Part 194

In the abdomen these observers found nothing which suggested the possibility of tubercles or any obscure form of cancer. In the pericardium, on the heart side, were found numerous small nodular roughnesses. Irregularities of the pericardial false membrane are so common that nothing but the close and universal adhesions would raise any question of these relations. But tubercles would hardly be here and nowhere else.

{1164} Delafield says that one form of the chronic disease is the continuance of his cellular peritonitis. In this, he says, the surface of the omentum is covered with cells which look as if they were derived from the endothelium and connective-tissue cells, although they differ from the normal shape of these. The new cells are for the most part polygonal, of different size, with one or several nuclei, and giant-cells--large granular masses filled with nuclei. Although these new cells are produced over the entire surface of the peritoneum, yet, as a rule, they are more numerous in little patches here and there. These little patches may be heaped together in such numbers as to form nodules visible to the naked eye. There is never any stroma between these cells.

This form of peritonitis occurs most frequently with organic heart disease, with cirrhosis of the liver, with chronic pulmonary phthisis, and with acute general tuberculosis. In the two latter diseases he thinks they have been improperly called tubercles.

He describes a form of chronic adhesion of peritoneal surfaces that occurs without the intervention of fibrin, but, as he supposes, by coalescence of the branching cells and a production from them of a fibrillated basement substance, the fibrils crossing in all directions. In the midst of these fibrils he finds the nuclei of these cells. He finds also in the immediate neighborhood of these adhesions thousands of branching cells that are attached one to another and float free in the water, the fixed end being attached to the peritoneum. He regards such a peritonitis with adhesions as a more advanced stage of the forms of cellular peritonitis already described, and the new cells are changed into membrane.

Sayre has published an extraordinary case in the Transactions of the Pathological Society. He calls it chronic proliferative peritonitis; it might be called more aptly the consequence of peritonitis.

A large, strong man fell from a hammock, the rope breaking, upon his shoulders, and felt a severe pain in his stomach, and soon developed symptoms of peritonitis. This pain never entirely subsided. The peritonitis was recognized. About one month after he was tapped, and 240 ounces of serum were drawn. He was tapped one hundred and eighty-seven times, and 1203-5/16 pounds of fluid were taken from him during the remainder of his life. At post-mortem examination 3000 cc. of yellow serum were found. The liver and spleen were covered by a thick layer of false membrane, intestines were glued together in the upper part of the abdomen, and the stomach was adherent to the lower surface of the liver. The portal vein was contracted by this membranous coating. There were numerous other lesions in the heart and pleura, but these will account for the dropsy.

This man was unusually strong and hearty until 1876, when he had an attack of double pleuro-pneumonia, and in 1878 he slipped on the front steps and fell, but seemed to recover from the effects of this. The fall from the swing occurred in July, 1879. He died in February, 1884.

{1165} Tubercular Peritonitis.

This form of disease is by no means uniform in its first symptoms or in its progress. The only things uniformly attending it are tubercles on the peritoneum and more or less of inflammatory effusion, chiefly lymph and serum; tumor and hardness of the bowels, general or local; deranged function of the stomach and intestines; emaciation; and extreme fatality.

In some cases the invasion is acute and marked--a chill followed by fever, vomiting, early development of meteorism, and in a few days a point or points of resistance to pressure, but not necessarily dulness on percussion. In a few days the febrile action and the meteorism may subside, leaving the symptoms of local peritonitis. But we have not long to wait for a renewal of them and an evident extension of the inflammatory action. Remission and relapse alternate at varying intervals, until the whole extent of the peritoneal surface seems to be involved in inflammation. With this mode of development meteorism may not be renewed in the most common way. The lymphy product of inflammation may so bind the intestines to the posterior walls of the abdomen that they cannot extend forward, but are pushed upward against the liver and diaphragm, and so encroach on the thoracic space. But then the anterior parietes are tense and hard, and do not move in respiration. The febrile heat may not continue more than two or three months, but the pulse will be frequent to the end. There will be a thinning of bowel walls, and here and there a knuckle of adherent intestines may cause some prominence and give some resonance on percussion. There will be also occasional vomiting, and the dejections will be irregular--maybe only deficient or thin; there may be an alternation of constipation and diarrhoea.

