Part 89

Few, if any, at present believe that depressing emotions, such as grief, anxiety, disappointment, which were once considered important causes of cancer, exert any such influence. Cancer of the stomach occurs as {537} frequently in those of strong as in those of weak constitution--as often among the temperate as among the intemperate. If, as has been claimed (D'Espine), gastric cancer is relatively more frequent among the rich than among the poor, this is probably due only to the fact that a larger number of those in favorable conditions of life attain the age at which there is greatest liability to this disease. No previous condition of constitution, no previous disease, no occupation, no station in life, can be said to exert any causative influence in the production of gastric cancer.

It will be observed that the obscurity which surrounds the ultimate causation of gastric cancer is in no way cleared up by the points which have been here considered and which are usually considered under the head of etiology. It is impossible to avoid the assumption of an individual--and in my opinion a local--predisposition to gastric cancer, vague as this assumption appears. All other supposed causes are at the most merely occasional or exciting causes. The attempts to explain in what this predisposition consists are of a speculative nature, and will be briefly considered in connection with the pathenogenesis of gastric cancer.

SYMPTOMATOLOGY.--We may distinguish the following groups of cases of gastric cancer:

First: Latent cases, in which the cancer of the stomach has produced no symptoms up to the time of death. Many secondary cancers of the stomach belong to this class. Here also belong cases in which a cancer is found unexpectedly in the stomach when death has resulted from other causes. I have found a medullary cancer, slightly ulcerated, as large as a hen's egg, seated upon the posterior wall and lesser curvature of the stomach of a laboring man suddenly killed while in apparent health and without previous complaint of gastric disturbance. These cases, in which life is cut short before any manifestation of the disease, are without clinical significance, save to indicate how fallacious it is to estimate the duration of the cancerous growth from the first appearance of the symptoms.

Second: Cases in which gastric symptoms are absent or insignificant, whereas symptoms of general marasmus or of progressive anæmia or of cachectic dropsy are prominent. Cases of this class are frequently mistaken for pernicious anæmia, and occasionally for Bright's disease, heart disease, or phthisis. It is difficult to explain in these cases the tolerance of the stomach for the cancerous growth, but this tolerance is most frequently manifested when the tumor does not invade the orifices of the organ.

Third: Cases in which the symptoms of the primary gastric cancer are insignificant, but the symptoms of secondary cancer, particularly of cancer of the liver or of the peritoneum, predominate. In some, but not in all, of these cases the primary growth is small or has spared the orifices of the stomach.

Fourth: Cases in which the symptoms point to some disease of the stomach, or at least to some abdominal disease; but the absence of characteristic symptoms renders the diagnosis of gastric cancer impossible or only conjectural.

Fifth: Typical cases in which symptoms sufficiently characteristic of {538} gastric cancer are present, so that the diagnosis can be made with reasonable positiveness.

It is not to be understood that these groups represent sharply-drawn types of the disease. It often happens that the same case may present at one period the features of one group, and at another period those of another group. Nor is it supposed that every exceptional and erratic case of gastric cancer can be classified in any of the groups which have been mentioned.

A typical case of gastric cancer runs a course about as follows: A person, usually beyond middle age, begins to suffer from disordered digestion. His appetite is impaired, and a sense of uneasiness, increasing in course of time to actual pain, is felt in the stomach. These symptoms of dyspepsia are in no way peculiar, and probably at first occasion little anxiety. It is, however, soon observed that the patient is losing flesh and strength more rapidly than can be explained by simple indigestion. He becomes depressed in spirits. The bowels are constipated. Vomiting, which was usually absent at first, makes its appearance and becomes more and more frequent. After a while it may be that, without any improvement, the vomiting becomes less frequent, comes on longer after a meal, but is more copious. In the later periods of the disease a substance resembling coffee-grounds and consisting of altered blood is often mingled with the vomit. By this time the patient has assumed a cachectic look. He is wasted, and his complexion has the peculiar pale yellowish tint of malignant disease. Perhaps there is a little oedematous pitting about the ankles. During the progress of the disease in the majority of cases an irregular hard tumor can be felt in the epigastrium. While one or another of the symptoms may abate in severity, the general progress of the disease is relentlessly downward. Within six months to two years of the onset of the symptoms the patient dies of exhaustion.

