Part 69

There is more or less flow of saliva from the mouth in consequence of the inability to swallow it; and in some cases the losses of material from the blood are so great as to reduce the patient very rapidly.

PATHOLOGY AND MORBID ANATOMY.--Paralysis of the oesophagus may be partial or complete. It may be associated with paralysis of the pharynx, palate, tongue, epiglottis, or larynx; with so-called bulbar paralysis; with general paralysis; with cerebro-spinal disseminated sclerosis.

DIAGNOSIS.--The diagnosis rests mainly on the symptoms of dysphagia, especially when associated with paralyses elsewhere. It is differentiated {430} from paralysis of the pharynx by the ability to swallow the bolus and the apparent arrest of the bolus at some portion of the tube. Auscultation of the oesophagus will determine the locality of the arrest. It likewise affords presumptive evidence of an alteration in the usual form of the bolus, which, being subjected to compression at its upper portion only, assumes the form of an inverted cone. The remaining auscultatory indications are similar to those of dilatation.

There is no impediment to the passage of the stomach-tube or oesophageal sound, or to its free manipulation when within the oesophagus.

When the symptoms quickly reach a maximum, they indicate a paralysis due to apoplexy, and so they do when the symptoms are sudden, hysteria being eliminated. Paralysis due to gumma or other cerebral tumor is much slower in its course.

PROGNOSIS.--In idiopathic paralysis, the local or special affection to which it is due being curable, the prognosis is favorable, especially if the paralysis be confined to the oesophagus. Recovery, however, is often slow, even in curable cases. In hysterical paralysis the prognosis is good. In deuteropathic paralysis the prognosis is much less favorable, and will depend upon the nature of the causal disease--apoplexy, insanity, cerebral tumor, syphilis, etc.

TREATMENT.--The treatment varies with the nature of the cause as far as combating the origin of the disease is concerned. With regard to the intrinsic paralysis of the oesophagus itself, strychnine and its congeners are indicated, and may be administered hypodermatically if the difficulty in swallowing be very great. If the paralysis be partial, it is better to give nux vomica or Ignatia amara by the mouth, in hopes of getting some beneficial astringent influence on the walls of the oesophagus.

In all instances the feeding of the patient is an important element in treatment. Masses of food arrested in the tube should be forced onward with the sound. In some cases nourishment must be habitually introduced through the stomach-tube and nutritive enemata be resorted to.

Electricity, though sometimes successful, is a risky agent to employ, because, as announced by Duchenne, the use of an oesophageal electrode is attended with some risk of unduly exciting the pneumogastric nerve and thereby inducing syncope.

Dilatation of the Oesophagus.

DEFINITION.--An abnormal distension of a portion of the oesophagus or of the entire tube, whether general, annular, or pouched.

SYNONYMS.--Oesophagocele, Hernia of the oesophagus, Diverticulum of the oesophagus.

ETIOLOGY.--Dilatation of the oesophagus is occasionally met as a congenital affection (Hanney, Grisolle, and others). The cause under these circumstances is obscure. Usually, however, dilatation of the oesophagus is of mechanical origin, due to distension by food or water above a stricture or an impacted foreign body. Presumptive paralysis of the muscular coat in chronic oesophagitis is alleged as a source of similar distension.

{431} General dilatation is presumed to be the mechanical result of constriction of the cardiac extremity, leading to distension of the oesophagus by the accumulation of large quantities of liquids. Sometimes it is due to paralysis of the muscular coat, permitting its distension by food.

Annular dilatation is sometimes due to distension just above the seat of a stricture. Sometimes it is due to impaction of a foreign body; sometimes there is no mechanical impediment; occasionally it is observed as a congenital anomaly.

Pouched dilatation (diverticulum) is usually due to retention of food immediately above an impacted foreign body or some obstruction of another character. Some of the muscular fibres of the oesophageal wall become separated and spread asunder, allowing the mucous membrane to be gradually forced through them by repeated efforts of deglutition upon retained masses of food or drink, until finally a pouch is formed, hernia-like, outside of the tube. Another mode of production is said (Rokitansky) to consist in the subsidence of tumefied glands outside the oesophagus, after adhesions had been contracted with the oesophagus during the inflammatory process. The shrinking of these enlarged glands to their normal volume sometimes draws the tube outward into a funnel-shaped sac constricted at its margin by the muscular coat, which has receded from the pouch or has been stripped loose. The same form of dilatation is likewise an occasional result of rupture of the muscular coat sustained in blows or falls. It occasionally exists, too, as a congenital defect, and this has been attributed (Bardeleben and Billroth) to partial closing of one of the branchial fissures externally, while the internal opening has remained patent.

SYMPTOMATOLOGY.--The symptoms, at first, are usually those of obstruction to the passage of food, but before this obstruction occurs dilatation may have existed without symptoms. In some cases of diverticulum high up, there is a tumor, usually on the left side of the neck. Rokitansky has reported one the size of the fist situated on the right side of the neck, and Hankel and others a tumor upon each side. The tumor varies in bulk from time to time according as it may be empty or may be distended with food, drink, or gas.