Tuberculous ulcerations of the mucous layer of the bowels is not uncommon in tubercular peritonitis, and these ulcers have in rare cases perforated and allowed the fecal matter to accumulate in considerable quantity in a sac limited by previous adhesions. In all forms of tubercular peritonitis death is caused as often by grave complications as by what appears to be the primary disease. The affection occurs in probably every instance in those who had at the beginning, or had acquired in its progress, what we call the tubercular diathesis. We are not surprised, therefore, to find on inspection a wide diffusion of tubercles in the body, particularly on other serous membranes, and in the lungs. Death may occur, then, from phthisis pulmonalis or from pleurisy or meningitis, as well as from the exhaustion and accidents of the peritoneal disease. The effusion serum or turbid serum is very common in tubercular peritonitis, and can be recognized by the dulness it produces in part of the cavity, and sometimes by fluctuation. It is often sacculated, but it is not constantly found after death, it having been absorbed before, and perhaps long before, that event.

In other cases the invasion of the disease is stealthy and deceiving. It comes so quietly that the patient is not conscious of any local disorder beyond a dyspepsia and irregular action of the bowels. He has a pulse of growing frequency, but if he knows it he ascribes it to his dyspepsia. He is slowly losing flesh and strength; this he accounts for in the same way. At length a perceptible swelling of the bowels attracts his attention. At this stage the physician finds that the swollen bowels are tympanitic everywhere or only in the upper, while there is evidence of fluid {1166} effusion in the more depending, parts. He discovers some, it may be little, tenderness on pressure, and a pulse of 85, or maybe 90, increasing in frequency toward evening. The appetite is poor, the digestion slow, and occasionally there is vomiting; the complexion is pale and a little dingy; the skin of the abdomen may be dry and rough or may be natural; some colicky pains have been or soon will be felt. From this point the disease gradually advances. The distension of the bowels slowly increases or they are firmly retracted; the emaciation increases; the strength diminishes; there is often cough, which is generally dry; the bowels are slow or diarrhoea alternates with constipation; with the distended bowels there is always more than natural resonance on percussion, except when there is fluid effusion, though not often the full tympanitic sound observed in acute diffuse peritonitis. This resonance is not equal, always, in different parts of the abdomen; the respiration is embarrassed and almost wholly thoracic. The abdomen is often as large as that of a female at full term of pregnancy, and indeed the condition has been mistaken for pregnancy. This is an inexcusable blunder in a case like that which I have in mind--a young unmarried woman. She had no dulness on percussion in the space that would be occupied by the gravid uterus, but rather resonance. The case might have been a little less clear if there had been fluid effusion in the abdominal cavity, but if this were not encysted it would flow from one side of the abdomen to the other when the patient turned correspondingly in bed; if it was encysted, there would be small chances that it would have the shape and position of the gravid uterus; if it had, there would be no chance of hearing in it the foetal heart or feeling the foetal movements; and after all this there remains the experimentum crucis--a vaginal examination.

At first the diagnosis is unavoidably uncertain. Some aid is found, possibly, in the medical history of the family, in tuberculous antecedents, yet I remember cases in which no phthisis could be found in any living or dead member of the family on the paternal or maternal side as far back as it could be traced. Some aid is found if the patient himself has any of the physical or rational indications of pulmonary phthisis, and yet there are recorded cases in which the abdominal symptoms were the first to appear. The prominent German physicians attach great importance to the pre-existence of a cheesy mass or degeneration somewhere in the body as the real parent of tubercles wherever they appear. The truth of this doctrine, I do not think, has received anything like universal recognition; and if it had, as this cheesy degeneration is often, perhaps commonly, only discoverable after death, it could rarely give any assistance in diagnosis, so that the early diagnosis is always difficult, and a very early one often impossible. But as time goes on, and the symptoms are better defined and show themselves one after another as they are above described, it seems as if a careful observer could not confound it with anything except perhaps one of the other forms of chronic peritonitis or cancerous peritonitis. As to the latter, the cough which exists in most cases of tubercular peritonitis will assist in the distinction, but a physical examination much more; for a cough does not always attend phthisis when this disease exists; for example, I visited a daughter of one of the distinguished gentlemen of Vermont. She had had the bowel symptoms that indicated tubercular peritonitis for eight or ten months, and the diagnosis was not {1167} difficult. Remembering Louis's opinion that if tubercles invade any other part of the body, they are likely to be found at the same time in the lungs and in a more advanced condition, I examined the lungs, and found in the upper part of the right a cavity so large that it could have received a fist. I was only surprised by the fact that she did not cough, and had not coughed. She herself assured me of that (she was twenty-one years old); her physician, who was present at the visit, had never heard her cough, and had no suspicion of any pulmonary complication; but, more than all, her mother, who had walked with her, slept with her, eaten with her, travelled with her, and from the beginning of the illness had not been out of her company more than twenty minutes in any twenty-four hours since the disease began, had never heard her cough. Here, then, the nervous deviation to the abdomen, or whatever else it may have been, had so benumbed the sensibility of the pulmonary nerves that the alarm-bell of phthisis had never been sounded; but the cavity, had there been any doubt whether the bowel disease was cancerous or tuberculous, would have almost fully settled the question. But more of the peculiarities of cancerous peritonitis a little farther on.

