm-blooded animals was similar. A sodium salt, whether swallowed or administered as subcutaneous or intravenous injections, was poisonous. Cats were the most sensitive—hedgehogs the least—of all the animals that were subjected to the experiments. Volkard’s synthetic preparation of vulpinic acid gave the same results as the solution directly extracted from the lichens.
D. LICHENS USED IN TANNING, BREWING AND DISTILLING
The astringent property in Cetraria islandica and in Lobaria pulmonaria has been made use of in tanning leather. The latter lichen grows commonly on oak and could hardly be gathered in sufficient quantity to be of commercial importance. Like many other lichens it develops very slowly. Lobaria pulmonaria has also been used to replace hops in the brewing of beer. Gmelin in his journey through Siberia visited a monastery at Ussolka where the monks employed it for this purpose. The beer tasted exactly like that made with hops, but was more intoxicating. The lichen in that country grew on pine-trees.
Lichens have in more modern times been used in the preparation of alcohol. The process of manufacture was discovered by Roy of Tonnerre, early in the nineteenth century, and was described by Léorier. It was further improved by Stenberg, a Professor of Chemistry in Stockholm. Roy had worked with Physcia ciliaris, Ramalina fraxinea, R. fastigiata, R. farinacea and Usnea florida, but Stenberg and distillers after his time made more use of Cladonia rangiferina (Fig. 127), Cetraria islandica (Fig. 128) and Alectoria jubata.
By treatment with weak sulphuric or nitric acid the lichenin of the thallus is transformed into glucose which on fermentation forms alcohol. Stenberg found that 68 per cent. of the weight in Cladonia rangiferina was a “sugar” from which a good brandy could be prepared: a kilogramme of the lichens furnished half a litre of alcohol. The Professor followed up his researches by establishing a distillery near Stockholm. His papers contain full instructions as to collecting and preparing the plants. Henneguy, writing in 1883, stated that the fabrication of alcohol from lichens was then a large and increasing industry in Sweden. The whole industry seems, however, to have fallen into disuse very soon: Wainio, quoting Hellbom, states that the various distilleries were already closed in 1884, because of the exhaustion of the lichen in the neighbourhood, and the impossibility of obtaining sufficient supplies of such slow-growing plants.
E. DYEING PROPERTIES OF LICHENS
a. LICHENS AS DYE-PLANTS. Knowledge as to the dyeing properties of lichens dates back to a remote antiquity. It has been generally accepted that lichen-colours are indicated by the prophet Ezekiel in his denunciation of Tyre: “blue and purple from the Isles of Elishah was that which covered thee.” Theophrastus describes certain plants as growing in Crete, and being used to dye wool, etc., and Pliny in his Phycos Thalassion is also understood as referring to the lichen Roccella, “with crisp leaves, used in Crete for dyeing garments.”
Information as to the dyeing properties of certain lichens is given in most of the books or papers dealing with these plants from the herbals onwards. Hoffmann devoted a large part of his Commentatio de vario Lichenum usu to the dye-lichens, and, illustrating his work, are a series of small rectangular coloured blocks representing samples of woollen cloth dyed with different lichens. There are seventy-seven of these samples with the colour names used by French dyers.
An important treatise on the subject translated into French was also contributed by Westring. He desired to draw attention to the tinctorial properties of lichens other than the Roccellae which do not grow in Sweden. The Swedes, he states, already used four to six lichens as dye-plants, but only for one colour. He demonstrated by his improved methods that other colours and of finer tint could be obtained. He describes the best methods both of extraction and of dyeing, and then follows with an account of the different lichens likely to be of service. The treatise was subsequently published at greater length in Swedish with twenty-four very fine coloured illustrations of the lichens used, and with sample blocks of the colours to be obtained.
b. THE ORCHIL LICHEN, ROCCELLA. The value of Roccella as a dye-plant had been lost sight of until it was accidentally rediscovered, early in the fourteenth century, by a Florentine merchant called Federigo. He introduced its use into Florence, and as he retained the industry in his own hands he made a large fortune, and founded the family of the Orcellarii, called later the Rucellarii or Rucellai, hence the botanical name, Roccella. The product was called orseille for which the English name is orchil or archil. Another origin suggested for orchil is the Spanish name of the plant, Orcigilia. There are a number of different species that vary in the amount of dye-product. Most of them grow on rocks by the sea-side in crowded bluish-grey or whitish tufts of strap-shaped or rounded stiff narrow fronds varying in length up to about six inches or more. The main supply of “weeds” came from the Levant until the fifteenth century when supplies were obtained from the Canaries (long considered to produce the best varieties), Cape Verd and the African coasts. The geographical distribution of the Roccellae is very wide: they grow on warm sea-coasts all over the globe, more particularly in Angola, the Cape, Mozambique, Madagascar, in Asia, in Australia, and in Chili and Peru.
Zopf has proved the existence of two different colouring substances among the Roccellas: in R. fuciformis (Fig. 57) and R. fucoides (both British species), in R. Montagnei and R. peruensis the acid present is erythrin; in R. tinctoria, R. portentosa and R. sinuensis it is lecanoric acid. In R. tinctoria (Fig. 133), according to Ronceray, the acid is located chiefly in the gonidial layer and the soredia but is absent from the cortex and centre. In R. portentosa it is abundant in the cortex and central layer, while scarcely to be detected in the gonidial layer, and it is wanting altogether in the soredia. In R. Montagnei it is chiefly found in the cortex and the gonidial layer, and is absent from the soredia and from the medulla.
c. PURPLE DYES: ORCHIL, CUDBEAR AND LITMUS. Orseille or orchil is formed not only from erythrin and lecanoric acid (orseillic acid), but also from erythrinic, gyrophoric, evernic and ramalic acids and may be obtained from any lichen containing these substances. By the action of ammonia the acids are split up into orcin and carbonic acid. In time, under the influence of ammonia and the oxygen of the air, orcin becomes orcein which is the colouring principle of orchil; the perfecting of the process may take a month. The dye is used for animal fibres such as wool and silk; it has no effect on cotton.
There are several different preparations on the market, chiefly obtained from France and Holland; orchil or orseille in the form of a solution, cudbear (persio of Germany) almost the same, but manufactured into a violet-reddish powder, and litmus (tournesol of France) which is prepared in a slightly different manner. At one time the lichen, broken into small pieces, was soaked in urine; a fermentation process was set up, then lime and potash with an admixture of alum were added. The mass of material when ready was pressed into cubes and dried in the air. Commercial litmus contains three substances, erythrolein, erythrolitmin and azolitmin; the last named, which is the true litmus, is a dark brown amorphous powder soluble in water, and forming a blue solution with alkalies.
An aqueous solution of litmus when exactly neutralized by an acid is violet coloured; it becomes red with the smallest trace of free acid, or blue with free alkali. Litmus paper is prepared by steeping specially prepared unsized paper in the dye solution. It is as a ready and sensitive indicator of acidity or alkalinity that litmus is of so much value. According to Zopf it is also used as a blueing agent in washing and as a colouring of wine. Litmus is chiefly manufactured in Holland. Still another substance somewhat differently prepared from the same lichens is sold as French purple, a more brilliant and durable colour than orchil.
d. OTHER ORCHIL LICHENS. Though species of Roccella rank first in importance as dye-plants, purple and blue colours are obtained, as indicated above, from other very different lichens. Lindsay extracted orchil from about twenty species. Those most in use in northern countries are on the whole less rich in colouring substances; they are: Umbilicaria pustulata, species of Gyrophora, Parmelia and Pertusaria, and above all Lecanora tartarea (Fig. 134). The last named, one of the hardiest and most abundant of rock- or soil-lichens, is chiefly used in Scotland and Sweden (hence the name “Swedish moss”) to furnish a red or crimson dye. In Scotland all dye-lichens are called “crottles,” but the term “cudbear” was given to Lecanora tartarea (either the lichen or the dye-product); it was acquired from a corrupt pronunciation of the Christian name of Dr Cuthbert Gordon, a chemist, who, according to Bohler, obtained a patent for his process of producing the dye, or who first employed it on a great scale in Glasgow. Johnson remarks that the colour yielded by cudbear, if well prepared, is a fine, clear, but not very bright purple. It is, he alleges, not permanent. Like other orchil substances it is without effect on cotton or linen.
e. PREPARATION OF ORCHIL. A general mode of treatment of dye-lichens recommended by Lauder Lindsay for home production of orchil, cudbear and litmus is as follows:
1. Careful washing, drying and cleansing to separate earthy and other impurities.
2. Pulverization into a coarse or fine pulp with water.
3. Repeated addition of ammoniacal liquor of a certain strength, obtainable from several sources (e.g. putrid urine, gas liquor, etc.).
4. Frequent stirring of the fermenting mass so as to ensure full exposure of every part thereof to the action of atmospheric oxygen.
5. Addition of alkalies in some cases (e.g. potash or soda), to heighten or modify colour; and of chalk, gypsum and other substances to impart consistence.
f. BROWN AND YELLOW DYES. The extracting of these colours from lichens is also a very old industry. Linnaeus found during his journey to Lappland, undertaken when he was quite a young man, that the women in the northern countries made use of a brown lichen for dyeing which is evidently Parmelia omphalodes (Fig. 135). He describes it as a “rich Lichenoides of a brown stercoraceous colour,” and he has stated that it grew in such abundance in the Island of Aland, that every stone was covered, especially near the sea. In the Plantae tinctoriae there is a record of six other lichens used for dyeing: Lichen Roccella, L. tartareus, L. saxatilis, L. juniperinus, L. parietinus and L. candelarius. The value of Lichen omphalodes was also emphasized by Lightfoot; the women of Scotland evidently appreciated its dyeing properties as much as other northern peoples.
A series of memoirs on the utility of lichens written by Willemet, Amoreux and Hoffmann, and jointly published at Lyons towards the end of the eighteenth century, represents the views as to the economic value of lichens held by scientific botanists of that time. All of them cite the various dye-species, and Hoffmann, as already stated, gives illustrations of colours that can be obtained. It has been once and again affirmed that Parmelia saxatilis yields a red colour, but Zopf denies this. It contains saxatillic acid which is colourless when extracted but on boiling gives a clear reddish-yellow to reddish-brown solution which dyes wool and silk directly without the aid of a mordant. Zopf observed the process of dyeing followed in South Tyrol: a layer of the lichen was placed in a cooking pot, above this a layer of the material to be dyed, then lichen and again the material until the pot was filled. It was covered with water and boiled three to four hours, resulting in a beautiful rust-brown and peculiarly fast dye.
Reddish- or rust-brown dye is also obtained from Haematomma ventosum and H. coccineum, a yellow-brown from Parmelia conspersa (salazinic acid), and other shades of brown from Parmelia perlata, P. physodes, Lobaria pulmonaria and Cetraria islandica.
Yellow lichens in general furnish yellow dyes, as for instance Xanthoria parietina which gives either brown or yellow according to treatment and Cetraria juniperina which forms a beautiful yellow colouring substance on boiling. Teloschistes flavicans and Letharia vulpina yield very similar yellow dyes, and from Lecanora parella (Fig. 39), Pertusaria melaleuca and Usnea barbata yellow colours have been obtained. Candelariella vitellina and Xanthoria lychnea both contain yellow colouring agents and have been employed by the Swedes for dyeing the candles used in religious ceremonies.
g. COLLECTING OF DYE-LICHENS. Lauder Lindsay made exhaustive studies of dye-lichens both in the field and in the laboratory, and recorded results he obtained from the micro-chemical examination of 540 different specimens. He sought to revive and encourage the use of their beautiful colour products among country people; he has given the following practical hints to collectors:
1. That crustaceous dwarf pale-coloured species growing on rocks, and especially on sea-coasts, are most likely to yield red and purple dyes similar to orchil, cudbear or litmus; while on the other hand the largest, most handsome foliaceous or fruticose species are least likely.
2. That the colour of the thallus is no indication of colorific power (in orchil lichens), inasmuch as the red or purple colouring substances are the result of chemical action on crystalline colorific “principles” previously devoid of colour.
3. That alterations in physical characters, chemical composition and consequently in dyeing properties are very liable to be produced by modification in the following external circumstances:
(i) Degree of moisture. (ii) Degree of heat. (iii) Degree of exposure to light and air. (iv) Climate. (v) Elevation above the sea. (vi) Habitat; nature of basis of support. (vii) Age. (viii) Seasons and atmospheric vicissitudes, etc.
August has been recommended as the best month for collecting dye-lichens: i.e. just after the season of greatest light and heat when the accumulation of acids will be at its maximum.
Some of the acids found useful in dyeing occur in the thalli of a large number of lichens, many of which are too scantily developed to be of any economic value. Thus salazinic acid which gives the effective yellow-brown dye in Parmelia conspersa was found by Zopf in 13 species and varieties. It has since been located by Lettau in 72 different lichens, many of them, however, with poorly developed or scanty thalli, so that no technical use can be made of them.
h. LICHEN COLOURS AND SPECTRUM CHARACTERS. In a comparative study of vegetable colouring substances, Sorby extracted yellow colouring matters from various plants distinguished by certain spectrum characters. He called them the “lichenoxanthine group” because, as he explains, “these xanthines occur in a more marked manner in lichens than in plants having true leaves and fronds.” Orange lichenoxanthine he found in Peltigera canina, Platysma glaucum, etc., when growing well exposed to the sun. Lichenoxanthine he obtained from the fungus Clavaria fusiformis; it was difficult to separate from orange lichenoxanthine. Yet another, which he terms yellow lichenoxanthine, he obtained most readily from Physcia (Xanthoria) parietina. The solutions of these substances vary according to Sorby in giving a slightly different kind of spectrum. He did not experiment on their dyeing properties.
F. LICHENS IN PERFUMERY
a. LICHENS AS PERFUMES. There are a few lichens that find a place in Gerard’s Herball and that are praised by him as being serviceable to man. Among others he writes of a “Moss that partakes of the bark of which it is engendered. It is to be used in compositions which serve for sweet perfumes and that take away wearisomeness.” At a much later date we find Amoreux recording the fact that Lichen (Evernia) prunastri, known as “Mousse de Chêne,” was used as a perfume plant.
Though lichens are not parasitic, the idea that they owed something of their quality to the substratum was firmly held by the old herbalists. It appears again and again in the descriptions of medicinal lichens, and still persists in this matter of perfumes. Hue states in some notes to a larger work, that French perfumers extract an excellent perfume from Evernia prunastri (Fig. 59) known as “Mousse des Chênes” (Oak moss), and it appears that the plants which grow on oak contain more perfume than those which live on other trees. The collectors often gather along with Evernia prunastri other species such as Ramalina calicaris and R. fraxinea, but these possess little if any scent. A still finer perfume is extracted from Lobaria pulmonaria called “moss from the base of the oaks,” but as it is a rarer lichen than Evernia it is less used. Most of the Stictaceae, to which family Lobaria belongs, have a somewhat disagreeable odour, but this one forms a remarkable exception, which can be tested by macerating the thallus and soaking it in spirit: it will then be found to exhale a pleasant and very persistent scent. These lichens are not, however, used alone; they are combined with other substances in the composition of much appreciated perfumes. The thallus possesses also the power of retaining scent and, for this reason, lichens frequently form an ingredient of potpourri.
b. LICHENS AS HAIR-POWDER. In the days of white-powdered hair, use was occasionally made of Ramalina calicaris which was ground down and substituted for the starch that was more commonly employed.
In older books on lichenology constant reference is made to a hair-powder called “Pulvis Cyprius” or “Cyprus powder” and very celebrated in the seventeenth century. It was believed to beautify and cleanse the hair by removing scurf, etc. Evernia prunastri was one of the chief ingredients of the powder, but it might be replaced by Physcia ciliaris or by Usnea. The virtue of the lichens lay in their capacity to absorb and retain perfume. The powder was for long manufactured at Montpellier and was a valuable monopoly. Its composition was kept secret, but Bauhin (J.) published an account of the ingredients and how to mix them. Under the title “Pulvis Cyprius Pretiosius” a more detailed recipe of the famous powder was given by Zwelser, a Palatine medical doctor. The lichen employed in his preparation, as in Bauhin’s, is Usnea, but that may include both Evernia and Physcia as they are all tree plants. He gives elaborate directions as to the cleaning of the lichen from all impurities—it is to be beaten with a stick, washed repeatedly with limpid and pure water, placed in a linen cloth and dried in the sun till it is completely bleached and deprived of all odour and taste.
When well dried it was placed in a basket in alternate layers with freshly gathered, entire flowers of roses and jasmine (or flowers of orange and citrus when possible). The whole was compressed by a heavy weight, and each day the flowers were renewed until the “Usnea” was thoroughly impregnated with a very fragrant odour. It was then reduced to a fine powder and ready for other ingredients. To each pound should be added:
1-1/2 oz. powdered root of white Iris.
1-1/2 oz. of Cyperus (a sedge).
1 scruple or half drachm of musk reduced to a pulp with fragrant spirit of roses.
1/2 drachm of ambergris dissolved in a scruple of genuine oil of roses, or oil of jasmine or oranges as may be preferred.
Zwelser adds:
“This most fragrant royal powder when sprinkled on the head invigorates by its remarkably pleasant odour; by its astringency and dryness it removes all impurities, and, since it operates with no viscosity nor sticks firmly either to skin or hair, it is easily removed from the hair of the head.”
G. SOME MINOR USES OF LICHENS
The possibility of extracting gum or mucilage from lichens was demonstrated by the Russian scientist, Professor Georgi, and later by Amoreux, the method employed being successive boiling of the plants. The larger foliose or fruticose forms were specially recommended.
At a later date, during the Napoleonic wars, the “ingenious Lord Dundonald,” of great fame as an inventor, published an account of the extraction process and of the application of the gum to calico-printing, staining and manufacture of paper, dressing and stiffening silks. Lord Dundonald’s aim was to replace the gum Senegal, then a monopoly of the French, who were in possession of the Settlement of Senegambia. He took out a patent for his invention, but whether the gum was successfully used is not recorded.
According to Henneguy, lichen mucilage, as a substitute for gum arabic, has been used at Lyons with advantage in the fabrication of dyed materials.
APPENDIX
POSTSCRIPT TO CHAPTER VII
In a remarkable paper on The Symbiosis of Lichens, Dr A. Henry Church has presented a new and striking view of the origin and development of lichens: he has sought to link them up with other classes of vegetation that, in the great transmigration, passed from sea to land. As we know from his Thalassiophyta and the subaerial transmigration, he holds that primeval algae of advanced form and structure were left exposed on dry land by the gradually receding waters, and those that successfully adapted themselves to the changed conditions formed the basis of the land flora. A certain number of the algae lost their surface tissues containing chlorophyll and they had perforce to secure from other organic sources the necessary carbohydrates: they adopted a heterotrophic existence as saprophytic or parasitic fungi. Fungi are a backward race (deteriorated according to Dr Church) as regards their soma, but in number, distribution and variety of spore-production, they are eminently successful plants.
Lichens are similarly regarded by Dr Church as derived from stranded contemporaneous types of marine algae—crustaceous, foliose and fruticose, that had also lost their chlorophyll, but by taking into association green algal units of a lower grade they established a vicarious photosynthesis. But, to quote his own words, “as the alga-lichen-fungus left the sea, so it remained: it might deteriorate, but it certainly never advanced, once the sea factors which produced it were eliminated, it simply stopped along these lines.”
And again: “Lichens thus present an interesting case of an algal race deteriorating along the lines of a heterotrophic existence, yet arrested, as it were, on the somatic down-grade, by the adoption of intrusive algal units of lower degree to subserve photosynthesis (much in the manner of the marine worm Convoluta). Thus arrested, they have been enabled to retain more definite expression of more deeply inherent factors of sea-weed habit and construction than any other race of fungi; though closely paralleled by such types as Xylaria (Ascomycete) and Clavaria (Basidiomycete), which have followed the full fungus progression as holosaprophytic on decaying plant residues.”
Dr Church’s theory is of vivid interest and might be convincing were there no possibility and no proof of advance within the symbiotic plant, but in numbers of crustaceous thalli, there is evident, by normal or abnormal development, the first advance to the formation of rudimentary squamules, a condition diagnosed as subsquamulose. “Deterioration” of the lichen plant—when it occurs owing to unfavourable conditions—is a reversion to the leprose early stage of the association; there is no evidence of reversion from fruticose or foliose to squamulose. A glance at the table of lichen phyla shows progression again and again from the crustaceous forms onwards. In such a phylum as Physciaceae (with colourless polarilocular spores) there is a clear example of a closely connected series; the different types of thallus—crustaceous, squamulose, foliose and fruticose—are all represented and form a natural sequence, being well delimited by the unusual form of the spore and by the presence of parietin in thallus or apothecium.
That there has been development seems absolutely certain, and that along the lines sketched in the chapter on phylogeny. Progress has been mainly in the thallus, but there has also been change and advance in the reproductive organs, more especially in the spores which in several families reach a size and septation unparalleled in fungi. That association with green algal cells stimulated the fungus to new development is the view taken of the lichen plant and emphasized in the present volume. But it seems more in accordance with the polyphyletic origin and recurring parallel development in the phyla that association began at the elementary crustaceous stage, and that the lichen soma was gradually evolved within what is after all a very limited and simple structure.
ADDENDUM
FOOTNOTE TO PAGE 404
E. M. Holmes has published recently an account of a substance which seems in some respects to answer to the description of manna (Exodus xvi.; Numbers xi.) more nearly than the generally accepted Lecanora esculenta. The information is quoted from Swann’s book: Fighting the slave-hunters in Central Africa. The author writes (p. 116): “I was shown a curious white substance similar to porridge. It was found early in the morning before the sun rose. On examination it was found to possess all the characteristics of the manna ... of the Israelites. In appearance it resembled coriander seed, was white in colour like hoar frost, sweet to the taste, melted in the sun and if kept over night was full of worms in the morning. It required to be baked if you intended to keep it for any length of time. It looked as if it was deposited on the ground in the night.” The writer has suggested that “the substance might be mushroom spawn as, on the spot where it melted tiny fungi sprung up the next night.” Swann’s statement has been confirmed by Dr Wareham, a medical missionary from the same district, who states, however, that it is of rare occurrence.
FOOTNOTES
E. Acton (1909) has described a primitive lichen Botrydina vulgaris, in which there is no fruiting stage, and in which the fungus seems to show affinity with a Hyphomycete.
Luyken 1809.
Hornschuch 1819.
Raab 1819.
Dillenius 1741, p. 200.
Wallroth 1825.
Agardh 1820.
See p. 27.
Schwendener 1867.
Fink 1913.
Lindsay 1876.
Nylander 1869.
Crombie 1891.
Nylander 1891.
Crombie 1874.
Crombie 1877.
Crombie 1885.
Fink 1913.
Elfving 1913.
Moreau 1918.
Peirce 1898.
French 1898.
Morison 1699.
Tournefort 1694 and 1700.
Dillenius 1741.
Krempelhuber 1867-1872.
Grete Herball 1526.
Ruel 1536.
Dorstenius 1540.
Camerarius 1586.
Tabernaemontanus 1590.
L’Obel 1576.
Dodoens 1583.
Gerard 1597.
Schwenckfeld 1600.
Colonna 1606.
Bauhin 1623, pp. 360-2.
Parkinson 1640.
How 1650.
Merrett 1666.
Plot 1686.
Morison 1699.
Ray 1670.
Ray 1686.
Ray 1690.
Petiver 1695.
Plukenet 1691-1696.
Malpighi 1686.
Porta 1688.
Tournefort 1694.
Tournefort 1700.
Rupp 1718.
Buxbaum 1721.
Vaillant 1727.
Dillenius 1724 and 1741.
Micheli 1729.
Dillenius 1719.
See Druce and Vines 1907.
Crombie 1880.
Haller 1742.
Linnaeus 1753.
Schneider 1897.
Hill 1751. Hill’s genus Collema is Nostoc, etc.
Hill 1760.
Watson 1759.
Scopoli 1760.
Adanson 1763.
Hudson 1762 and 1778.
Withering 1776.
Lightfoot 1777.
Dickson 1785.
Weber 1780.
Sibthorp 1794.
Relhan 1785 and 1820.
Smith 1790.
Hoffmann 1798.
Persoon 1794.
Buxbaum 1728.
Petiver 1712.
Sloane 1796 and 1807.
Swartz 1788 and 1791.
Desfontaines 1798-1800.
Georgi 1797.
Willomet, etc. 1787.
Acharius 1798.
Acharius 1803.
Acharius 1810.
Acharius 1814.
Hue 1908.
De Candolle 1805.
Flörke 1815-1819.
Davies 1813.
Forster 1816.
S. F. Gray 1821.
Carrington 1870.
See List of the Books, etc. by John Edward Gray, p. 3, 1872.
Hooker 1821.
Hooker 1831.
Greville 1823-1827.
Greville 1824.
Hooker 1833.
Taylor 1836.
Fries 1831.
Fée 1824.
Flörke 1828.
Wallroth 1829.
Delise 1822.
Chevalier 1824.
Wallroth 1825.
Meyer 1825.
Holle 1849.
Koerber 1839.
Michaux 1803.
Mühlenberg 1813.
Torrey 1819.
Halsey 1824.
Tuckerman 1839.
Fée 1824.
Martius 1833.
Montagne 1851.
Hooker 1841.
Schaerer 1850.
Eschweiler 1824.
Fée 1824.
De Notaris 1846.
Massalongo 1852.
Norman 1852.
Koerber 1855.
Mudd 1861.
Lindsay 1856.
Leighton 1851, etc.
See Hue 1899.
Nylander 1854 and 1855.
Tulasne 1852.
Lauder Lindsay 1859.
Itzigsohn 1854-1855.
Speerschneider 1853.
Sachs 1855.
Thwaites 1849.
Schwendener 1863-1868.
Leighton 1851.
Leighton 1854.
Leighton 1856.
Mudd 1865.
Th. Fries 1858.
Schwendener 1867.
Nylander 1874.
Crombie 1885.
Lett 1890.
Fünfstück 1898.
Zahlbruckner 1903-1907.
Ventenat 1794, p. 36.
Cassini 1817, p. 395.
Agardh 1820.
Scopoli 1760, p. 79.
Persoon 1794, p. 17.
Sprengel 1804, p. 325.
Wallroth 1825, I.
Wallroth 1825, I., p. 303.
Fries 1831, pp. lvi and lvii.
Kützing 1843.
Thwaites 1849, pp. 219 and 241.
Flotow 1850.
Sachs 1855.
Itzigsohn 1855.
Itzigsohn 1854.
Hicks 1860 and 1861.
Speerschneider 1853.
Famintzin and Baranetzky 1867.
Baranetzky 1869.
Itzigsohn 1867.
Bayrhoffer 1851.
Tulasne 1852.
Speerschneider 1854.
de Bary 1866, p. 242.
Schwendener 1860, p. 125.
de Bary 1866, p. 291.
Nylander 1870.
Elfving 1903 and 1913.
See p. 133.
Minks 1878 and 1879.
Müller 1878 and 1884.
Zukal 1884.
Darbishire 1895¹.
Schwendener 1860, etc.
Schwendener 1867.
Schwendener 1868, p. 195.
Schwendener 1869.
Rees 1871.
Bornet 1872.
The authors quoted have been followed in their designation of the various green algae that form lichen gonidia. It is however now recognized (Wille 1913) that either Protococcus viridis Ag., Chlorella or other Protococcaceae may form the universal green coating on trees, etc., and be incorporated as lichen gonidia. Pleurococcus vulgaris Naeg. and Pleurococcus Naegeli Chod. are synonyms of Protococcus viridis. In that alga there is no pyrenoid, and no zoospores are formed.
The genus Cystococcus, according to Chodat (1913), is characterized by the presence of a pyrenoid and by reproduction with zoospores and is identical with Pleurococcus vulgaris Menegh. (non Naeg.), though Wille regards Meneghini’s species as of mixed content. Paulson and Hastings (1920) now find that Chodat’s pyrenoid is the nucleus of the cell.
Woronin 1872.
Archer 1873, 1874, 1875.
Bornet 1873 and 1874.
Treub 1873.
Borzi 1875.
Stahl 1877.
Bonnier 1886 and 1889.
Bonnier was probably experimenting with an Arthopyrenia. Verrucaria species combine with Protococcus or according to Chodat with Coccobotrys gen. nov.
Nylander 1858.
Fuisting 1868, p. 674.
Winter 1876, p. 264.
Stahl 1877.
See p. 62.
Wainio 1890, 2, p. 29.
Reinke 1872, p. 108.
Reinke 1873¹.
Reinke 1873², p. 98.
Frank 1876.
de Bary 1879.
Bornet 1873.
Hedlund 1892.
Peirce 1899.
Hue 1915.
Lindau 1895¹.
Peirce 1899.
Claassen 1914.
Frank 1876.
Lindau 1895.
Bachmann 1913.
Cunningham 1879.
Ward 1884.
Jennings 1895.
Fitting 1910.
Bornet 1873.
Bonnier 1889².
Schwendener 1867.
Elenkin 1902¹ and 1904¹, 1904².
Elenkin 1906².
Danilov 1910.
Paulson and Hastings 1920.
Nienburg 1917.
Zukal 1891.
Sutherland 1915.
Beyerinck 1890.
Artari 1902.
See p. 56.
Artari 1902.
Treboux 1912.
Chodat 1913.
See Paulson and Hastings 1920.
Keeble 1910.
Reinke 1872.
Dufrenoy 1918.
Artari 1899.
Etard and Bouilhac 1898.
Radais 1900.
Artari 1901.
Chodat 1913.
Treboux 1905.
Marshall Ward 1884.
Uhlir 1915.
Tobler 1911.
Zopf 1907.
Chambers 1912.
Chodat 1913.
See note Paulson and Hastings, p. 28.
Chodat 1913.
Gargeaune 1911.
Servettaz 1913.
See p. 65.
Wettstein 1915.
Meyer 1825.
Holle 1849.
Tulasne 1852.
Bonnier 1889².
Term coined by Lindau (1899) to describe the pseudo-cellular tissue of lichens and fungi now referred to as “plectenchyma.”
Wainio 1897.
Möller 1887.
Tobler 1909.
Wahrlich 1893.
Baur 1898.
Darbishire 1899.
Kienitz-Gerloff 1902.
Meyer 1902.
Salter 1902.
Nylander (1866) gave the term “gonimia” to the blue-green algae of the Phycolichens, retaining the term “gonidia” for the bright-green algae of the Archilichens: the distinction is not now maintained.
For further details see also the chapter on Classification.
See p. 133.
Krempelhuber 1873.
Chodat 1913.
Paulson and Hastings 1920.
Paulson in litt.
Acton 1909.
Bialosuknia 1909.
Hue 1905.
Deckenbach 1893.
In a comparative study of leaf algae from Ceylon and Barbadoes, N. Thomas (1913) came to the conclusion that Marshall Ward’s alga in its early stages is the same as Phyllactidium tropicum Moebius; and that the Barbadoes alga with which she was working represented the older stages, it being then subcuticular in habit, forming rhizoids, barren and sterile aerial hairs and subcuticular zoosporangia.
De Toni 1889.
Bornet 1873.
Fünfstück 1899.
Hedlund 1892.
Zukal 1895, p. 19.
Moebius 1888.
Frank 1876, p. 158.
Stahl 1877.
Neubner 1893.
Krabbe 1891.
Forssell 1885.
Hue 1910.
Harmand 1913, p. 1050.
Forssell 1886.
See Chap. VII.
Lindau 1895.
Darbishire 1897.
Nienburg 1917.
Bonnier 1888 and 1889².
Bonnier 1889.
Forssell 1884, p. 34.
Zahlbruckner 1902.
Lindau 1899.
Reinke 1895.
Zukal 1895, p. 562.