Food caught in the pouch can often be forced out into the pharynx by external pressure over the tumor in the neck. The retention of food above a constriction or in a sac is usually accompanied by some distress after indulgence in too much food. This uneasiness becomes relieved upon regurgitation or vomiting. Deglutition is impeded to a less extent when the disease does not implicate the upper portion of the gut.

Complete dilatation is sometimes indicated by long addiction to habits of rumination. In some instances this rumination is an agreeable sensuous process. In pouched dilatation it is very often disagreeable, the regurgitated matters being acrid, owing to acid fermentation of the contents of the sac.

While the dilatation remains moderate there may be little dysphagia or none at all, the muscles continuing sufficiently vigorous to propel the food; but after the muscles become paralyzed by distension the dysphagia gradually increases and may culminate in complete aphagia. One {432} of the special indications of diverticulum is that the regurgitation does not take place until several hours after a meal. As the sac enlarges there may be less and less complaint of dysphagia, because it becomes able to contain larger quantities of food. At the same time it may so compress the main tube as to occlude its calibre and prevent access of food to the stomach.

The symptoms of annular dilatation are similar to those of stricture with retention of food above it, the regurgitation usually following deglutition more quickly.

In some cases of dilatation, circumscribed and general, food is sometimes retained for an entire day or more before it is ejected. The decomposition of the retained food usually produces a more or less continuous foul odor from the mouth.

The course of the affection is progressively from bad to worse, and entails ultimate emaciation. Some patients succumb early, and some live to advanced age. Perforation of the oesophagus ensues in some instances, and death results in consequence of the injuries sustained by perioesophageal structures by the escape of the contents of the oesophagus. Perforation is indicated by sudden collapse and by emphysema from swallowed air.

PATHOLOGY AND MORBID ANATOMY.--Dilatation of the oesophagus is either general or partial, according as it takes place in the whole or greater portion of the oesophagus or in a circumscribed portion. Partial dilatation may involve the entire circumference of the canal (annular dilatation), or it may implicate but a portion of the wall, which becomes pouched into a sac externally (diverticulum or saccular dilatation).

General dilatation, though sometimes congenital, is, as mentioned under Etiology, more frequently the mechanical result of distension of the oesophagus by food or drink prevented from ready entrance into the stomach by a constriction at the cardiac orifice. This form of dilatation is sometimes discovered as a post-mortem curiosity. The muscles have usually undergone great hypertrophy, and the mucous membrane some thickening and congestion, with erosions and sometimes ulcerations, indicative of chronic oesophagitis. In some instances all the coats of the oesophagus have undergone hypertrophy. The dilatation may vary from slight enlargement to the thickness of an ordinary man's arm or larger (Rokitansky); in rare cases, even a capacity nearly equal to that of the stomach (Luschka and others). (See Fig. 19.)

The oesophagus is usually fusiform or spindle-shaped, being constricted at those portions at which it is normally slightly constricted. Sometimes the dilatation takes place between the lobes of the lungs (Raymond).

Annular dilatation is usually due to circumferential distension just above a stricture. When not due to stricture its seat is usually just above the diaphragm, where the oesophagus is normally liable to constriction. The upper portion of the dilatation is larger than the lower portion, and the muscular walls are usually hypertrophied.

Pouched dilatation (diverticulum) is usually formed chiefly of mucous membrane and submucous tissue pushed through gaps in the fibres of the {433} muscular coat, produced by distension. It sometimes involves the entire coat in cases in which the oesophageal wall has become adherent to enlarged lymphatic glands, which subsequently undergo subsidence in volume and drag the adherent portion of the wall after them (Rokitansky). The muscular walls are then usually hypertrophied, the mucous membrane sometimes hypertrophied, sometimes atrophied. The diverticulum is usually located in the upper portion of the oesophagus, just below the inferior constrictor muscle of the pharynx. It may thus be, in part, a pharyngocele also. It may be located behind the point of bifurcation of the trachea or where the oesophagus is crossed by the left bronchus. Its direction may be to the left side in the upper portion of the oesophagus, to the right side, or upon both sides; but when situated lower down it is usually directed backward, between the posterior wall of the tube and the spinal column. Hence its distension with food completely blocks up the calibre of the oesophagus. The orifice by which the oesophageal wall remains in communication with the pouch is round or elliptic in shape and variable in size, sometimes being about an inch in its long diameter, sometimes much smaller. The size of the diverticulum varies; a common size is that of a duck egg, but the size of a fist has been attained. Sometimes the diverticulum drags the oesophagus out of position and forms a sort of blind pouch in the direct line of its axis, so that it becomes filled with food which fails to reach the stomach. Sometimes there are several dilatations.