The lesions of this disease (or its pathological anatomy) differ considerably, but the differences are in the amount of tuberculous deposit and the secondary results, not in the real nature of the disease. Lebert has published among his plates of pathological anatomy one which shows the peritoneum thickly sprinkled over with small tuberculous grains, and represents each particular grain surrounded by a little zone of inflammatory injection. There is yet no exudation, but that would soon follow. A fibrinous exudation will soon come over this primary deposit, and undergo a kind of organization, or at least get blood-vessels, which in their turn can furnish the material for a new crop of tubercles. These again provoke a new layer of fibrous tissue, which also becomes studded with tubercles, and so on, till a thick covering is formed over the intestines. But the same material is interposed between their folds, separating one from another and compressing them and diminishing their calibre; at the same time this agglomerated mass is firmly adherent to the abdominal walls everywhere. The new material may have a thickness of half an inch or even more. I remember how surprised and confused I was when I made my first inspection of such a case. The abdominal walls were cut through, but they could not be lifted from the intestines, but were firmly adherent to something. They were carefully dissected off and the bowel cavity (?) exposed; there was apparently an immense tumor filling the whole space: no intestines, no viscera, could be seen. A section was made through this mass from above downward, and another parallel with it and an inch distant from it, and this part removed. It appeared like a large, hard tumor, through which the intestine made several perforations. The new material appeared to be fibrous, with grayish-white tubercles sprinkled in through it everywhere, and pretty abundantly. In another case this fibro-tubercular material may occupy one part of the abdomen, and a large serous cyst or serous cysts another. The tuberculo-fibrous material may be found in markedly less quantity than is so far described, till there will be no more than in a case from Ziemssen's clinique, quoted by Bauer: "In the peritoneal cavity about four liters of yellowish-brown, slightly turbid fluid. Omentum {1168} thickened, stretched, adherent to the anterior wall of the abdomen and beset with hemorrhages; the same was true of the parietal peritoneum; between the hemorrhages whitish-yellow and entirely white tubercles occur, varying in size from the head of a pin to a lentil. The intestinal serous membrane was similarly invaded. The intestines intensely inflated; a number of ulcers on the mucous membrane, one approaching perforation. Covering of the liver thickened by fibrinous deposition."

The lungs and serous membranes generally will, in all probability, show more or less of tubercular deposit, the pericardium less frequently than the others.

The result in this affection, after it is fully established, is believed to be uniformly fatal, and at its commencement the difficulty of diagnosis may lead one to doubt whether his apparent success is anything better than apparent. Still, a plan which I have relied on is, I believe, worth announcing. As soon as the disease is recognized the patient is put upon the use of the iodide of potassium and the iodide of iron, in full average doses, and a solution of iodine in olive oil is applied to the whole surface of the abdomen by such gentle friction as will produce no pain; and after a minute or two of such friction the oil is brushed thinly over the surface and the whole covered with oiled silk. This dressing is repeated twice a day. The quantity of iodine to an ounce of oil will vary considerably in different persons; for some, seven to ten grains will be enough; for others, thirty will be needed. The iron is to make the application moderately irritating, and if it produce pinhead blisters or blisters a little larger, all the better. When the application becomes painful the oil is washed off, and the application is not renewed for two or three days. In this manner it may be continued for two or three months. Meantime, the patient is put upon the diet and regimen of the consumptive, the appetite encouraged; he takes sustaining food, with plenty of milk and cream, or cod-liver oil, as much fresh air as possible, and friction is applied to other parts of the body with dry flannel.

Cancerous Peritonitis.

Benign tumors of the abdomen are not frequently the cause of general peritonitis, and when they are, the grade of the disease is acute rather than chronic. They very often provoke local inflammation and become adherent to the neighboring structures. The same is true of malignant growths in the abdominal cavity, except that the adhesions are earlier formed and more likely to occur. Localized cancer, of whatever variety, is not very prone to produce general peritonitis, even though there be multiple developments of it. But when the disease takes the disseminated form, and is sprinkled over the whole extent of the peritoneum, then inflammation is almost certain to occur--not of high grade, and yet deserving the name subacute rather than chronic. A case which illustrates this statement has come under my observation within the last year. I will recite it with sufficient detail to make it intelligible.