Zahlbruckner 1907.
Hue 1899.
Wainio has adopted this term for growing hyphae 1897, p. 33.
Tulasne 1852.
Zukal 1895.
Zukal 1895.
Schwendener 1866.
Schwendener 1863.
Hue 1906.
See p. 83.
Malinowski 1911.
Steiner 1881.
Fünfstück 1899.
Bachmann 1913.
See p. 215.
Friedrich 1906.
Bachmann 1907.
Bachmann 1904.
Bachmann 1904.
Stahlecker 1906.
Lang 1903.
Fünfstück 1899.
Darbishire 1897.
Frank 1876.
Bornet 1873, p. 81.
Lindau 1895.
Bitter 1899.
See p. 83.
Friedrich 1906.
See p. 76.
See p. 126.
Schwendener 1860, 1863 and 1868.
Zukal 1895, p. 1305.
Hue 1906.
Heber Howe 1912.
Hue 1911.
Schwendener 1863, p. 180.
Darbishire 1897.
Rosendahl 1907.
See p. 96.
See p. 133.
Rosendahl 1907.
Meyer 1902.
See p. 52.
Nylander 1858.
Hue 1898.
Rosendahl 1907.
Darbishire 1912.
Porter 1919.
Darbishire 1897.
Schwendener 1860.
Rosendahl 1907.
Meyer 1902.
Reinke 1895, p. 186.
Bitter 1901.
Sernander 1901.
Parfitt in Leighton 1871, p. 470.
Galløe 1915.
Bitter 1899.
Sturgis 1890.
See p. 108.
Darbishire 1898.
Darbishire 1895.
Brandt 1906.
Hue 1906.
Haberlandt 1896.
Schulte 1904.
See p. 120.
Lutz 1894.
Peirce 1898.
Zopf 1903.
Lindau 1895.
Brandt 1906.
Porter 1916.
Darbishire 1898.
Wainio 1880.
Krabbe 1891.
Wainio 1897.
Wainio 1880.
Krabbe 1891.
Krabbe 1891.
Baur 1904.
Wainio 1880.
Chodat 1913.
Wainio 1897.
Baur 1904.
Wainio 1897.
Wainio 1897.
Lindsay 1859, p. 171.
Wainio 1897.
Wainio 1897, p. 9.
Wainio 1880.
Krabbe 1891.
Necker 1871.
Persoon 1794.
Acharius 1803.
Wallroth 1829, p. 61.
Tulasne 1852.
Koerber 1855.
Reinke 1894.
Sättler 1914.
Nienburg 1908.
See p. 183.
Wainio 1897.
Baur 1904.
Wolff 1905.
Aigret 1901.
Wainio 1897.
Wainio 1890, p. 67.
Reinke 1895.
Nylander 1858, p. 63.
Acharius 1810, p. 12.
Haller 1768, p. 85.
Schreber 1791, p. 768.
Meyer 1825, p. 148.
Delise 1822.
Nylander 1858, p. 14.
Nylander 1860, p. 333.
Schwendener 1863, p. 169.
Wainio 1890, I. p. 183.
Schwendener 1863, p. 169.
Stizenberger 1895.
Zukal 1895, p. 1355.
Wainio 1909.
Schwendener 1863, p. 169.
Jatta 1889, p. 48.
Zukal 1895, p. 1357.
Rosendahl 1907.
Zukal 1895.
Reinke 1895, p. 183.
Darbishire 1901.
Brandt 1906.
Bitter 1899.
Nylander 1874².
Bitter 1901².
Zukal 1895, p. 1348.
Acharius 1803.
Hue 1904 and 1910.
Flörke 1815, IV. p. 15.
Wallroth 1825, p. 678.
Th. M. Fries 1858.
Forssell 1884.
Leighton 1869.
Nylander 1878.
Schneider 1897.
Hue 1910.
Hue 1910.
Tuckerman 1875.
Schneider 1897, p. 58.
Nylander 1869.
Bornet 1873, p. 72.
Forssell 1885, p. 24.
Riddle 1910.
Babikoff 1878.
Th. M. Fries 1866.
Winter 1877.
Schneider 1897.
Etard and Bouilhac 1898.
Hue 1910.
Sernander 1907.
Bitter 1904.
Bitter 1904.
Linkola 1913.
Acharius, 1798, p. xix, and 1810, pp. 8 and 10.
Malpighi, 1686, p. 50, pl. 27, fig. 106.
Micheli 1729, pp. 73, 74.
Linnaeus 1737, p. 325.
Hedwig 1798.
Sprengel 1807, Letter XXIII.
Wallroth 1825, I. p. 595.
Koerber 1841.
Schwendener 1860.
Meyer 1825, p. 170.
Krabbe 1891.
Bitter 1901.
Schwendener 1860, p. 137.
Wainio 1897, p. 32.
Reinke 1895, p. 380.
Bitter 1901.
Lesdain 1910.
Schwendener 1860.
Nilson 1903.
Darbishire 1897.
Bitter 1901, p. 191.
Krabbe 1891.
Darbishire 1907.
Tobler 1911², 11.
Bitter 1901².
Lindau 1895.
Nilson 1903.
Bitter 1904.
Acharius 1798, pp. 2, 87.
Fries 1825.
Hooker 1833.
Taylor 1836.
Rosendahl 1907.
Bitter 1899.
Nilson 1903.
Kajanus (Nilson) 1911.
Zopf 1903.
Zopf 1905².
Bitter 1899.
Swartz 1788.
Gmelin 1791.
Woodward 1797.
Fries 1825.
Nylander 1855.
Mattirolo 1881.
Johow 1884.
Wainio 1890.
Möller 1893.
Malpighi 1686.
Tournefort 1694.
Morison 1699.
Micheli 1729.
Micheli, Pls. 52 and 56.
Dillenius 1741.
Linnaeus 1737.
Necker 1771, p. 257.
Scopoli 1772.
Koelreuter 1777.
Hoffmann 1784.
Hedwig 1784.
Acharius 1810.
Hornschuch 1821.
Wallroth 1825.
Meyer 1825.
Sprengel 1804.
Luyken 1809.
Persoon 1801.
See also p. 166.
Wainio 1890.
Tulasne 1852.
Fuisting 1868.
Stahl 1877.
Borzi 1878.
Baur 1898.
Fünfstück (1902) suggests that the lichen worked at by Baur is Collema cheileum Ach.
Krabbe 1883.
Mäule 1891.
F. Bachmann 1912.
This species of Collema has been described as Collemodes Bachmannianum by Bruce Fink 1918.
F. Bachmann 1913.
Wainio I. 1890.
Wolff 1905.
Stahl 1877.
Forssell 1885².
Zukal 1887, p. 42.
Borzi 1878.
Lindau 1888.
Mäule 1891.
Darbishire 1900.
Baur 1904.
Lindau 1888.
Darbishire 1900.
See also p. 180.
Nienburg 1908.
Wainio I. 1890.
Darbishire 1900.
Baur 1901.
Baur 1904.
Nienburg 1908.
Harper 1900.
Guilliermond 1904, p. 60.
Baur 1899.
Sturgis 1890.
Nienburg 1908.
Schwendener 1864.
Wahlberg 1902.
Baur 1904.
Brown 1911.
Moreau 1916.
Lindau 1888.
Fünfstück 1884.
Baur 1904.
Nienburg 1908.
Rosendahl 1907.
Lindau 1888.
Baur 1904.
Wolff 1905.
Fünfstück 1902.
Krabbe 1882.
Baur 1901.
Fünfstück 1902.
Darbishire 1897.
See also p. 147.
Wolff 1905.
See Chap. VII.
Krabbe 1883 and 1891.
Baur 1904.
Sättler 1914.
See Chap. VII.
Fuisting 1868.
Stahl 1877.
Baur 1904.
Baur 1901.
Krabbe 1882.
Forssell 1883.
Wainio 1890, p. x.
Neubner 1893.
Fünfstück 1884.
Darbishire 1913.
Moreau 1915.
Sturgis 1890.
Metzger 1903.
Baur 1904.
Moreau 1916.
Krabbe 1882.
Lindau 1899.
Wolff 1905.
Rosendahl 1907.
Bitter 1901².
Baur 1904.
Nienburg 1908.
Krabbe 1882.
Schulte 1904.
Wainio 1890.
Schikorra 1909.
Harper 1900.
Fraser 1907.
Thaxter 1912.
Faull 1911.
Dawson 1900.
Brooks 1910.
Blackman and Welsford 1912.
Lindau 1899.
Van Tieghem 1891.
Zukal 1895.
Wainio 1890.
Steiner 1901.
See also Chap. VII.
F. Bachmann 1913.
Cutting 1909.
Darbishire 1900.
Baur 1904.
See p. 161.
Stahl 1877.
Baur 1898.
F. Bachmann 1912 and 1913.
Darbishire 1900.
Fitzpatrick 1918.
Harper 1900.
Fünfstück 1902.
Schwendener 1864.
Hue 1906.
Lindau 1899.
Hedwig 1784.
Acharius 1803.
Sprengel 1807.
Luyken 1809.
Eschweiler 1824.
Fée 1824.
Mohl 1833.
Dangeard 1894.
Baur 1904.
Nienburg 1908.
Maire 1903.
Bachmann 1913.
Mohl 1833.
Zukal 1895.
Fée 1824.
Meyer 1825.
Holle 1849.
Tulasne 1852.
De Bary 1866-1867.
Haberlandt 1887.
Zopf 1905.
Massalongo 1852.
Koerber 1855.
Wainio 1. 1890, p. 113.
Harper 1899.
Hue 1911².
Tulasne 1852.
Bornet 1873.
Bonnier 1889².
Maire 1905.
Neubner 1893.
Brefeld 1889.
See p. 143.
Bornet 1873.
Bornet’s observations have not been repeated, and it is possible that he may have been dealing with a parasitic hyphomycetous fungus.
Steiner 1901.
Müller 1881.
Wainio 1890, II. p. 27.
Fée 1873.
Müller 1890.
Tulasne 1851.
Dillenius 1741.
Hedwig 1784 and 1789.
Acharius 1810.
Fries 1831.
Wallroth 1825.
Schaerer 1823-1842.
Flotow 1850.
Itzigsohn 1850.
Tulasne 1851.
Tulasne 1852.
Lindsay 1859 and 1872.
Forssell 1885.
Nienburg 1908.
Möller 1887.
Sturgis 1890.
Nylander 1858, pp. 34, 35.
Nylander, Crombie and others apply the term “sterigma” to the whole spermatiophore. In the more usual restricted sense, it refers only to the short process from which the spermatium is abstricted.
Glück 1899.
Steiner 1901.
Gibelli 1866.
Tulasne 1852.
Nylander 1858.
Corda 1839.
Allescher 1901-3.
Keiszler 1911.
Nylander 1858, p. 37.
Möller 1887.
Istvanffi 1895.
Möller 1888.
Hedlund 1892.
Tulasne 1852.
Müller 1885.
Lindsay 1859 and 1872.
Laubert 1911.
Blackman 1904.
Istvanffi 1895.
Plowright 1889.
Sappin-Trouffy 1896.
Brefeld 1891.
De Bary 1866, p. 7.
Gilson 1893.
Winterstein 1893.
Gilson 1894.
The chemical formula of chitin is given as C₆₀H₁₀₀N₈O₃₈, that of chitosan as C₁₄H₂₆N₂O₁₀.
Escombe 1896.
Wisselingh 1898.
Wester 1909.
Berzelius 1813.
Guérin-Varry 1834.
Mulder 1838.
Berg 1873.
Beilstein ex Errera 1882, p. 16 (note).
Escombe 1896.
Wiesner 1900.
Lacour 1880.
Wisselingh 1898.
Stüde 1864.
Czapek 1905, I. p. 515.
Ulander 1905.
Müller 1905.
Stüde 1864.
Wisselingh 1898.
Schellenberg 1896.
Escombe 1896.
Wester 1909.
Czapek 1905, I. p. 515.
Moreau 1916.
Errera 1882.
Schwendener 1862, p. 231.
De Bary 1866-1867, p. 211.
Gautier 1899.
Herissey 1898.
Czapek 1905, II. p. 257.
Ronceray 1904.
Zopf in Schenk 1890, p. 448.
Knop 1872.
Zopf 1907.
Hamlet and Plowright 1877.
Braconnot 1825.
Zopf 1907.
Errera 1893.
Euler 1908, p. 7.
Rosendahl 1907.
Knop 1872.
Kratzmann 1913.
Zukal 1895, p. 1311.
Kerner and Oliver 1894, p. 235.
Steiner 1881.
Zukal 1884.
Zukal 1886.
Hulth 1891.
Bachmann 1892.
Fünfstück 1895.
Fünfstück 1899.
Bachmann 1904¹.
Lang 1906.
Lang 1906, p. 171.
Bachmann 1892.
Bachmann 1904¹.
Bachmann 1904².
Fünfstück 1895.
Zukal 1895, p. 1372.
Rosendahl 1907.
Zukal 1895.
Fünfstück 1896.
Fünfstück 1899.
Lang 1906.
Beijerinck 1904.
Wehmer 1891.
Stahel 1911.
See p. 218.
Pfeffer 1877.
Pfaff 1826.
Herberger 1830.
Knop and Schnederman 1846.
Hesse 1904.
Zopf 1907, p. 179.
Zopf 1907.
Senft 1907.
Tobler 1909.
Keegan 1907.
Schwarz 1880, p. 264.
Schwendener 1863, p. 180.
Fünfstück 1902.
Heber Howe 1913.
Knowles 1913.
West, W. 1905.
Lettau 1914.
Lettau 1914.
Parietin differs chemically from chrysophanic acid of Rheum, etc.
Stenhouse and Groves 1877.
Volkard 1894.
Nylander 1866.
Jumelle 1892.
Sievers 1908.
Zukal 1895.
Beckmann 1907.
Herre 1911².
Sievers 1908.
Jumelle 1892.
Schrenk 1898.
Bonnier 1889².
West 1905.
Sandstede 1904.
Friedrich 1906.
Lindau 1895².
See p. 109.
Uloth 1861.
Zopf 1903.
Zopf 1907.
Ohlert 1871.
See p. 75.
Uloth 1861.
Egeling 1881.
Buchet 1890.
Bachmann 1904.
Bachmann 1911.
Lang 1903.
Stahlecker 1906.
Bitter 1899.
Zukal 1879.
Kihlman 1890.
Jumelle 1892.
Zopf 1890, p. 489.
Jumelle 1892.
Weir 1919.
Wainio 1897, p. 16.
Nienburg 1908.
Metzger 1903.
Bitter 1899.
Wiesner 1895.
Bitter 1901, p. 465.
Fink 1909.
Galløe 1908.
Zukal 1896.
Bitter 1901.
Maheu 1906.
Wiesner 1895.
R. Paulson, ined.
Krempelhuber 1861.
Zukal 1896, p. 111.
Zukal 1896.
Hedlund 1892, p. 22.
Zopf 1893.
Zopf 1907.
Zopf 1892.
Knop 1872.
Bachmann 1890.
A similar reaction with nitric acid is produced on the blue hypothalline hyphae of Placynthium nigrum.
Knowles 1915.
Rosendahl 1907.
John 1819.
Grimbel 1856.
Molisch 1892.
Nilson 1907.
Meyer 1825, p. 44.
Lindsay 1856.
Berkeley 1857.
Weddell 1869.
Phillips 1878.
Scott Elliot 1907.
Vallot 1896.
Bitter 1901.
Heere 1904.
Krabbe 1891, p. 131.
Reinke 1894, p. 18.
Bonnier, see p. 29.
Darbishire, see p. 148.
Tobler, see p. 148.
Stahl 1877, p. 34.
Paulson 1918.
Paulson and Thompson 1913.
Fink 1917.
Baur 1901.
Miyoshi 1901.
Darbishire 1897, p. 657.
Beckmann 1907.
Bitter 1899.
Peirce 1898.
Schrenk 1898.
Elenkin 1901.
See Chap. X.
Mereschkovsky 1918.
Meyer 1825, p. 44.
Paulson and Somerville Hastings 1914.
Crombie 1872.
See p. 35.
Dufrenoy 1918.
Arnold 1874.
Kupfer 1894.
See p. 236.
Malme 1895.
Bitter 1899.
Hofmann 1906.
Almquist 1880.
Bitter 1899.
See p. 237.
Arnold 1874.
Nylander 1852.
Hue 1915.
Th. Fries 1874, p. 343.
Tobler 1911².
Lindsay 1869².
Winter 1877.
Abrothallus has been included in the lichen genus Buellia.
Tulasne 1852.
Lindsay 1856.
Crombie 1894.
Kotte 1910.
Zopf 1896.
Zopf 1898, p. 249.
Tobler 1911².
See p. 276.
Elenkin 1901².
Stahl 1904.
Lindsay 1859, 1869, 1871.
Zopf 1896.
Zopf 1898.
Moreau 1916³.
Vouaux 1912, etc.
Bitter 1904.
Zukal 1893.
Lister 1911.
Zopf 1897.
Zukal 1896, p. 258.
Zukal 1896, p. 255.
Cunningham 1879.
Friedrich 1906, p. 401.
See p. 78.
Gleditsch 1775, p. 31.
Lindau 1895, p. 53.
Dufrenoy 1881.
Porter 1917.
Friedrich 1906.
Waite 1893.
Lesdain 1912.
Zopf 1907.
Lesdain 1910.
Zukal 1896, p. 258.
See p. 51.
See p. 177 et seq.
Zahlbruckner 1903.
Steiner 1896.
Müller-Argau 1880.
Wainio 1890, p. xxiii.
Lloyd 1917.
Rehm 1890.
Reinke 1894.
See p. 260.
Wainio 1890.
Müller-Argau 1862.
Rehm 1890.
Rehm 1890.
Tobler 1911², p. 407.
Lightfoot 1777, p. 965.
See Chap. III.
Forssell 1885.
Hue 1911¹.
See p. 133.
Zahlbruckner 1907.
Reinke 1895.
See p. 126.
Reinke 1895.
Neubner 1893.
Reinke 1895, p. 110.
Wainio 1890.
See Chap. III.
Wainio 1897.
See Chap. III.
Sättler 1914.
See p. 90.
Darbishire 1912.
See p. 101.
See p. 188.
Dr Church (1920) has published a new conception of the origin of lichens. See postscript at the end of the volume, p. 421.
Tournefort 1694.
Morison 1699.
Dillenius 1741.
Linnaeus 1753.
Acharius 1803.
Acharius 1810.
Acharius 1814.
Wallroth 1825.
Meyer 1825.
Nylander 1854.
Reinke 1894, ’95, ’96.
Darbishire and Fischer-Benzon 1901.
Wainio 1887, ’94, ’97.
Wainio 1890.
Zahlbruckner 1907.
Massee 1887.
Fischer 1890.
Linnaeus 1753.
Steiner 1901.
See p. 56.
Norman 1872 and ’74.
Genera marked with an asterisk have not been found in the British Isles.
Zukal 1890.
Hue 1914.
Hue 1909.
Hue 1905.
Zahlbr., in Hedwigia, LIX. p. 301, 1917.
Riddle 1917.
Bioret 1914.
Reinke 1895.
Darbishire 1898.
Hue 1909.
Nylander 1855.
Nylander 1883.
Lorrain Smith 1906.
Neophyllis Wils. is synonymous with Gymnoderma.
Lindau 1899.
Stirton 1877, p. 164.
A. Zahlbruckner, in Oesterr. bot. Zeitschr. 1919, p. 163.
Bitter 1904².
Hue 1892.
Hue 1914.
Tuckerman 1872, p. 107.
See p. 188.
Hue 1908.
See p. 152.
Olivier 1907.
Th. Fries 1867.
Darbishire 1909.
Hue 1892.
Arnold 1890.
These genera are associated with Trentepohlia algae which are numerous and abundant in tropical climates, and their presence there may possibly account for these particular lichens.
Wainio 1897.
Wainio 1909.
Elenkin 1906.
Darbishire 1905.
Hue 1915.
Darbishire 1912.
Lindsay 1870.
Calkins 1896.
Hue 1898.
Fink 1903.
Wainio 1896.
Comm. Heber Howe.
Herre 1910.
Nylander 1890.
Müller 1879.
Nylander and Crombie 1884.
Babington 1855.
Stirton 1875.
Nylander 1888.
Hellbom 1896.
Wilson 1892.
Müller-Argau 1884.
Stizenberger 1888-1895.
Steiner 1895.
Flagey 1892.
Wainio 1890.
Wainio 1890, II. p. 27 (recorded under Lecidea).
Elenkin and Woronichin 1908.
Jaczewski 1904.
Steiner 1919.
Müller 1892.
Nylander 1867.
Leighton 1869.
Nylander 1900.
Nylander 1891.
Schimper 1869, p. 145.
Lindsay 1879.
Braun 1840.
Muenster 1846, p. 26.
Eltingshausen and Debey 1857.
Engelhardt 1870 (Pl. I. figs. 1 and 2).
Goeppert 1845, p. 195.
See Schimper 1869, pp. 145, etc.
Goeppert and Menge 1883, t. 1, fig. 3.
Ludwig 1859, p. 61 (t. 9, figs. 1-4), 1859-61.
Schimper in Zittel 1890.
Goeppert and Menge 1883.
Sernander 1918.
See p. 392.
Moss 1913.
Macmillan 1894.
See p. 240 et seq.
See p. 238.
West 1915.
Fink 1894.
Kihlman 1890.
Nilson 1907.
Lindsay 1869.
Sättler 1914.
Peirce 1898.
Schrenk 1898.
Nylander 1866.
Hue 1898.
Wheldon and Wilson 1915.
Paulson and Thompson 1911.
Paulson and Thompson 1912.
Chodat 1912.
Fée 1824.
Fries 1831.
Krempelhuber 1861.
Arnold 1891, etc.
Fink 1902.
Watson 1909.
Paulson 1919.
Lesdain 1912.
Fink 1896, etc.
Stahl 1877.
Fink 1902, etc.
Arnold 1891.
Mayfield 1916.
Paulson and Thompson 1913.
Lesdain 1910².
Lettau 1911.
Fink 1903.
Wheldon and Wilson 1907.
Arnold 1892, p. 34.
Wheldon and Wilson 1915.
See p. 358.
Aigret 1901.
Kieffer 1894.
Stahlecker 1906.
Link 1795.
Malinowski 1911.
See also p. 254.
Fink 1904.
Link 1789.
Watson 1918².
Wheldon and Wilson 1907.
Flagey 1901.
Bruce Fink 1902².
Forssell 1885.
Servit 1910.
Malinowski 1911.
Bachmann 1914.
West 1912.
Wheldon and Wilson 1913.
Stahlecker 1906.
Malinowski 1911.
Wheldon and Wilson 1915.
Wheldon and Wilson 1907.
Schade 1916.
Lesdain 1910.
Arnold 1858.
Richard 1877.
Darbishire 1909.
Cf. p. 234.
Paulson and Thompson 1913.
Wheldon and Wilson 1913.
Weddell 1875.
Knowles 1913.
The two morphologically similar plants Ramalina cuspidata and R. scopulorum are here united under the older name R. siliquosa. The distinction between the two is based on reaction tests with potash, which give very uncertain results.
Nylander 1861.
Knowles 1915.
Wheldon and Wilson 1913.
Sandstede 1904.
Aigret 1901.
Wheldon and Wilson 1915.
Watson 1918¹.
Sandstede 1904.
McLean 1915.
Wheldon and Wilson 1915.
Wheldon and Wilson 1914.
Maheu 1887.
Leighton 1867.
Kihlman 1890.
Nilson 1907.
Darbishire 1909.
Flagey 1901.
Patouillard 1897.
Steiner 1895.
Bruce Fink 1909.
Herre 1911².
See p. 97.
Lindsay 1856.
Macmillan 1894.
Knowles in litt.
Bruce Fink 1903.
Lettau 1911.
Wheldon and Wilson 1915.
Wheldon and Wilson 1913.
Linnaeus 1762.
Guembel 1856.
Goeppert 1860.
Salter 1856.
Bachmann 1911.
Bachmann 1913.
Braun 1917.
Treub 1888.
Brez 1791.
Persoon 1794.
Zukal 1895, p. 1317 (note).
Zukal 1895, p. 1315.
Zopf 1896.
Stahl 1904.
Hue 1915.
Zopf 1907.
Bitter 1899.
Petch 1913.
Paulson and Thompson 1913.
Michael 1884.
Zopf 1907.
Lesdain 1910.
Wheldon 1914.
See also p. 267.
Paulson and Thompson 1913.
Stone 1896.
Tutt 1900, p. 107.
Zopf 1907, p. 372.
Kihlman 1890.
Linnaeus 1762.
Johnson 1861.
Lindsay 1856.
Willemet 1787.
Keller 1866.
Proust 1906.
Johnson 1861.
Church 1880.
Brown 1898.
Hutchinson 1916.
Forskål 1875, p. 193.
Watt 1890.
Calkins 1892.
Miyoshi 1893.
See p. 422.
Eversmann 1825.
Berkeley 1849.
Visiani 1867.
Errera 1893.
Müller-Argau 1881, p. 526.
See p. 138.
From an examination of old figures of the Muscus cranii, Arnold (1892, p. 53) has decided that several kinds of lichens or hepatics are included in this designation.
Parkinson 1640, p. 1313.
Ray 1686, p. 117.
Amoreux 1787, p. 46.
Dillenius 1741, p. 202.
Lightfoot 1777, II. p. 846.
Dorstenius 1540.
Culpepper 1652.
Hill 1751.
Cordus 1561.
Sibbald 1684.
Ray 1686.
Linnaeus 1737.
Scopoli 1760.
Cramer 1880.
Kobert 1895.
Keegan 1905.
Henneguy 1883.
Kobert 1895.
Neubert 1893.
See p. 228.
Gmelin 1752, p. 425.
Léorier 1825.
Stenberg 1868.
Richard 1877.
Henneguy 1883.
Wainio 1887, p. 47.
Hellbom 1886, p. 72.
Hoffmann 1787.
Westring 1792 and 1793.
Westring 1805-1809.
Zopf 1907.
Ronceray 1904.
Zopf 1907.
Zahlbruckner (1905, p. 109) quotes from Czapek a statement that orchil fermentation is brought about by an obligate aerobic bacillus.
Zopf 1907, p. 393.
Lindsay 1855.
Bohler 1835, N. 10.
Johnson 1861.
Lindsay 1855.
Linnaeus 1711.
Linnaeus 1760.
Willemet etc. 1787.
Zopf 1907.
Lindsay 1855.
Lettau 1914.
Sorby 1873.
Gerard 1597.
Amoreux 1787.
Hue 1889.
Hue 1900.
Bauhin 1650, p. 88.
Zwelser 1672.
Georgi 1779.
Amoreux 1787.
Dundonald 1801.
Henneguy 1883.
See p. 302.
Journ. Bot. LVIII. pp. 213-9; 262-7, 1920.
Bot. Memoirs, 3, Oxford, 1919.
Church in litt.
Journ. Bot. l.c.
See p. 271 ante.
See p. 302 ante.
Chemist and Druggist, XCII. pp. 25-26, 1920; Bot. Abstracts, N. 903, p. 135, 1920.
BIBLIOGRAPHY OF BOOKS AND PAPERS CITED IN THE TEXT
=Acharius, Erik.= Lichenographiae Suecicae Prodromus. Linköping, 1798.
—— Methodus Lichenes. Stockholm, 1803.
—— Lichenographia Universalis. Göttingen, 1810.
—— Synopsis Methodica Lichenum. Lund, 1814.
=Acton, E.= Botrydina vulgaris Bréb., a Primitive Lichen. Ann. Bot. XXIII. pp. 579-587, 1909.
=Adanson, M.= Famille des Plantes. Paris, 1763.
=Agardh, C. A.= Dissertatio de Metamorphosi Algarum. Lund, 1820.
=Aigret, Clém.= Monographie des Cladonia de Belgique. Bull. Soc. Roy. Bot. Belgique, XL. pp. 43-213, 1901.
=Allescher, Andreas.= Rabenhorst Krypt. Flora, I. 7. Leipzig, 1901-3.
=Almquist, S.= Monographia Arthoniarum Scandinaviae. K. Svensk. Vet.-Akad. Handl. XVII. No. 6, 69 pp., 1880.
=Amoreux, D. M.= Recherches et expériences sur les divers Lichens. Lyon, 1787.
=Arcangeli, G.= Sulla Questione dei Gonidi. Nuovo Giorn. Bot. Ital. VII. p. 270, 1875.
=Archer, W.= A Résumé of Recent Views respecting the Nature of Lichens. Quart. Journ. Microsc. Sci. XIII. pp. 217-235 (2 pls.), 1873.
—— A Further Résumé of Recent Observations on the “Gonidia-Question.” Op. cit. XIV. pp. 115-139, 1874.
—— On apothecia occurring in some Scytonematous and Sirosiphonaceous Algae, in addition to those previously known. Op. cit. XV. p. 27 (1 pl.), 1875.
=Arnaud, G.= Sur la Cytologie du Capnodium meridionale et du mycelium des Fumagines. Comptes Rendus CLV. pp. 726-728 (figs.), 1912.
=Arnold, F.= Lichenologische Fragmente XVI. Flora, LVII. pp. 81-89, etc., etc., 1874.
—— Die Lichenen des Fränkischen Juras. Flora, XLI. etc., pp. 81, etc., 1858-1885. Separate publication, Regensburg, 323 pp., 1885.
—— Die Lichenen des Fränkischen Jura. Denkschr. R. Bayer. Bot. Ges. Regensburg, VI. pp. 1-61, 1890.
—— Zur Lichenenflora von München (Issued with the Ber. Bayer. Bot. Ges. München), Abth. I. 147 pp., 1891; II. 76 pp., 1892; III. 45 pp., 1897; IV. 82 pp., 1898; V. 100 pp., 1900; VI. 24 pp., 1901.
=Artari, A.= Ueber die Entwickelung der grünen Algen unter Ausschluss der Bedingungen der Kohlensäure-assimilation. Bull. Soc. Imp. Nat. Moscou. Nouv. sér. XIV. pp. 39-47, 1899.
—— Zur Ernährungsphysiologie der grünen Algen. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. XIX. pp. 7-9, 1901.
—— Zur Frage der physiologischen Rassen einiger grüner Algen. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. XX. pp. 172-175, 1902.
—— Ueber die Bildung des Chlorophylls durch grüne Algen. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. XX. pp. 201-207, 1902².
=Babikoff, J.= Du Développement des céphalodies sur le thallus du lichen Peltigera aphthosa Hoffm. Bull. Acad. Imp. Sci. St Pétersbourg, XXIV. pp. 548-559 (1 pl.), 1878.
=Babington, Churchill.= Lichenes in the Botany of the Antarctic Voyage by Joseph Dalton Hooker. II. Flora Novae-Zelandiae, pp. 266-311 (8 pls.). London, 1855.
=Bachmann, E.= Ueber nichtkrystallisirte Flechtenfarbstoffe, ein Beitrag zur Chemie und Anatomie der Flechten. Pringsh. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. XXI. pp. 1-61 (1 pl.), 1890.
—— Der Thallus der Kalkflechten. Wiss. Beil. Realsch. Plauen I. v. 26 pp. (1 pl.), 1892, and Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. X. pp. 30-37 (1 pl.), 1892.
—— Zur Frage des Vorkommens von ölfuhrenden Sphaeroidzellen bei Flechten. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. XXII. pp. 44-46, 1904.
—— Die Beziehungen der Kieselflechten zu ihrem Substrat. Tom. cit. pp. 101-104 (1 pl.), 1904.
—— Die Rhizoidenzone granitbewohnender Flechten. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. XLIV. pp. 1-40 (2 pls.), 1907.
