Part 32

1st. In this, that it does not require, like the feeling, any particular modification of sensibility. The hand is a little more sensible than the rest of the skin; but there is not a great difference, and we should touch bodies almost as well, if that of the abdomen covered the phalanges. On the contrary, each sense has a peculiar sensibility which places it exclusively in relation with a determinate body in nature. The pituitary membrane would be struck by light in vain, if placed at the bottom of the eye like the retina; the palatine membrane if it lined the nasal fossæ, would not perceive odours, &c.

2d. The touch is exercised only upon masses, more or less considerable parcels. The other senses are brought into action by the insensible and infinitely multiplied particles of bodies, as the luminous, savoury particles, &c.

3d. Most of the other senses do not require the previous exercise of the will. Odours, light and sounds strike upon their respective organs, and often produce, without our attending to them, their respective sensations. It is the same with feeling; the will most commonly has no part in it. It is exercised because we live in the midst of many excitements. We do not most often seek for the causes of general sensations; they are those that come and act upon us. On the contrary, the touch requires to be produced by an act of the will. It is exerted in consequence of the exercise of the other senses; it is because we have seen, heard or felt an object, that we touch it. We confirm or correct by this sense the notions, which the others have given us. Hence why it is, as it were, dependant on them. The more they are contracted, the less frequently is it exercised. The blind, the deaf, &c. have less desire to touch than him, who has all his sensitive gates open to the impression of external bodies.

4th. Most of the other senses require a peculiar structure as well as a peculiar sensibility in the organs which compose them. On the contrary, the touch only requires a particular form in its organs. Provided that these have on the one hand animal sensibility, and on the other can embrace by many points external objects, they can distinguish their tangible qualities. The touch will be obscure if we grasp bodies in one or two directions only; yet it will take place. Thus we touch with the hollow of the axilla, the bend of the arms, hams, &c. with the lips and with the tongue. Thus the elephant touches with his trunk, reptiles by twining themselves around bodies, most animals with their snouts, &c. But the more the points of contact are multiplied, the more perfectly is the sense exercised. The hand of man is in this respect the most advantageously formed; it proves that he is better adapted to communicate with what surrounds him than all other animals; that the empire of his animal life is naturally much more extended than that of theirs; that his sensations are more accurate, because they have a means of perfection that theirs have not; and that his intellectual faculties are destined to have an infinitely greater sphere, since they have an organ infinitely better than theirs to perfect them.

The sensibility of the skin resides essentially, as we have seen, in the papillary body; it is there that all the great phenomena relative to sensation take place. It is this portion of the skin that truly belongs to animal life, as the reticular body is, on account of the vascular plexus that forms it, the portion essentially dependant on organic life. The chorion being as it were passive, remains foreign to every kind of important function, and serves only for a covering.

The extremely acute sensibility of the papillary body requires a covering to defend it from strong impressions. This covering is the epidermis. When it is removed, every touch is painful; the impression of the air even is very much so; it is this removal of the epidermis that produces the smarting that is felt when a blister is taken off. Observe in fact that smarting is a very frequent kind of pain, which the animal sensibility of the skin occasions when more raised than usual. This term is borrowed from burns, which, when they are only to a certain extent, acting nearly like blisters, lay the papillæ bare; now as it is always the skin which is exposed to the action of fire, we transfer to all burnt organs the ideas which we attach to the word smarting. But the pain is far from having the same character in the other systems; this peculiar one belongs only to the dermoid, in which it takes place from a burn, erysipelas, after a blister, &c. and during all inflammations that have their seat in the reticular body. No other system when inflamed gives us this sensation. The pain is throbbing in the cellular; it exhibits a wholly different modification in the muscular, when it is the seat of acute rheumatism, &c.

In order to understand this sentence it should be observed that the word which I have translated smarting is cuisson, which means the action of fire upon animal bodies, and is also used for the painful sensation which this action produces.—TR.

There is another kind of pain which is also peculiar to the cutaneous system; it is itching, which is the first degree of smarting. We remove it by a gentle friction, which exciting in the papillæ a different sensation, effaces that of which they are then the seat; but when this new sensation has passed off, the former one, which is occasioned by a permanent cause, is reproduced and requires a new friction; there happens then in a small way, what we observe in a large one, when a stronger pain makes us forget one that is weaker. No other system in the economy exhibits this kind of pain, so frequent in itch, herpes and many other cutaneous eruptions. In their tubercular inflammations, the serous membranes become the seat of white eruptions, analogous to many of those of the skin; the mucous surfaces are also often affected with many small pimples; now this sensation is never manifested in either of them.

There is also a sensation which appears to be the minimum of that pain of which smarting is the maximum; it is tickling, a mixed sensation, an hermaphrodite, as an author has called it, which is agreeable when carried to a certain degree and painful beyond it. Carry the fingers lightly over a mucous or serous surface, a muscle or a nerve laid bare; an analogous sensation will never arise from the contact.