A lady about forty years of age had, up to the summer of 1881, enjoyed very good health, though she was never robust. At that time she felt her strength abating and her stomach disordered. She sought {1169} health in various places, and took professional advice in September. It availed her little; the bowels were gradually swelling and fluctuation could be felt. She was losing strength and flesh. There was not a cachectic countenance, but the features were growing sharp. She had suffered but little from pain till October. At that time she was at the family country home. Then she began to suffer from a severe pain in the left thigh; and this, it was noticed, increased as the accumulation in the bowels increased, and at length her physician felt compelled to tap her--not so much on account of great distension of the bowel as in the hope of relieving the pain. He drew off nine quarts of gluey, viscid fluid, and her pain was wholly relieved. Twelve or fifteen days after this she was brought to her city home, and her city physician, seeing that her case was a grave one, sought the aid of a distinguished gynæcologist. She was then again tapped to give him a more satisfactory examination. He found the ovaries considerably enlarged and hard. They could not, however, be felt by pressing the fingers into the pelvis from above--only by the vagina. I saw her on the 10th of November. The fluid had again made considerable tumefaction of the bowels, and she was again suffering great pain in the region of the right kidney and in the leg of the same side, together with cramps. The relief given by the first tapping induced us to propose its repetition. It was, however, delayed till the 14th, that the physician who had tapped her before might be present and assist. The quantity of water drawn was again nine quarts, and again the pains and spasms were quieted. The examination of the abdominal fluid was interesting. It was nearly clear, reddish, of syrupy flow and consistence, and so viscid that while a portion of it had remained on the slide of the microscope long enough for the examination of its constituents the thin cover became so firmly attached to the slide that it could not be removed without breaking or long maceration. The albumen was so abundant that the fluid was completely consolidated on boiling. Fibrinous threads were running through it in great numbers, and here and there was a cell of large size, round, granular, but not plumped up with granules, with a nucleus barely less in size than the cell itself; its outer border within, but only just within, the boundary or wall of the cell. It was the nucleus that was granular, for there was little room for granules between the nucleus and the cell wall. The vial containing the fluid had been standing three or four hours for a sediment. This in a vial four inches high occupied the lower half, and gave nothing to the dropping-tube till the sedimentary matter was drawn into it by suction. This matter consisted of fibrillated fibrin in large quantity; a great number of the cells just described, some grouped, but most separate or single. There were pus-cells in moderate quantity, each having the amoeboid movements, and a considerable number of red blood-corpuscles, some of natural form, some crenate.

Immediately after the tapping the flaccid condition of the abdominal walls admitted an examination. A solid, hard mass was found running across the upper part of the bowels, a nodule of which was lying on the stomach at the point of the ensiform cartilage. A harder mass of irregular shape was also found just above the pelvis on the right side, extending upward and to the right. This was in extent two by three inches. The ovary, however, could not be detected by pressure from above {1170} downward. The diagnosis up to this time was hardly doubtful, but these revelations made it complete, and crushed any lingering hope of the patient's recovery.

While the pain and spasm ceased after the tapping, the oedema of the left leg, which came on some time before the last tapping, did not diminish. The hard spot near the right iliac fossa was tender on pressure, but otherwise hardly painful. While the fluid did not exceed six quarts or so, she had little pain anywhere. There were no external glandular swellings. Her appetite was poor, and she took but little food. She vomited very little till the end was approaching. The urine contained a few globules of pus, some pigment matter, two or three hyaline casts, but no trace of albumen. For sixteen days following November 14th the patient was comfortable, but the fluid was slowly filling the bowels again. At that time the pains already referred to began to return. On December 5th they required another tapping, and preparations were made for it, but vomiting, rather severe, led to its postponement to the next day. The quantity of fluid drawn was nine and a half quarts. It was of the same syrupy consistence as that previously drawn, and under the microscope showed exactly the same constituents and gave the same quantity of albumen. The next day stercoraceous vomiting commenced, with no movement of the bowels, except what was produced by 10 grains of calomel given on the second day of this vomiting. That acted well and produced a temporary relief. She after this took no food by the mouth, but milk and beef-tea were injected into the rectum. Still, the fecal vomiting returned, and she died on the 15th.