—— Die Beziehungen der Kieselflechten zu ihrer Unterlage. II. Granat und Quarz. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. XXIX. pp. 261-273 (figs.), 1911. III. Bergkristall und Flint. Op. cit. XXXV. pp. 464-476, 8 figs., 1917.
—— Der Thallus der Kalkflechten. II. Flechten mit Chroolepusgonidien. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. XXXI. pp. 3-12 (1 pl.), 1913.
—— Zur Flechtenflora des Erzgebirges. I. Rittersgrün. Hedwigia, LIII. pp. 99-123, 1913. II. Allenburg. Hedwigia, LV. pp. 157-182, 1914.
=Bachmann, Freda M.= A New Type of Spermogonium and Fertilization in Collema. Ann. Bot. XXVI. pp. 747-760 (1 pl.), 1912.
—— The Origin and Development of the Apothecium in Collema pulposum. Arch. Zellforsch, x. 4, pp. 369-430 (7 pls.), 1913.
=Baranetzky, J.= Beitrag zur Kenntniss des selbständigen Lebens der Flechtengonidien. Bull. Acad. Imp. Sci. St Pétersbourg XII. pp. 418-431 , 1868.
—— Beitrag zur Kenntniss des selbständigen Lebens der Flechtengonidien. Pringsh. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. VII. pp. 1-18 (1 pl.), (1868), 1869-70.
=Bary, Anton de.= Morphologie und Physiologie der Pilze, Flechten und Myxomyceten. Leipzig, 1866.
—— Ueber die Keimung einiger grosssporiger Flechten. Pringsh. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. V. pp. 201-216 (3 pls.), 1866-7.
—— Die Erscheinung der Symbiose. Naturf. Vers. Cassel, LI. Tagebl. p. 121, 1879.
—— Vergleichende Morphologie und Physiologie der Pilze. Leipzig, 1884.
=Bauhin, J. and Cherler, J. H.= Historiae Plantarum Universalis I. Lib. II. Yverdun, 1650.
=Bauhin, Kaspar.= Pinax Theatri botanici, etc. Basle, 1623.
=Baur, Erwin.= Zur Frage nach der Sexualität der Collemaceen. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. XVI. pp. 363-367 (1 pl.), 1898.
—— Die Anlage und Entwickelung einiger Flechtenapothecien. Flora, LXXXVIII. pp. 319-332 (2 pls.), 1901.
—— Untersuchungen über die Entwickelungsgeschichte der Flechtenapothecien I. Bot. Zeit. LXII. pp. 21-44 (2 pls.), 1904.
=Bayrhoffer.= Einiges über Lichenen und deren Befruchtung. Bern. 44 pp. (4 pls.), 1851.
=Beckmann, Paul.= Untersuchungen über die Verbreitungsmittel von gesteinbewohnenden Flechten im Hochgebirge mit Beziehung zu ihrem Thallusbau. Engler, Bot. Jahrb. XXXVIII. Beibl. pp. 1-72 (10 figs.), 1907.
=Berg, Th.= Zur Kenntniss des in der Cetraria islandica vorkommenden Lichenins und jodbläuenden Stoffes. Russ. Zeitschr. Pharm. 1873, pp. 129 and 161. See Jahresber. Chemie (1873), p. 848, 1875.
=Berkeley, M. J.= Note on Lecanora esculenta. Gard. Chron. p. 611 (figs.), 1849.
—— Introduction to Cryptogamic Botany. London, 1857.
=Berzelius, J. J.= Versuche über die Mischung des Isländischen Mooses und seine Anwendung als Nahrungsmittel. Schweigger Journ. VII. pp. 317-352, 1813.
=Beyerinck, M. W.= Culturversuche mit Zoochlorellen, Lichenengonidien und anderen niederen Algen. Bot. Zeit. XLIII. pp. 725-739, 741-754, 757-768, 781-785 (1 pl.), 1890.
=Beyerinck, M. W.= Das Assimilationsprodukt der Kohlensäure in den Chromatophoren der Diatomeen. Rec. Trav. Bot. Néerl. I. pp. 28-33, 1904.
=Bialosuknia, W.= Sur un nouveau genre de Pleurococcacées. Bull. Soc. Bot. Genève. Sér. 2, I. pp. 101-104 (figs.), 1909.
=Bioret, G.= Contributions à l’étude de l’apothécie chez les Graphidées. Rev. Gén. de Bot. XXVI. pp. 249-252 (1 pl.), 1914.
=Bitter, G.= Ueber das Verhalten der Krustenflechten beim Zusammentreffen ihrer Ränder. Pringsh. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. XXXIII. pp. 47-127 (14 figs.), 1899¹.
—— Ueber maschenförmige Durchbrechungen der untern Gewebeschichte oder des gesammten Thallus bei verschiedenen Laub-und Strauchflechten. Botan. Untersuch., Festschrift für Schwendener. Berlin, pp. 120-149 (8 figs.), 1899².
—— Ueber die Variabilität einiger Laubflechten und über den Einfluss äusserer Bedingungen auf ihr Wachsthum. Pringsh. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. XXXVI. pp. 421-492 (7 pls. and figs.), 1901¹.
—— Zur Morphologie und Systematik von Parmelia, Untergattung Hypogymnia. Hedwigia, XL. pp. 171-274 (2 pls., 21 figs.), 1901².
—— Zur Soredienbildung. Hedwigia, XLIII. pp. 274-280, 1904¹.
—— Peltigeren-Studien I und II. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. XXII. pp. 248 254 (1 pl.), 1904².
=Blackman, V. H.= On the Fertilization, Alternation of Generations, and General Cytology of the Uredineae. Ann. Bot. XVIII. pp. 323-373 (3 pls.), 1904.
=Blackman, V. H. and Welsford, E. J.= The Development of the Perithecium of Polystigma rubrum DC. Ann. Bot. XXVI. pp. 761-767 (2 pls.), 1912.
=Bohler, J.= Lichenes Britannici. Sheffield, 1835.
=Bonnier, Gaston.= Recherches expérimentales sur la synthèse des lichens dans un milieu privé de germes. Comptes Rendus, CIII. p. 942, 1886.
—— Germination des spores des lichens sur les protonémas des Mousses et sur des Algues différent des gonidies du Lichen. Comptes Rendus Soc. Biol., Sér. 8, V. pp. 541-543, 1888.
—— Germination des lichens sur les protonémas des Mousses. Rev. Génér. Bot. I. pp. 165-169 (1 pl.), 1889¹.
—— Recherches sur la synthèse des lichens. Ann. Sci. Nat., Sér. 7, IX. pp. 1-34 (5 pls.), 1889².
=Bornet, Ed.= Description de trois lichens nouveaux. Mém. Soc. Sci. Nat. Cherbourg, IV. pp. 225-234 (4 pls.), 1856.
—— Sur les gonidies des Lichens. Comptes Rendus, Paris, LXXIV. p. 820, 1872.
—— Recherches sur les gonidies des Lichens. Ann. Sci. Nat., Sér. 5, XVII. pp. 45-110 (11 pls. col.), 1873.
—— Deuxième note sur les gonidies des Lichens. Op. cit. XIX. pp. 314-320, 1874.
=Borzi, A.= Intorno agli offici dei Gonidii de Licheni. Nuovo Giorn. Bot. Ital. VII. pp. 193-204, 1875.
—— Studii sulla sessualità degli ascomiceti. Nuovo Giorn. Bot. Ital. X. pp. 43-78 (2 pls.), 1878.
=Braconnot, Henri.= De la présence de l’oxalate de chaux dans le règne minéral; existence du même sel en quantité énorme dans les plantes de la famille des Lichens, et moyen avantageux d’en extraire l’acide oxalique. Ann. Chim. Phys. XXVIII. pp. 318-322, 1825.
=Brandt, Theodor.= Beiträge zur anatomischen Kenntniss der Flechtengattung Ramalina. Hedwigia, XLV. pp. 124-158 (5 pls.), 1906.
=Braun, Fr.= Verzeichniss der in der Kreis.-Nat.-Samml. Bayreuth Petrefacten. Leipzig. p. 94, 1840.
=Braun, Lucy E.= The vegetation of conglomerate rocks of the Cincinnati region. Plant World, XX. pp. 380-392, 1917, and Bryologist, XXI. p. 93, 1918.
=Brefeld, Oscar.= Untersuchungen aus dem Gesammtgebiete der Mykologie, VIII. Leipzig, 1889.
—— Untersuchungen aus dem Gesammtgebiete der Mykologie. Münster, IX., 1891.
=Brez, Jacques.= La Flore des Insectophiles. Antrecht, 1791.
=Britten J. and Boulger, G. S.= A Biographical Index of British and Irish Botanists. London, 1893. Suppls. 1899, 1905, 1908.
=Brooks, F. T.= The Development of Gnomonia erythrostoma Pers. Ann. Bot. XXIV. pp. 585-605 (2 pls.), 1910.
=Brown, Ernest W.= Notes on Cetraria islandica (Iceland Moss). Amer. Journ. Physiol. I. pp. 455-460, 1898.
=Brown, W. H.= The Development of the Ascocarp of Lachnea scutellata. Bot. Gaz. LII. pp. 275-305 (figs. and pl.), 1911.
=Buchet, Gaston.= Les Lichens attaquent le verre et, dans le vitreux, semblent préférer certaines couleurs. C. R. Soc. Biol. Paris, Sér. 9, II. p. 13, 1890.
=Buddle, Adam.= Hortus siccus Plantarum Angliae, quo continetur curiosa Muscorum collectio (in Herb. Sloane in Brit. Mus.). 1690-1700.
=Buxbaum, J. C.= Enumeratio Plantarum, etc. Halle, 1721.
—— Plantarum minus cognitarum, complectens Plantas circa Byzantium in Oriente observatas. Cent. II. St. Petersburg, 1728.
=Calkins, W. W.= An edible lichen not heretofore noted as such. Bot. Gaz. XVII. p. 418, 1892.
—— The Lichen Flora of Chicago and vicinity. Bull. Geol. Nat. Hist. Survey. Chicago, 58 pp., 1896.
=Camerarius, Joachimus.= De plantis Epitome utilissima iconibus, etc. 1586.
=Candolle, A. P. de and Lamarck, J. B. P. A. de M. de.= Flore Française, II. Paris, 1805.
=Carrington, B.= Dr Gray’s Arrangement of the Hepaticae. Trans. Bot. Soc. Edinb. X. pp. 305-309, 1870.
=Cassini, Henri.= Doutes sur l’origine et la nature du Nostoc. Journ. de Phys. Chim. Hist. Nat. Paris, LXXXIV. pp. 395-399, 1817.
=Chambers, C. O.= The relation of algae to dissolved oxygen and carbon dioxide, with special reference to carbonates. Missouri Bot. Gard. Ann. Rep. 23, pp. 171-207, 1912.
=Chevallier, F.-T.= Histoire des Graphidées. Paris, 1824.
=Chodat, Robert.= On the Polymorphism of the Green Algae and the Principles of their Evolution. Ann. Bot. XI. pp. 97-121, 1897.
=Chodat, R.= Lichens épiphylles des environs de Genève. Verh. Schweiz. Naturf. Ges. XCV. pp. 209-210, 1912.
—— Monographies d’Algues en Culture Pure. Berne, 1913.
=Church, A. Herbert.= Food, some account of its sources, constituents, and uses. South Kensington Museum Science Handbooks, Chapman and Hall, Piccadilly, 1880.
=Claassen, E.= Caloplaca pyracea, eine Krustenflechte auf den Sandstein-Fuszsteigen zu East Cleveland, Ohio. Hedwigia, LIV. pp. 217-218, 1914.
=Colonna, Fabio.= Minus cognitarum Stirpium aliquot, ac etiam rariorum nostro coelo orientium [Ecphrasis], etc. Rome, 1606.
=Comère, J.= Les algues d’eau douce. Paris, 1912.
=Corda, A. C. I.= Icones Fungorum. Prague, 1837-1854; III., 1839.
=Cordus, Valerius.= Historiae Stirpium. Strasburg, 1561.
=Cramer, C.= Ueber das Verhältnis von Chlorodictyon foliosum J. Ag. und Ramalina reticulata (Noehden). Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges. I. pp. 100-123 (3 pls.), 1891.
=Cramer, G. C. P.= De Lichene Islandico (Diss.). Erlangen, 1780.
=Crombie, J. M.= On the Lichen-Gonidia question. Popular Science Review, 18 pp. (1 pl.), July, 1874.
—— Dr Nylander on gonidia and their different Forms (translation). Grevillea, VI. pp. 39-48, 1877.
=Crombie, J. M.= On the Lichens of Dillenius’s “Historia Muscorum,” as illustrated by his Herbarium. Journ. Linn. Soc. XVII. pp. 553-581, 1880.
—— On the Algo-Lichen Hypothesis. Journ. Linn. Soc. XXI. pp. 259-283 (2 pls.), 1885.
—— Recent observations of Dr Nylander on Schwendenerism (translation from Nylander). Grevillea, XX. pp. 60-62, 1891.
—— A Monograph of Lichens found in Britain, I. London, 1894.
=Culpepper, Nicolas.= The English Physician, etc. London, 1652.
=Cunningham, D. D.= On Mycoidea parasitica, a new genus of Parasitic Algae and the Part which it plays in the Formation of certain Lichens. Trans. Linn. Soc. Ser. 2, I. p. 301 (1 pl.), 1879.
=Cutting, E. M.= On the Sexuality and Development of the Ascocarp in Ascophanus carneus Pers. Ann. Bot. XXIII. pp. 399-417 (1 pl.), 1909.
=Czapek, Friedrich.= Biochemie der Pflanzen. 2 vols. Jena, 1905.
=Dangeard, P. A.= Recherches sur la structure des Lichens. Le Botaniste, Sér. 4, fasc. 1 and 2, 1894.
—— La Reproduction sexuelle des Ascomycètes. Tom. cit. pp. 21-58 (figs.), 1894.
=Danilov, A. N.= Ueber das gegenseitige Verhältnis zwischen den Gonidien und dem Pilzkomponenten in der Flechtensymbiose. Bull. Jard. Imp. Bot. St Pétersbourg, X. pp. 34-66 (German Résumé, pp. 66-70), (3 pls.). 1910.
=Darbishire, O. V.= Kritische Bemerkungen über das Microgonidium. Hedwigia, XXXIV. pp. 181-190, 1895.
—— Dendrographa, eine neue Flechtengattung. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. XIII. pp. 313-326 (1 pl.), 1895².
—— Botanische Ergebnisse. Flechten aus dem Umanakdistrikt. Bibliotheca Botanica, Heft 42, VI. pp. 55-61, 1897.
—— Die deutschen Pertusariaceen mit besonderer Berücksichtung ihrer Soredienbildung. Engler, Bot. Jahrb. XXII. pp. 593-671, 1897².
—— Monographia Roccelleorum. Bibliotheca Botanica, Heft 45, 103 pp. (30 pls., 29 figs.). Stuttgart, 1898.
—— Ueber die Apothecienentwickelung der Flechte Physcia pulverulenta. Pringsh. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. XXXIV. pp. 322-345, 1900.
—— The lichens of the South Orkneys. Trans. and Proc. Bot. Soc. Edinburgh, XXIII. pp. 1-6 (1 pl.), 1905.
—— Report of the second Norwegian expedition in the Fram 1898-1902, N. 21, Lichens. Kristiania, 68 pp. (2 pls.), 1909.
—— The lichens of the Swedish Antarctic Expedition. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Südpolar-Expedition 1901-1903. IV. Lief. 11, 73 pp. 1 fig., (3 pls.), 1912.
—— The Development of the Apothecium in the Lichen Peltigera (abstract). Trans. Brit. Ass. Adv. Sci. pp. 713-714, 1913.
=Darbishire, O. V. and Fischer-Benzon, R. V.= Die Flechten Schleswig-Holsteins. Kiel und Leipzig, 1901.
=Davies, Hugh.= Welsh Botanology. London, 1813.
=Dawson, Maria.= On the Biology of Poronia punctata. Ann. Bot. XIV. pp. 245-262 (2 pls)., 1900.
=Deckenbach, Const.= Ueber den Polymorphismus einiger Luftalgen. Scripta Botanica. Hort. Univ. Imp. Petrop. IV. pp. 32-40 (1 pl.), 1893.
=Delise, D.= Histoire des Lichens. Genre Sticta. Caen, 1822.
=Desfontaines, R. L.= Flora Atlantica, etc. Paris, 1798-1800.
=De-Toni, G. V.= Sylloge Algarum, I. Pavia, 1889.
=Dickson, J. J.= Plantarum Cryptogamicarum Britanniae. 4 Fasc. (Illus.). London, 1785-1801.
=Dillenius, Johann Jakob.= Catalogus Plantarum sponte circa Gissam nascentium, etc. Frankfurt am Main, 1719.
—— Ray’s Synopsis Methodica, etc. Ed. 3, 1724.
—— Historia Muscorum. Oxonii (1740), 1741.
=Dodoens, R.= Stirpium historiae pemptades. Antwerp, 1583.
=Dorstenius, Theodoricus.= Botanicon, continens Herbarum, aliorumque Simplicium, quorum usus in medicinis est, etc. Frankfurt, 1540.
=Druce, G. Claridge and Vines, S. H.= The Dillenian Herbaria. Oxford, 1907.
=Dufrenoy, J.= Les conditions écologiques du développement des champignons parasites. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France, XXXIV. pp. 8-26, 1918.
=Dundonald, Lord.= Process for extracting a gum from Lichens. Phil. Mag. London, X. pp. 293-299, 1801.
=Edinburgh Encyclopaedia= (=Brewster’s=). Lichen, XII. pp. 729-741, 1830.
=Egeling, Gustav.= Ein Beitrag zur Lösung der Frage bezüglich der Ernährung der Flechten. Oesterr. Bot. Zeitschr. XXXI. pp. 323-324, 1881.
=Elenkin, A. A.= Wanderflechten der Steppen und Wüsten. Bull. Jard. Imp. Bot. St Pétersbourg, I. pp. 16-38 and 52-72 (4 pls., 7 figs.), 1901¹.
—— Les Lichens facultatifs. Bull. Jard. Imp. Bot. St Pétersbourg, I. pp. 129-154 (1 pl. and figs.), 1901². (Russian with French résumé.)
—— Zur Frage der Theorie des “Endosaprophytismus” bei Flechten. Bull. Jard. Imp. Bot. St Pétersbourg, II. pp. 65-84, 1902.
—— Neue Beobachtungen über die Erscheinungen des Endosaprophytismus bei heteromeren Flechten. Bull. Jard. Imp. Bot. St Pétersbourg, IV. pp. 25-39 (2 col. pls.), 1904¹.
—— Zur Frage der Theorie des “Endosaprophytismus” bei Flechten. Bull. Soc. Imp. Nat. Moscou, p. 164, 1904².
—— Notes Lichenologiques. Bull. Jard. Imp. Bot. St Pétersbourg, V. pp. 121-133, 1905.
—— Species novae lichenum in Sibiria arctica, etc. Ann. Mycol. IV. pp. 36-38, 1906¹.
—— Die Symbiose als abstracte Auffassung des beweglichen Gleichgewichts der Symbionten. (Russian with German résumé.) Bull. Jard. Imp. Bot. St Pétersbourg, VI. pp. 1-19, 1906².
=Elenkin, A. A. and Woronichin, N. N.= Epiphylle Flechten im Kaukasus. Trav. Soc. Imp. Nat. St Pétersbourg, XXXIX. pp. 252-258, 1908.
=Elfving, F.= Ueber die Flechtengonidien. Förh. Nordisk. Nat.-forsk. och Läk. Helsingfors, 1902, 5 pp., 1903. Ann. Mycol. II. pp. 304-305, 1904.
—— Untersuchungen über die Flechtengonidien. Act. Soc. Sci. Fenn. XLIV. n. 2, 71 pp. (8 pls.), 1913.
=Engelhardt, Hermann.= Flora der Braunkohlenformation im Königreich Sachsen. Leipzig, 1870.
=Ernst, A.= (=Trans. by A. C. Seward=). The new Flora of the volcanic Island of Krakatau. Cambridge, 1908.
=Errera, Leo.= Ueber den Nachweis des Glykogens bei Pilzen in Bot. Zeit. XLIV. pp. 316-320, 1886.
—— “Pain du ciel” provenant de Diarbekir. Bull. Acad. Roy. Belg. Sér. 3, XXVI. pp. 83-91, 1893.
—— L’épiplasme des Ascomycetes et le glycogène des végétaux (Thèse. Bruxelles, 1882). Rec. Inst. Bot. Univ. Brux. I. pp. 1-70, 1906.
=Eschweiler, F. G.= Systema Lichenum, genera exhibens, etc. Nuremberg (1 pl.), 1824.
=Escombe, F.= Chemistry of Lichenic and Fungal Membranes. Ann. Bot. X. pp. 293-294, 1896.
—— Beitrag zur Chemie der Membranen der Flechten und Pilze. Zeitschr. Physiolog. Chemie, XXII. p. 288, 1896.
=Etard and Bouilhac.= Présence des chlorophylles dans un Nostoc cultivé à l’abri de la lumière. Comptes Rendus, CXXVII. pp. 119-121, 1898.
=Ettingshausen C. and Debey, M. H.= Die urweltlichen Thallophyten des Kreidegebirges von Aachen und Maestricht. Sitzungsb. K. Akad. Wiss. Wien, pp. 507-512, 1857; and Bull. Soc. Bot. France, V. pp. 304-306, 1858.
=Euler, H.= Grundlagen und Ergebnisse der Pflanzenchemie. Braunschweig, 1908.
=Eversmann, E.= In Lichenem esculentum Pallasci. Nova Acta Leop. XV. pp 349-362 (1 pl.), 1825.
=Famintzin, A.= Die Symbiose als Mittel der Synthese von Organismen. Biol. Centralbl. XXVII. p. 353, 1907.
=Famintzin, A. and Baranetzky, J.= Zur Entwickelungsgeschichte der Gonidien und Zoosporenbildung der Flechten. Mém. Acad. Imp. Sci. St Pétersbourg, Sér. 7, XI. No. 9, 7 pp. (1 pl.) (1867), 1868. Ann. Sci. Nat., Sér. 5, VIII. pp. 137-144 (1 pl.), 1867.
=Faull, J. H.= The Cytology of the Laboulbeniales. Ann. Bot. XXV. pp. 649-654, 1911.
=Fée, A. L. A.= Essai sur les Cryptogames des écorces exotiques officinales. Paris, 1824.
—— Matériaux pour une Flore Lichénologique du Brésil. Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr. XX. pp. 307-319, 1873.
=Fink, Bruce.= Lichens of Minneapolis and Vicinity. Minn. Bot. Stud. I. pp. 703-725, 1894.
—— Contributions to a knowledge of the lichens of Minnesota, I.-VII. Minn. Bot. Stud. I.-III., 1896-1903.
—— Lichens of the Lake Superior region. Minn. Bot. Stud. II. pp. 215-276, 1898-1902.
—— Lichens of the Minnesota Valley. Tom. cit. pp. 277-329².
—— Lichens of N. W. Minnesota. Tom. cit. pp. 657-709³.
—— Lichens of the Northern Boundary. Op. cit. III. pp. 167-236, 1903.
—— Composition of a Desert Lichen Flora. Mycologia, I. pp. 87-109, 1909.
—— Some Common Types of Lichen Formations. Torrey Bot. Club, XXX. pp. 412-418, 1903.
—— A Lichen Society of a Sandstone Rip-rap. Bot. Gaz. XXXVI. pp. 265-284 (5 figs.), 1904.
—— The Nature and Classification of Lichens. I. Mycologia, III. pp. 231-269, 1911; II. Op. cit. V. pp. 97-116, 1913.
—— The rate of Growth and Ecesis in Lichens. Mycologia, IX. pp. 138-158, 1917.
—— A new genus and species of the Collemaceae. Mycologia, X. pp. 235-238 (1 pl.), 1918.
=Fischer, Ed.= Beiträge zur Kenntniss exotischen Pilze. Hedwigia, XXIX. pp. 161-171 (1 pl.), 1890.
=Fitting, N.= Ueber die Beziehungen zwischen den epiphyllen Flechten und den von ihnen bewohnten Blättern. Ann. Jard. Bot. Buitenzorg, Suppl. 3, pp. 505-519, 1910.
=Fitzpatrick, Henry Morton.= Sexuality in Rhizina undulata. Bot. Gaz. LXV. pp. 201-226 (2 pls.), 1918.
=Flagey, C.= Lichenes algeriensis exsiccati. Rev. Mycol. XIII. pp. 83-87 and 107-117, 1901; pp. 70-79, 1892.
—— Catalogue des Lichens. Battandier and Trabut, Flore de l’Algérie. Algiers, Part 2, I. pp. XII. and 139, 1896.
=Flörke, H. G.= Deutsche Lichenen. 10 Lief. Berlin, 1815-19.
—— De Cladoniis, etc. Rostock, 1828.
=Flotow, Julius von.= Mikroskopische Flechtenstudien. Bot. Zeit. VIII. pp. 361-369, 377-382, 1850.
=Forskål, P.= Descriptiones Plantarum Florae Aegyptiaco-Arabicae (5). Hauniae, 1775.
=Forssell, K. B. J.= Studier öfver Cephalodierna. Bihang K. Svensk. Vet.-Akad. Handl. VIII. n. 3, 112 pp. (2 pls.), 1882.
=Forssell, K. B. J.= Lichenologische Untersuchungen. I. Ueber die Cephalodien. Flora, LXVII. pp. 1-8, 33-46, 58-63, 177-193, 1884.
—— Anatomie und Systematik der Gloeolichenen. Nov. Act. Reg. Soc. Sci. Upsal. Sér. 3, 118 pp., 1885¹.
—— Die anatomische Verhältnisse und die phylogenetische Entwicklung der Lecanora granatina Sommerf. Bot. Centralb. XXII. pp. 54-58 and 85-89, 1885².
—— Ueber den Polymorphismus der Algen (Flechtengonidien), etc. Flora, LXIX. pp. 49-64, 1886.
=Forster, T. F.= Flora Tonbrigensis. London, 1816.
=Frank, A. B.= Ueber die biologischen Verhältnisse des Thallus einiger Krustenflechten. Cohn’s Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen, II. pp. 123-200 (1 pl.), 1876.
=Fraser, H. C. I.= On the Sexuality and Development of the Ascocarp in Lachnea stercorea Pers. Ann. Bot. XXI. pp. 349-360 (2 pls.), 1907.
=French, G. H.= Mounting Lichens. Journ. Applied Microscopy: Rochester N. Y. I. p. 135, 1898.
=Friederich, Albert.= Beiträge zur Anatomie der Silikatflechten. Fünfstück’s Beitr. Wiss. Bot. V. pp. 377-404, 1906.
=Fries, Elias.= Systema orbis vegetabilis, I. Lund, 1825.
—— Primitiae Geographiae Lichenum. Lund, 1831.
—— Lichenographia Europaea reformata. Lund, 1831.
=Fries, Th. M.= Monographia Stereocaulorum et Pilophororum. Act. Reg. Soc. Sci. Upsala, Ser. 3, II. pp. 307-380 (4 pls.), 1858.
—— Genera Heterolichenum Europeae recognita. Upsala, 1861.
—— Lichenes Arctoi. Nova Act. Soc. Sci. III. pp. 103-398, 1861.
—— Beiträge zur Kenntniss der sogenannten Cephalodien bei den Flechten. Flora, XLIX. pp. 17-25, 1866.
—— Lichenes Spitsbergenses. K. Sv. Vet.-Akad. Handl. VII. n. 2, 1867.
=Fritsch, F. E.= The Rôle of Algal Growth in the colonization of new ground, etc. Geographical Journal, XXX. pp. 531-547, 1907.
=Fuisting, W.= Beiträge zur Entwickelungsgeschichte der Lichenen. Bot. Zeit. XXVI. pp. 641, etc. (1 pl.), 1868.
=Fünfstück, M.= Beiträge zur Entwickelungsgeschichte der Lichenen. Eichler’s Jahrb. ot. Gart. Berlin, III. pp. 155-174 (3 pls.), 1884.
—— Die Fettabscheidung der Kalkflechten in Fünfstück’s Beitr. Wiss. Bot. I. pp. 157-220 (3 pls.), 1895 and Nachtrag, pp. 316-321, 1896.
—— Lichenes (Allgemeiner Teil). Engler und Prantl, Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, I. 1*, pp. 1-48, 1898.
—— Weitere Untersuchungen über die Fettabscheidung der Kalkflechten. Bot. Untersuch., Festschrift für Schwendener, pp. 341-356. Berlin, 1899.
—— Der gegenwärtige Stand der Flechtenforschung nebst Ausblicken auf deren voraussichtliche Weiterentwickelung. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. XX. 19te General-Versammlung, pp. 62-77, 1902.
=Galløe, O.= Danske Likeners Ökologi. Botan. Tidsskrift, XXVIII. pp. 285-372 (3 pls.), 1908.
—— Forberedende Undersøgelser til en almindelig Likenølogi. Dansk Botanisk Arkiv, I. n. 3, 119 pp. (240 figs.), 1913-15.
=Garjeaune, A. J. M.= Die Verpilzung der Lebermoosrhizoiden. Flora, CII. pp. 147-185 (2 pls. and figs.), 1911.
=Gautier, Armand.= Présence de l’iode en proportions notables dans tous les végétaux à chlorophylle de la classe des Algues et dans les sulfuraires. Comptes Rendus, CXXIX. pp. 191-194, 1899.
=Georgi, I. G.= Scrutamen chemicum Lichenum parasiticorum. Acta Acad. Sci. Imp. Petropol. III. Pars II. pp. 282-292 , 1783.
=Gerard, John.= The Herball or generall historie of Plantes, etc. London, 1597.
=Gibelli, Giuseppe.= Sugli Organi Riproduttori del genere Verrucaria. Memorie della Soc. Ital. Sci. Nat. Milano, I. n. 5 (1 pl.), 1866.
=Gilson, E.= La cristallisation de la cellulose et la composition chimique de la membrane cellulaire végétale. La Cellule, IX. fasc. 2, 1893.
—— Recherches chimiques sur la membrane cellulaire des Champignons. La Cellule, XI. fasc. 1. pp. 7-15, 1894.
=Gleditsch, J. G.= Einleitung in die neuere Forstwissenschaft, I. Berlin, 1775.
=Glück, Hugo.= Entwurf zu einer Vergleichenden Morphologie der Flechten-Spermogonien. Verh. Naturhist.-Med. Ver. VI. 2. Heidelberg, pp. vi. and 136 (2 pls.), 1899.
=Gmelin, J. F.= Systema Naturae, II. Leipzig, 1791.
=Gmelin, J. G.= Reise durch Sibirien. Göttingen, 1752.
=Goeppert, H. R.= Uebersicht der fossilen Flora Schlesiens 1844-45 (in Wimmer’s Flora von Schlesien, Breslau, 1845).
—— Ueber den Einfluss der Pflanzen auf felsige Unterlage. Flora, XLIII. pp. 161-171, 1860.
=Goeppert, H. R. and Menge, A.= Die Flora des Bernsteins, I. Danzig, 1883.
=Gray, S. F.= A Natural Arrangement of British Plants, I. London, 1821.
=Greville, R. K.= Scottish Cryptogamic Flora, etc. I.-VI. Edinburgh, 1823-28.
—— Flora Edinensis. Edinburgh, 1824.
=Guembel, C. W.= Mittheilungen über die neue Färberflechte Lecanora ventosa Ach. Denkschr. K. Akad. Wiss. Math.-Natur. Cl. Wien, XI. Abth. 2, pp. 23-40 (1 pl.), 1856.
