Part 19

The selection of the preparation of colchicum in the treatment of an acute paroxysm is a matter of individual experience and preference. The acetous extract and the wine of the seeds are most commonly used, and many practitioners are not scrupulous in prescribing the proprietary preparations of Reynolds, Laville, and Blair. The wine of colchicum may be given in doses varying from 20 to 40 minims, alone or combined with Epsom salts in drachm doses, with small quantities of opium, every six or eight hours. Under this medication the pain, tenderness, and swelling rapidly abate, and sometimes with an abruptness that is magical. As soon as the acute symptoms subside, the colchicum should be continued in smaller and less frequent doses until the fever and local tenderness subside. The use of quinia with small doses of colocynth after the colchicum has been discontinued helps to re-establish the strength and regulate the digestive functions. The patient should always be warned against the possible demoralizing effects of a speedy recovery from a serious disease. Recurrence after the colchicum treatment is certainly more common than after the expectant method, but this should not be ascribed so much to a defective cure as to the temptation which the antidote offers to trifling with the poison. The accidents which have been ascribed to colchicum through its causing heart-failure are probably to be explained by its injudicious administration in large doses where acute gout is complicated with cardiac or renal degeneration.

Next in importance and value to colchicum in the abortive treatment of gout are salicin, salicylic acid, the sodium salicylate, and the oil of wintergreen. Unlike colchicum, which has no marked effect upon acute rheumatism, these medicines appear to act with similar energy on {136} gout and rheumatism. The rapidity and the almost uniform way with which they allay the inflammatory symptoms in rheumatic fever are well known; their value as specific remedies in both acute and subacute gout is not so generally appreciated. Whether the specific action of colchicum in gout differentiates this disease from rheumatism, or whether the similar action of the salicin compounds indicates that these diseases are allied in their etiology, are questions yet to be solved. The good effects of salicin and the sodium salicylate in many of the forms of irregular gout, and notably in the dyspeptic disorders and the erythematous tegumentary lesions, are especially worthy of notice. In acute attacks of articular gout the salicylic acid or the sodium salicylate, in 15 or 20 grain doses repeated every three or four hours, will often cut short the attack, and will very certainly allay within twenty-four hours the acuteness of the symptoms. As in rheumatism, the medicine should be continued in smaller doses after the acute symptoms have subsided for several days, the tendency to relapse being marked if the drug be discontinued too soon. In subacute articular gout and in the irregular forms of the disease, where the medicine has to be continued for some time, salicin and the oil of wintergreen are to be preferred to salicylic acid and the sodium salicylate. They are less liable to disturb the stomach and to produce toxic effects.

It is unnecessary to describe the treatment of the different forms of irregular gout, inasmuch as the general principles described in the treatment of the gouty dyscrasia involve the most important considerations in the management of these affections.

{137}

RACHITIS.

BY A. JACOBI, M.D.

DEFINITION.--Rachitis is a general nutritive disorder, almost always of long duration, usually with an introductory stage of weeks or months and a course mostly extending over months or years. Its beginning is mostly gradual, its final recovery slow. It is complicated with or dependent on disorders of the digestive or respiratory apparatuses, which are preceded by a disposition probably created by an undue width of the arteries. It exhibits amongst its prominent symptoms muscular debility; perspiration; anomalies of the subcutaneous tissue, which is either very much infiltrated with fat or deprived of it; disturbances of the intellectual and moral functions, and of those of the large thoracic and abdominal viscera and lymphatic glands; changes in the latter may outlive all others. Its most perceptible symptom, however, consists in an inflammatory disease of the primordial cartilage of the epiphyses, a copious deposit in that region and also under the periosteum of the bones; curvature of the diaphyses, and, while absorption remains intact, softening and retarded ossification of the bone. Without these affections of the osseous system the diagnosis of rachitis is not complete.