The post-mortem examination was made on the 17th by William H. Welch. I could not attend it. His report is complete as to the main features of the case, though it does not furnish an explanation of the spasms and the oedema of the left leg, regarding which Welch was not informed. The pain and spasm were doubtless due to backward pressure of a diseased part on a nerve or nerves, and the oedema to a narrowing of the iliac vein by pressure or constriction by fibro-cancerous matter on its outer sides. "The peritoneal cavity," he says, "contained somewhat over a gallon of clear, yellow serum. Both the visceral and parietal layers of the peritoneum were thickened, in some places more than in others; this was especially marked on the anterior of the stomach and on the lower part of the ileum and in the left iliac region. The omentum was greatly thickened and retracted into a firm mass (or roll), which extended somewhat obliquely across the body, more to the left than to the right. The mesentery was much thickened and contracted, drawing the intestines backward. In a few places only was the peritoneal surface coated with fibrin, and the intestines were mostly free from adhesions. The coils of the lower part of the ileum, however, were firmly matted together by organized connective tissue in such a way that they were twisted, often at a sharp angle, so as greatly to constrict the calibre of the gut. The serous and muscular layers of the intestine at this point were greatly thickened. By these causes there appeared to be a complete obstruction at a point about six inches above the ileo-cæcal valve. By careful dissection these coils were straightened out, so as to remove the main cause of obstruction. The peritoneal covering of the liver was adherent to the parietal layer.

{1171} "The surface of both the visceral and parietal peritoneum was studded over with hundreds of small, firm, whitish nodules, generally not larger than a pea, and often not larger than a pin's head. In some places they had coalesced and made firm patches an inch in extent. This same material was found in the contracted omentum in considerable quantity. In a few places, particularly on the uterus, a blackish pigmented deposit appeared.

"The ovaries were not adherent, but both were enlarged to the size of a hen's egg. The outer surface of each was rough and corrugated. The new growth was deposited on the exterior and penetrated each a quarter to half an inch. It was of uniform white color and of firm consistence.

"The stomach wall was thickened nearly throughout its extent, but particularly in the anterior part, where it amounted to thrice the normal thickness. This consisted wholly of hypertrophy of the muscular coat and increase of fibrous tissue in the peritoneal layer. This new growth was traced, in the interlacing bands, from the surface into the muscular coat. In the outer layer of the stomach were found three small white nodules. The mucous membrane of the organ was healthy or a little pale.

"The retro-peritoneal glands along the aorta were enlarged, soft, and of a reddish-gray color. A nodule was found in the wall of the duodenum outside the mucous membrane, and one in the Fallopian tube."

Every organ in the abdomen and chest was examined, but nothing important found except what is here recorded. Welch concludes his record with the following diagnosis: "Primary scirrhous carcinoma of the ovaries. Secondary deposits in the peritoneum, in the outer layer of the right Fallopian tube, of the stomach and duodenum, and in the retro-peritoneal glands. Chronic peritonitis, intestinal obstruction."

This case presents to the reader so accurately the usual course of cancerous peritonitis, and the inspection its lesions, that a treatise on the subject is hardly called for. It often happens that cancerous antecedents in the patient or his relatives will lend an aid to the diagnosis, which this case did not present. To distinguish this disease from tubercular peritonitis no question can arise except in its dropsical form, and then the lungs in every case of the latter that I have met with have the physical signs of tubercles, though not always the rational indications. The pulse is much more accelerated in the tuberculous variety. I omitted to state that the temperature of this patient was often taken, and till the closing scene was never found more than one or two degrees above the healthy standard, and the morning and evening heat did not materially vary; the opposite of both, then, would be expected in a tuberculous case. The existence of meteorism is much more common in the tubercular disease; indeed, in the cancerous case recited there was none of it. The duration of the two is different--that of the cancerous kind is recorded in months, while the tuberculous variety may continue two years. The cancerous is more likely to be attended by alarming accidents, like the complete obstruction of the bowels, large hemorrhages, and a sudden lighting up of acute peritonitis. Finally, in the light of the case here recorded, it seems probable that the examination of the abdominal fluid will become of great importance. I have never carefully examined the fluid of tubercular dropsy, but it does not seem probable that it will have the syrupy {1172} appearance, the large amount of albumen, the abundance of fibrin-fibres, and the granular large cells with nuclei only perceptibly less in size than the cells themselves, that were repeatedly found in this case--found by two observers, and at every tapping after the first.