=Guérin-Varry, R. J.= Mémoires sur deux Produits naturels de la Végétation considérés comme des Gommes. Ann. Chim. Phys. Sér. 2, LVI. pp. 225-252, 1834.
=Guilliermond, A.= Formation des Asques et de l’épiplasme des Ascomycètes. Rev. Gén. Bot. XVI. pp. 49-66, 1904.
=Haberlandt, G.= Ueber die Beziehungen zwischen Function und Lage des Zellkernes bei den Pflanzen. Jena, pp. viii, 135 (2 pls.), 1887.
—— Physiologische Pflanzenanatomie, ed. 2. Leipzig, 1896.
=Haller, Alb. von.= Enumeratio Methodica Stirpium Helvetiae indigenarum, etc. Göttingen, 1742.
—— Historia Stirpium indigenarum Helvetiae, III. Berne, 1768.
=Halsey, A.= Synoptical view of the Lichens, growing in the vicinity of the city of New York. Ann. Lyceum Nat. Hist. New York, I. pp. 3-21, 1824.
=Hamlet, W. M. and Plowright, C. B.= On the occurrence of Oxalic Acid in Fungi. Chemical News, XXXVI. pp. 93-94, 1877.
=Harmand, J.= Lichens de France. Fasc. I. II. 1905; III. 1907; IV. 1909; V. 1913.
=Harper, R. A.= Cell-Division in Sporangia and Asci. Ann. Bot. XIII. pp. 467-525, 1899.
—— Sexual reproduction in Pyronema confluens, etc. Ann. Bot. XIV. pp. 321-400 (3 pls.), 1900.
=Hassall, A. H.= A History of the British Freshwater Algae. London, 1845.
=Hedlund, T.= Kritische Bemerkungen über einige Arten der Flechtengattungen Lecanora, Lecidea und Micarea. Bih. K. Svensk. Vet.-Akad. Handl. XVIII. Afd. III. n. 3. 104 pp. (1 pl.), 1892.
—— Ueber Thallusbildung durch Pyknokonidien bei Catillaria denigrata und C. prasina. Bot. Centralbl. LXIII. pp. 9-16, 1895.
=Hedwig, Johann.= Microscopisch-Analytische Beschreibungen und Abbildungen neuer und zweifelhafter Laub-Moose, II. Leipzig, 1789.
—— Theoria generationis et fructificationis plantarum cryptogamicarum. St Petersburg, 1784. Enlarged edition. Leipzig, 1798.
=Hellbom, P. J.= Norrlands Lafvar. K. Svensk. Vet.-Akad. Handl. XX. n. 8. 131 pp., 1884.
=Hellbom, P. J.= Lichenaea Neo-Zeelandica, etc. Bihang K. Svensk. Vet.-Akad. Handl. XXI. Afd. III. n. 13, 150 pp., 1896.
=Henneguy, Félix.= Les Lichens Utiles. Paris, 114 pp. (20 figs.), 1883.
=Herbal.= The Grete Herball, etc., translated from the French, printed by Peter Treveris. London, 1526.
=Herberger, J. E.= Ueber den Bitterstoff des isländischen Mooses (Cetraria islandica). Buchner’s Repertorium für Pharmacie, XXXVI. pp. 226-237, 1830.
=Herissey, H.= Sur la présence de l’émulsine dans les Lichens. Comptes Rendus Soc. Biol. Sér. 10, V. pp. 532-534, 1898; Bull. Soc. Mycol. France, XV. pp. 44-48, 1899.
=Herre, A. C.= The growth of Ramalina reticulata. Bot. Gaz. XXXVIII. pp. 218-219, 1904.
—— Suggestions as to the origin of California’s Lichen Flora. Plant World, XIII. pp. 215-220, 1910.
—— The Gyrophoraceae of California. Contrib. U.S. Nat. Herb. XIII. 10, pp. 313-321 (5 pls.), 1911¹.
—— The desert Lichens of Reno, Nevada. Bot. Gaz. LI. pp. 286-297, 1911².
=Hesse, O.= Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Flechten und ihrer charakteristischen Bestandteile, 9 Mitth. Journ. prakt. Chem. LXX. pp. 449-502, 1904.
=Hicks, J. Braxton.= Contributions to the knowledge of the Development of the Gonidia of Lichens in relation to the Unicellular Algae. Quart. Journ. Micros. Sci. VIII. p. 239, 1860. New series, I. p. 15, 1861.
—— Observations on the Gonidia and Confervoid Filaments of Mosses, and on the relation of their Gonidia to those of Lichens and of certain freshwater Algae. Trans. Linn. Soc. London, XXIII. pp. 567-588 (2 pls.), 1862.
=Hill, Sir John.= History of Plants. London, 1751.
—— Flora Britannica. London, 1760.
=Hoffmann, G. Fr.= Enumeratio Lichenum iconibus et descriptionibus illustrata. Erlangen, 1784.
—— Commentatio de vario Lichenum usu. Lyon, 1787.
—— Descriptio et Adumbratio plantarum e classe cryptogamica Linnaei quae Lichenes dicuntur. Leipzig, 1790-1801.
—— Deutschland’s Flora, etc. Erlangen, 1795.
=Hofmann, W.= Parasitische Flechten auf Endocarpon miniatum. Fünfstück’s Beitr. Wiss. Bot. V. pp. 259-274, 1906.
=Holle, G. von.= Zur Entwickelungsgeschichte von Borrera ciliaris. Inaug.-Diss. Göttingen, 43 pp. (2 pls.), 1849.
=Hooker, W. J.= Flora Scotica. London, 1821.
—— English Botany Supplement. London, 1831.
—— Smith’s Engl. Fl. V. pp. 129-241, 1833.
=Hooker, Sir W. J. and Arnott, G. A. Walker.= The Botany of Captain Beechey’s Voyage, etc. London, 1841.
=Hornschuch, Friedrich.= Einige Beobachtungen über das Entstehen der Algen, Flechten und Laubmoose. Flora, II. pp. 140-144, 1819.
—— Einige Beobachtungen und Bemerkungen über die Entstehung und Metamorphose der niedern vegetabilischen Organismen. Acad. Caes. Leop. Nov. Act. X. p. 544, etc., 1821.
=How, William.= Phytologia Britannica. London, 1650.
=Howe, R. Heber.= Classification de la Famille des Usneaceae dans l’Amérique du Nord. 32 pp. (10 pls.), Paris, 1912.
—— North American Species of the genus Ramalina. Bryologist, XVI. pp. 65-74, etc. 1913.
=Hudson, W.= Flora Anglica. London, ed. 1, 1762; ed. 2, 1778.
=Hue, A. M.= Lichenes exoticos a professore W. Nylander descriptos, etc., etc. Paris, 1892.
—— Revue des Travaux sur la description et la géographie botanique des Lichens. Rev. Gén. Bot. I. pp. 397-403, 1888; II. pp. 403-411, 1889; IV. pp. 31-39, 1890; V. pp. 36-48, 1891; VI. pp. 174-185, etc. 1894; X. pp. 125-128, etc. 1898¹.
—— Causerie sur les Parmelia. Journ. de Bot. XII. pp. 177-189, 239-250, 1898².
—— William Nylander with portrait and lists of publications. Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr. XLVI. pp. 153-165, 1899.
—— Lichenes extra-Europaei, etc. Nouv. Arch. Mus. Hist. Nat. Paris, Sér. 3, X. pp. 213-280, 1898; Sér. 4, I. pp. 27-220, 1899; II. pp. 49-122, 1900; III. pp. 21-146 (18 pls.), 1901.
—— Description de deux espèces de Lichens et de céphalodies nouvelles. Ann. Ass. Nat. Levallois-Perret, p. 31, 1904; Bot. Centralbl. XCIX. p. 34, 1905.
—— Lichens Tarbelliens. Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr. LV. Mém. 12, 19 pp., 1908.
—— Le Mastoidea tessellata Hook. fil. et Harv. Bull. Soc. Bot. France, LVI. pp. 315-322 (5 figs.), 1909¹.
—— Lichenes morphologice et anatomice disposuit. Nouv. Arch. Mus. Hist. Nat. Paris, Sér. 4, VIII. pp. 237-272 (figs.), 1906; op. cit. X. pp. 169-224 (figs.), 1908; Sér. 5, I. pp. 110-166 (figs.), 1909; II. pp. 1-119 (figs.), 1910.
—— Lichenum Generis Crocyniae Massal, etc. Mém. Soc. Sci. Nat. Cherb., Sér. 4, VII. pp. 223-254, 1909².
—— Sur la variation des gonidies dans le genre Solorina. Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. Paris, CLI. pp. 332-334, 1910.
—— Monographiam Generis Solorinae Ach., etc. Mém. Soc. Sci. Nat. Cherb. XXXVIII. pp. 1-56, 1911¹.
—— Notice sur les spores des “Licheni blasteniospori” Massal. Bull. Soc. Bot. France, LXIII. pp. lxvii-lxxxvi (2 pls.), 1911².
—— Lichenes novos vel melius cognitos. Ann. Mycol. XII. pp. 509-534, 1914.
—— Expédition Antarctique Française (1903-1905). Dr J. Charcot, Lichens. Paris, 1908.
—— Deuxième Expédition (1908-1910). Dr J. Charcot, Lichens. Paris, 1915.
=Hulth, J. M.= Ueber Reservestoffbehälter bei Flechten. Bot. Centralbl. XLV. pp. 209-210 and 269-270, 1891.
=Hutchinson, Robert.= Food and the Principles of dietetics. Ed. 4. London, Arnold. 1916.
=Istvanffi, Gy. von.= Ueber die Rolle der Zellkerne bei der Entwickelung der Pilze. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. XIII. pp. 452-467, 1895.
=Itzigsohn, Hermann.= Die Antheridien und Spermatozoën der Flechten. Bot. Zeit. VIII. pp. 393-394 and 913-919, 1850.
—— Wie verhält sich Collema zu Nostoc und zu den Nostochineen. Bot. Zeit. XII. pp. 521-527, 1854.
—— Gloeocapsa und Cladonia. Bot. Zeit. XIII. pp. 203-207, 1855.
—— Cultur der Glaucogonidien von Peltigera canina. Bot. Zeit. XXVI. pp. 185-196, , 1868.
=Jaczewski, A.= Specimina Pilocarpi leucoblephari e Caucaso. See A. Elenkin in Bull. Jard. Imp. Bot. St Pétersb. IV. pp. 3-8, 1904.
=Jatta, A.= Monographia Lichenum Italiae Meridionalis. Trano, 1889.
=Jennings, A. Vaughan.= On two new species of Phycopeltis from New Zealand. Proc. Roy. Irish Acad. Ser. 3, III. pp. 753-766 (2 pls.), 1895.
=John, T. F.= Ueber die Ernährung der Pflanzen. Berlin, 1819.
=Johnson, Charles Pierpoint.= The Useful Plants of Great Britain. Illustrated by J. E. Sowerby. London, 1861 .
=Johow, Friedrich.= Die Gruppe der Hymenolichenen, etc. Pringsh. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. XV. pp. 360-409 (5 pls.), 1884.
=Jumelle, Henri.= La vie des Lichens pendant l’Hiver. Mém. Soc. Biol. Paris, Sér. 9, II. pp. 115-119, 1890.
—— Recherches Physiologiques sur les Lichens. Rev. Gén. Bot. IV. pp. 49-64, 103-121, etc. Résumé général, p. 316 (2 pls.), 1892.
=Kajanus, Birger= (=früher Nilson=). Morphologische Flechtenstudien. Ark. Bot. X. n. 4, 47 pp. (2 pls.), 1911.
=Kappen, Hubert.= Kristallographisch-optische Untersuchungen einiger Flechtensäuren. Zeitschr. Kristallogr. XXXVII. pp. 151-170, 1903.
=Keeble, F.= Plant-Animals. A study in Symbiosis. Cambridge, 1910.
=Keegan, P. Q.= The Chemistry of some Common Plants. Naturalist, pp. 274-275, 1905; pp. 24-25, 1907.
=Keiszler, Karl von.= Zwei neue Flechtenparasiten aus Steiermark. Hedwigia, L. pp. 294-298, 1911.
=Keller, F.= The Reindeer Age on the Lake of Constance. Athenaeum, p. 500, 1866.
=Kerner von Marilaun, A. and Oliver, F. W.= The Natural History of Plants. Vols. I. and II. London, 1894.
=Kieffer, J. J.= Die Flechten Lothringens. Hedwigia, XXXIII. pp. 101-122, 1894.
=Kienitz-Gerloff, F.= Neue Studien über Plasmodesmen. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. XX. p. 93 (1 pl.), 1902.
=Kihlman, A. Osw.= Pflanzenbiologische Studien aus Russisch-Lappland. Act. Soc. Faun. and Fl. Fenn. VI. 3, XXIV. 263 pp., 1890.
=Knop, W.= Chemisch-physiol. Untersuchung über die Flechten. Ann. Chem. XLIX. pp. 103-124, 1844.
—— Chemischer Beitrag zur Physiologie der Flechten. Chem. Zentralbl. III. pp. 172-176, 1872.
=Knop, W. and Schnederman, G.= Chemisch-physiologische Untersuchung der Flechten und zwar der Cetraria islandica. Flora, XXIX. pp. 238-239, 1846.
—— Chemisch-physiologische Untersuchungen über die Flechten. Erdm. Journ. prakt. Chem. XXXIX. pp. 363-367, 1846.
=Knowles, Matilda C.= The maritime and marine Lichens of Howth. Sci. Proc. Roy. Dublin Soc. XIV. (N.S.), No. 6, pp. 79-143 (7 pls.), 1913.
—— Results of a Biological Survey of Blackrod Bay, Co. Mayo. Lichenes. Dept. Agric. Techn. Instr. Ireland, pp. 22-26, 1915.
=Kobert, R.= Ueber Giftstoffe der Flechten. Sitzungsb. Naturf. Ges. Dorpat, X. pp. 157-166, 1895.
=Koelreuter, J. G.= Das entdeckte Geheimnisz der Cryptogamie. Carlsruhe, 1777.
=Koerber, G. G.= De Gonidiis Lichenum. Berlin, 1839.
—— Einige Bemerkungen über individuelle Fortpflanzung der Flechten. Flora, XXIV. pp. 6 and 17, 1841.
—— Systema Lichenum Germaniae. Breslau, 1855.
=Kotte, J.= Einige neue Fälle von Nebensymbiose (Parasymbiose). Inaug.-Diss., G. Fischer, Jena, 1909. (Bot. Centralbl. XXIII. p. 19, 1910.)
=Krabbe, G.= Entwickelung, Sprossung und Theilung einiger Flechtenapothecien. Bot. Zeit. XL. pp. 65-83, 89-99, 105-116, 121-142 (2 pls.), 1882.
—— Morphologie und Entwickelungsgeschichte der Cladoniaceen. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. I. pp. 64-77, 1883.
—— Entwickelungsgeschichte und Morphologie der polymorphen Flechtengattung Cladonia. Leipzig (12 pls.), 1891.
=Kratzmann, E.= Der microchemische Nachweis und die Verteilung des Aluminiums im Pflanzenreiche. Sitzungsb. K. Akad. Wiss. Math.-Nat. Cl. Wien, XXVII. 2, Abt. I. pp. 311-336, 1913. (Mycol. Centralbl. V. p. 36, 1914.)
=Krempelhuber, August von.= Die Lichenen-Flora Bayerns. Regensburg, 1861.
—— Geschichte und Litteratur der Lichenologie, I. 1867: II. 1869-1872.
—— Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Lichenen-Flora der Südsee-Inseln. Journ. Mus. Godeffroy, Hamburg, IV. pp. 93-100 (1 pl.), 1873.
=Kützing, F. T.= Phycologia Generalis. Leipzig, 1843.
=Lacour, E.= Analyse chimique du Lichen esculentus manne du désert ou manne des Hébreux. Just. Bot. Jahresb. für 1880, I. p. 463, 1883.
=Lang, Eugen.= Beiträge zur Anatomie der Krustenflechten. Fünfstück’s Beitr. Wiss. Bot. V. pp. 162-188 (13 figs.), 1903.
=Laubert, R.= Ein interessanter neuer Pilz an absterbenden Apfelbäumen. Gartenflora, LX. p. 76, 1911.
=Leighton, W. A.= The British Species of Angiocarpous Lichens elucidated by their sporidia. 101 pp. (30 pls.). London, 1851.
—— Monograph of British Graphideae. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 2, XIII. pp. 81-97, etc. (4 pls.), 1854.
—— Monograph of the British Umbilicariae. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 2, XVIII. pp. 273-297 (1 pl.), 1856.
—— Notes on Lichens collected by Sir John Richardson in Arctic America. Journ. Linn. Soc. Bot. IX. pp. 184-200 (1 pl.), 1867.
—— Notulae Lichenologicae, No. XXX. Further Notes on the Lichens of Cader Idris, North Wales. Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 4, IV. pp. 198-202, 1869.
—— The Lichens of Ceylon collected by G. H. K. Thwaites. Trans. Linn. Soc. XXVII. pp. 161-185 (2 pls.), 1869.
—— The Lichen Flora of Great Britain, Ireland and the Channel Islands. Shrewsbury, 1871; ed. 3, 1879.
=Léorier.= Rapport fait à la Société Linnéenne sur le procédé de M. Roy de Tonnerre pour retirer de l’alcool des Lichens. Soc. Linn. Paris, IV. pp. 219-225, 1825.
=Lesdain, Bouly de.= Lichens de Dunkerque. Dunkerque, 1910¹.
—— Végétation de l’argile des Polders. Comptes Rendus Congrès, Soc. Savantes, 1909. Sciences, 8 pp. Paris, 1910².
—— Écologie d’une petite panne dans les dunes des environs de Dunkerque. Bull. Soc. Bot. France, Sér. 4, XII. pp. 177-184, 207-284, 1912.
=Lett, H. W.= Report on the Mosses, Hepatics and Lichens of the Mourne Mountains district. Proc. Roy. Irish Acad. Ser. 3, I. pp. 319-325, 1890.
=Lettau, G.= Beiträge zur Lichenographie von Thüringen. Hedwigia, LI. pp. 176-220, 1915.
—— Nachweis und Verhalten einiger Flechtensäuren. Hedwigia, LV. pp. 1-78, 1914.
=Lightfoot, John.= Flora Scotica, II. London, 1777.
=Lindau, G.= Ueber die Anlage und Entwickelung einiger Flechtenapothecien. Flora, LXXI. pp. 451-489 (1 pl.), 1888.
—— Die Beziehungen der Flechten zu den Pilzen. Hedwigia, XXXIV. pp. 195-204, 1895¹.
—— Lichenologische Untersuchungen, Heft I. Ueber Wachstum und Anheftungsweise der Rindenflechten. 4to, 66 pp. (3 pls.), Dresden, 1895².
—— Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Gattung Gyrophora. Festschrift für Schwendener, pp. 19-37 (2 pls.), 1899. (Hedwigia, XXXVIII. Beibl. p. 101, 1899.)
=Lindsay, W. Lauder.= Experiments on the Dyeing Properties of Lichens. Edin. New Phil. Journ. LVII. pp. 228-249, 1854, and LVIII. pp. 56-80, 1855.
—— A Popular History of British Lichens. London, 1856.
—— Monograph of the genus Abrothallus. Trans. Brit. Assoc., 41 pp. (2 col. pls.), 1856.
—— Memoir on the Spermogones and Pycnides of Filamentous, Fruticulose, and Foliaceous Lichens. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin. XXII. pp. 101-303 (11 pls.), 1859.
=Lindsay, W. Lauder.= Observations on new Lichenicolous Micro-Fungi. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb. XXV. pp. 513-555 (2 pls.), 1869¹.
—— Observations on the Lichens collected by Dr Robert Brown in West Greenland in 1867. Trans. Linn. Soc. XXVII. pp. 305-368 (5 pls. col.), 1869².
—— The Lichen Flora of Greenland. Trans. Bot. Soc. Edinb. X. pp. 32-65, 1870¹.
—— Experiments on Colour-Reaction as a specific character in Lichens. Tom. cit. pp. 82-98, 1870².
—— Enumeration of Micro-Lichens parasitic on other Lichens. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci. IX. pp. 49-57, etc., 1869².
—— Observations on Lichenicolous Micro-Parasites. Op. cit. XI. pp. 28-42, 1871.
—— Memoir on the Spermogones and Pycnides of Crustaceous Lichens. Trans. Linn. Soc. XXVIII. pp. 189-318 (8 pls.), 1872.
—— The true Nature of Lichens. Nature, XIII. p. 247, 1876.
—— Fossil Lichens. Gard. Chron. VIII. p. 566, 1877.
—— Fossil Lichens. Trans. and Proc. Bot. Soc. Edinb. XIII. pp. 160-165, 1879.
=Link, H. F.= Florae Goettingensis Specimen sistens vegetabilia saxo calcareo propria. Hildesheim, 1789.
—— Einige Bemerkungen über den Standort (loca natalia) der Pflanzen. Usteri, Ann. Bot. XIV. pp. 1-17, 1795.
=Linkola, K.= Ueber die Thallusschuppen bei Peltigera lepidophora. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. XXXI. pp. 52-54 (1 pl.), 1913.
=Linnaeus, Carolus.= Flora Lapponica. Amsterdam, 1737.
—— Genera Plantarum, etc. Leyden, 1737.
—— Species Plantarum. Stockholm, 1753.
—— Plantae Tinctoriae (E. Jörlin, Upsala, 1759). Amoenitates Academicae, Holmiae, V. pp. 314-342, 1760.
—— Oeconomia Naturae (Isacus J. Biberg, Upsala, 1749). Amoenitates Academicae, Holmiae, ed. 2, II. pp. 1-52, 1762.
—— Lachesis Lapponica or a Tour in Lappland ... translated by J. E. Smith. 2 Vols. illust. London, 1811.
=Lister, Gulielma.= A Monograph of the Mycetozoa, ed. 2. Brit. Mus., London, 1911.
—— Haunts of the Mycetozoa. Essex Naturalist, XVIII. pp. 301-321, 1918.
=Lloyd, C. G.= Synopsis of some genera of the large Pyrenomycetes. Cincinnati, Ohio. 17 pp. (pls. and figs.). Jan. 1917.
=L’Obel, Mathias de (Lobelius).= Plantarum seu Stirpium Historia, etc. illust. Antwerp, 1576.
=Lotzy, J. P.= Beiträge zur Biologie der Flechtenflora des Hambergs bei Göttingen. Diss. Göttingen, 1890.
=Ludwig, R.= Fossile Pflanzen aus der ältesten Abtheilung der Rheinisch-Wetterauer Tertiär-Formationen. Meyer, Palaeontographica, VIII. pp. 39-154, 1859-1861.
=Lutz, K. G.= Ueber die sogenannte Netzbildung bei Ramalina reticulata Krplhbr. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. XII. pp. 207-214 (figs.), 1894.
=Luyken, J. A.= Tentamen Historiae Lichenum, etc. Göttingen, 1809.
=McLean, R. C.= Ecology of Maritime Lichens at Blakeney Point, Norfolk. Journ. Ecol. III. pp. 129-148 (1 pl. and figs.), 1915.
=Macmillan, Conway.= Observations on the Distribution of Plants along the shore at Lake of the Woods. Minn. Bot. Stud. I. pp. 949-1022 (pls.), 1894.
=Maheu, Jacques.= Contribution à l’Étude de la Flore souterraine de France. Ann. Sci. Nat. Sér. 9, III. Chap. IV. Lichens, pp. 98-101, 1906.
—— Les Lichens des hauts Sommets du Massif de la Tarentaise (Savoie). Bull. Soc. Bot. France, LIV. pp. 232-240, 1907.
=Maire, René.= Recherches cytologiques sur quelques Ascomycètes. Ann. Mycol. III. pp. 123-154 (3 pls.), 1905.
=Malinowski, E.= Sur la biologie et l’écologie des lichens épilithiques. Bull. Acad. Sci. Cracovie, Sér. B. Sci. Nat. pp. 349-390 (1 pl., 6 figs.), 1911.
=Malme, G. O.= Ein Fall antagonistischer Symbiose zweier Flechtenarten. Bot. Centralbl. LXIV. pp. 46-49, 1895.
=Malpighi, Marcello.= Opera Omnia, II. Londini, 1686.
=Martius, Ph. V.= Flora Brasiliensis, etc. I. Stuttgart and Tübingen, 1833.
=Massalongo, A. B.= Synopsis Lichenum blasteniospororum. Flora, XXXV. pp. 545-576, 1852.
—— Ricerche sull’autonomia dei Licheni crostosi. Verona, 1852.
—— Monografia dei Licheni blasteniospori. Atti Ist. Sci. Lett. ed Arti, Ser. 2, III. Appendice III. 131 pp. (6 pls.), 1852. (Reprint, Venezia, 1853.)
=Massee, G.= On Gasterolichenes, a new type of the Group Lichenes. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, CLXXVIII. pp. 305-309 (2 pls.), 1887.
=Mattirolo, Oreste.= Contribuzioni allo studio del genere Cora Fr. Nuovo Giorn. Bot. Ital. XIII. pp. 245-267 (2 pls.), 1881.
=Mäule, C.= Ueber die Fruchtanlage bei Physcia pulverulenta. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. IX. pp. 209-213, 1891.
=Mayfield, A.= The Lichens of a Boulder-Clay Area. Journ. Ipswich, etc. Field Club, V. pp. 34-40, 1916.
=Mereschkovsky, Const.= Note sur une nouvelle forme de Parmelia vivant à l’état libre. Bull. Soc. Bot. Genève, Sér. 2, X. pp. 26-34, 1918.
=Merrett, Christopher.= Pinax rerum naturalium Britannicarum, continens Vegetabilia, Animalia, etc. London, 1666.
=Metzger, Otto.= Untersuchungen über die Entwicklung der Flechtenfrucht. Fünfstück’s Beiträge Wiss. Bot. V. pp. 108-144 (7 figs.), 1903.
=Meyer, Arthur.= Die Plasmaverbindungen und die Fusionen der Pilze der Florideenreihe. Bot. Zeit. LX. pp. 139-178 (1 pl.), 1902.
=Meyer, G. F. W.= Die Entwickelung, Metamorphose und Fortpflanzung der Flechten. Goettingen, 1825.
=Michael, A. D.= British Oribatidae. London Ray Society, 2 vols. (pls.), 1884.
=Michaux, André.= Flora Boreali-Americana, II. p. 320 etc., Paris and Strasburg, 1803.
=Micheli, Pier Antonio.= Nova Plantarum Genera. Florence, 1729.
=Minks, Arthur.= Das Microgonidium. Flora, LXI., Nos. 14-20, pp. 209, etc., 1878.
—— Das Microgonidium. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntniss des wahren Wesens der Flechten. Basel, V. and 249 pp., 6 pls. col., 1879.
=Miyoshi, Manabu.= Die essbare Flechte Japans, Gyrophora esculenta n. sp. Bot. Centralbl. LVI. pp. 161-163, 1893.
—— Ueber die Sporocarpenevacuation und darauf erfolgendes Sporenausstreuen bei einer Flechte. Journ. Coll. Sci. Imp. Univ. Tōkyō, XV. pp. 367-370 (1 pl.), 1901.
=Moebius, M.= Ueber einige in Portorico gesammelte Süsswasser und Luft-Algen. Hedwigia, XXVII. pp. 221-249 (3 pls.), 1888.
=Mohl, Hugo.= Einige Bemerkungen über die Entwickelung und den Bau der Sporen der Cryptogamischen Gewächse. Flora, XVI. p. 55, 1833.
=Molisch, H.= Die Pflanze in ihren Beziehungen zum Eisen. Jena, 1892.
=Möller, Alfred.= Ueber die Cultur flechtenbildender Ascomyceten ohne Algen. Unters. aus Bot. Inst. K. Akad. Münster i. W., 52 pp., 1887.
—— Ueber die sogenannten Spermatien der Ascomyceten. Bot. Zeit. XLVI. pp. 421-425, 1888.
—— Ueber die eine Thelephoree, welche die Hymenolichenen, Cora. Dictyonema und Laudatea bildet. Flora, LXXVII. pp. 254-278, 1893.
=Montagne, Cam.= Cryptogamia Guyanensis, etc. Ann. Sci. Nat. XVI. pp. 47-63, 1851.
=Moreau, Fernand (M. and Mme).= L’évolution nucléaire et les phénomènes de la sexualité chez les lichens du genre Peltigera. Comptes Rendus, CLX. pp. 526-528, 1915.
=Moreau, Fernand (M. and Mme).= Les phénomènes de la sexualité chez les Lichens du genre Solorina. Op. cit. CLXII. pp. 793-795, 1916².
—— Quelques observations sur un Ascomycète parasite du Peltigera polydactyla. Bull. Soc. Mycol. Fr. XXXII. pp. 49-53 (3 figs.), 1916³.
—— La Biomorphogénèse chez les Lichens. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France, XXXIV. pp. 84-85, 1918.
=Moreau, Fernand.= Sur le rôle de l’amyloide des asques et son utilisation éventuelle comme matière de réserve. Bull. Soc. Mycol. Fr. XXXII. pp. 25-26, 1916².
=Morison, Robert.= Plantarum Historiae Universalis Oxoniensis III. Oxford, 1699.
=Moss, C. E.= Vegetation of the Peak District. Cambridge, 1913.
=Mudd, W.= A Manual of British Lichens. Darlington, 1861.
—— Monograph of British Cladoniae. Cambridge, 1865.
=Mühlenberg, H.= Catalogue of the Plants of North America. Philadelphia, 1813.
=Mulder, G. J.= Ueber das Inulin und die Moosstärke. Erdm. Journ. Chem. XV. pp. 299-302, 1838.
=Müller, Jean (Müller-Argau).= Principes de Classification des Lichens. Mém. Soc. Phys. et Hist. Nat. Genève, XVI. 2, pp. 343-435 (3 pls.), 1862.
—— Notice sur la nature des lichens. Archiv Soc. Phys. Nat. Genève, I. pp. 49-55, 1878.
—— Lichenes japonici. Flora, LXII. pp. 481-487, 1879.
—— Enumeratio Lichenum Aegyptiacorum. Roumeguère Rev. Mycol. II. pp. 73-83, 1880.
—— Lichenologische Beiträge, XII. and XIV. Flora, LXIV. p. 111 and pp. 513-527, 1881; Beiträge, XXI. op. cit. LXVIII. p. 345, 1885; Beiträge, XXXIII. op. cit. LXXIII. p. 202, 1890.
—— Lichens de Palestine. Rev. Mycol. VI. pp. 12-13, 1884.
—— Enumeratio Lichenum aegyptiacorum. Tom. cit. pp. 13-20, 1884.
—— Lichenes Persici, etc. Hedwigia, XXXI. pp. 151-159, 1892.
=Müller, Karl.= Die chemische Zusammensetzung der Zellmembranen bei verschiedenen Kryptogamen. Zeitschr. Phys. Chemie, XLV. pp. 265-298, 1905.
=Münster, Georg, Count.= Beiträge zur Petrefacten-Kunde. Heft VI., 1846.
=Necker, N. J. de.= Methodus Muscorum, etc. Mannheim, 1771.
=Nees von Esenbeck.= Handbuch der Botanik, I. Nürnberg, 1820.
=Neubert, Adolf.= I. Toxikologische Studien über einige organische Säuren. Diss. Dorpat (Jurjew), 1893. See Zopf, Die Flechtenstoffe, p. 376, 1907.
=Neubner, Eduard.= Untersuchungen über den Thallus und die Fruchtanfänge der Calycieen. Wiss. Beil. IV. Jahresber. K. Gymnas. Plauen I. V. 12 pp., 1893.