Too much stress should not be laid upon any so-called typical course of gastric cancer. This course is modified by many circumstances, such as the situation of the cancer, its size, its rapidity of growth, the presence or absence of ulceration, the existence or non-existence of secondary tumors, the presence of complications, and the individuality of the patient. It is necessary, therefore, to consider in detail each of the important symptoms of gastric cancer. But in thus fixing attention upon individual symptoms one must not lose sight of the clinical picture as a whole. It is not any single symptom which is decisive; it is rather the combination, the mode of onset, and the course of the symptoms, which are of most importance in diagnosis.

Impairment of the appetite is the rule in gastric cancer. Anorexia is sometimes a marked symptom before pain, vomiting, and other evidences of gastric indigestion are noted. There is often a special distaste for meat. The appetite may be capricious; it is very rarely even increased. There are exceptional cases in which the appetite is preserved throughout the greater part or even the whole course of the disease. This seems to {539} be more frequent with cancer of the cardia than with cancer of other parts of the stomach. Loss of appetite is a much more common symptom in gastric cancer than in gastric ulcer. In cancer, as well as in ulcer, the patient sometimes refrains from food less on account of disrelish for it than on account of the distress which it causes him.

Pain is one of the most frequent symptoms of cancer of the stomach. If the pain begins early in the disease, and continues, as it often does, with increasing severity, it renders gastric cancer one of the most distressing affections. The pain is usually felt in the epigastrium, but it may be more intense in the hypochondria. It is sometimes felt in the interscapular region, the shoulders, or even in the loins. With cancer of the cardia it is often referred to the point of the xiphoid cartilage or behind the sternum. In general, however, there is so little correspondence between the site of the cancer and the exact locality of the pain that no weight can be attached to the situation of the pain in diagnosing the region of the stomach involved in the growth. Nor does any import attach to the quality of the pain, whether it is described as burning, gnawing, dull, lancinating, etc. Severe gastralgic paroxysms occur, although less frequently than in gastric ulcer.

The pain is usually aggravated by ingestion of food, although it may not become severe until the process of digestion is far advanced. Pain, however, occurs independently of taking food, and is occasionally a marked symptom when there are no evidences of dyspepsia. There can be no doubt that the cancer, as such, produces pain by involvement of the nerves of the stomach, but there is no specific cancerous pain, such as has been described by Brinton and other writers. There is usually tenderness on pressure over the stomach, and this tenderness is often over the tumor, if such can be felt.

In general, it may be said that the pain of gastric cancer, as contrasted with that of simple gastric ulcer, is often less dependent upon taking food, less intense, less circumscribed, less paroxysmal, less often relieved by vomiting; but there is so little constancy about any of these points that no reliance is to be placed upon any peculiarity of the pain in the diagnosis of gastric cancer.

The observation of several cases of gastric cancer without pain as a marked symptom leads me to emphasize the fact that absence or trifling severity of pain throughout the greater part or the whole of the disease, although exceptional, is not extremely rare. The frequency of painless gastric cancers is given by Lebert as 25 per cent., and by Brinton as 8 per cent., of the whole number. For many reasons, numerical computations as to the frequency of this and of other symptoms of gastric cancer are of very limited value. Absence of pain is more common in {540} gastric cancers of old persons and in cancers not involving the orifices of the stomach than it is at an earlier period of life or when the gastric orifices are obstructed.

The functions of the stomach are almost invariably disordered in gastric cancer. Sometimes, especially in the early stages, this disorder is only moderate, and is manifested by the milder symptoms of indigestion, such as uneasy sensations of weight and fulness after a meal, nausea, flatulent distension of the stomach relieved by eructation of gases, and heartburn. With the progress of the disease the uneasy sensations become actually painful; watery fluids, and sometimes offensive acrid fluids and gases, are regurgitated; and nausea culminates in vomiting. The breath is often very fetid. The eructation of inflammable gases has been observed in a few cases.

