Descriptions of New Hylid Frogs From Mexico and Central America is a public-domain classic of science by William Edward Duellman.
The complete text is on this page and the chapter pages below — all 5 chapters, about 8,814 words (~44 minutes of reading), free to read online with no signup.
Short, fact-checked Wunder courses related to Descriptions of New Hylid Frogs From Mexico and Central America — free to read, no signup. Or browse every course.
Produced by Chris Curnow, Carol Brown, Joseph Cooper and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS PUBLICATIONS
MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY
Volume 17, No. 13, pp. 559-578, 3 pls. 17-19
Date, April 5, 1968
Descriptions of New Hylid Frogs From Mexico and Central America
WILLIAM E. DUELLMAN
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE 1968
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS PUBLICATIONS, MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY
Editors: E. Raymond Hall, Chairman, Henry S. Fitch, Frank B. Cross
Volume 17, No. 13, pp. 559-578, 3 pls. 17-19 Published April 5, 1968
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS Lawrence, Kansas
PRINTED BY ROBERT R. (BOB) SANDERS, STATE PRINTER TOPEKA, KANSAS
1968
31-9420
Descriptions of New Hylid Frogs From Mexico and Central America
BY WILLIAM E. DUELLMAN
Biological exploration of Mexico and Central America has revealed the presence of a diverse fauna, elements of which have undergone speciation in separate areas within the relatively small region. Some genera of amphibians, especially Eleutherodactylus and Hyla, are represented by many species having small geographic ranges in Mexico and Central America. Most of the species of Hyla inhabiting the lowlands have been known to science for many years, and most of the novelties today are found in the less accessible highlands. No fewer than 19 new species of hylid frogs have been discovered and named from Mexico and Central America in the past decade.
In the spring and summer of 1966 I studied hylid frogs in many parts of southern Mexico and Central America; the field work was designed to obtain specimens and data that would resolve certain systematic problems. To a certain extent the studies were successful, but in the course of the work five previously unknown hylids were discovered; these are named and described in this paper. The only species described herein that I do not know in life is one of Plectrohyla that has been represented in museum collections for several years but was not obtained in my own field work.
In this paper I am presenting diagnoses, descriptions, and brief comments on the relationships of five new species and one subspecies. More exhaustive accounts will be included in a monograph, now in preparation, on the Middle American hylids.
For use of comparative material used in the preparation of this paper, I am indebted to Richard J. Baldauf, Texas Cooperative Wildlife Collection (TCWC); Charles M. Bogert, American Museum of Natural History (AMNH); James A. Peters, United States National Museum (USNM); Hobart M. Smith, University of Illinois Museum of Natural History (UIMNH); Charles F. Walker, University of Michigan Museum of Zoology (UMMZ); and Ernest E. Williams, Museum of Comparative Zoology (MCZ). KU refers to the University of Kansas Museum of Natural History. I am especially grateful for help in obtaining specimens and data to Linda Trueb, who accompanied me throughout Mexico and Central America, where we were joined by John D. Lynch in Costa Rica and Charles W. Myers in Panama. Linda Trueb offered helpful suggestions in the course of preparing the manuscript, and David M. Dennis skillfully prepared the illustrations which more accurately depict the frogs than my written descriptions; both of these persons have my thanks for their contributions.
Ratibor Hartmann of Finca Santa Clara, Chiriqui, Panama, made possible our travels to the Rio Changena on the Atlantic slopes of Bocas del Toro. Field work in Costa Rica was facilitated by the Organization of Tropical Studies through the courtesy of Stephen B. Preston and Norman Scott. Rodolfo Hernandez Corzo of the Direccion General de la Fauna Silvestre provided the necessary permits to collect in Mexico. I thank each of these persons for his helpfulness and cooperation.
Field work in Mexico and Central America and the associated laboratory studies on Middle American hylid frogs are supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (GB-1441 and GB-5818). The field work in Panama was part of a survey of the herpetofauna of that country carried out in cooperation with the Gorgas Memorial Laboratory and supported by the National Institutes of Health (GM-12020).
Hyla xanthosticta new species
Plate 17
Holotype.--Adult female, KU 103772, from the south fork of the Rio Las Vueltas on the south slope of Volcan Barba, near the northwest base of Cerro Chompipe, Heredia Province, Costa Rica, elevation 2100 meters; obtained on June 26, 1966, by John D. Lynch.
Diagnosis.--A member of the Hyla pictipes group (Starrett, 1966), characterized by having dorsum uniform green, canthal stripe bronze-color, flanks and anterior and posterior surfaces of thighs dark brown with bright yellow spots, throat and belly yellow, and hands having only vestigial web.