=Nienburg, W.= Beiträge zur Entwickelungsgeschichte einiger Flechtenapothecien. Flora, XCVIII. pp. 1-40 (7 pls., 3 figs.), 1908.
—— Ueber die Beziehungen zwischen den Algen und Hyphen im Flechtenthallus. Zeitschr. für Bot. IX. pp. 529-543 (1 pl., 6 figs.), 1917.
=Nilson, Birger.= Zur Entwickelungsgeschichte, Morphologie und Systematik der Flechten. Bot. Not. pp. 1-33, 1903.
—— Die Flechtenvegetation des Sarekgebirges. Hamberg’s Nat. Wiss. Untersuch. Sarekgebirges in Schwedisch-Lappland, III. pp. 1-70 (9 pls.), Stockholm, 1907; Bot. Centralbl CV. p. 309, 1907.
=Norman, J. M.= Conatus praemissus redactionis novae generum, etc. Nyt. Mag. Naturvid. VII. pp. 213-252, 1852.
—— Fuligines lichenosae Moriolei. Bot. Not. pp. 9-20, 1872.
—— Allelositismus eller det forhold, etc. K. Norsk. Vid. Selsk. Skrift. VII. pp. 243-255 , 1874.
=Notaris, G. de.= Frammenti lichenografici di un lavoro inedito. Giorn. Bot. Ital. II. pp. 174-224 and 299-330, 1846.
=Nylander, W.= Conspectus Florae Helsingforsiensis. Helsingfors Act. Soc. Sci. Fenn. III. p. 62, 1852.
—— Observationes aliquot ad Synopsin Lichenum Holmiensium. Bot. Not. pp. 175-180, 1852.
—— Essai d’une nouvelle classification des Lichens. Mém. Soc. Sci. Nat. Cherbourg, II. pp. 5-16, 1854.
—— Second Mémoire. Op. cit. III. pp. 161-202, 1855.
—— Synopsis Lichenum. Paris, 2 vols. 1858-1860 and 1885.
—— Lichenes adnotati in Armorica, ad Pornic. Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr. VIII. pp. 753-759, 1861.
—— Adhuc circa characteres quosdam Lichenum. Flora, XLIX. pp. 177-181, 1866¹.
—— Circa novum in studio Lichenum criterium chemicum. Flora, XLIX. pp. 198-201 (1866)¹.
—— Les Lichens du Jardin du Luxembourg. Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr. XIII. pp. 364-371, 1866.
—— Lichenes Kurziani e Calcutta. Flora, L. pp. 3-9, 1867.
—— Exemplum cephalodiorum in Sphaerophoro. Flora, LII. pp. 68-69, 1869.
—— Animadversio de theoria gonidiorum algologica. Flora, LIII. pp. 52-53, 1870.
—— Review, including notes, on the Algo-Lichen hypothesis. Flora, LVII. pp. 56, etc., 1874. Translation by Crombie. Grevillea, II. pp. 145-152, 1874.
—— Addenda nova ad Lichenographiam Europaeam. Flora, LVII. p. 306, 1874.
—— Céphalodies. Baillon’s Dictionnaire de Botanique, IX. p. 69, 1878.
—— Addenda nova ad Lichenographiam Europaeam. Flora, LXVI. pp. 97-109, 1883.
—— Lichenes Novae Zelandiae. Paris, 1888.
—— Lichenes Japoniae. Paris, 1890.
—— Sertum Lichenææ Tropicæ, Labuan et Singapore. Paris, 1891.
—— Lichenes Ceylonenses, etc. Act. Soc. Sci. Fenn. XXVI. n. 10, 33 pp., 1900.
=Nylander, W. and Crombie. J. M.= On a collection of Lichens made in Eastern Asia by the late Dr A. C. Maingay. Journ. Linn. Soc. XX. pp. 48-69, 1884.
=Ohlert, Arnold.= Lichenologische Aphorismen, II. Schrift. Naturf. Ges. Danzig. Neue Folge 2, III., Heft 4, 34 pp., 1871.
=Olivier, H.= Lichens d’Europe. Cherbourg, Fasc. 1 and 2, 1907, 1909.
=Parkinson, John.= Theatrum Botanicum: The Theater of Plants, or, an Herball of a large extent, etc. London, 1640.
=Patouillard, N.= Plantes Cellulaires de la Tunisie. (Lichens by A. Hue. pp. 136-151.) Paris, 1897.
=Paulson, R.= Notes on the Ecology of Lichens. Essex Naturalist, XVIII. pp. 276-286 (2 pls.), 1918.
—— The Lichen Flora of Hertfordshire. Trans. Herts. Nat. Hist. Soc. XVII. pp. 83-96 (1 pl.), 1919.
=Paulson, R. and Hastings, Somerville.= A wandering Lichen. Knowledge, XXXVII. pp. 319-323, 1914.
—— The Relation between the Alga and Fungus of a Lichen. Journ. Linn. Soc. XLIV. pp. 497-506 (2 pls.), 1920.
=Paulson, R. and Thompson, P. G.= Reports on the Lichens of Epping Forest (First paper), Essex Naturalist, XVI. pp. 136-145, 1911; (Second paper), op. cit. XVII. pp. 90-105, 1913.
=Peirce, G. J.= Fixing and Imbedding Lichens. Journ. Applied Microscopy. Rochester, N.Y. =I.= pp. 99-100, 1898.
—— On the mode of dissemination and on the reticulations of Ramalina reticulata. Bot. Gaz XXV. pp. 404-417, 1898.
—— The Nature of the Association of Alga and Fungus in Lichens. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. Ser. 3, I. pp. 207-240 (1 pl.), 1899.
=Peirce, G. J.= The Relation of Fungus and Alga in Lichens. The American Naturalist, XXXIV. pp. 245-253, 1900.
=Persoon, C. H.= Einige Bemerkungen über die Flechten, etc. Usteri, Ann. Bot. VII. pp. 1-32, 1794.
—— Synopsis Methodica Fungorum. Göttingen, 1801.
=Petch, T.= The black termite of Ceylon. Ann. Roy. Bot. Gardens, Peradeniya, V. part 6, pp. 395-420, 1913.
=Petiver, J.= Musei Petiveriani. Cent. II. and III. London, 1695.
—— Pterigraphia Americana (Gazophylacium, Vol. II.). London, 1712.
=Pfaff, C. H.= Ueber eine neue eigenthümliche Säure in dem isländischen Moose (Cetraria islandica). Schweigger Journ. Chem. Phys. XLVII. pp. 476-483, 1826. See Berzelius, Jahresb. VII. pp. 216-217, 1828.
=Pfeffer, W.= Die Oelkörper der Lebermoose. Flora, LVII. pp. 2-6, etc. (1 pl.), 1877.
=Phillips, W.= Lichens, their rate of Growth. Gard. Chron. n.s. IX. p. 624, 1878.
=Plot, Robert.= The Natural History of Staffordshire. Oxford, 1686.
=Plowright, C. B.= British Uredineae and Ustilagineae. London, 1889.
=Plukenet, Leonard.= Phytographia. London, 1691-1696.
=Porta, Joh. Bapt.= Phytognomonica ... octo libris contenta. Naples, 1588.
=Porter, Lilian.= Attachment Organs of corticolous Ramalinae. Proc. Roy. Irish Acad. XXXIV. pp. 17-32 (3 pls.), 1917.
—— On the attachment organs of some common Parmeliae. Proc. Roy. Irish Acad. XXXIV. pp. 205-211 (3 pls.), 1919.
=Proust, J. L.= L’utilité du Lichen d’Islande comme Aliment. Journ. Phys. Chim. Hist. Nat. LXIII. pp. 81-96, 1806.
=Raab,—.= Excursion in die Gegend von Muggendorf. Flora, II. pp. 289-304, 1819.
=Radais, M.= Sur la culture pure d’une algue verte; formation de chlorophylle à l’obscurité. Comptes Rendus, CXXX. pp. 793-796, 1900.
=Rave, P.= Untersuchung einiger Flechten aus der Gattung Pseudevernia in Bezug auf ihre Stoffwechselprodukte. Inaug.-Diss. von Münter i. W. Borna, Leipzig, 1908. (Hedwigia, XLVII. (171), 1908.)
=Ray, John.= Catalogus Plantarum Angliae, etc. London, 1670.
—— Historia Plantarum. London, I. 1686; II. 1688; III. 1704.
—— Synopsis Methodica Stirpium Britannicarum. London, ed. 1, 1690; ed. 2, 1696; ed. 3 (edited by Dillenius), 1724.
=Rees, Max.= Ueber die Entstehung der Flechte Collema glaucescens Hoffm. Monatsber. K. Acad. Wiss. Berlin, pp. 523-533 (1 pl.), 1871.
=Rehm, H.= Die Pilze Deutschlands, etc., Ascomyceten. Rabenhorst’s Krypt.-Flora, I. 3, 1887-1896.
=Reinke, J.= Ueber die anatomische Verhältnisse einiger Arten von Gunnera. Göttingen, Nachrichten, pp. 100-108, 1872.
—— Morphologische Abhandlungen. Leipzig, 1873.
—— Abhandlungen über Flechten, I. and II. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. XXVI. pp. 495-542, 1894; Abh. III. and IV. op. cit. XXVIII. pp. 39-150 and 359-486, 1895; Abh. V. op. cit. XXIX. pp. 171-236, 1896.
=Reinke, J. and Grisebach, A. H. R.= A. S. Oersted’s System der Pilze Lichenen und Algen. Leipzig, 1873.
=Relhan, Richard.= Flora Cantabrigiensis. Cambridge, 1785; ed. 3, 1820.
=Richard, O.-J.= Catalogue des Lichens des Deux-Sèvres. Niort, 1877.
=Riddle, Lincoln Ware.= The North American species of Stereocaulon. Bot. Gaz. pp. 285-304, 1910.
—— Pyrenothrix nigra, gen. et sp. nov. Bot. Gaz. LXIV. pp. 513-515 (4 figs.), 1917.
=Ronceray, P. L.= Contribution à l’étude des Lichens à orseille. Paris, 94 pp. (3 pls.), 1904.
—— Orseille (Translation). The Pharmaceutical Journal, Ser. 4, XIX. p. 734, 1904.
=Rosendahl, F.= Vergleichend anatomische Untersuchungen über den braunen Parmelien., Dissertation Münster 1907, and in Nova Acta Abh. K. Leop.-Carol. Deutsch. Akad. Naturf. LXXXVII. 3, pp. 403-459 (4 pls.), 1907.
=Ruel, J. (Ruellius).= De natura stirpium, etc. Paris, 1536.
=Ruppius, Heinr. Bernh.= Flora Jenensis. Frankfurt and Leipzig, 1718.
=Sachs, Jul.= Zur Entwickelungsgeschichte des Collema pulposum Ach. etc. Bot. Zeitung, XII. pp. 1-9 (1 pl.), 1855.
=Salter, J. H.= Protoplasmic connections in Lichens. Journ. Bot. XL. p. 48, 1902.
=Salter, J. W.= On some Reactions of Oxalic acid. Chem. Gaz. XIV. pp. 130-131, 1856.
=Sandstede, H.= Rügen’s Flechtenflora. Verh. Bot. Ver. Prov. Brandenburg, XLV. pp. 110-140, 1904.
=Sappin-Trouffy, P.= Recherches histologiques sur la famille des Urédinées. Le Botaniste, Sér. 5, pp. 59-244, 1896.
=Sättler, Hans.= Untersuchungen und Erörterungen über die Ökologie und Phylogenie der Cladoniapodetien. Hedwigia, LIV. pp. 226-263 (5 pls.), 1914.
=Schade, A.= Die Schwefelflechte der Sachseschen Schweiz. Abh. Naturw. Gesell. “Isis” in Dresden 1916, pp. 28-44. See also Ann. Mycol. XV. p. 511, 1917.
=Schaerer, Ludov. Eman.= Lichenum Helveticorum Spicilegium. Bern, 1823-1842.
=Schellenberg, H.= Beiträge zur Kenntniss der verholtzten Zellmembran. Jahr. Wiss. Bot. XXIX. p. 249, 1896.
=Schikorra, Walter.= Ueber die Entwickelungsgeschichte von Monascus. Zeitschr. Bot. I. pp. 378-410 (1 pl., 1 fig.), 1909.
=Schimper, W. P.= Traité de Paléontologie Végétale, I. Paris, 1869.
=Schneider, Albert.= A Text-Book of General Lichenology. Binghampton, N.Y., 1897.
=Schreber, J. C. D.= Linnaei ... Genera Plantarum, ed. 8, II. Frankfurt am Main, 1789-1791.
=Schrenk, Hermann von.= On the Mode of Dissemination of Usnea barbata. Trans. Acad. Sci. St Louis, VIII. pp. 189-198 (1 pl.), 1898.
=Schulte, Fritz.= Zur Anatomie der Flechtengattung Usnea. Beih. Bot. Centralbl. XVIII. 2, pp. 1-22 (3 pls. and figs.), 1904.
=Schwarz, Fr.= Chemische-botanische Studien über die in den Flechten vorkommenden Flechtensäuren. Cohn’s Beitr. Biol. III. pp. 249-265, 1880.
=Schwenckfeld, Caspar.= Stirpium et fossilium Silesiae catalogus, etc. Leipzig, 1600.
=Schwendener, S.= Untersuchungen über den Flechtenthallus, Naegeli’s Beitr. Wiss. Bot. Leipzig, II. pp. 109-186 (7 col. pls.), 1860.
—— Op. cit. III. pp. 127-198 (4 col. pls.), 1863.
—— Op. cit. IV. pp. 161-202 (2 col. pls.), 1868.
—— Ueber die Entwickelung der Apothecien von Coenogonium Linkii. Flora, XLV. pp. 225-234 (1 pl.), 1862.
—— Ueber die “Apothecia primitus aperta” und die Entwickelung der Apothecien im Allgemeinen. Flora, XLVII. pp. 321-332, 1864.
—— Ueber den angeblichen Protothallus der Krustenflechten. Flora, XLIX. pp. 401-412 (1 pl.), 1866.
—— Ueber den Bau des Flechtenthallus. Verh. Schweiz. Naturf. Ges. Aarau, p. 88, 1867.
—— Die Algentypen der Flechtengonidien. Basel (3 col. pls.), 1869.
—— Erörterungen zur Gonidienfrage. Flora, LV. pp. 161-166; 177-183; 193-202; 225-234 (1 pl.), 1872.
—— Die Flechten als Parasiten der Algen. Verh. Schweiz. Naturf. Ges. Basel, V. pp. 551-557, 1873¹.
—— Erörterungen zur Gonidienfrage. Flora, LV. pp. 161, etc., 1872. Translated Archer, Quart. Journ. Micros. Sci. XIII. pp. 235-251 (2 pls.), 1873².
=Scopoli, J. A.= Flora carniolica. Vienna, 1760; ed. 2, 1772.
—— Anni historico-naturales, II. Lichenis islandici vires medicae. Leipzig, pp. 107-118, 1769.
=Scott-Elliot, G. F.= Notes on the Trap Flora of Renfrewshire. Ann. Anders. Nat. Hist. Glasgow, III. Reprint, 10 pp., 1907.
=Senft, E.= Ein neues Verfahren zum mikrochemischen Nachweis der Flechtensäuren. Phar. Praxis. Vienna and Leipzig, VI. 12, 9 pp. (text figs.). 1907. Hedwigia, XLVIII. Beibl. pp. 24-25, 1908.
=Sernander, R.= On förekomsten af stentafvar på gammalt trä. Bot. Notis. pp. 17-33, 1891.
—— Om de buskartade lafvarnes hapterer. Bot. Notis. 1901, pp. 21 and 107, etc. See also Bot. Centralbl. LXXXVIII. p. 293, 1901.
—— Om några former för art och varietets-bildnung hos lafvarna. Svensk. Bot. Tidskr. I. pp. 97-115 and 135-186 (5 pls.), 1907.
—— Subfossile Flechten. Flora, CXII. pp. 703-724 (7 figs.), 1918.
=Servettaz, Camille.= Recherches expérimentales sur le Développement et la nutrition des Mousses en milieux stérilisés. Ann. Sci. Nat., Sér. 9, XVII. p. 111, 1913.
=Servit, Mir.= Zur Flechtenflora Böhmens und Mährens. Hedwigia, L. pp. 51-85, 1910.
=Sibbald, Robert.= Scotia illustrata. Part 2, I. De Plantis Scotiae, etc. Edinburgh, 1684.
=Sibthorp, J.= Flora Oxoniensis, etc. Oxford, 1794.
=Sievers, F.= Ueber die Wasserversorgung der Flechten. Wiss. Beil. 38 Jahresber. Ber. Landw. Schule Marienberg, 52 pp., 1908. (Bot. Centralbl. CXIII. p. 22, 1910.)
=Sloane, Hans.= Catalogus Plantarum quae in Insula Jamaica sponte proveniunt. London, 1696.
—— A voyage to ... Jamaica with the Natural History of Herbs, Trees, etc. London, 1707.
=Smith, A. Lorrain.= British Coenogoniaceae. Journ. Bot. XLIV. pp. 266-268, 1906.
—— Fungal parasites of Lichens. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. III. pp. 174-178, 1910.
—— Monograph of British Lichens, Part II. London, 1911. Part I., 1918.
=Smith, J. E.= English Botany. London, 1790-1814.
—— Linnaeus’ Lachesis Lapponica or a Tour in Lappland. 2 Vols. London, 1811.
=Sorby, H. C.= Comparative Vegetable Chromatology. Proc. Roy. Soc. XXI. pp. 442-483 (1873).
=Speerschneider, J.= Zur Entwickelungsgeschichte der Hagenia ciliaris. Bot. Zeit. XI. pp. 705, etc., 1853.
—— Zur Anatomie und Entwickelungsgeschichte der Usnea barbata dasypoga Fr. Bot. Zeit. XII. pp. 193, etc. (1 pl.), 1854.
=Spiegel, A.= Ueber die Vulpinsäure. Ber. Deutsch. Chem. Ges. XIII. pp. 1629-1635, 1880; tom. cit. pp. 2219-2221; op. cit. XIV. pp. 1686-1696, 1881.
=Sprengel, K.= Einleitung in das Studium der kryptogamischen Gewächse, 1804. Eng. ed. London (Letter XXV.), 1807.
=Stahel, Gerold.= Stickstoffbildung durch Pilze bei gleichzeitiger Ernährung mit gebundenem Stickstoff. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. XLIX. pp. 579-615, 1911.
=Stahl, E.= Beiträge zur Entwickelungsgeschichte der Flechten. Heft I. and II. 55, and 32 pp. (4 pls. 2 col.). Leipzig, 1877.
—— Die Schutzmittel der Flechten gegen Tierfrass. Festschrift zum siebzigsten Geburtstage von Ernst Haeckel. Jena, pp. 357-375, 1904.
=Stahlecker, Eugen.= Untersuchungen über Thallusbau in ihren Beziehungen zum Substrat bei siliciseden Krustenflechten. Fünfstück’s Beitr. Wiss. Bot. V. pp. 405-451 (10 figs.), 1906.
=Steiner, J.= Verrucaria calciseda, Petractis exanthematica, ein Beitrag zur Kenntniss des Baues und der Entwickelung der Krustenflechten. Programm K.K. Staatsobergymn. Klagenfurt, XXXI. 50 pp. (1 pl.), 1881.
—— Ein Beitrag zur Flechtenflora der Sahara. Sitzungsb. K. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-Nat. Cl. CIV. pp. 384-393, 1895.
=Steiner, J.= Beitrag zur Flechtenflora Sudpersiens. Sitzungsb. K. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-Nat. Cl. cv. Abth. I. pp. 436-446, 1896.
—— Ueber die Function und den systematischen Wert der Pycnoconidien der Flechten. Festschr. zur Feier des zweihundert Jahr. Best. K.K. Staatsgymn. im VIII. Bezirke Wiens, pp. 119-154, 1901.
—— Flechten auf Madeira und den Kanaren, etc. Oesterr. Bot. Zeitschr. LIV. pp. 333-336, 1904.
—— Flechten aus Transkaukasien. Ann. Mycol. XVII. pp. 1-32, 1919.
=Stenberg, Sten.= Om användandet af Lafvar rason material för framställning af Drufsocker och Alkohol. Oefv. K. Vetensk. Akad. Förh. pp. 17-28, 1868.
—— Om Tillverkning af Lafbränvin. Stockholm, 52 pp., 1868.
—— See also Flora LII. pp. 517-522, 1869.
=Stenhouse, J. and Groves, C. E.= Picroroccellin. Proc. Roy. Soc. XXV. pp. 60-68, 1877.
=Stirton, J.= Additions to the Lichen-Flora of New Zealand. Journ. Linn. Soc. XIV. pp. 458-474, 1875.
—— Description of recently discovered foreign Lichens. Proc. Phil. Soc. Glasgow, X. pp. 156-164, 1874.
=Stizenberger, E.= Lichenaea Africana. Jahresb. Naturw. Ges. St Gallen, 1888-1895.
—— Die Grübchenflechten (Stictei) und ihre geographische Verbreitung. Flora, LXXXI. pp. 88-150, 1895.
=Stone, G. E.= Resemblance of an Insect Larva to a Lichen Fruit. Torrey Bot. Club, XXIII. pp. 454-455, 1896.
=Stüde, Fr.= Ueber Everniin, Pectin und eine neue Glycogene Substanz. Ann. Chem. Pharm. CXXXI. pp. 241-251, 1864.
=Sturgis, W. C.= On the Carpologic Structure and Development of the Collemaceae and allied groups. Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts Sci. XXV. pp. 15-52 (8 pls.), 1890.
=Sutherland, G. K.= New Marine Fungi on Pelvetia. New Phytologist, XIV. pp. 33-42, 1915.
=Swartz, O.= Nova genera et species plantarum, etc. Stockholm, 1788.
—— Observationes Botanicae quibus Plantae Indiae occidentalis, etc. Erlangen, 1791.
=Tabernaemontanus, Jac. Theodor.= Eicones plantarum seu stirpium, etc. Frankfurt, 1590.
=Taylor, T.= Lichenes in Mackay’s Flora Hibernica, II., 1836.
=Thaxter, R.= Preliminary Descriptions of new species of Rickia and Trenomyces. Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts and Sci. XLVIII. pp. 365-386, 1912.
=Thomas, Nesta.= Notes on Cephaleuros. Ann. Bot. XXVII. pp. 781-792 (1 pl.), 1913.
=Thwaites, G. H. K.= On the gonidia of Lichens. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 2, III. pp. 219-222, 1849.
—— Note on Cystocoleus, a new genus of minute plants. Tom. cit. pp. 241-242.
=Tieghem, Ph. van.= Traité de Botanique, I. and II. Paris, 1891.
=Tobler, F.= Das physiologische Gleichgewicht von Pilz und Alge in den Flechten. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. XXVII. pp. 421-427 (1 fig.), 1909.
—— Zur Ernährungsphysiologie der Flechten. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. XXIX. pp. 3-12, 1911¹.
—— Zur Biologie von Flechten und Flechtenpilzen, I., II. Pringsh. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. XLIX. pp. 389-416 (1 pl.), 1911².
=Torrey, J.= A Catalogue of plants growing spontaneously within 30 miles of the city of New York. Albany, 1819.
=Tournefort, Joseph Pitton de.= Élémens de Botanique. Paris, 1694.
—— Institutiones Rei Herbariae. Paris, 1700.
=Treboux, O.= Organische Säuren als Kohlenstoffquelle bei Algen. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. XXIII. pp. 432-441, 1905.
—— Die freilebende Alge und die Gonidie Cystococcus humicola in Bezug auf die Flechtensymbiose. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. XXX. pp. 69-80, 1912.
=Treub, M.= Lichenencultur. Bot. Zeit. XXXI. pp. 721-727 (1 pl.), 1873.
—— Notice sur la nouvelle Flore de Krakatau. Ann. Jard. Bot. Buitenzorg, VII. pp. 213-223, 1888.
=Tuckerman, E.= An Enumeration of some Lichens of New England with Remarks. Boston Journ. Nat. Hist. II. pp. 245-261, 1839.
—— Genera Lichenum (North American). Amherst, 1872.
—— Lichens of Kerguelen’s Land. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club, VI. pp. 57-59, 1875.
=Tulasne, L. R.= Note sur l’appareil reproducteur dans les Lichens et les Champignons. Comptes Rendus, XXXII. pp. 427 and 470, etc., 1851.
—— Mémoire pour servir à l’Histoire Organographique et Physiologique des Lichens. Ann. Sci. Nat., Sér. 3, XVII. pp. 5-128 and 153-249 (16 pls.), 1852.
=Tutt, J. W.= British Lepidoptera. London, vol. II., 1900.
=Uhliř, V.= Ueber Isolation der Algen aus dem Collemacaeen. Živa (1915), p. 233. See also Bot. Centralbl. CXXIX. p. 379, 1915.
=Ulander, A.= Untersuchungen über die Kohlenhydrate der Flechten. Inaug.-Dissert. Göttingen, 8ᵒ, 59 pp., 1905.
=Uloth, W.= Beiträge zur Flora der Laubmoose und Flechten von Kurhessen. II. Flechten. Flora, XLIV. pp. 565, etc., 1861.
=Vaillant, Sebastien.= Botanicon Parisiense, etc. Leyden and Amsterdam, 1727.
=Vallot, J.= Sur la vitesse de croissance d’un lichen saxicole. Rev. Gén. Bot. VIII. pp. 201-202, 1896.
=Ventenat, E. P.= Tableau du règne végétal. Paris, vol. II. p. 36, 1794.
=Villars, M.= Histoire des Plantes de Dauphiné. Grenoble, Lyon, Paris, 1786-1789.
=Visiani, de.= Bericht über einen Regen einer vegetabilischen Nahrungs-Substanz, etc. (1864), translated by Krempelhuber. Flora, L. pp. 197, etc., 1867.
=Volkard, J.= Synthese und Constitution der Vulpinsäure. Ann. Chemie, CCLXXXII. pp. 1-21, 1894.
=Vouaux, Léon.= Synopsis des Champignons parasites de Lichens. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France, XXVIII. pp. 177-208, etc., etc., 1912-1914.
=Wahlberg, A.= Ueber die Apothecienentwicklung bei einigen Flechten der Gattungen Anaptychia und Physcia. Öfvers. Finsk. Vet.-Soc. Förh. XLIV. 30 pp. (1 pl.), 1902.
=Wahrlich, W.= Zur Anatomie der Zelle bei Pilzen und Fadenalgen. Script. Bot. Hort. Univ. Imp. Petrop. IV. pp. 41-100, German résumé (3 pls.), 1893.
=Wainio, E. A.= Tatkimus Cladoniein phylogenetillisesta, etc. Inaug.-Diss. Helsingfors, 62 pp. (1 pl.), 1880.
—— Lichens du Brésil. I. II. Helsingfors, 1890. (Act. Soc. Faun. et Fl. Fenn. VII.)
—— Lichenes Sibiria Meridionali collecti. Act. Soc. Faun. and Fl. Fenn. XIII. n. 6, 20 pp., 1896.
—— Monographia Cladoniarum universalis. Helsingfors, I. 1887; II. 1894; III. 1897.
—— Lichenes in Caucaso, etc. Termész. Füz. XXII. pp. 269-343, 1899.
—— Expédition Antarctic Belge. Résultats du voyage du S.Y. Belgica en 1897-1899, etc. Lichens, 46 pp. (4 tab.), Anvers, 1903.
—— Lichenes ... Pitlekai in Sibiria septentrionali a E. Almquist collecti. Arkiv Bot. VIII. n. 4, 175 pp., 1909.
=Waite, M. B.= Experiments with Fungicides in the removal of Lichens from Pear trees. Journ. Mycol. =VII.= pp. 264-268 (2 pls.), 1893.
=Wallroth, F. W.= Naturgeschichte der Flechten. 2 vols. Frankfurt am Main, 1825-1827.
—— Naturgeschichte der Säulchen-Flechten. Naumburg, 1829.
=Ward, Marshall.= On the structure, development and life-history of a tropical epiphyllous lichen (Strigula complanata Fée, fide Rev. J. M. Crombie). Trans. Linn. Soc., Ser. 2, II. pp. 87-119 (4 pls.), 1884.
=Watson, Sir W.= An Historical Memoir concerning a Genus of Plants called Lichen, etc. Phil. Trans. L. 2 , pp. 652-688. London, 1759.
=Watson, W.= The Distribution of Bryophytes in the woodlands of Somerset. New Phytologist, VIII. pp. 60-96, 1909.
—— Cryptogamic Vegetation of the Sand-Dunes of the West coast of England. Journ. Ecol. VI. pp. 126-143, 1918¹.
—— The Bryophytes and Lichens of calcareous soil. Tom. cit. pp. 189-198, 1918².
=Watt, George.= A Dictionary of the Economic Products of India, IV. pp. 635-639, 1890.
=Weber, G. H.= Wiggers’ Primitiae Florae Holsaticae. Kiel, 1780.
=Weddell, H. A.= Les Lichens des promenades publiques et, en particulier, du Jardin de Blossac, à Poitiers. Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr. XVI. pp. 194-203. 1869.
—— Les Lichens du massif granitique de Ligugé, etc. Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr. XX. pp. 142-155, 1873.
—— Excursion lichénologique dans l’ile d’Yeu sur la côte de la Vendée. Mém. Soc. Sci. Nat. Cherb. XIX. pp. 251-316, 1875¹.
—— Remarques complémentaires sur le rôle du substratum, etc. Comptes Rendus, LXXX. pp. 1434-1438, 1875².
—— Les substratum neutres. Op. cit. LXXXI. pp. 211-214, 1875³.
—— Remarques sur le rôle du substratum dans la distribution des Lichens saxicoles. Ann. Sci. Nat. Sér. 6, I. pp. 394-398, 1875⁴.
=Wehmer, Carl.= Entstehung und physiologische Bedeutung der Oxalsäure im Stoffwechsel einiger Pilze. Bot. Zeit. XLIX. pp. 611-620 and 630-638, 1891.
=Weir, James R.= Concerning the introduction into the United States of extra-limital wood-destroying fungi. Mycologia, XI. pp. 58-65, 1919.
=West, G. S.= A Treatise on the British Freshwater Algae. Cambridge, 1904.
—— Cambridge Botanical Handbooks. Algae, vol. I. Cambridge, 1916.
=West, W.= Physcia parietina. Journ. Bot. XLIII. p. 31, 1905.
—— Ecological Notes; chiefly Cryptogamic. Journ. Linn. Soc. XLIII. pp. 57-85, 1915.
=Wester, D. A.= Studien über das Chitin. Arch. Pharm. CCXLVII. pp. 282-307, 1909. (Bot. Zeit. LXVII. pp. 293-294, 1909.)
=Westring, J. P.= Sur la propriété tinctoriale des Lichens. Ann. Chimie, XV. pp. 267-297, 1792; XVII. pp. 67-84, 1793.
—— Svenska Lafvarnes Farghistoria. Stockholm (24 col. pls.), 1805-1809.
=Wettstein, F. V.= Geosiphon Fr. Wettst., eine neue interessante Siphonee. Oesterr. Bot. Zeitschr. pp. 145-156 (2 pls.), 1915. See also Bot. Centralbl. CXXXI. pp. 131-132, 1916.
=Wheldon, J. A.= Stone Mites in West Lancashire. Lancashire and Cheshire Naturalist. pp. 31-32 (4 figs.), 1914.
=Wheldon, J. A. and Travis, W. G.= The Lichens of South Lancashire. Journ. Linn. Soc. XLIII. pp. 87-136, 1915.
=Wheldon, J. A. and Wilson, A.= The Flora of West Lancashire. Eastbourne, 1907.
—— Inverness and Banff Cryptogams. Journ. Bot. XLVIII. pp. 123-129, 1910.