ETIOLOGY AND PATHOLOGY.--The nature of rachitis has been considered to be inflammatory by F. A. Walter. Renard looked for that inflammation in the periosteum. Guérin emphasizes the vascular increase in periosteum, bone, and marrow; Trousseau and Lasègue the congestive character of the local tumefaction, besides fever and pain. Virchow also inclines to the opinion that the rachitical process is of an inflammatory nature, though it be impossible to state the exact cause of the process. Still, he claims that we are no better off in regard to other inflammations of unknown character--for instance, those of the skin--and that we have to look for a future increase of our knowledge of such constitutional predisposition of the organism and of such specific qualities of the blood as will produce the local irritation of the osseous tissue in rachitis. Last, and mainly, it is Kassowitz who seeks the {138} essence of the rachitical process in a chronic inflammation originating in the points of apposition of the growing bones of the foetus or infant. During the chronic inflammation blood-vessels are formed in large numbers, and a morbid congestion takes place in all blood-vessels, but mainly in those of the localities in which new bone is forming; thus in the chondro-epiphyses, in the perichondrium and periosteum, and the sutural substances. Faulty introduction or elimination of lime has nothing to do with this process. It cannot be deposited in the current of a copious circulation; in fact, it is not deposited in the immediate neighborhood of blood-vessels to any extent. Even in otherwise normal bone hyperæmia produced by the experimenter softens the bone, which was fully formed before. If the relative percentage of lime were of any account in the etiology of rachitis, the periosteal and cartilaginous proliferations would find no explanation. But why is it that this peculiar process takes place at an early age only? and in the bone only? Kassowitz urges the fact that the growth of the bone differs in this from the development of all other tissues: that the latter grow uniformly through their whole mass; that the circulation in them is more uniform and carries material through and into every particle simultaneously, while in the bones the only places in which the whole circulation can contribute to their growth--the few blood-vessels distributed in the interior not adding to their growth at all--are the periosteum and the places of apposition between epiphysis and diaphysis. Every morbid irritation, whether resulting from bad air, habitation, and food, or from either chronic or acute ailment, acts on the whole mass of other tissues and organs, but in the bones only on the growing ends or surface.

The results of the pathologists and experimenters are confirmed by chemical analyses. Fat has been generally found somewhat increased in the rachitical bones, and water largely so; chondrin is diminished according to Marchand and Lehmann, but was found unaltered in the later analyses of A. Baginsky. The latter found, after having deprived the bone of fat, the organic and inorganic material to be in a proportion of 100 to 563 in the normal, and of 100 to 160 in the rachitical osseous tissue; and in 100 parts of dry bone, Gorup-Besanez found in the

Ossein. Phosphoric Acid. Lime. Manganese Oxide. Healthy adult 34 26 34 0.3 Infant of six months 34.9 27 35 0.5 Rachitical femur 72 7 9 0.3 " tibia 60 12.9 17 0.3

Defective calcification of the forming bone is one of the principal characteristics of rachitis. In it lime cannot either enter into the composition of the osseous tissue or remain in it. Its elimination must take place either through the kidneys or the intestinal tract. In the feces Ad. Baginsky, and many before him, have found an abnormal quantity. In regard to the urine, modern investigations do not agree with former analyses. Thus, Baginsky concludes that there is no increase of lime in the urine of rachitical as compared with that of healthy children; Seemann found even a diminution of the percentage of lime. Amongst modern writers only Rehn found an occasional increase of lime in the urine of rachitis.

{139} In regard to the elimination of phosphoric acid, the analyses of different periods do not agree any better. The conclusions of previous researches, pointing to a quadruple elimination of phosphoric acid in the urine of rachitis, are refuted by Seemann, who found no increase, and by Baginsky, according to whose researches the phosphoric acid of the healthy urine compares with that of rachitical urine as 40:12-37.

As far as the elimination of nitrogen is concerned, there appears to be but little difference between normal and rachitical urine. Chlorine was found to be diminished in rachitis by Baginsky. Lehmann and Von Gorup found lactic acid several times. Several times albumen was met with; in a case of Ritchie's, blood; in one of Von Gorup's, fat.