The animal sensibility of the skin is, like that of the mucous surfaces, subjected to the essential influence of habit, which can transform successively into indifference or even into pleasure, what was at first painful. Every thing that surrounds us furnishes constant proof of this assertion. The air in the succession of the seasons, caloric in the numerous varieties of the atmosphere, in the sudden change from one temperature to another, water in a bath, in the moist vapours with which the medium is loaded in which we live, our garments of which some, as those of wool, are at first very painful, every thing which acts upon the skin by mere contact, produces sensations in it which habit continually modifies. Observe the mode of dress of different nations; in some, all the superior extremities are bare; in others, the fore-arm only appears; the inferior extremities, either in whole or part, are naked in others; in some, a more or less considerable portion of the trunk is left exposed to the air, and among the savages, nothing is covered. The portions which in each people remain naked, bear the contact of the air, without giving any painful sensation. Let them expose, on the contrary, parts usually covered, especially if it is cold, and at first pain will be the consequence of it; then the parts gradually becoming accustomed to this contact, will get to be insensible to it. There has been much said latterly of the danger of the Grecian costumes, of the nudity of females, &c. I do not speak of the morality of them; but every thing that is reprehensible physiologically is, that the progress of the fashion has been more rapid than that of the sensibility. If they had exposed at first the neck, then a little of the chest, then the bosom, &c. habit would by degrees have given a new modification to this property, and no accident would have resulted from it. But in going suddenly from a costume in which every part is covered, to that in which the superior half of the chest, either before or behind, remains naked, is it astonishing that colds, catarrhs, &c. should be the result of it?

Habit extends its empire, in relation to the skin, even to our manners themselves. Decency is in this respect a thing of comparison. An Indian woman, with nothing but a narrow cloth around the pelvis, would be with us an object at which the public modesty would be shocked. The habit of mankind serves her as a veil in her own country. A female savage transported entirely naked to the same country, would be indecent there; she is not so in her own. Observe our fashions in their rapid succession; a woman, who by not changing her costume, would have had two years since, that of a courtezan, would now find herself dressed with great modesty. Indecency in costume is that merely which shocks our habit. The female Indian, with the rag that covers only a quarter of her body, is more decent than the woman in whom a small opening separated the neck-handkerchief in our old fashions. The sight of the face shocks those people among whom females are veiled. Let us consider then habit as the type of the decency of costumes. Nature has wished in physiology, that the phenomena over which it presides, should be slowly connected; it is the same in morals. The woman who suddenly changes her dress from one that is close to one that is not, exposes herself to painful sensations, to catarrhal diseases, &c. and shocks the eyes of those who had been accustomed to see her in a different exterior. When the change is gradually and insensibly brought about, neither health nor morals are affected.

Habit does not modify the cutaneous sensibility which arises from an alteration of texture, from an inflammation, &c. Powerfully raised in this last state, it is much above its natural level. Then the least contact becomes extremely painful; thus the skin is no longer then in a state to exercise the sense of feeling. The touch itself does not distinguish general sensations. All bodies make a common and uniform impression, it is that of pain.

The animal sensibility of the skin sometimes diminishes and even disappears; paralysis is a proof of this. These affections, more rare than the loss of motion, often however take place. In the organs of the senses, it is the eye which most frequently loses the sensation; the ear comes next, then the skin, then the nostrils and finally the tongue, which is the sensitive organ that is always most rarely paralyzed, no doubt because it is that which is the most connected with the support of organic life, without which we could not exist. The others belong especially to animal life, which we can lose in part without ceasing to exist.

The whole skin is never at the same time paralyzed; there is rarely even hemiplegia in this respect; the feeling is not extinguished but in an insulated part. I would remark that the existence of these paralyses is also a proof of the want of nervous influence upon cutaneous exhalation and the capillary circulation, since both go on very well in this case as well as in paralysis of motion, as I have observed above. Cut the nerves of a limb of an animal, in order to render this limb insensible; if after this you apply an irritant, the skin will inflame as usual.

When the animal sensibility is in exercise, is there a kind of erection of the papillæ that they may feel more acutely? The same observation may here be made as was in regard to the mucous surfaces. This erection is an ingenious idea of some physicians, and not a fact which rests upon observation. I even think that this contradicts it; for examined with a glass the papillæ appear to be constantly in the same state. Why should not the skin feel like a nerve laid bare, like the eye, the ear, &c. in which these sorts of erections have never been imagined?

Animal contractility is wholly foreign to the cutaneous organ, which moves voluntarily only by the influence of its fleshy pannicle.

Properties of Organic Life.

Organic sensibility and insensible contractility exist in the highest degree in the cutaneous organ. The external capillary system, which forms the reticular body, is, as I have said, especially the seat of these properties. They are in constant activity in order to preside, 1st, over the capillary circulation; 2d, over exhalation; 3d, over absorption; 4th, over the nutrition of the whole dermoid texture; 5th, over the secretion of the cutaneous oil, if the sebaceous glands exist. It is not astonishing that these properties should be so much developed in the skin, in which they have so many functions to support. Add to these considerations the constant action of external bodies, an action which keeps this organ in continual excitement, which incessantly stimulates its sensibility, which is to this sensibility what that of the bodies contained in the mucous surfaces is to the sensibility of these surfaces; the irritation is even more sensible, because the stimuli are oftener changed. A thousand agents of nature, of different density and composition continually succeed each other on the exterior of the body, and at the same time that they act upon the animal sensibility of the skin, to produce various sensations, they excite the organic sensibility in order to support the functions over which this sensibility presides.