—— Lichens of Arran. Journ. Bot. LI. pp. 248-253, 1913.
—— The Lichens of Perthshire. Journ. Bot. LIII. Suppl. 73 pp., 1915.
=Wiesner, J.= Untersuchungen über den Lichtgenuss der Pflanzen, etc. Sitzungsb. K. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-Naturw. Cl. CIV. pp. 606-711, 1895.
—— Die Rohstoffe des Pflanzenreichs. I. pp. 668-671, 1900.
=Wille, N.= Algologische Notizen. XXII. Nyt. Magazin. Naturv. LI. I. pp. 1-26 (1 pl.), 1913.
=Willemet, M.= Lichenographie Économique ou Histoire des Lichens utiles. Lyon, 1787.
=Wilson, A. and Wheldon, J. A.= Alpine Vegetation of Ben-y-Gloe, Perthshire. Journ. Bot. LII. pp. 227-235, 1914.
=Wilson, F. R. M.= The Climate of Eastern Tasmania indicated by its lichen flora. Papers and Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasmania for 1892, p. 131, 1893.
=Winter, Georg.= Ueber die Gattung Sphaeromphale und Verwandte. Ein Beitrag zur Anatomie der Krustenflechten. Pringsh. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. X. pp. 245-274 (3 pls.), 1876.
—— Lichenologische Notizen. I. Cephalodien von Sticta und Solorina. Flora, LX. pp. 177-184, 193-203, 1877¹. II. Flechtenparasiten, tom. cit. pp. 209-214, 1877².
=Winterstein, E.= Zur Kenntniss der Pilzcellulose. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. XI. pp. 441-445, 1893.
=Wisselingh, C. van.= Mikrochemische Untersuchungen über die Zellwände der Fungi. Pringsh. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. XXXI. pp. 618-687 (pl.), 1898.
=Withering, W.= A Botanical Arrangement, etc. ed. I. Birmingham, 1776.
=Wolff, Gertr. P.= Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Flechtenapothecien. Flora, XCV. pp. 31-57 (figs.), 1905.
=Woodward, T. J.= Observations upon the Generic Characters of Ulva with Descriptions of some new species. Trans. Linn. Soc. III. pp. 46-58, 1797.
=Woronin, M.= Recherches sur les gonidies du Lichen Parmelia pulverulenta Ach. Ann. Sci. Nat. Sér. 5, XVI. pp. 317-325 (1 pl.), 1872.
=Zahlbruckner, A.= Studien über brasilianische Flechten. Sitzungsb. K. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-Naturw. Cl. CXI. pp. 357-432 (2 pls.), 1902.
—— Lichenes (Specieller Teil). Engler and Prantl, Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, LI*. pp. 49-249, 1903-1907.
=Zittel, A.= Handbuch der Palaeontologie. Abt. II. von W. Ph. Schimper und A. Schenk. München und Leipzig, 1890.
=Zopf, W.= Die Pilze. Schenk’s Handbuch der Botanik, IV. pp. 271-775, 1890.
—— Beitr. Phys. Morph. niederer Organismen. Leipzig, 1892.
—— Die Weissfärbung von Thamnolia vermicularis, etc. Hedwigia, XXXII. pp. 66-69, 1893.
—— Uebersicht der auf Flechten schmarotzenden Pilze. Hedwigia, XXXV. pp. 312-366, 1896.
—— Ueber Nebensymbiose (Parasymbiose). Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. XV. pp. 90-92, 1897.
—— Zur biologischen Bedeutung der Flechtensäuren. Biol. Centralbl. XVI. No. 16, pp. 593-610, 1896.
—— Untersuchungen über die durch parasitische Pilze hervorgerufene Krankheiten der Flechten. Nova Acta Acad. Caes. Leop.-Carol. LXX. No. 2, pp. 97-190 (pl.), 1897, and tom. cit. No. 4, pp. 243-288 (fig.), 1898.
—— Vergleichende Untersuchungen über Flechten in Bezug auf ihre Stoffwechselprodukte. Beih. Bot. Centralbl. XIV. pp. 95-126 (4 pls.), 1903.
—— Biologische und morphologische Beobachtungen an Flechten. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. XXIII. pp. 497-504 (1 pl.), 1905.
—— Zur Kenntniss der Flechtenstoffe. Lieb. Ann. Chemie, CCLXXXIV.-CCCLII., 1895-1907.
—— Die Flechtenstoffe in chemischer botanischer pharmakologischer und technischer Beziehung. Jena, 1907.
—— Biologische und morphologische Beobachtungen an Flechten. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. XXV. pp. 233-238 (1 pl.), 1907.
—— Beiträge zu einer chemischen Monographie der Cladoniaceen. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. XXVI. pp. 51-113 (4 pls.), 1908.
—— Die Flechtenstoffe. Liebig’s Ann. Chemie, CCCLXIV. pp. 273-313, 1909.
=Zschacke, H.= Ein Beitrag zur Flechtenflora des unteren Saaletales. Zeitschr. Naturwiss. LXXX. pp. 231-253, 1908.
=Zukal, H.= Das Zusammenleben von Moos und Flechten. Oesterr. Bot. Zeitschr. XXIX. pp. 189-191, 1879.
—— Flechtenstudien. Denkschr. K. Akad. Wiss. Math.-Nat. Cl. Wien, XLVIII. II. pp. 249-292 (1 pl.), 1884.
—— Ueber das Vorkommen von Reservestoffbehältern bei Kalkflechten. Bot. Zeit. XLIV. pp. 761-770, 1886.
—— Ueber einige neue Ascomyceten. Verh. K. K. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien, XXXVII. pp. 39-46 (1 pl.), 1887.
—— Epigloea bactrospora. Verh. K. K. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien, XXXIX. p. 78, 1889 and Österr. Bot. Zeitschr. XL. pp. 323-328 (1 pl.), 1889.
—— Halbflechten. Flora, LXXIV. pp. 92-107 (1 pl.), 1891.
—— Ueber zwei neue Myxomyceten. Oesterr. Bot. Zeitschr. XLIII. pp. 73-77 and 133-137 (1 pl.), 1893.
—— Morphologische und biologische Untersuchungen über die Flechten. Sitzungsb. K. Akad. Wiss. Math.-Naturw. Cl. Wien, CIV. pp. 529-574 and 1303-1395 (2 pls.), 1895; op. cit. CV. pp. 197-264, 1896.
=Zwelser, Joanne.= Pharmacopæa augustana reformata cum ejus mantissa, etc. (p. 578), 1672.
INDEX
Abrothallus De Not., 267 A. Cetrariae Kotte, 264 A. oxysporus Tul., 263 A. Peyritschii Kotte, 264 A. Smithii Tul., 263
Acanthothecium Wain., 322
Acarinae, 271, 397
Acarospora Massal., 183, 331, 390 A. chlorophana Massal., 374, 375, 390 A. glaucocarpa Koerb., 176 A. Heppii Koerb., 377 A. pruinosa (Sm.), 377 A. smaragdula Massal., 388, 393 A. xanthophana (Nyl.), 242
Acarosporaceae, 310, 331
Acarus, 395
Acharius, 1, 10, 123, 126, 133, 141, 149, 156, 185, 192, 304
Acolium, S. F. Gray, 277
Acrocordia gemmata Koerb., 152 (Fig. 90 B)
Acroscyphus, Lév., 320 A. sphaerophoroides Lév., 289
Actinoplaca Müll.-Arg., 327
Acton, xix, 57
Adanson, 9
Aesculus, 253
Agardh, C. A., xx, 21
Agyrium flavescens Rehm, 266
Aigret, 125, 371, 384
Alectoria Ach., 85, 94, 101, 103, 200, 257, 300, 340, 346, 350, 352 A. implexa Nyl., 227 A. jubata Ach., 3, 111, 401, 411 A. nigricans Nyl., 346, 389 A. ochroleuca Ach., 227, 389 A. thrausta Ach., 105 (Fig. 60)
Alectoriaceae, 339
Allarthonia Nyl., 321
Allarthothelium Wain., 321
Allescher, 201
Almquist, 262
Ambergris, 419
Amoreux, 10, 407, 415, 418, 420
Amphidium Nyl., 335
Amphiloma Koerb., 325
Anabæna Bory, 41
Anaptychia Koerb., 341 (see Physcia)
Anapyrenium Müll.-Arg., 315
Anema Nyl., 333, 373
Angiocarpeae, 156
Anthoceros L., 41
Anthracothecium Massal., 316, 350
Anzia Stiz., 90, 299, 339 A. colpodes Stiz., 90 A. japonica Müll.-Arg., 90
Archer, 28
Arctomia Th. Fr., 334
Argopsis Th. Fr., 105, 135, 297, 330
Arnold, 18, 261, 342, 343, 364, 368, 370, 407
Arnoldia minutula Born., 190 (Fig. 108)
Arnott, Walker, 15
Artari, 39, 42
Arthonia Ach., 158, 203, 278, 305, 321, 343, 361 A. astroidea Ach., 202 A. cinnabarina Wallr. (see A. gregaria), 349 A. dispersa Nyl., 365 A. gregaria Koerb., 247, 248 A. lecideella Nyl., 365 A. pruinosa Ach., 145 A. radiata Ach., 78, 365 A. subvarians Nyl., 262
Arthoniaceae, 59, 278, 309, 321
Arthoniopsis Müll.-Arg., 321
Arthopyrenia Massal., 30, 316 A. fallax Arn., 365 A. halizoa A. L. Sm., 383 A. halodytes Oliv., 383 A. leptotera A. L. Sm., 383 A. macrospora Fink, 365 A. marina A. L. Sm., 383 A. punctiformis Arn., 346, 365 A. quinqueseptata Fink, 365
Arthotheliopsis Wain., 327
Arthothelium Massal., 321
Ascolichens, 272, 273, 281, 308, 311
Ascomycetes xix, 178 et passim
Ascophanus carneus Boud., 180
Aspergillus Micheli, 220
Aspicilia Massal., 133, 136, 140 (see Lecanora) A. atroviolacea (Flot.) Hue, 158 A. flavida (Hepp), 248
Aspidoferae, 9
Aspidopyrenium Wain., 314
Aspidothelium Wain., 314
Asteristion Leight., 337
Asteroporum Müll.-Arg., 316
Asterothyrium Müll.-Arg., 327
Astrotheliaceae, 309, 317, 352
Astrothelium Trev., 317
Athalami, 305
Aulaxina Fée, 322
Azolla Laur., 41
Babikoff, 138
Babington, 18, 350
Bachmann, E., 35, 75, 76, 215, 216, 235, 247, 347, 393
Bachmann, Freda, 162, 179, 181, 186
Bacidia, De Not., 329 B. acclinis (Flot.), 248 B. Beckhausii Koerb., 262 B. flavovirescens Anzi, 280 B. fuscorubella Arn., 249, 365 B. inundata Koerb., 372, 373, 377, 391, 392 B. muscorum Mudd, 248, 368, 370, 377 B. rubella Massal., 365
Bacotia sepium, 399
Baeomyces Pers., 123, 293, 294, 330 B. paeminosus Krempelh., 55 B. placophyllus Ach., 293, 368 B. roseus Pers., 123, 167, 195, 218, 247, 362, 367, 368, 369 B. rufus, DC., 123, 167, 177, 218, 237, 240, 362, 368, 369
Baranetzky, 24
Bary, de, 24, 31, 187, 209, 213
Bauhin, J., 419
Bauhin, K., 3
Baur, 51, 115, 118, 124, 161, 165, 167, 168, 169, 170, 172, 173, 174, 176, 177, 180, 181, 185, 255
Beckmann, 230, 257
Beechey, 15
Beetle-mites, 397
Beijerinck, 39, 220
Beilstein, 211
Belonia Koerb., 316
Berg, 211
Berkeley, 252, 404
Berzelius, 210
Betula nana L., 95
Bialosuknia, 57
Biatora Koerb., 158, 279, 293 (see also Lecidea), 391
Biatorella Th. Fr., 331 B. cinerea Th. Fr., 375 B. pruinosa Mudd, 217 (Fig. 119) B. resinae Th. Fr., 355 B. simplex Br. and Rostr., 217 (Fig. 118) B. testudinea Massal., 375
Biatorina Massal., 245, 291 B. Bouteillei Arn., 363 B. chalybeia Mudd, 386 B. coeruleonigricans A. L. Sm., 367 B. globulosa Koerb., 378 B. lenticularis Koerb., 383 B. prasina Syd., 33, 61 B. (denigrata) synothea Koerb., 33, 204
Bilimbia, aromatica Jatta, 349 B. incana A. L. Sm., 343 B. microcarpa Th. Fr., 262 B. obscurata Th. Fr., 262 B. sabulosa Massal., 370 B. sphaeroides Koerb., 385
Bioret, 320
Birger, see Nilson
Bitter, 64, 79, 94, 97, 131, 140, 143, 147, 148, 149, 151, 176, 240, 242, 253, 257, 261, 267, 337, 397
Blackman, 206
Blackman and Welsford, 179
Blastenia Th. Fr., 340
Blastodesmia Massal., 316
Bohler, 415
Bombyliospora De Not., 329
Bonnier, 29, 36, 47, 65, 189, 232, 253
Bornet, 27, 28, 32, 36, 61, 78, 136, 189
Borrer, 12, 14
Borrera, see Physcia
Borzi, 28, 161, 164
Botrydina vulgaris Bréb., xix, 57
Botrydium pyriforme Kütz., 45
Bottaria Massal., 317
Bouilhac, 42, 140
Braconnot, 214
Brandt, 103, 130
Braun, Fr., 354
Braun, L., 393
Brefeld, 189, 207
Brez, 395
Brooks, F. T., 64, 179
Brown, E. W., 402
Brown, W. H., 168
Bryopogon, see Oropogon
Bryum L., 392
Buchet, 90
Buddle, 4
Buellia, De Not., 263, 280, 291, 302, 308, 341, 347 B. aethalea Th. Fr., 261 B. atrata Mudd, 245, 375 B. canescens De Not., 80, 366, 377, 380, 399 B. colludens Tuck., 382, 386 B. coracina Koerb., 375 B. discolor Koerb., 388 B. leptocline Koerb., 374 B. myriocarpa Mudd, 50, 346, 366, 369 B. parasema Th. Fr., 365, 367, 377 B. Parmeliarum Oliv., 263 B. punctiformis, 50, 202, 207 (Fig. 118) B. ryssolea A. L. Sm., 380, 382 (Fig. 125) B. stellulata Mudd, 382, 388 B. triphragmia Th. Fr., 390 B. turgescens Tuck., 367 B. verruculosa Mudd, 261
Buelliaceae, 311, 341
Buxbaum, 6, 10
Buxus sempervirens L., 353
Cactus, 325, 353
Calenia Müll.-Arg., 338
Caliciaceae, 62, 115, 175, 189, 244, 288, 309, 319, 353, 366
Calicium De Not., 184, 201, 277, 319, 361 C. arenarium Nyl., 376 C. corynellum Ach., 376 C. hyperellum Ach., 349, 365 C. parietinum Ach., 202, 367 C. trachelinum Ach., 196, 202, 204
Calkins, 348, 403
Callopisma, see Placodium
Calluna Salisb., 95, 355
Caloplaca Th. Fr. (see Placodium), 340 C. aurantia, var. callopisma Stein., 190 C. gilvella (Nyl.), 276 C. interveniens Müll.-Arg., 276 C. pyracea Th. Fr., 34, 388
Caloplacaceae, 311, 340
Calothricopsis Wain., 333
Calycidium Stirt., 289, 320 C. cuneatum Stirt., 350
Camellia L., 269
Camerarius, 1
Camillea Fr., 276
Campylidium, 191
Campylothelium Müll.-Arg., 317
Candelaria Massal., 339 C. concolor Wain., 365, 388, 399
Candelariella Müll.-Arg., 338 C. cerinella A. Zahlbr., 390 C. vitellina Müll.-Arg., 233, 237, 369, 377, 393, 417
Capnodium Mont., 179
Carpinus Tournef., 240
Carrington, 12
Carroll, 19
Cassini, 21
Catillaria Th. Fr. (see Biatorina), 329 C. Hochstetteri Koerb., 375
Celidiaceae, 265
Cellidium stictarum Tul., 267
Cenomyce Th. Fr., 295
Cephaleuros Kunze (see Mycoidea), 59, 288
Cephaloidei, 303
Cepteus ocellatus, 397
Cerania S. F. Gray, 340 C. vermicularis S. F. Gray, 194, 387
Cetraria Ach., 84, 94, 200, 210, 213, 225, 241, 264, 299, 346, 350, 357, 358, 370, 388, 399 C. aculeata Fr., 211, 241, 262, 299, 300, 355, 369, 384, 385, 386, 387 C. caperata Wain., 264 C. crispa Lamy, 387, 388 C. cucullata Ach., 201, 244, 389 C. diffusa A. L. Sm., 366 C. glauca Ach., 201, 231, 259, 264, 347, 388, 418 C. islandica Ach., 2, 94, 128, 195 (Fig. 112), 210, 212, 221, 227, 231, 241, 338, 355, 387, 401 (Fig. 128), 406, 408, 409, 411, 416 C. juniperina Ach., 201, 246, 416 C. Laureri Kremp., 364 C. nivalis Ach., 201, 210, 389 C. pinastri S. F. Gray, 145, 246, 410 C. tristis, see Parmelia
Chaenotheca Th. Fr., 201, 319 C. chrysocephala Th. Fr., 265, 277, 288
Chalice-Moss, 3
Chambers, 43
Chasmariae, 295
Chevalier, 13
Chiodecton Müll.-Arg., 276, 320, 323, 351, 364
Chiodectonaceae, 59, 278, 309, 323
Chlorella Beij., 56 Ch. Cladoniae Chod., 56 Ch. faginea Wille, 56 (Fig. 23 A) Ch. lichina Chod., 56 Ch. miniata Wille, 56 (Fig. 23 A) Ch. viscosa Chod., 56 Ch. vulgaris Beyer., 42, 56
Chlorococcus (?Chlorococcum Fr.), 24
Chlorophyceae, xix, 51, 55-60, 61, 272, 324
Chodat, 28, 30, 43, 44, 55, 115, 329
Chroococcaceae, 25
Chroococcus Naeg., 24, 52, 82, 136, 153, 284, 311, 332, 373 Ch. giganteus West, 52 (Fig. 16) Ch. Schizodermaticus West, 52 (Fig. 16) Ch. turgidus Naeg., 52 (Fig. 16), 136
Chroolepus Ag., see Trentepohlia C. ebeneus Ag., 22
Chrysothricaceae, 57, 310, 325
Chrysothrix Mont., 325, 353 C. noli tangere Mont., 325
Church, A. Henry, 421
Church, A. Herbert, 402
Cicinnobolus Ehrenb., 261
Cinchona L., 364 C. cordaminea Humb., 364 C. cordifolia Mutis, 364 C. oblongifolia Mutis, 364
Claassen, 34
Cladina Leight., 112, 122, 253, 292
Cladonia Hill, 9, 13, 23, 38, 44, 55, 56, 80, 81, 95, 104, 106, 172, 213, 237, 241, 242, 257, 262, 329, 344, 346, 347, 355, 358, 372, 375, 385, 391, 399, 408 Cl. agariciformis Wulf., 368 Cl. aggregata Ach., 120 Cl. alcicornis Floerk., 385, 386 Cl. alpestris Rabenh., 125, 211, 349, 369 Cl. alpicola Wain., 122 Cl. amaurocrea Schaer., 118 Cl. bellidiflora Schaer., 119 Cl. botrytes Willd., 173 Cl. caespiticia Floerk., 115, 124, 294, 296 Cl. cariosa Spreng., 113, 120, 295, 296, 368 Cl. cartilaginea Müll.-Arg., 122 Cl. ceratophylla Spreng., 122 Cl. cervicornis Schaer., 113, 120, 122, 243, 384, 387 Cl. coccifera Willd., 113, 118, 368, 369, 370, 387 Cl. cristatella Tuck., 367, 369 Cl. decorticata Spreng., 172 (Fig. 98) Cl. deformis Hoffm., 226 Cl. degenerans Floerk., 114, 117, 124 Cl. destricta Nyl., 387 Cl. digitata Hoffm., 113, 122, 371 Cl. divaricata Meng. and Goepp., 355 Cl. enantia f. dilatala Wain., 112 Cl. endiviaefolia Fr., 384 Cl. fimbriata Fr., 51, 117, 120, 295, 296, 349, 367, 368, 370, 377; Subsp. fibula Nyl., 119, 369 Cl. flabelliformis Wain., 371 Cl Floerkeana Fr., 173, 296, 362, 370 Cl. foliacea Willd., 112, 113, 120, 122, 240, 295, 296 Cl. furcata Schrad., 117 (Fig. 70), 118, 124, 194 (Fig. 109), 212, 295, 297, 355, 368, 369, 377, 386 Cl. gracilis Hoffm., 115 (Fig. 68), 122, 124, 210, 297, 367, 369, 387 Cl. leptophylla Floerk., 295, 296 Cl. macilenta Hoffm., 362, 366, 367, 369, 378 Cl. miniata Mey., 112, 122 Cl. nana Wain., 112 Cl. Neo-Zelandica Wain., 112 Cl. papillaria Hoffm., 195, 296, 344 Cl. pityrea Floerk., 255, 366 Cl. pungens Floerk. (see Cl. rangiformis) Cl. pycnoclada Nyl., 345 Cl. pyxidata Hoffm., 2, 44, 110, 111 (Fig. 66), 113, 114, 117 (Fig. 69), 118, 120, 124, 172, 227, 295, 346, 349, 362, 366, 368, 370, 371, 377, 408 Cl. racemosa Hoffm., 387 Cl. rangiferina Web., 56, 95, 117, 119, 120, 210, 211, 215, 227, 231, 237, 238, 253, 267, 293, 297, 349, 355, 357, 369, 386, 388, 400, 411 Cl. rangiformis Hoffm., 271, 295, 366, 368, 386 Cl. retepora Fr., 117, 120 (Fig. 71), 231, 351 Cl. rosea Ludw., 354 Cl. solida Wain., 114 Cl. squamosa Hoffm., 113, 115 (Fig. 67), 118, 210, 243, 295, 366, 368 Cl. sylvatica Hoffm., 95, 112, 117, 119, 271, 349, 366, 368, 369, 385, 400 Cl. symphicarpia Tuck., 367 Cl. tophacea Hill, 8 Cl. turgida Hoffm., 369 Cl. uncialis Web., 112, 120, 369, 387, 389 Cl. verticillaris Fr., 122 Cl. verticillata Floerk., 114, 119, 120, 124, 349, 367, 369
Cladoniaceae, 135, 292, 310, 329, 366, 370
Cladoniodei, 306
Cladophora Kütz., 35, 59, 188 C. glomerata Kütz., 58 (Fig. 30)
Cladophoraceae, 59
Clathrinae, 117, 120
Clathroporina Müll.-Arg., 316
Clausae, 295
Clavaria Vaill., 421
Cleora lichenaria, 399
Cocciferae, 295
Coccobotrys Chod., 30, 40, 56, 315 C. Verrucariae Chod., 57 (Fig. 24)
Coccocarpia Pers., 335 C. molybdaea Pers., 61 C. pellita Müll.-Arg., 166
Coccomyxa Schmidle, 56 C. Solorinae croceae Chod., 56 C. Solorinae saccatae Chod., 56 C. subellipsoidea Acton, 57 (Fig. 25)
Coccotrema Müll.-Arg., 316
Coenogoniaceae, 59, 291, 310, 328
Coenogonium Ehrenb., 23, 35, 69, 182, 246, 291, 328, 351 C. ebeneum A. L. Sm., 22 (Fig. 3), 34, 59, 328, 350, 352, 363 C. implexum Nyl., 352 C. Linkii Ehrenb., 213
Coenothalami, 303
Coleochaete Bréb., 178
Collema Wigg., 6, 9, 21, 23, 25, 30, 48, 69, 87, 132, 165, 173, 200, 230, 284, 305, 334, 367, 392 C. ceranoides Borr., 385 C. cheileum Ach., 161 C. crispum Ach., 161, 180 C. flaccidum Ach., 365 C. fluviatile Sm., 392 C. granulatum Ach., 368 C. granuliferum Nyl., 69, 232, 243 C. Hildenbrandii Garov., 202 (see Leptogium) C. limosum Ach., xx, 21, 349 C. microphyllum Ach., 160 (Fig. 91), 161 (Fig. 92), 202 C. nigrescens Ach., 20 (Fig. 2), 161, 243, 245, 364 C. plicatile, 409 C. pulposum Ach., 24, 162, 179, 186, 202, 266, 368, 385 C. pustulatum Ach., 373 C. pycnocarpum Nyl., 365 C. tenax Sm., 368
Collemaceae, 27, 53, 69, 160, 241, 244, 266, 284, 306, 310, 334, 364, 384, 396
Collemodes Fink, 162 C. Bachmannianum Fink, 162
Collemodium, see Leptogium
Collemopsidium Nyl., 333, 374
Collybia, Quél., 105
Colonna, 3
Combea De Not., 83
Conida Massal., 265, 267 C. rubescens, Arn., 265
Conidella urceolata Elenk., 265
Coniocarpi, 307
Coniocarpineae, 267, 273, 274, 276, 288, 309, 319
Coniocarpon DC., 305
Coniocybe Ach., 277, 319, 366 C. furfuracea Ach., 246, 376
Conotrema Tuck., 326 C. urceolatum Tuck., 343
Convoluta roscoffensis, 40
Cora Fr., 53, 246, 281, 311, 342, 352 C. Pavonia Fr., 88, 152 (Figs. 86, 87)
Coralloides, 5, 6, 7, 303
Corda, 200
Cordus, 409
Cordyceps Fr., 261
Corella Wain., 153, 311, 342, 352 C. brasiliensis Wain., 154
Coriscium Wain., 285, 288, 319
Cornicularia (Cetraria) Schreb., 388 C. ochroleuca Ach., 355 C. subpubescens Goepp., 355 C. succinea Goepp., 355
Corylus Tournef., 240
Cramer, 409
Croall, 19
Crocynia Nyl., 325 C. gossypina Nyl., 325 C. lanuginosa Hue, 325, 373
Crombie, xxi, 7, 18, 19, 197, 260, 262, 264, 306, 361
Crottles, 415
Cruoria Fr., 73
Cryptothecia Stirton, 331
Cryptothele Nyl., 333
Cudbear, 413, 415
Culpepper, 409
Cunningham, 35, 269
Cuppe-Moss, 3
Cupthongs, 9
Curnow, 19
Cutting, 180
Cyanophili, 308, 310
Cyanophyceae, 309; see Myxophyceae
Cycas L., 40
Cyclocarpineae, 273, 279, 290, 309, 324
Cyperus, 419
Cypheliaceae, 309, 320
Cyphelium Th. Fr., 276, 277, 288, 320
Cyphella aeruginascens Karst., 191
Cystococcus Chod., 55, 56 C. Cladoniae fimbriatae Chod., 56 C. Cladoniae pixidatae Chod., 56 (Fig. 56)
Cystococcus Naeg., 24, 26, 28, 34, 115, 229 C. humicola Naeg., 24, 27, 40, 55
Cystocoleus Thwaites, 23
Cytospora Ehrenb., 204
Czapek, 211, 413
Dacampia Massal., 315
Dactylina Nyl., 340 D. arctica Nyl., 339, 346
Dangeard, 185
Danilov, 37
Darbishire, 18, 26, 51, 64, 77, 86, 90, 92, 101, 103, 110, 130, 147, 148, 166, 167, 171, 175, 180, 181, 253, 256, 299, 324, 342, 346, 347, 377, 389
Darbishire and Fischer-Benzon, 307
Darbishirella A. Zahlbr., 324
Davies, 12, 14
Dawson, 178
De Candolle, 12
Deckenbach, 59
Deer, 401
Delise, 13, 126
Dendrographa Darbish., 324 D. leucophaea Darbish., 103, 213
Dermatiscum Nyl., 331
Dermatocarpaceae, 309, 314
Dermatocarpon Eschw., 80, 81, 276, 288, 315 D. aquaticum A. Zahlbr., 391, 392 D. cinereum Th. Fr., 368 D. hepaticum Th. Fr., 368, 388 D. lachneum A. L. Sm., 88, 368 D. miniatum Th. Fr., 56, 96 (Fig. 56), 173 (Fig. 99), 185, 241, 261, 373, 391, 392, 403
Desfontaines, 10
Diatoms, 220
Dichodium Nyl., 334
Dickson, 9
Dictyographa Müll.-Arg., 322
Dictyonema A. Zahlbr., 54, 153, 311, 342, 352
Didymella Sacc., 276
Didymosphaeria pulposi Zopf, 266
Dillenius, xx, 1, 6, 155, 192, 262, 304, 407
Dioscorides, 2
Diplogramma Müll.-Arg., 322
Diplopodon, 270
Diploschistaceae, 310, 326
Diploschistes Norm., 326 D. bryophilus Zahlbr., 374 D. ocellatus Norm., 247, 248, 374 D. scruposus Norm., 195, 214, 241, 243, 262, 368
Diplosphaera Bial., 57 D. Chodati Bial., 57
Dirina Fr., 73, 83, 290, 323
Dirinaceae, 290, 309, 323
Dirinastrum Müll.-Arg., 290, 323
Discocarpi, 307
Discomycetes, 267, 273
Dodoens, 3
Dog-lichen, 408
Domestic animals (Oxen, horses, etc.), 401
Don, 14
Doody, 4
Dorstenius, 2, 408
Dothidea Fr., 317
Dufour, 11
Dufourea Nyl., 340
Dufrenoy, 42, 260, 269
Dumontia Lamour., 111
Dundonald, Lord, 420
Ectolechiaceae, 69, 310, 327, 352, 363
Egeling, 234
Elaphomyces Nees, 261
Elenkin, 36, 37, 258, 265, 347
Elenkin and Woronichin, 353
Elfving, xxi, 25
Encephalographa Massal., 322
Enchylium Massal., see Forssellia
Endocarpon Hedw., 62, 88, 89, 197, 200, 261, 288, 315, 351, 389 E. monstrosum Massal., 373 E. pusillum Hedw., 28 (Figs. 5, 6)
Endocena Cromb., 339, 340
Endomyces scytonemata Zuk., 38
Englehardt, 354
Enterodictyon Müll.-Arg., 323
Enterographa Fée, 320 E. crassa Fée, 350
Enterostigma Müll.-Arg., 323
Erioderma Fée, 335
Eolichen Zuk., 285, 319 E. Heppii Zuk., 319
Ephebaceae, 54, 284, 310, 331
Ephebe Fr., 23, 25, 27, 30, 38, 68, 201, 284, 322 E. lanata Wain., see E. pubescens E. pubescens Nyl., 23 (Fig. 3)
Ephebeia Nyl., 332
Epiconiaceae, 307
Epiconiodei, 306
Epigloea Zuk., 313 E. bactrospora Zuk., 313