The etiology of rachitis must be studied from two points of view. It has its predisposition and its direct and proximate causes. The former has been studied by F. W. Beneke upon an anatomical basis. He finds that the arteries of rachitical patients are large all through the body. This is so particularly in the carotids; it seems probable that the changes taking place in the head are due to this anomaly in the size of the arteries. Three cases in which the width of the arteries of the neck was unusually large terminated fatally--one by hydrocephalus, one with a very large skull, and one suddenly. This width of the arteries is most marked, under ordinary circumstances, from the second to the fourth year; that is, the exact time in which (except the cases of early rachitis) the rachitical process is at its height. It is considered by Beneke to be the cause of the local increase of vascular irritation, particularly in the epiphyses with their retarded circulation; and also of the increase of nutritive development which is so often noticed during recovery from rachitis; and, finally, of the many pulmonary complications of an inflammatory nature.

There is another interesting consideration in regard to the effect of wide arteries on the relations between the blood and tissues. A great many more blood-cells are required to fill the arteries when wide than when narrow. Now, the formation of blood-cells is hindered by any disease of the digestive and blood-preparing organs, so that the tissues are liable to show the relative increase in the percentage of water, which is uniformly confirmed for rachitis by the biochemists.

The pulmonary artery of the healthy infant is larger than the aorta by not more than four millimeters. In the majority of cases of rachitis examined by Beneke this difference in size was very much more favorable to the pulmonary artery; it is abnormally large in rachitis. This anatomical fact is suggestive of the pathological processes so frequently found in the lungs and in the neighboring lymphatic and large abdominal glands. For, while the amount of blood introduced into the lungs through its wide artery is unusually large, particularly so in a chest which is contracted in consequence of the rachitical process in the bones, the exit from the lungs is relatively impeded. Not only, however, the narrowness of the chest is a cause of this disproportion. For even in rather normal chests the lungs of rachitical children are relatively small.

The liver of almost all rachitical children is large. In but one-half {140} of the cases this enlargement is accompanied with a large heart. In pure cases of scrofula, on the contrary, Beneke found a small heart, rather narrow arteries, and usually a small liver, the size of the lungs offering but few anomalies.

The spleen also is large in the majority of cases. Its size is not dependent on the large size of the liver or the small size of the lungs. For these conditions are found in the majority of cases only, not in all of them, and the large spleen is not always found with a large liver and small lungs. The variability of the anatomical conditions permits of various degrees of combination; so that varying combinations of rachitis with other constitutional disorders may correspond with the different sizes of the principal organs. After all, as there is a great deal of independence of these organs, as to size, of each other, the conclusion is justified that those differences are not the result of the disease, but that they are congenital and stand in some causal relation with it.

The kidneys are large in the majority of cases, like the spleen and liver, while the lungs are small. This disproportion is apt to result in a hyperæmic condition of all the organs of the abdominal cavity, and especially of the kidneys. To what extent this undue amount of volume interferes with, or increases, renal secretion, it is difficult to say. The amount of urine secreted by rachitical children is about normal, though, as already stated, the percentage of lime in it is rather diminished, contrary to the opinions held formerly.