The most troublesome symptoms of indigestion occur with those cancers which by obstructing the pyloric orifice lead to dilatation of the stomach. Cases of gastric cancer in which the distressing symptoms of dilatation of the stomach dominate the clinical history are frequent. These symptoms are in no way peculiar to cancer of the stomach, but belong to dilatation produced by pyloric stenosis from whatever cause, and will be described in the article on DILATATION OF THE STOMACH.

Various causes combine to impair the normal performance of the gastric functions in cancer of the stomach. Chronic catarrhal gastritis is a factor in not a few cases. The destruction by the cancer of a certain amount of secreting surface can be adduced as a sufficient cause only in exceptional cases of extensive cancerous infiltration. Of more importance is interference with the peristaltic movements of the stomach, particularly in the pyloric region, where the cancer is most frequently situated. As already mentioned, dilatation of the stomach is a most important cause of indigestion in many cases. Of great interest in this connection is the discovery by Von den Velden that as a rule (to which there are exceptions) the gastric juice in cases of dilatation of the stomach due to cancer contains no free hydrochloric acid, and that this gastric juice has comparatively feeble digestive power, as proven by experiments. As this alteration of the gastric juice interferes particularly with the digestion of albuminous substances, it is explicable why many patients with gastric cancer have an especial abhorrence for meat.

During the progress of the disease the dyspeptic symptoms may improve, but this improvement is usually only temporary. In exceptional cases of gastric cancer dyspeptic symptoms, as well as other gastric symptoms, may be absent or not sufficiently marked to attract attention.

Hiccough, sometimes very troublesome, has been observed not very infrequently during the later periods of the disease.

There is nothing noteworthy about the appearance of the tongue, which is often clean and moist, but may be furred or abnormally red and dry. In the cachectic stage, toward the end of the disease, aphthous patches {541} often appear on the tongue and buccal mucous membrane. An increased flow of saliva has been occasionally observed in gastric cancer as well as in other diseases of the stomach. Thirst is present when there is profuse vomiting.

Vomiting usually appears after other symptoms of indigestion have been present for some time. It may, however, be one of the earliest symptoms of the disease. At first of occasional occurrence, it increases in frequency until in some cases it becomes the most prominent of all symptoms. Vomiting may occur in paroxysms which last for several days or weeks, and then this symptom may improve, perhaps to be renewed again and again, with remissions of comparative comfort. There are rare cases of gastric cancer in which the first symptom to attract attention is uncontrollable vomiting, accompanied often with pain and rapid emaciation. Such cases may run so acute a course that a fatal termination is reached within one to two months. In these cases, which have been interpreted as acutely-developed gastric cancers, it is probable that the cancer has remained latent for weeks or months before it gave rise to marked symptoms.

The situation of the cancer exerts great influence upon the frequency of vomiting and the time of its occurrence after meals. When the cancer involves the pyloric orifice, vomiting is rarely absent, and generally occurs an hour or more after a meal. As this is the most frequent situation of the cancer, it has been accepted as a general rule that vomiting occurs at a longer interval after eating in cases of gastric cancer than in cases of simple ulcer. But even with pyloric cancer the vomiting may come on almost immediately after taking food, so that it is not safe to diagnose the position of the cancer by the length of time between eating and the occurrence of vomiting. As the cancer in its growth obstructs more and more the pyloric orifice, the vomiting acquires the peculiarities of that accompanying dilatation of the stomach. The vomiting comes on longer after a meal--sometimes not until twelve or twenty hours or even more have elapsed. It may be that several days elapse between the acts of vomiting, which then present a certain periodicity. The patient then vomits enormous quantities containing undigested food, mucus, sarcinæ, and gaseous and other products of fermentation. Sometimes, especially toward the end of the disease, the vomiting ceases altogether. This cessation has been attributed to reopening of the pyloric orifice by sloughing of the growth. It is not necessary to assume such an occurrence, as a similar cessation of vomiting sometimes occurs in dilatation of the stomach due to persistent stenosis of the pylorus. Cessation of vomiting in these cases is by no means always a favorable symptom.