Is it astonishing then that the greater number of cutaneous diseases supposes an alteration in this property and in the insensible organic contractility which is not separated from it? I divide these diseases into four classes, according to the structure we have distinguished in the skin.

1st. There are diseases of the papillæ; these are the paralyses and various kinds of increase of feeling, which reside only in the nerves. Women are especially subject to these last, which are so great in some nervous affections, that mere contact of the skin if considerably powerful produces convulsions. To this also should be referred the extreme susceptibility of some individuals in whom tickling produces a general revolution. It is necessary to distinguish these exaltations of animal sensibility, from those of which we have spoken above, and which depend upon inflammation. The organic sensibility is especially affected in these last; we might say that by its increase it is transformed into animal sensibility; whereas in the other case this last property alone is altered.

2d. There are diseases which have evidently their seat in the cellular texture which occupies the dermoid spaces; such are the inflammations of the cutaneous portion which covers a phlegmon, a bile, &c.

3d. There are diseases of the external capillary net-work, from which the exhalants arise. To this must be referred erysipelas, many species of herpes, measles, scarlatina and many acute cutaneous eruptions that are daily met with in practice.

4th. Finally, there are diseases in which the chorion is affected. Elephantiasis, and in general many chronic cutaneous diseases appear to me to be of this number, and I will even observe that the chorion never appears to be primarily affected in acute diseases. The obscurity of its vital forces, its dense and compact texture, and its comparative want of vessels prevent it from accommodating itself except to chronic affections. In phlegmonous erysi pelas, in biles, &c. it is only influenced, but it is not essentially diseased. Thus we have seen that all the affections of the osseous, cartilaginous, fibrous, fibro-cartilaginous systems, &c. are really slow and chronic, on account of the texture and the vital obscurity of these systems.

Now if we reflect on this division of cutaneous diseases, we shall see that except those of the first class, which are not numerous and which consist in greater or less alterations of animal sensibility, we shall see, I say, that all the others suppose a more or less considerable affection of the organic sensibility and of the corresponding insensible contractility. All are derived from an increase, a diminution or an alteration of these properties.

It is also to the different changes of these properties, that must be referred the more or less copious sweats and the various exudations of which the skin is the seat. In fact, the exhalant vessels remain always the same in relation to their structure. Why then do they admit a greater or less quantity of fluids? Why at certain times do they allow of the passage of substances, which they repel at others? It is because the modifications of their organic forces are changed. These forces are often weakened in an evident manner in diseases; they become languid and are prostrated. Then blisters are applied in vain; the organic sensibility no longer answers to the excitement that is made upon it. This is a striking phenomenon in ataxic fevers, and proves the independence of the phenomena of cutaneous exhalation, capillary circulation, &c. in regard to the cerebral nerves. In fact, whilst during the paroxysm the brain is in extreme excitement, the voluntary muscles are put by this excitement into a violent state of convulsion, and the energy of the whole of the animal life seems to be doubled before it ceases to exist, the organic is already in part exhausted; the functions of the portion of the skin which belongs to this life have already ceased.

The stimuli of cutaneous organic sensibility vary remarkably in their degree of intensity. 1st. The strongest are fire, cantharides, the alkalies, the acids sufficiently diluted by water not to act but upon the vital forces and not to alter the dermoid texture by the horny hardening, the juices of many acrid and corrosive plants, certain fluids even produced in the economy, as those of cancers, &c. All these stimuli redden the skin when they are applied to it. 2d. Most of the same stimuli, diminished in intensity, stimulate it but slightly. 3d. Finally, aqueous fluids, cataplasms and emollient fomentations seem to produce this excitement the least; they even rather weaken the cutaneous organic sensibility; they seem to act upon it like sedatives and moderate the kind of excitement it produces in inflammations. The same is true of most of the fatty substances; thus oils, butter, grease, &c. are in general not calculated to keep up the suppuration of blisters. It is requisite, in order to keep the skin at the degree of organic sensibility, necessary for the purulent exudation that then takes place, to mix cantharides with fatty substances.

The skin does not appear to enjoy sensible organic contractility. Stimuli usually produce no other action upon it, than the contraction imperceptible to the eye, which composes insensible contractility, and which takes place especially in the small capillary vessels. There is however one circumstance in which this contraction is, to a certain extent, apparent; it is when cold acts briskly upon the skin, which it wrinkles into goose flesh, as it is called. I have pointed out above the mechanism of this contraction, of which the chorion is the seat, and which holds a medium, like many motions which I have already had occasion to notice, between the two species of organic contractility.

Sympathies.