Description of holotype.--Female having a snout-vent length of 29.3 mm.; tibia length 16.2 mm., 55.3 per cent of snout-vent length; foot length (measured from proximal edge of inner metatarsal tubercle to tip of longest toe) 14.1 mm., 48.1 per cent of snout-vent length; head length 10.0 mm., 34.1 per cent of snout-vent length; head width 10.3 mm., 35.2 per cent of snout-vent length. Snout in lateral profile truncate, slightly inclined posteroventrally, in dorsal profile narrow but truncate; canthus angular; loreal region barely concave; lips thick, barely flared. Snout long; distance from anterior corner of eye to nostril equal to diameter of eye; nostrils slightly protuberant, directed laterally; internarial distance, 2.6 mm.; internarial area slightly depressed; top of head slightly convex; interorbital distance 3.2 mm., 31.1 per cent of width of head; width at eyelid 2.6 mm.; 24.3 per cent of width of head. Diameter of eye 3.0 mm.; thin dermal fold extending posteriorly from posterior corner of eye, above tympanum, to point above insertion of arm. Tympanum distinct, its diameter half that of eye.
Axillary membrane absent; arms slender; thin scalloped dermal fold on ventrolateral edge of forearm; thin dermal fold on wrist; fingers long, tapering; length of fingers from shortest to longest, 1-2-4-3; discs small, only slightly wider than digits; subarticular tubercles large; distal tubercle on third finger broad, flat; distal tubercle on fourth finger strongly bifid; supernumerary tubercles large, round, closely spaced irregularly on proximal segments of digits; prepollex moderately enlarged. Web lacking between first and second fingers, vestigial between second and third fingers, extending from middle of antepenultimate phalanx of third to base of penultimate phalanx of fourth. Heels overlap by about one-third length of shank when hind limbs adpressed; tibiotarsal articulation extends to anterior edge of eye; thin transverse dermal fold on heel; scalloped dermal fold along outer edge of tarsus; inner metatarsal tubercle large, flat, elliptical, visible from above; toes long, slender; length of toes from longest to shortest, 1-2-5-3-4; discs small, barely wider than digits; subarticular tubercles large, round, subconical; supernumerary tubercles few, scattered on proximal segments of digits; toes about two-thirds webbed; webbing extending from middle of penultimate phalanx of first toe to middle of penultimate phalanx of second, from distal end of penultimate phalanx of second to base of penultimate of third, from distal end of penultimate phalanx of third to middle of antepenultimate of fourth to middle of penultimate of fifth toe.
Anal opening directed posteroventrally at level of mid-thigh, bordered below by large tubercles; anal sheath lacking. Skin smooth on dorsum except for small scattered tubercles, granular on belly and posteroventral surfaces of thighs. Tongue round, emarginate, barely free behind. Prevomerine teeth 5-5, on large ovoid elevations at level of posterior edges of small round choanae.
Color (in preservative): dark purplish brown above, brown on limbs; first three fingers and first three toes creamy yellow; other digits brown; flanks dark brown with white spots; anterior and posterior surfaces of thighs and inner surfaces of shanks brown with cream-colored spots. White stripes on edge of upper lip, ventrolateral edge of forearm, outer edge of tarsus, and above anus. Chin and throat white; belly and ventral surfaces of limbs cream-color.
Color (in life): dorsum green, palest on sides of head; dorsal surfaces of thighs tan; canthal stripe bronze-tan (reddish copper at night); flanks, anterior and posterior surfaces of thighs, and inner surfaces of tarsi brown with bright yellow spots. Throat and belly pale yellow; ventral surfaces of limbs dull, dark yellow; large, bright yellow spot on anteroventral surface of thigh; bright yellow tubercles on median part of ventral surface of thigh. Anal area dark brown with white stripe above and yellow stripe below; white stripe on outer edge of forearm, outer edge of tarsus, and edge of upper lip. Iris gold-color with fine black reticulations and faint reddish suffusion medially; palpebral membrane clear.
Comparisons.--Hyla xanthosticta is a member of the Hyla pictipes group that contains debilis, pictipes, rivularis, and tica. From all of these, xanthosticta differs by having large yellow spots on the flanks and thighs, a white labial stripe, and a large yellow spot on the proximal ventral surface of each thigh. Females of Hyla pictipes have small creamy yellow spots on the flanks and thighs but have dark spots on the venter; furthermore, pictipes lacks white stripes on the upper lip and above the anus, lacks a canthal stripe, and has larger discs and less webbing on the hand. Hyla tica differs from xanthosticta by having white mottling on the flanks, dark transverse bands on the limbs, and larger discs, and lacks yellow spots on the thighs, and white stripes on the upper lip, limbs, and above the anus. Hyla rivularis is notably different in having a tan dorsum and creamy yellow venter with black flecks; moreover, rivularis lacks spots on the flanks and thighs and white stripes on the upper lip, limbs, and above the anus. Of all of the species in the pictipes group, xanthosticta most closely resembles debilis. This species has a dull green dorsum, usually flecked with brown or black, and a creamy white venter. The flanks of debilis are creamy white with small brown flecks, and the anterior and posterior surfaces of the thighs are bright yellow. Hyla debilis has a dull tan canthal stripe and white spots on the upper lip; the webbing on the hand is slightly more extensive, and the discs are slightly larger, in debilis than in xanthosticta.
The Wunder Library · Learn anything · Home — complete public-domain books, free to read, with narration and illustrations. Descriptions of New Hylid Frogs From Mexico and Central America is in the public domain.