Next to pyloric cancer, it is cancer involving the cardiac orifice which is most frequently accompanied by vomiting. Here the vomiting occurs often immediately after taking food, but there are exceptions to this rule. {542} If in consequence of stenosis of the cardiac orifice the food does not enter the stomach, it is shortly regurgitated unchanged or mingled simply with mucus. It is this regurgitation rather than actual vomiting which in most common and characteristic of cardiac cancer. Even in cases in which the passage of an oesophageal sound reveals no obstruction at the cardiac orifice it sometimes happens that food, including even liquids, is regurgitated almost immediately, as in a case reported by Ebstein in which cold water was returned at once after swallowing. In these cases Ebstein with great plausibility refers the regurgitation to reflex spasm of the oesophagus induced by irritation of a cancer at or near the cardia through contact of food or liquids, especially when cold, with its surface.

When the cancer is seated in other parts of the stomach and it does not obstruct the orifices, vomiting is more frequently absent or of only rare occurrence. Vomiting is absent, according to Lebert, in one-fifth, according to Brinton in about one-eighth, of the cases of gastric cancer. Absence of vomiting is sufficiently frequent in gastric cancer to guard one against excluding the diagnosis of this disease on this ground alone.

Although in many cases the vomiting of gastric cancer can be explained on mechanical grounds by stenosis of the orifices, this is an explanation not applicable to all cases. Mention has already been made of spasm of the oesophagus as a cause of regurgitation of food in some cases of cardiac cancer. A similar spasm of the muscle in the pyloric region may explain the vomiting in certain cases in which during life there were symptoms of pyloric stenosis, but after death no or slight stenosis can be found. There is reason also to believe that atony of the muscular coats of the stomach may cause stagnation of the contents of the stomach and dilatation of the organ. In exceptional cases of gastric cancer in which the stomach is so intolerant as to reject food almost immediately after its entrance a special irritability of the nerves of the stomach must be assumed. It is customary to refer this form of vomiting to irritation of the ulcerated surface of the cancer by analogy with a similar irritability of the stomach observed in some cases of simple gastric ulcer. But there is little analogy between the ulcerated surface of a cancer in which tissues of little vitality and irritability are exposed and the surface of a simple ulcer in which the normal or slightly altered tissues of the stomach are laid bare. Finally, in the existence of chronic catarrhal gastritis is to be found another cause of vomiting in many cases of gastric cancer.

The presence of fragments of the cancer in the contents removed by washing out the stomach with the stomach-tube has been observed by Rosenbach in three cases of gastric cancer, and utilized for diagnostic purposes. A cancerous structure could be made out in these fragments by the aid of the microscope. Hitherto, the presence of particles of the tumor in the vomited matter has been considered as hardly more than a curiosity, and I have not been able to find a well-authenticated instance in which such particles in the vomit have been recognized by microscopical examination. According to Rosenbach, the fragments of the tumor in the washings from the stomach can be recognized by the naked eye by the red, reddish-brown, or black specks on their surface, due to recent or old hemorrhages which have aided in the detachment of the fragments. {543} By this means such particles are distinguished macroscopically from bits of food. By employing soft-rubber tubes and the syphon process there is no danger, in washing out of the stomach, of detaching pieces of the normal mucous membrane, which, moreover, can be distinguished from the fragments of the tumor by the aid of the microscope and usually by the naked eye. It remains to be seen how frequently such fragments of the tumor are to be found in the fluids obtained by washing out the stomach. It is not probable that they will be found so often as Rosenbach anticipates. According to the experience of most observers, they are very rarely present. They would naturally be most readily detached from soft, fungoid, and ulcerating cancerous growths. In this connection may also be mentioned the occasional separation of bits of the tumor by the passage of the stomach-tube in cases of cancer of the cardia. The eye of the tube as well as the washings from the stomach should be carefully examined for such particles.