Epigloeaceae, 57, 309, 313
Erica tetralix L., 95
Errera, 213, 214, 405
Erysiphe Link, 188
Eschweiler, 15, 184
Escombe, 210
Etard and Bouilhac, 42, 140
Ettingshausen and Debey, 354
Euler, 214
Eunephroma Stiz., 337
Euopsis granatina Nyl., 282, 387
Evernia Ach., 84, 95, 99, 200, 213, 340 E. furfuracea Mann, 24, 38, 94, 99, 108, 142 (Fig. 81), 151, 227, 231, 233, 300, 366, 376, 403, 405 E. prunastri Ach., 2, 100 (Fig. 59), 108, 210, 211, 212, 227, 233, 234, 238, 269, 300, 364, 384, 385, 396, 400, 403, 418, 419
Everniopsis Nyl., 339, 340
Eversman, 404
Famintzin, 24
Farriolla Norm., 319
Faull, 178
Fée, 13, 15, 184, 187, 192, 364
Fink, Bruce, xx, 242, 254, 348, 358, 365, 367, 368, 369, 373, 389, 391
Fischer, 308
Fitting, 36
Fitzpatrick, 181
Flagey, 373, 389
Florideae, 160, 177, 273
Flörke, 12, 13, 133
Flotow, 23, 192
Fontinalis L., 391
Forficula auricularia, 396
Forskål, 403
Forssell, 63, 65, 133, 136, 163, 175, 282, 373
Forssellia A. Zahlbr., 284, 333, 373
Forster, 12, 14
Fossil Lichens, 353-355
Frank, 31, 62, 78
Fraser, 178
French, xxiii
Friedrich, 75, 233, 269, 270
Fries, E., 13, 22, 149, 364
Fries, Th. M., 17, 18, 133, 138, 152, 192, 263, 342
Fucus L., 281 F. spiralis L., 383
Fuisting, 30, 159, 173
Fünfstück, 18, 19, 61, 75, 76, 161, 169, 170, 171, 175, 181, 216, 218, 219, 224, 342
Gage, 14
Galløe, 95, 242
Gargeaune, 45
Gasterolichens, 308
Gautier, 213
Geisleria Nitschke, 314 G. sychnogonioides Nitschke, 370
Georgi, 10, 420
Geosiphon Wettst., 45
Gerard, John, 3, 418
Gibelli, 200
Gilson, 209
Gleditsch, 269
Gloeocapsa Kütz., 23, 32, 55, 61, 68, 136, 195, 232, 284, 292, 332, 373 G. magma Kütz., 52 (Fig. 17), 60, 136 G. polydermatica Kütz., 53
Gloeocystis Naeg., 33, 57 (Fig. 28), 61, 133, 318
Gloeolichens, 175, 282, 284, 373, 389
Glossodium Nyl., 330 G. aversum Nyl., 294
Glück, 198
Glyphis Fée, 276, 323
Glypholecia Nyl., 331
Gmelin, J. F., 152
Gmelin, J. G., 411
Gnomonia erythrostoma Auersw., 178
Goeppert, 354, 393
Goeppert and Menge, 354
Gomphillus Nyl., 293, 330
Gongrosira Kütz., xxi
Gongylia Koerb., 314 G. viridis A. L. Sm., 368, 388
Gonohymenia Stein., 333
Gonothecium Wain., 31, 327
Gordon, Cuthbert, 415
Gossypina Ulmi, 399
Grammophori, 307
Graphidaceae, 59, 158, 309, 321, 351, 352, 364
Graphideae, 13, 17, 27, 34, 62, 78, 79, 172, 348, 349, 351, 353, 364
Graphidineae, 273, 278, 289, 309, 320, 365
Graphina Müll.-Arg., 322
Graphis Adans., 9, 211, 321, 322, 343, 349, 351, 355, 361, 364 G. elegans Ach., 30, 158 (Fig. 89), 172, 180, 397 G. scripta Ach., 50, 349, 354, 365, 366 G. scripta succinea Goepp., 355
Gray, J. E., 12, 305
Grete Herball, 2
Greville, 12
Grimbel, 250
Grimmia pulvinata Sm., 393 G. apocarpa Hedw., 393
Guembel, 392
Guérin-Varry, 210
Guillermond, 167
Gunnera L., 31, 41
Gyalecta Ach., 191, 328 G. cupularis Schaer., 244 G. Flotovii Koerb., 244 G. geoica Ach., 254 G. rubra Massal., 249
Gyalectaceae, 54, 59, 69, 310, 327
Gyalolechia Massal., 201 G. subsimilis (Th. Fr.) Darb., 378
Gymnocarpeae, 156, 308, 318
Gymnoderma Nyl., 330 G. coccocarpum Nyl., 293
Gymnographa Müll.-Arg., 322
Gyrophora Ach., 88, 96, 184, 200, 227, 231, 241, 249, 268, 304, 331, 346, 350, 376, 390, 393, 414 G. cylindrica Ach., 176, 184 (Fig. 103), 375, 387 G. erosa Ach., 330, 387 G. esculenta Miyosh., 403 G. flocculosa Turn. and Borr., 375 G. murina Ach., 94 G. polyphylla Hook., 387 G. polyrhiza Koerb., 94, 349, 404 (Fig. 129) G. proboscidea Ach., 192, 346, 375 G. spodochroa Ach., 94 G. tonefacta Cromb., 375, 387 G. vellea Ach., 74, 176
Gyrophoraceae, 291, 310, 330
Gyrostomum Fr., 326
Haberlandt, 106, 188
Haematomma Massal., 230, 236, 338 H. coccineum Koerb., 214, 223, 226 H. elatinum Koerb., 201 H. ventosum Massal., 214, 225, 241, 252, 298, 375, 376, 388, 393
Hagenia ciliaris, 24
Haller, 7, 126
Halopyrenula Müll.-Arg., 318
Halsey, 14
Hamlet and Plowright, 213
Harmand, 63
Harper, 167, 178, 181, 188
Harpidium Koerb., 298, 338 H. rutilans Koerb., 298
Harriman, 14
Hassea A. Zahlbr., 319
Hedlund, 32, 61, 204, 245
Hedwig, 142, 156, 184, 192
Helix hortensis, 396 H. cingulata, 396
Hellbom, 350, 411
Helminthocarpon Fée, 322
Henneguy, 410, 411, 420
Heppia Naeg., 81, 175, 285, 335, 348, 351, 389 H. Depreauxii Tuck., 368 H. Guepini Nyl., 80, 88, 96 H. virescens Nyl., 368
Heppiaceae, 54, 285, 310
Herberger, 221
Herissey, 213
Herre, 230, 253, 349
Hesse, 12, 221, 224
Heterocarpon Müll.-Arg., 315
Heterodea Nyl., 339 H. Mülleri Nyl., 128, 299, 339, 350
Heterogenei, 303
Heteromyces Müll.-Arg., 293, 330
Heufleria Trev., 317
Hicks, 24
Hildenbrandtia Nardo, 73
Hill, Sir John, 8, 409
Hoffmann, 10, 154, 412, 415
Hofmann, 261
Holl, 19
Holle, 14, 46, 187
Holmes, 19, 422
Homogenei, 303
Homopsella Nyl., 334
Homothalami, 305
Homothecium Mont., 334
Hooker, 12, 15, 149
Hornschuch, xx, 156
How, 3
Howe, Heber, 85, 224, 348
Hudson, 7, 9, 303
Hue, 11, 16, 18, 33, 57, 63, 69, 73, 82, 85, 103, 133, 135, 136, 140, 188, 262, 283, 315, 325, 339, 340, 342, 347, 348, 360, 396, 418
Hulth, 215
Hutchins, 14
Hutchinson, 403
Hydrothyria Russ., 336 H. venosa Russ., 97, 175, 233, 286, 348, 390
Hymenobolina parasitica Zuk., 267, 399
Hymenolichens, xix, 54, 152-154, 273, 281, 308, 311, 335, 342
Hymenomycetes, xix, 153 et passim
Hyphomycetes, xix, 191
Hypnum L., 392 H. cupressiforme L., 385
Hypogymnia Nyl., 94, 176
Hypoxylon Bull., 12
Hysteriaceae, 273, 307
Hysterium Tode, 12
Iceland Moss, 210, 401 et passim
Icmadophila Massal., 166, 338 I. aeruginosa Mudd, see I. ericetorum I. ericetorum A. Zahlbr., 196, 244, 370
Illosporium carneum Fr., 268
Ingaderia Darbish., 324
Iris, white, 419
Isidium Ach., 149 I. corallinum Ach., 149 I. Westringii Ach., 149
Istvanffi, 202, 206
Itzigsohn, 17, 23, 24, 193
Jaczewski, 353
Jasmine, oil of, 419
Jatta, 129
Jenmania Wächt., 333, 352
Jennings, Vaughan, 60
Jesuit’s bark, 10
John, 250
Johnson, C. P., 401, 402
Johnson, W., 19
Johow, 153
Jonaspis Th. Fr., 328
Joshua, 19
Jumelle, 230, 238
Kajanus (Nilson), 151
Karschia Koerb., 280 K. destructans Tobl., 265 K. lignyota Sacc., 280
Keeble, 41
Keegan, 224, 410
Keiszler, 201
Keller, 402
Kerner and Oliver, 215
Kieffer, 371
Kienitz-Gerloff, 51
Kihlman, 237, 358, 388, 401
Knop, 213, 247
Knop and Schnederman, 221
Knowles, 224, 249, 379, 384, 391
Kobert, 409, 410
Koelreuter, 155
Koerber, 14, 123, 142, 188, 305
Koerberia Massal., 334
Kotte, 264
Krabbe, 63, 113, 114, 119, 122, 123, 124, 143, 147, 162, 170, 172, 174, 176, 177, 253
Kratzmann, 214
Krempelhuber, 1, 55, 244, 364
Kupfer, 261
Kützing, 22
Laboulbenia Mont. and Robin, 178
Laboulbeniaceae, 178, 274
Lachnea scutellata Gill., 168 L. stercorea Gill., 178
Lacour, 211
Lang, 76, 216, 235
Larbalestier, 19
Laubert, 206
Laudatea Joh., 154
Laurera Reichenb., 317
Lecanactidaceae, 310, 325
Lecanactis Eschw., 204, 325
Lecania Massal., 136, 338 L. candicans A. Zahlbr., 80 (Fig. 43) L. cyrtella Oliv., 377 L. erysibe Mudd, 377 L. holophaea A. L. Sm., 350
Lecaniella Wain., 327
Lecanora Ach., 78, 88, 200, 298, 305, 338, 347, 349, 351, 353, 364, 365, 372, 390 L. aquatica Koerb., 391 L. aspidophora f. errabunda Hue, 262 L. atra Ach., 63, 225, 249, 375, 380, 382 (Fig. 125), 384, 386, 393 L. atriseda Nyl., 261 L. atroflava, see Placodium L. aurella (Hoffm.), 262 L. badia Ach., 79, 375, 386 L. caesiocinerea Nyl., 218, 384 L. calcarea Somm., 218 (Fig. 120), 373, 396 L. campestris B. de Lesd., 361, 384 L. cenisia Ach., 375 L. cinerea Somm., 229, 349, 375 L. citrina Ach., see Placodium L. coilocarpa Nyl., 30 L. crassa Ach., 79, 81, 201, 218, 367, 368, 373, 389 L. crenulata Hook., 361, 377 L. Dicksonii Nyl., 250, 375 L. dispersa Nyl., 261, 369, 377, 384 L. effusa Ach., 204 L. epanora Ach., 246 L. epibryon Ach., 378, 389 L. epulotica Nyl., 392 L. esculenta Eversm., 211, 257, 265, 298, 389, 404 (Fig. 130), 422 L. exigua, see Rinodina L. ferruginea Nyl., 30 L. galactina Ach., 254, 262, 360, 369, 377, 384, 386 L. gelida Ach., 135, 136, 137 (Fig. 77), 140, 375 L. gibbosa Nyl., 375, 384, 386 L. glaucoma Ach., see L. sordida; var. corrugata Nyl., 84 (Fig. 46) L. Hageni Ach., 366, 367, 369, 377, 383 L. hypnorum Ach., see Psoroma L. lacustris Th. Fr., 233, 250, 391, 392 L. lentigera Ach., 81, 90, 298, 367 L. muralis Schaer., 242 L. ochracea Nyl., 373 L. pallescens Mudd, 213 L. pallida Schaer., 78 L. parella Ach., 72, 375, 382, 384, 417 L. peliocypha Nyl., 375 L. picea Nyl., 374 L. piniperda Koerb., 204 L. polytropa Schaer., 237, 376, 394 L. prosechoides Nyl., 383, 384 L. rubina Wain., 390 L. rugosa Nyl., 366 L. Sambuci Nyl., 204 L. saxicola Ach., 79, 80, 81, 233, 252, 349, 369, 384, 386, 393, 396 L. simplex Nyl. (see Biatorella), 75, 77, 382 L. smaragdula Nyl., 382 L. sophodes Ach., 30; see Rinodina L. sordida Th. Fr., 194, 236, 261, 374, 375, 380, 382 L. squamulosa Nyl., 374 L. subfusca Ach., 22, 30, 49, 65 (Fig. 34), 70 (Fig. 57), 157 (Fig. 88), 164, 166, 167, 168, 236, 347, 365, 366 L. sulphurea Ach., 226, 238, 376, 384 L. tartarea Ach., 57, 147, 183 (Fig. 102), 224, 225, 227, 237, 262, 346, 358, 359, 371, 375, 387, 389, 414 (Fig. 134) L. umbrina Massal., 377, 385 L. upsaliensis Nyl., 387 L. urbana Nyl., 361 L. varia Ach., 227, 346, 360, 361, 362, 366, 367, 377 L. ventosa, see Haematomma L. verrucosa Laur., 378 L. xantholyta Nyl., 373
Lecanoraceae, 136, 311, 337, 353
Lecanorales, 297
Lecidea Ach., 78, 184, 261, 279, 292, 304, 308, 328, 346, 347, 349, 351, 353, 364, 365, 372, 373, 385, 390 L. aglaea Somm., 375 L. albocoerulescens Ach., 392 L. alpestris Somm., 387 L. arctica Somm., 387 L. aromatica (see Bilimbia) L. atrofusca Nyl., 248, 387 L. auriculata Th. Fr., 375 L. Berengeriana Th. Fr., 387 L. coarctata Nyl., 247 L. coeruleonigricans Schaer., 373 L. colludens Nyl., 384; see Buellia L. confluens Ach., 375, 388; f. oxydata Leight., 250 L. consentiens Nyl., 134, 135 L. contigua Fr., 375, 376, 388, 392; var. flavicunda Nyl., 250 L. crustulata Koerb., 369 L. (Bilimbia) cuprea Somm., 387 L. cupreiformis Nyl., 387 L. decipiens Ach., 291, 367, 368 L. decolorans Floerk, see L. granulosa L. demissa Th. Fr., 369, 387 L. diducens Nyl., 375 L. enteroleuca Nyl., 164, 168, 365 L. fumosa Ach., 159 L. fuscoatra Ach., 200 (Fig. 114), 375 L. gelatinosa Floerk., 368 L. granulosa Schaer., 218, 237, 269, 291, 362, 369, 370, 377 L. grisella Floerk., 243 L. helvola Th. Fr., 245 L. herbidula Nyl., xxi L. illita Nyl., 136 L. immersa Ach., 217 (Fig. 117), 398 L. inserena Nyl., 375 L. insularis Nyl., 236, 261 L. irregularis Fée, 192 L. Kochiana Hepp, 375 L. lapicida Ach., 375 L. lavata Nyl., 384 L. limosa Ach., 387 L. lucida Ach., 246, 376 L. lurida Ach., 79, 195, 241, 367 L. mesotropa Nyl., 375 L. Metzleri Th. Fr., 398 L. nigroclavata Nyl., 384 L. ostreata Schaer., 79, 145, 291, 366 L. pallida Th. Fr., 135 L. panaeola Ach., 134, 135, 136, 375 L. parasema Ach., 183 (Fig. 101), 366 L. pelobotrya Somm., 135, 136 L. phylliscocarpa Nyl., 31 L. phyllocaris Wain., 31, 327 L. plana Nyl., 375 L. platycarpa Ach., 375 L. pycnocarpa Koerb., 375 L. quernea Ach., 236, 349, 386 L. rivulosa Ach., 374, 375, 376 L. sanguinaria Ach., 187 (Fig. 105), 248 L. sanguineoatra Ach., 370 L. stellulata Tayl., 376 L. sulphurella Hedl., 242 L. sylvicola Flot., 372 L. testacea Ach., 195 (Fig. 111) L. tricolor Nyl. (Biatorina Griffithii), 362 L. tumida Massal., 375 L. uliginosa Ach., 254, 291, 370, 385, 387 L. vernalis Ach., 66 (Fig. 35)
Lecideaceae, 135, 241, 279, 291, 298, 310, 327, 328, 341, 346, 353
Lecideales, 290, 308
Leciophysma Th. Fr., 334
Leighton, 16, 17, 18, 19, 134, 306, 342, 353, 388
Leiosoma palmicinctum, 397
Lemming rats, 401
Lemmopsis A. Zahlbr., 334
Lenzites Fr., 261, 371
Léorier, 411
Lepidocollema Wain., 81, 336
Lepidoptera, 399
Lepolichen Trevis., 318 L. coccophora Hue, 57, 318 L. granulatus Müll.-Arg., 318
Lepra Hall., 143 L. viridis Humb., 23
Lepraria Ach., 143, 237, 305 L. botryoides, xx L. chlorina, 376
Leprieur, 15
Leprocollema Wain., 285, 354
Leproloma Nyl., 325
Leptodendriscum Wain., 284, 332
Leptogidium Nyl., 284, 332, 350 L. dendriscum Nyl., 332
Leptogium S. F. Gray, 69, 84, 87, 232, 285, 335, 370 L. Burgessii Mont., 245 L. byssinum Nyl., 368 L. Hildenbrandii Nyl., 364 L. lacerum S. F. Gray, 243, 254, 373 L. myochroum Nyl., 365 L. scotinum Fr., 385 L. turgidum Nyl., 385
Leptorhaphis Koerb., 263, 316
Lesdain, Bouly de, 140, 270, 271, 366, 369, 376, 398
Letharia A. Zahlbr., 84, 340 L. vulpina Wain., 95, 105, 226, 228, 246, 265, 349, 364, 410, 417
Lett, 19
Lettau, 225, 227, 369, 391, 417
Lichen, xxvi, 1, 5, 9, 303
Lichen albineus Ludw., 354
Lichen candelarius L., 371, 415
Lichen cinereus terrestris, 407
Lichen dichotomus Engelh., 354
Lichen diffusus Ludw., 354
Lichen gelatinosus Rupp, 6
Lichen juniperinus L., 415
Lichen orbiculatus Ludw., 354
Lichen parietinus L., 371, 415
Lichen Roccella L., 415
Lichen saxatilis L., 415
Lichen tartareus L., 415
Lichen tenellus Scop., 371
Lichenacei, 306
Lichenes Coralloidei etc. Hall., 7
Lichenodium Nyl., 334
Lichenoides, 1, 6, 7, 304, 415
Lichenophoma Keisz., 201
Lichenoxanthine, 418
Lichina Ag., 163, 195, 201, 233, 281, 284, 334, 383 L. confinis Ag., 383, 384 L. pygmaea Ag., 195, 201, 383
Lichinaceae, 55, 99, 310, 333
Lichinella Nyl., 354
Lightfoot, 9, 280, 303, 407, 415
Limax, 396
Lindau, 18, 34, 36, 48, 64, 67, 78, 108, 149, 164, 168, 170, 176, 178, 184, 233, 269, 330
Lindsay, xx, 16, 17, 19, 120, 193, 203, 252, 262, 266, 348, 354, 358, 391, 401, 415, 417
Link, 371
Linkola, 141
Linnaeus, 7, 142, 154, 304, 312, 392, 401, 409, 415
Lister, 267
Listerella paradoxa Jahn, 267
Lithographa Nyl., 322
Lithoicea Massal., see Verrucaria L. lecideoides Massal., 373
Lithothelium Müll.-Arg., 317
Litmus, 413
Lobaria Schreb., 136, 182, 287, 336 L. laciniata Wain., 133, 134 L. laetevirens A. Zahlbr., 2, 196 L. pulmonaria Hoffm., 2, 3, 10, 90, 96, 126 (Fig. 127), 130, 195, 252, 267, 336, 400, 406, 408, 411, 416, 418 L. scrobiculata DC., 130, 143
L’Obel, 2
Lopadiopsis Wain., 327
Lopadium Koerb., 191, 329
Lophothelium Stirt., 319
Loxa (Cinchona), 364
Ludwig, 354
Luffia lapidella, 399
Lung-wort, 406, 409
Lutz, 108
Luyken, xx, 156, 184
Lycoperdaceae, 307
Lyell, 14
Lyngbya Ag., 136
Mackay, 13
McLean, 385
Macmillan, 357, 391
Maheu, 243, 387
Maire, 185, 186, 189
Malinowski, 74, 371, 374
Malme, 261
Malpighi, 5, 142, 155
Manna, 404, 422
Marchantia L., 1, 5
Maronea Massal., 331
Martindale, 19
Martius, 15
Massalongia Koerb., 287, 335
Massalongo, 16, 188, 305
Massee, 308
Mastoidea Hook. and Harv., 315
Mastoidiaceae, 60, 309, 315
Mattirolo, 152
Mäule, 162, 164
Mayfield, 368
Mazosia Massal., 59, 323
Mead, Richard, 407
Megalospora Mey. and Flot., 329
Melampydium Müll.-Arg., 325
Melanotheca Müll.-Arg., 317
Melaspilea Nyl., 321, 322
Mereschkovsky, 258
Merrett, 3
Metzger, 176, 240
Meyer, 13, 46, 51, 126, 143, 156, 187, 252, 258, 305
Micarea Fr., see Biatorina Massal.
Michael, 397
Michaux, 14
Micheli, 1, 6, 142, 155
Microcystis Kütz., 52, 319
Microglaena Lönnr., 314
Micrographa Müll.-Arg., 322
Microphiale A. Zahlbr., 328
Microthelia Koerb., 316
Microtheliopsis Müll.-Arg., 318
Minks, 26
Minksia Müll.-Arg., 323
Mites, 395, 397
Miyoshi, 256, 403
Mnium hornum L., 65 (Fig. 35)
Moebius, 62
Mohl, 185, 186
Molisch, 250
Möller, 49, 154, 196, 202, 203
Moma orion, 399
Monas Lens, xx
Monascus, Van Teigh., 178
Montagne, 15
Moreau, xxi, 168, 175, 176, 212, 266
Moriola Norm., 313
Moriolaceae, 309, 313
Morison, 1, 4, 5, 155, 304
Moss, 356
Mousse des Chênes, 418
Mudd, 16, 17, 19
Muenster, 354
Mühlenberg, 14
Mulder, 210
Müller(-Argau), 18, 26, 191, 192, 205, 278, 307, 353, 405
Müller, K., 212
Müllerella Hepp, 275
Musco-fungus, 1
Muscus, 1
Muscus cranii humani, 413
Musk, 419
Mycetozoon on Lichens, 267
Mycoblastus Norm., 329 M. sanguinarius Th. Fr., 188; see Lecidea
Mycocalicium Rehm, 277 M. parietinum Rehm, 277
Mycoconiocybe Rehm, 277
Mycoidea Cunningh., 35, 59, 309, 318, 352, 363 M. parasitica Cunningh., 36, 59 (Fig. 31), 60
Mycoideaceae, 59
Mycoporaceae, 309, 318, 352
Mycoporellum Zahlbr., 159, 318
Mycoporum Flot., 159, 276, 318
Mycosphaerella Johans., 39
Mycosphaerellaceae, 275
Myriangiacei, 306
Myxodictyon Massal., 338
Myxophyceae, xix, 51, 52-55, 60, 68, 272, 324, 385
Narcyria monilifera, 399
Necker, 123, 154
Nees von Esenbeck, xxiv
Neophyllis Wils., 330, 351
Nephroma Ach., 63, 135, 136, 169, 244, 286, 337, 348 N. expallidum Nyl., 139 (Fig. 79)
Nephromium Nyl., 63, 158, 175, 200, 222, 244, 283, 286, 337, 349, 351 N. laevigatum Nyl., 195 N. lusitanicum Nyl., 228, 246 N. tomentosum Nyl., 87, 128, 169
Nephromopsis Müll.-Arg., 158, 244, 339
Neubert, 410
Neubner, 62, 175, 189, 288
Neuropogon Flot. and Nees, 346
Nienburg, 38, 64, 123, 166, 167, 168, 169, 177, 185, 196, 240
Nilson, 147, 151, 250, 358, 389
Norman, 16, 313
Normandina Nyl., see Coriscium
Normandina Wain., 315
Nostoc Vauch., 20, 21, 23, 24, 26, 27, 32, 42, 53, 61, 63, 69, 136, 138, 232, 246, 266, 285, 309 et seq., 396 N. coerulescens Lyngb., 53 (Fig. 18) N. lichenoides Kütz., xx, 54 N. Linckia Born., 53 (Fig. 18) N. sphaericum Vauch., 54 N. symbioticum, 45
Nostocaceae, 25, 53
Notaris, De, 1, 15, 16
Notaspis lutorum, 397
Nyctalis Fr., 261
Nylander, xxi, 7, 8, 16, 18, 25, 30, 52, 126, 131, 135, 136, 152, 197, 228, 262, 306, 325, 350, 353, 360, 383
Nylanderiella Hue, 315
Obryzum Wallr., 263
Ocellularia Spreng., 326
Ochrolechia Massal., 338 O. pallescens Koerb., 187 (Fig. 106), 213
Ochrophaeae Wain., 295
Officinal barks, 15
Ohlert, 234
Oidia, 189
Olivier, 342
Omphalaria Dur. and Mont., 348, 373, 393 O. Heppii Müll., 63 O. pulvinata Nyl., 373
Oniscus, 396
Oospora Wallr., 45
Opegrapha Ach., 11, 13, 35, 184, 304, 321, 322, 353, 354, 361 O. atra Pers., 15, 202 O. calcarea Turn., 383 O. endoleuca Nyl., 243 O. hapalea Ach., 243 O. saxicola Ach., 216, 219 O. subsiderella Nyl., 50, 202, 349 O. Thomasiana Goepp., 354 O. varia Pers., 354, 365 O. vulgata Ach., 30 O. zonata Koerb., 392
Opegraphella Müll.-Arg., 322
Orbilia coccinella Karst., 261
Orchil lichen, 412, 416
Oribata Parmeliae, 397
Oribatidae, 397
Oropogon Fr., 340 O. loxensis Th. Fr., 130, 210, 352
Orphniospora Koerb., 329
Orthidium, 191
Orthoptera, 397
Oscillaria Bosc., 24
Pachyphiale Lönnr., 328
Padina Pavonia Gaillon, 153
Palmella Lyngb., 24, 57, 232, 278, 282, 289, 309, 321, 338, 353 P. botryoides Kütz., 313
Pannaria Del., 61, 79, 81, 135, 168, 175, 336, 392 P. brunnea Massal., 244, 370 P. microphylla Massal., 81, 244 P. pezizoides Leight., 63 P. rubiginosa Del., 283 P. triptophylla Nyl., 244
Pannariaceae, 54, 135, 285, 287, 311, 335
Pannoparmelia Darbish., 338 P. anzioides Darbish., 90 (Fig. 51)
Paracelsus, 407
Paratheliaceae, 309, 316, 352
Parathelium Müll.-Arg., 317
Parfitt, 95
Parkinson, 3, 407
Parmelei, 353
Parmelia Ach., 84, 86, 93, 94, 95, 133, 200, 213, 227, 231, 238, 241, 242, 249, 260, 264, 267, 269, 299, 300, 305, 346, 347, 348, 349, 351, 354, 364, 372, 414 P. acetabulum Dub., 30, 167, 169 (Fig. 96), 170, 180, 195 (Fig. 111), 231, 255, 259, 360 P. adglutinata Floerk., 365 P. aleurites Ach., 364 P. alpicola Fr., 18, 350, 387 P. aspidota Rosend. (see P. exasperata), 92 (Fig. 53), 170, 338 P. Borreri Turn., 265; see P. dubia P. caperata Ach., 88 (Fig. 49), 253, 255, 365, 366, 395 P. cetrata Ach., 92 P. conspersa Ach., 194, 241, 242, 355, 369, 376, 416, 417 P. crinita Nyl., 365 P. dubia Schaer., 377 P. encausta Ach., 268, 388, 393 P. enteromorpha Ach., 131 P. exasperata Carroll, 62, 129 (Fig. 74), 132, 196 P. farinacea Bitt., 131, 143 P. fuliginosa Nyl., 247, 361, 376, 386 P. glabra Nyl., 87, 170, 176 P. glabratula Lamy, 170 P. glomellifera Nyl., 249, 251 P. hyperopta Ach., 261 P. isidiophora A. Zahlbr., 66 P. Kamtschadalis Eschw., 300 P. lacunosa Meng. and Goepp., 355 P. lanata Wallr., see P. pubescens P. locarensis Zopf., 249 P. molliuscula Ach., 265 P. Mougeotii Schaer., 375 P. obscurata DC., 64, 131, 176, 242 P. olivacea Ach., 247, 365 P. omphalodes Ach., 3, 260, 375, 387, 415 (Fig. 135) P. papulosa Rosend., 150, 214, 219 P. perforata Hook. (?), 365 P. perlata Ach., 92, 114, 213, 237, 243, 262, 353, 363, 403, 416 P. pertusa Schaer., 131 P. physodes Ach., 64, 91, 144 (Fig. 83), 146 (Fig. 84), 156, 194, 234, 237, 242, 253, 262, 299, 355, 361, 363, 366, 384, 385, 416 P. pilosella Hue, 92 P. proboscidea Tayl., 92, 150 P. prolixa Carroll, 241, 249, 382 P. pubescens Wain., 85, 299, 300, 350, 375, 387 P. revoluta Floerk., 247, 259 (Fig. 121) P. saxatilis Ach., 169, 170, 242, 243, 253, 260, 355, 361, 365, 366, 375, 386, 387, 393, 407 (Fig. 131), 416 P. scortea Ach., 150, 366 P. stygia Ach., 130, 299, 350, 375, 387, 393 P. subaurifera Nyl., 143, 226, 246, 377 P. sulcata Tayl., 144, 361 P. tiliacea Ach., 164, 170, 252, 365 P. tristis Wallr., 88, 130, 247, 375, 387 P. verruculifera Nyl., 87, 143, 214 P. vittata Nyl., 131, 143
Parmeliaceae, 200, 287, 298, 311
Parmeliales, 308
Parmeliella Müll.-Arg., 81, 286, 336
Parmeliopsis Nyl., 339
Parmentaria Fée, 317
Patellaria Fr., 280
Patellariaceae, 278
Patinella Sacc., 279 P. atroviridis Rehm, 278
Patouillard, 389
Paulia Fée, 284, 333, 352
Paulson, 244, 254, 366
Paulson and Hastings, 28, 38, 44, 56, 260
Paulson and Thompson, 254, 361, 369, 377, 397
Peccania Forss., 284, 333, 373
Peirce, xxiii, 33, 34, 108, 258, 359
Peltati, 305
Peltidea Ach., 63, 286; see Peltigera
Peltigera Willd., 3, 42, 53, 61, 63, 88, 135, 136, 137, 168, 175, 186, 204, 212, 213, 222, 232, 242, 257, 266, 283, 286, 337, 346, 349, 355, 367, 384, 385, 392 P. americana Wain., 351 P. aphthosa Willd., 26, 87, 133, 138 (Fig. 78 A, B), 141, 211, 262, 347, 359, 370, 406 P. canina Willd., 24, 51, 84 (Fig. 47), 87, 89 (Fig. 50), 93 (Figs. 54, 55), 97, 185, 213, 254, 262, 359, 367, 370, 394, 396, 407, 418 P. horizontalis Hoffm., 169, 244 P. lepidophora (Nyl.) Bitt., 140 P. leptoderma Nyl., 351 P. malacea Fr., 169, 370 P. polydactyla Hoffm., 51, 244, 266, 368 P. rufescens Hoffm., 169, 386 P. spuria Leight., 268, 369 P. spuriella Wain., 351 P. venosa Hoffm., 244, 347
Peltigeraceae, 54, 135, 283, 286, 287, 311, 336
Pelvetia canaliculata Dec. and Thur., 39
Pentagenella Darbish., 83, 324
Perforaria Müll.-Arg., 337
Persio, 413
Persoon, 10, 21, 123, 156, 395
Pertusaria DC., 34, 73, 85, 86, 88, 170, 180, 186, 213, 246, 253, 337, 414 P. amara Ach., 148, 236, 243, 349, 361, 366, 408 (Fig. 132) P. communis DC., 50, 202, 214 (Fig. 116), 255, 269, 366, 393 P. concreta Nyl., 382 P. corallina (Ach.) Bachm., 374 P. dactylina Nyl., 387 P. dealbata Cromb., 215, 375, 376 P. faginea Leight., 396 P. globulifera Nyl., 33 (Fig. 12), 236, 237, 262, 357, 366 P. glomerata Schaer., 387 P. lactea Nyl., 374, 376 P. leioplaca Schaer., 365 P. lutescens Lamy, 226 P. melaleuca Dub., 417 P. oculata Th. Fr., 387 P. velata Nyl., 265 P. Wulfenii DC., 226, 366
Pertusariaceae, 147, 311
Petch, 397
Petiver, 4, 10
Petractis Fr., 327 P. exanthematica Fr., 61, 75, 215, 216
Peziza Dill., 157, 213, 307 P. resinae Fr., 355
Pfaff, 221
Pfeffer, 220
Phacopsis vulpina Tobl., 265
Phaeographina Müll.-Arg., 322
Phaeographis Müll.-Arg., 322 Ph. Lyellii A. Zahlbr., 350
Phaeotrema Müll.-Arg., 326
Phalena, 395
Phascum cuspidatum Schreb., 45
Phialopsis rubra Koerb., 174, 249; see Gyalecta
Phillips, 252
Phleopeccania Stein., 284, 333, 352
Phlyctella Müll.-Arg., 338
Phlyctidia Müll.-Arg., 338
Phlyctis Wallr., 338 P. agelaea Koerb., 174
Phycolichens, 22, 282, 283, 285
Phycopeltis Millard., 59, 278, 318, 321, 322, 323, 327, 352, 363 P. expansa Jenn., 35 (Fig. 13), 60 (Fig. 32)
Phyllactidium Moeb., 59, 62, 288, 309, 310, 318, 327, 363 P. tropicum Moeb., 59
Phylliscidium Forss., 333
Phylliscum Nyl., 286, 333
Phyllobathelium Müll.-Arg., 318
Phyllophora Grev., 111
Phyllophthalmaria A. Zahlbr., 326, 352 Ph. coccinea A. Zahlbr., 352
Phylloporina Müll.-Arg., 318
Phyllopsora Müll.-Arg., 329 P. furfuracea A. Zahlbr., 329
Phyllopsoraceae, 310, 329
Phyllopyreniaceae, 309, 318
Phymaloidei, 304
Physcia Schreb., 90, 94, 166, 186, 238, 301, 351, 372, 399 P. aipolia Nyl., 20 (Fig. 1), 249 P. aquila Nyl., 380, 382, 384 P. ascendens Bitt., 270, 369, 377 P. caesia Nyl., 226, 369, 384 P. chrysophthalma, see Teloschistes P. ciliaris DC., 3, 46, 84 (Fig. 48), 92, 94, 99, 103, 155, 165 (Fig. 94), 166, 167, 182 (Fig. 100), 184, 185 (Fig. 104), 187, 189, 192, 243, 246, 247, 355, 360, 411, 419 P. granulifera Nyl., 365 P. hispida Tuck., 29, 92, 146, 164, 166, 169, 194 (Fig. 110), 241, 271, 360, 366 P. hypoleuca Tuck., 399 P. intricata Schaer., 301 P. leucomelas Mich., 99 P. obscura Nyl., 243, 360, 365, 369, 377 P. parietina (see Xanthoria), 29 (Figs. 7, 8) P. picta Nyl., 349, 353 P. pulverulenta Nyl., 28, 164 (Fig. 93), 166, 181, 248, 360, 365, 366, 377, 399 P. puncticulata Hue, 33 P. sciastrella Hann., 369 P. stellaris Nyl., 29, 365, 384 P. stellaris var. tenella Cromb., see P. hispida Tuck. P. subobscura A. L. Sm., 384 P. tenella Bitt., 366, 384, 386 P. tribacia Nyl., 365 P. villosa Dub., 268
Physciaceae, 136, 200, 267, 300, 308, 311, 341
Physcidia Tuck., 299, 339 Ph. Wrightii Nyl., 352
Physma Massal., 163, 284, 334, 341 P. chalazanum Arn., 32 (Fig. 9) P. compactum Koerb., 163, 266 P. franconicum Massal., 263
Pilocarpaceae, 310, 325
Pilocarpon Wain., 325, 353; see Pilophorus P. leucoblepharum Wain., 325, 363
Pilophorus Th. Fr., 17, 125, 133, 135, 201, 292, 294, 297, 330 P. robustus Th. Fr., 136
Pinus sylvestris L., 94, 271
Piptocephalis De Bary, 261
Placidiopsis Beltr., 288
Placodium DC., 80, 339, 340, 346, 360, 372 P. atroflavum A. L. Sm., 386 P. aurantiacum Hepp, 365 P. bicolor Tuck., 136 P. callopismum Mér., 349 P. cerinum Hepp, 262, 365, 366, 367 P. citrinum Hepp, 224, 271, 349, 373, 377, 386, 393 P. decipiens Leight., 218, 369, 383 P. elegans DC., 225, 241, 347, 369, 390 P. ferrugineum Hepp, 346, 384 P. flavescens A. L. Sm., 377 P. fruticulosum Darbish., 347 P. fulgens S. F. Gray, 367 P. lacteum Lesd., 377 P. lobulatum A. L. Sm., 379, 382, 384 P. luteoalbum Hepp, 301 P. murorum DC., 42, 80 (Fig. 42), 227, 241, 243, 347, 369, 380 P. nivale Tuck., 301 P. pyraceum Anzi, 369, 377 P. rupestre Br. and Rostr., 301 P. subfruticulosum Elenk., 347 P. sympageum, see P. flavescens P. tegularis (Ehrh.) Darbish., 379, 384 P. teicholytum DC., 369
Placodium Hill (non DC.), 8
Placodium Web. (non DC.), 9 P. Garovagli (Koerb.) Fried., 81 P. saxicolum S. F. Gray, 146, 168; see Lecanora
Placolecania Zahlbr., 338
Placothelium Müll.-Arg., 285, 319
Placynthium Ach., 336 P. nigrum S. F. Gray, 248, 373
Plagiothecium sylvaticum Buch. and Schimp., 237
Plagiotrema Müll.-Arg., 317
Platygrapha Nyl., 325
Platysma Nyl., 8, 200, 257; see Cetraria P. commixtum Nyl., 375 P. corniculatum Hill, 8 P. Fahlunense Nyl., 375 P. glaucum Nyl., 10, 375, 376, 418 P. lacunosa Nyl., 375
Pleospora collematum Zuk., 163, 266
Pleurococcus Menegh. (?), 22, 29, 62 P. Naegeli Chod., 28 P. vulgaris Menegh., 28, 55 (Fig. 22), 223 P. vulgaris Naeg., 28
Pleurocybe Müll.-Arg., 320 P. madagascarea A. Zahlbr., 289
Pleurothelium Müll.-Arg., 317
Pleurotrema Müll.-Arg., 317
Plot, 4
Plowright, 207
Plukenet, 5
Poa compressa L., 393
Poduridae, 256
Polyblastia Massal., 48, 314 P. catalepta (Ach.) Fuist., 30 P. Vouauxi Lesd., 378
Polyblastiopsis Nyl., 316
Polycauliona Hue, 339, 340, 346 P. regale Hue, 339, 346
Polycaulionaceae, 339
Polychidium A. Zahlbr., 284, 332
Polycoccus Kütz., 24 P. punctiformis Kütz., 24, 54, 61
Polyporus Mich., 261
Polystictus versicolor (Fr.), 152
Polystigma rubrum DC., 178, 207
Polystroma Clem., 326 P. Ferdinandezii Clem., 326
Polytrichum L., 392 P. commune L., 237
Polyxenus, 270
Porina Ach., 204, 316 P. lectissima A. Zahlbr., 249, 251, 392 P. olivacea A. L. Sm., 159 (Fig. 90 A)
Porocyphus Koerb., 332
Poronia Willd., 13, 178
Porta, 5
Porter, 109, 270
Prasiola Ag., 60, 309, 315 P. parietina Wille, 60 (Fig. 33)
Prasiolaceae, 60
Propagula, 11
Protocaliceaceae, 277
Protococcaceae, 55, 288, 291, 309, 310, 313 et seq., 353, 363
Protococcus Ag., xx, 28, 56, 62, 63, 65, 287 P. botryoides Kirchn., 65 P. viridis Ag., 22, 28, 44, 48 (Fig. 15), 55 (Fig. 22), 65, 313
Pseudopyrenula Müll.-Arg., 316
Psocus, 397
Psora (Lecidea) decipiens Hook., 388
Psorella Müll.-Arg., 329
Psoroglaena Müll.-Arg., 315
Psoroma S. F. Gray, 136, 285, 286, 335 P. hypnorum S. F. Gray, 63, 81, 88, 89, 135, 246, 283, 370
Psoromaria Nyl., 285, 286, 335
Psorotichia Massal., 68, 163, 333, 373 Ps. lugubris Dal. Tor. and Sarnth., 375 Ps. lutophila Arn., 368
Psychides, 399
Pterygiopsis Wain., 332
Pterygium Nyl., 333 Pt. Kenmorensis A. L. Sm., 392
Ptychographa Nyl., 321, 322
Pulteney, 4, 14
Pulvis antilyssus, 407
Pulvis Cyprius, 419
Pycnothelia (Cladonia) papillaria Duf., 369
Pyrenastrum Eschw., 317
Pyrenidiaceae, 53, 54, 275, 285, 309, 319
Pyrenidium Nyl., 285, 319 P. actinellum Nyl., 99
Pyrenocarpeae, 158, 273, 308
Pyrenocarpei, 306, 307, 353
Pyrenocarpineae, 273, 275, 288, 308
Pyrenocollema Reinke, 334
Pyrenographa Müll.-Arg., 323
Pyrenolichens 159, 241, 276, 352, 391
Pyrenomycetes 158, 267, 273
Pyrenopsidaceae, 282, 284, 310, 352
Pyrenopsidium Forss., 333
Pyrenopsis Nyl., 60, 68, 163, 175, 333 P. haematopis Th. Fr., 195 P. impolita Forss., 175 P. phaeococca Tuck., 175
Pyrenothamnia Tuck., 99, 315 P. Spraguei Tuck., 288
Pyrenothamniaceae, 309, 315
Pyrenothea Ach., 192
Pyrenothrix Riddle, 319
Pyrenula Ach., 200, 316 P. cinerella Fink, 365 P. leucoplaca Koerb., 365 P. nitida Ach., 174, 194, 240, 255, 350, 354, 364, 365 P. thelena Fink, 365
Pyrenulaceae, 50, 276, 309, 316, 365
Pyrgidium Nyl., 319 P. bengalense Nyl., 353
Pyrgillus Nyl., 289, 320
Pyronema Carus., 167 P. confluens Tul., 178
Pyxidium Hill, 8
Pyxine Nyl., 301, 341 P. Cocoës Nyl., 353 P. Meissnerii Tuck., 353
Quercus alba, 359 Q. chrysolepis, 359 Q. Douglasii, 359
Racodium Pers., 35, 328 R. rupestre Pers., 291, 328
Radais, 42
Ramalina Ach., 3, 84, 103, 110, 195, 213, 238, 244, 257, 270, 305, 340, 347, 348, 351, 359, 361, 363 R. calicaris Fr., 3, 104, 147, 210, 353, 355, 365, 366, 418, 419 R. ceruchis De Not., 103 R. Curnowii Cromb., 104, 109 R. cuspidata Nyl., 225, 271 (see R. siliquosa), 384 R. dilacerata Hoffm., 106, 130 R. Eckloni Mont., 130 R. evernioides Nyl., 103, 300 R. farinacea Ach., 10, 239, 269, 271, 353, 366, 400, 411 R. fastigiata Ach., 109, 365, 366, 400, 411 R. fraxinea Ach., 104, 106, 130 (Fig. 75 A), 155, 164, 170, 195, 200, 212, 215, 300, 355, 365, 366, 400, 411, 418 R. gracilenta Ach., 349 R. homalea Ach., 103 R. Landroensis Zopf, 109, 130 R. minuscula Nyl., 103 (Fig. 62), 147 R. pollinaria Ach., 109, 227, 349, 366 R. reticulata Krempelh., 33 (Fig. 11), 99, 106 (Fig. 64), 253, 257, 359 R. scopulorum Ach., see R. siliquosa R. siliquosa A. L. Sm., 104, 109 (Fig. 65), 130, 224, 225, 271, 300, 379 (Fig. 122), 381 (Figs. 123, 124) R. strepsilis Zahlbr., 104, 130 (Fig. 75 B) R. subfarinacea Nyl., 380 R. tertiaria Engelh., 354
Ramalinaceae, 339
Ramalinites lacerus Braun, 354
Ramalodei, 306
Ramonia Stizenb., 328
Rathapu, 403
Ray, 4, 407, 409
Rees, 27
Rehm, 277
Reindeer, 401
Reindeer moss, 400 et passim
Reinke, 18, 31, 41, 68, 123, 125, 130, 144, 253, 277, 284, 291, 307, 324
Reinkella Darbish., 83, 324
Relhan, 9
Rhabdopsora Müll.-Arg., 319
Rhizina undulata Fr., 181
Rhizocarpon Ramond, 248, 302, 329, 341 R. alboatrum Th. Fr., 365, 369, 373, 383 R. concentricum, see R. petraeum R. confervoides DC., 71 (Fig. 38 A, B), 369, 386 R. distinctum Th. Fr., 261 R. epipolium (Ach.), 265 R. geographicum DC., 73, 74 (Figs. 40, 41), 226, 236, 243, 246, 249, 252, 261, 264, 291, 346, 372, 374, 376, 380 R. obscuratum Massal., 392 R. Oederi Koerb., 375 R. petraeum Koerb. (?), 374 R. petraeum Massal., 171 (Fig. 97), 375, 392 R. viridiatrum Koerb., 249, 375, 376
Rhizomorpha Roth, 12
Rhymbocarpus punctiformis Zopf, 264
Ricasolia De Not., 94 (see Lobaria), 168, 175 R. amplissima De Not., 133, 134 (Fig. 76), 195, 197, 357 R. laetevirens Leight., 357
Richard, 377, 411
Richardson, Dr, 6
Richardson, Sir John, 388
Riddle, 137
Rinodina S. F. Gray, 301, 302, 341, 372 R. archaea Wain., 346 R. Conradi Koerb., 370 R. exigua S. F. Gray, 366, 367, 377, 383, 384 R. isidioides Oliv., 301 R. oreina Wain., 301, 374, 390 R. sophodes Th. Fr., 367 R. turfacea Th. Fr., 262, 377
Rivularia, 55, 136, 138, 284, 333 R. Biasolettiana, 54 (Fig. 21) R. minutula Born. and Fl., 54 (Fig. 21) R. nitida Ag., 55
Rivulariaceae, 54
Roccella DC., 3, 34, 35, 83, 103, 200, 225, 233, 242, 278, 292, 324, 351, 359, 363 R. fuciformis DC., 83 (Fig. 45), 98 (Fig. 57), 101, 110, 227, 228, 349, 350, 412 R. fucoides Wain., 349, 350 R. Montagnei Bél., 213, 413 R. peruensis Kremp., 413 R. phycopsis Ach., 110; see R. fucoides R. portentosa Mont., 413 R. sinuensis Nyl., 413 R. tinctoria DC., 213, 215, 227, 349, 350, 413 (Fig. 133)
Roccellaceae, 59, 83, 110, 279, 290, 309, 323
Roccellaria Darbish., 323, 324
Roccellina Darbish., 83, 290, 323, 324
Roccellographa Stein., 83, 290, 323, 324
Rock tripe, 404
Roebuck, 401
Ronceray, 213, 413
Rosendahl, 86, 90, 93, 129, 170, 176, 214, 218, 249
Roses, spirit of, 419
Roy, 411
Ruel, 2
Rupp, 5
Russula Pers., 161
Sachs, 17, 23
Sagedia, see Verrucaria S. declivum Am., 251
Sagiolechia Massal., 328
Salix repens L., 357
Salter, 51, 393
Sandstede, 233, 384, 385
Sappin-Trouffy, 207
Sarcographa Fée, 323
Sarcographina Müll.-Arg., 323
Sarcogyne (= Biatorella) latericola Stein., 76
Sarcopyrenia Nyl., 314
Sättler, 123, 173, 296, 358
Schade, 376
Schaerer, 15, 192
Schellenberg, 212
Schenk, 213
Schikorra, 178
Schimper, 354, 355
Schismatomma Flot., 325
Schizopelte Th. Fr., 83, 324
Schneider, 7, 135, 136, 139
Schreber, 126
Schrenk, 231, 258, 359
Schulte, 104, 105, 106, 177
Schwarz, 224
Schweinfurth, 405
Schweinitz, 15
Schwenckfeld, 3
Schwendener, xx, 2, 16, 17, 18, 25, 27, 36, 71, 82, 86, 92, 126, 128, 129, 142, 147, 168, 213, 224, 307
Sclerophyton Eschw., 323 S. circumscriptum A. Zahlbr., 322
Scopoli, 8, 21, 154, 409
Scott-Elliot, 253
Scutellati, 305
Scutovertes maculatus, 397
Scytonema Ag., 54, 57, 61, 68, 75, 136, 153, 216, 232, 281, 284, 309 et seq., 318 S. mirabile Thur., 53 (Fig. 19)
Scytonemaceae, 54
Secoliga (Gyalecta) bryophaga Koerb., 368
Segestria, see Porina
Senft, 223
Septoria Fr., 204
Sernander, 94, 140, 355
Servettaz, 45
Servit, 374
Sherard, 4, 6, 7
Sibbald, 409
Sibthorp, 9
Sievers, 230
Simonyella Steiner, 324
Siphula Fr., 340
Sirosiphon pulvinatus Bréb., 54
Sloane, 10
Smith, Lorrain, 328
Smith, Sir J. E., 10
Solorina Ach., 56, 63, 85, 94, 135, 136, 168, 175, 176, 183, 287, 337, 392 S. bispora Nyl., 135 S. crocea Ach., 63, 88, 140, 210, 228, 246, 287, 346, 388 S. octospora Arn., 85 S. saccata Ach., 155, 244, 388 S. spongiosa Carroll, 135, 186, 368
Solorinella Anzi, 337
Sorby, 418
Sowerby, James, 10
Speerschneider, 17, 25
Sphaeria Hall., 192, 213
Sphaeriaceae, 307
Sphaerocephalum Web., 9
Sphaerophoraceae, 135, 309, 320
Sphaerophoropsis Wain., 291, 329 S. stereocauloides Wain., 292
Sphaerophorus Pers., 83, 105, 184, 277, 289, 320, 361, 375, 387, 393 S. coralloides Pers., 83 (Fig. 44) (see S. globosus), 355, 375, 387, 388, 389 S. fragilis Pers., 375, 387 S. globosus A. L. Sm., 346 S. stereocauloides Nyl., 135
Sphagnum Dill., 231, 355
Spheconisca Norm., 313
Sphinctrina Fr., 277, 319, 353
Sphyridium byssoides, 177 S. fungiforme Koerb., 177
Spilonema Born., 68, 333
Spirographa A. Zahlbr., 322
Spirogyra Link, 188
Splachnum L., 5
Sporocladus lichenicola Corda, 200
Sporodinia Link, 188
Sporopodium Mont., 327, 352 S. Caucasium Elenk. and Woron., 353
Sprengel, 21, 142, 156, 184
Squamaria DC., 200, 298 S. saxicola, see Lecanora
Stahel, 220
Stahl, 28, 30, 62, 160, 163, 173, 266, 395
Stahlecker, 76, 235, 371, 374
Staurothele Norm., 31, 62, 76, 314 S. clopima Th. Fr., 391 S. clopismoides Anzi, 249 S. hymenogonia A. Zahlbr., 361 S. umbrinum A. L. Sm., 373, 393
Steganosporium cellulosum Corda, 201
Steiner, 75, 179, 190, 198, 215, 276, 312, 353, 389
Steinera A. Zahlbr., 333
Stenberg, 411
Stenhouse and Groves, 228
Stenocybe Nyl., 177, 319
Stereocaulon Schreb., 17, 23, 83, 105, 125, 133, 135, 176, 201, 283, 292, 294, 297, 330, 346, 358, 361, 387 S. alpinum Laur., 137, 346, 387 S. condensatum Hoffm., 319, 388 S. coralloides Fr., 125, 375 S. Delisei Borg., 375 S. denudatum Floerk., 137, 375, 387 S. evolutum Graewe, 375 S. paschale Fr., 211, 372, 385, 391, 401 S. ramulosum Ach., 125, 136 S. salazinum Borg., 227 S. tomentosum Fr., 125, 136, 387
Stereochlamys Müll.-Arg., 316
Stichococcus Naeg., 62 S. bacillaris Naeg., 42
Sticta Schreb., 13, 63, 85, 86, 94, 136, 138, 200, 283, 287, 336, 350, 351, 364, 392 St. aurata Ach., 126, 128, 223, 226, 246, 350 St. crocata Ach., 128, 246 St. damaecornis Nyl., 127 (Fig. 73), 128, 210, 350 St. Dufourei Del., 128 St. fuliginosa Ach., 126, 128, 223 St. intricata Del., 128 St. limbata Ach., 128 St. oregana Tuck., 136, 139 St. sylvatica Ach., 128 St. Wrightii Nyl., 349
Stictaceae, 96, 136, 286, 311, 336, 347, 350, 418
Stictidaceae, 278
Stictina Nyl., 63, 168, 175, 287
Stictis Pers., 278
Stigmatea Fr., 275
Stigonema Ag., 23, 26, 54 (Fig. 20), 68, 136, 283, 284, 310 et seq., 317 S. panniforme Kirchn., 54
Stigonemaceae, 54
Stirton, 331, 350
Stizenberger, 18, 128
Stone, 399
Streptothrix Cohn, 45
Strigula Fr., 60, 65, 288, 318, 353, 363 S. Buxi Chod., 363 S. complanata Mont., 35, 42, 59, 205, 260, 269 S. elegans Müll.-Arg., 205
Strigulaceae, 59, 60, 204, 309, 318, 363
Stüde, 211
Sturgis, 97, 168, 175, 197, 289
Suaeda fruticosa Forsk., 387
Swartz, 10, 152
Swedish moss, 415
Symbiosis, 31
Synalissa Fr., 32, 33, 61, 284, 333, 373 S. symphorea Nyl., 33 (Fig. 10)
Synarthonia Müll.-Arg., 321
Tabernaemontanus, 2
Tapellaria Müll.-Arg., 327
Taylor, 13, 149
Tegeocranus labyrinthicus, 328
Teloschistaceae, 311, 341
Teloschistes Norm., 85, 301, 341 T. chrysophthalmus Th. Fr., 92, 365, 367 T. flavicans Norm., 3, 301, 341, 417
Teras literana, 399
Termes monoceros, 397
Termites, 397
Tetranychus lapidus, 398 (Fig. 126)
Tetrasporaceae, 57
Thamnolia Ach., 83, 101 (see Cerania), 246, 340, 389 Th. vermicularis Schaer., 346, 377
Thamnonia Tuck., 339
Thaxter, 178
Thelenidia Nyl., 314
Thelephora Ehrh., 281, 342
Thelephoraceae, 152, 273
Thelidea Hue, 335 Th. corrugata Hue, 335
Thelidium Massal., 314 Th. microcarpum A. L. Sm., 361 Th. minutulum Koerb., 253, 367
Thelocarpon Nyl., 331 Th. prasinellum Nyl., 367 Th. turficolum Arn., 370
Thelopsis Nyl., 316
Thelotrema Ach., 326, 343 Th. lepadinum Ach., 397
Thelotremaceae, 59, 302, 310, 326, 351, 352
Thelotremei, 353
Theophrastus, 1, 2, 411
Thermutis Fr., 68, 284, 332
Tholurna Norm., 320 Th. dissimilis Norm., 289
Thomas, N., 59
Thrambium Wallr., 192, 314 T. epigaeum Wallr., 254, 367, 368
Thwaites, 17
Thyrea Massal., 284, 333
Thysanothecium Berk. and Mont., 330 T. Hookeri Berk. and Mont., 294
Ticothecium Flot., 275, 319 T. pygmaeum Koerb., 267
Tieghem, Van, 179
Tobler, 43, 50, 148, 224, 253, 263, 265, 280
Tomasiella Müll.-Arg., 317
Toni, De, 60
Toninia Th. Fr., 329
Torrey, 14
Tournefort, 1, 5, 155, 304
Tournesol, 413
Treboux, 40, 42
Trematosphaeropsis Elenk., 266
Tremotylium Nyl., 326
Trentepohlia Born., 26, 30, 34, 59, 75, 78, 232, 246, 276, 278, 287, 289, 291, 309, 316 etc., 343, 352, 365 T. abietina Hansg., 65, 66 T. aurea Mart., 34, 35, 58 (Fig. 29 A), 59 T. jolithus, 223 T. umbrina Born., 22, 34, 58 (Fig. 29 B), 59, 62, 216
Trentepohliaceae, 59, 288, 289
Treub, 28, 394
Treveris, Peter, 2
Tricothelium Müll.-Arg., 318
Trimmatothele Norm., 314
Tripe de Roche, 404
Trypetheliaceae, 309, 317
Trypethelium Spreng., 276, 317, 351, 364
Tubercularia Web., 9
Tuckerman, 15, 136, 339
Tulasne, 17, 25, 46, 70, 123, 159, 187, 189, 192, 193, 200, 204, 263
Turner, Dawson, 14
Tutt, 399
Tylophorella Wain., 320
Tylophoron Nyl., 289, 320
Uhlir, 43
Ulander, 211
Uloth, 233
Umbilicaria, 17, 82, 200, 241, 262, 268, 331 U. pustulata Hoffm., 86, 96, 150, 195, 214, 240, 257, 414
Unguentum Armarium, 407
Unguentum sympatheticum, 407
Urceolaria Ach., 48; see Diploschistes
Urococcus Kütz., 57, 133, 318
Usnea Dill., 1, 3, 7, 9, 83, 111, 195, 213, 233, 257, 268, 269, 300, 304, 305, 340, 347, 348, 351, 361, 408, 419 U. articulata Hoffm., 210, 268 U. barbata Web., 25, 99 (Fig. 58), 104 (Fig. 63 A), 130, 143 (Fig. 82), 167 (Fig. 95), 168, 177, 200, 211, 215, 226, 234, 239, 246, 339, 348, 364, 417 U. ceratina Ach., 227 U. compressa Hill, 8 U. dasypoga Stiz., 359 U. florida Web., 91 (Fig. 52), 92, 210, 213, 348, 363, 411 U. hirta Hoffm., 348, 355, 366 U. laevis Nyl., 177 U. longissima Ach., 85, 99, 102 (Fig. 61), 105 (Fig. 63 B), 106, 215, 348 U. macrocarpa Arn., 177 U. melaxantha Ach., 346 U. plicata Web., 359 U. Taylori Hook., 104
Usneaceae, 299, 311, 339
Vaillant, 6
Vallot, 253
Valsa Fr., 317
Varicellaria Nyl., 337 V. microsticta Nyl., 77, 92, 187 (Fig. 126)
Variolaria Ach. (see Pertusaria), 64, 171, 237
Vaucheria sessilis DC., 65 (Fig. 34)
Ventenat, 21
Verrucaria Web. (non Pers.), 9, 174, 200, 275, 314, 364 V. aethiobola Wahlenb., 391, 392 V. anceps Koerb., 377 V. aquatilis Mudd, 383 V. calciseda DC., 176, 215, 219, 241, 373, 398 V. Dufourii DC., 173 V. fuscella Ach., 373 V. Hoffmanni Hepp; f. purpurascens Arn., 251 V. hydrela Ach., 391, 392 V. lecideoides Koerb., 373 V. maculiformis Krempelh., 379 V. margacea Wahlenb., 391, 392 V. maura Wahlenb., 245, 383, 384, 386 V. memnonia Flot., 383 V. microspora Nyl., 256, 383, 386 V. mucosa Wahlenb., 73, 383 V. muralis Ach., 30, 46 (Fig. 14), 70, 243, 255, 361, 393 V. nigrescens Pers., 56, 254, 369, 377, 392 V. papillosa Ach., 377 V. prominula Nyl., 383 V. rupestris Schrad., 215, 243, 361 V. scotina Wedd., 383 V. striatula Wahlenb., 383 V. viridula Ach., 391
Verrucariaceae, 249, 309, 314, 353, 367
Verrucarites geanthricis Goepp., 354
Verrucula Stein., 265, 276 V. aegyptica Stein., 276 V. cahirensis Stein., 276
Visiani, 405
Volkard, 228, 410
Vouaux, 267
Wahlberg, 11, 168
Wahrlich, 51
Wainio, 31, 48, 70, 112, 114, 118, 120, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 128, 144, 153, 159, 163, 166, 175, 177, 179, 188, 191, 240, 276, 277, 292, 294, 308, 344, 346, 348, 411
Waite, 270
Wallroth, xx, 13, 21, 22, 123, 133, 142, 156, 192, 305
Ward, Marshall, 35, 42, 59
Watson, Sir W., 8
Watson, 365, 373, 385
Watt, 403
Weber, 1, 9
Weddell, 252, 379
Wehmer, 220
Weir, 239
West, G. F., 52, 54, 55, 56
West, W., 225, 233, 357, 374
Wester, 211
Westring, 412
Wettstein, 45
Wheldon, 398
Wheldon and Wilson, 360, 370, 373, 374, 379, 384, 385, 387, 391, 392
Wiesner, 211, 241, 244
Wilde, 395
Wille, 28
Willemet, 10, 401, 415
Wilson, 350
Winter, 30, 138, 263
Winterstein, 209
Wisselingh, 211
Withering, 9
Wolff, 124, 163, 170, 172, 176
Woodward, 152
Woronin, 28
Woronina Cornu, 261
Xanthocapsa (Sect. of gloeocapsa), 52, 63, 284, 332, 373
Xanthoria Th. Fr., 166, 246 X. lychnea Th. Fr., 233, 252, 365, 417 X. parietina Th. Fr., 3, 22, 24, 27, 28, 38, 42, 48 (Fig. 15), 50, 56, 65, 67 (Fig. 36), 86, 164, 176, 189, 195, 200, 224, 225, 227, 231, 232, 241, 242, 253, 269, 270, 301, 341, 348, 351, 360, 369, 373, 376, 380, 383, 384, 386, 397, 406, 416, 418 X. polycarpa Oliv., 365, 390
Xylaria Hill, 12, 421
Xylographa Fr., 278, 322 X. spilomatica Th. Fr., 145
Xyloschistes Wain., 322
Zahlbruckner, A., 19, 59, 60, 66, 69, 275, 284, 308, 335, 413
Zopf, 19, 43, 108, 151, 188, 213, 221, 233, 238, 246, 264, 265, 266, 268, 270, 395, 396, 398, 400, 412, 417
Zukal, 18, 26, 38, 61, 68, 70, 82, 128, 129, 130, 163, 179, 187, 215, 219, 230, 237, 244, 267, 268, 271, 313, 395
Zwelser, 419
CAMBRIDGE: PRINTED BY J. B. PEACE, M.A., AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS
Lichens · The Wunder Library — complete classics, free to read, with narration.