For the direct cause of rachitis Glisson looked to the inequality of nutrition by the arterial blood, and for that of the curvature of the long bones to their superabundant vascularization. He found the disease mainly amongst the well-to-do classes, not unlike a modern American writer, who declares infantile paralysis to be the result of the nervousness of the better classes of the American people! John Mayow (1761) held a disturbance of the innervation responsible; Zeviani (in the same year), improper food in general, and particularly prolonged lactation; and Selle (1791), a peculiar diathesis (acrimonia rachitica). About that time a defective nutrition with abnormal function of the lymph-ducts was looked upon as the cause of rachitis by many--by others, an undue production of acid, and the softening of the osseous tissue thereby. This result was attributed by some to the influence of milk (Veirac, De Krzowitz). Attention was directed at an early time to phosphoric acid and lime, with the view that variations in the elimination of these substances might explain the occurrence of rachitis. A large quantity of both was found in some urines (Malfatti); a superabundance of phosphoric acid was presumed to prevail in the whole system (Wendt, Fourcroy); while symptoms resembling rachitis were found in animals fed upon small doses of phosphoric acid by Caspari (1824). Chossat fed young animals on food deprived of lime, and claimed to produce softening of the bones and death, a result which was denied by Friedleben. Guérin claimed to produce rachitis by feeding young animals on meat in place of their mother's milk, a result equally denied by Tripier, who, like Friedleben, found the bones under such circumstances more liable to fractures, but not rachitical. Wildt and Weiske found the bones uninfluenced by withholding lime from food; Forster, however, and Roloff claimed to notice a marked influence, and the latter {141} stated that animals, after having been rendered sick by depriving them of lime, recovered when they were again supplied with it. Wegner, in his numerous experiments with phosphorus, found that in growing animals it increases the growth and firmness of both long and flat bones; after the growth of the animal has been completed it renders epiphyses and vertebræ denser. There is no change, however, in the relative chemical composition of those parts. He found at the same time that results similar to those caused by the administration of phosphorus were obtained when food deprived of its phosphate of lime was given. But he met with no rachitical changes proper during these several procedures. Teissier having found an increase in the urine of rachitis after the administration of lactic acid, and lactic acid having been frequently found in the urine of rachitical patients by Ragsky, Morehead, Simon, and Lehmann, C. Heitzmann fed with lactic acid both carnivorous and herbivorous animals, found the cortical layer of the bones softened and the medullary substance hyperæmic, and claimed to produce rachitis in the former and osteomalacia in the latter. Both of these assertions were denied by Tripier and Toussaint, who insist upon Heitzmann's having selected animals which have a peculiar disposition to suffer from rachitis. Again, Milne Edwards and Boussaingault found the bones softened when they withdrew both phosphoric acid and lime from the food, without restoring the bone's consistency by administering powdered bone. But, lately, Ad. Baginsky states that he produced rachitis by withholding lime, and increased the effect by introducing lactic acid. By so doing, however, he changed only the relation of the mineral to the organic substances, without interfering with the normal proportions to each other of the constituents of the ashes. Beneke, finding oxalic acid in the urine in many cases of rachitis, attributes to it the want of calcification in rachitis, and Senator suggests that what impedes the deposition of bone might be formic, acetic, and lactic acids, which are also found in the young osseous tissue.

Of these statements many are uniform, others contradictory. Thus far, they are not convincing except in one way--viz. that both withholding and introducing certain ingredients, mainly lime, influence the growth of the bone considerably. This may prove nothing else but that lime is of paramount importance in the building up of bone, and that bone in the period of rapid development is amenable to a great many influences.

It is in the period of rapid development that rachitis is observed. Thus it occurs in every stage of intra-uterine and infant life. It is met with in the foetus in very early intra-uterine life; it is found as a congenital affection, continuing to develop after birth when it has originated in the latter half of foetal existence; there is, thirdly, the rachitis of early infancy; and, lastly, that of advanced infancy and childhood. Of 624 cases of rachitis enumerated by A. Baginsky, there were 256 less than a year old, 313 in the second, and 63 in the third year. After this time rachitis is rare, as far as the active symptoms of the disease are concerned. But still, a retarded form of rachitis (r. tardiva) has been described by some authors. It is said to occur about puberty, and to exhibit local changes in the bones of genuine rachitical character, but to be wanting in all the other symptoms required for the diagnosis of general rachitis. Such cases have been described {142} by C. Lucas. He found it complicated, now and then, with albuminuria. The occurrence of the latter at that time of life had been referred to by Moxon. The principal symptoms described by Lucas are scoliosis, talipes valgus, and genu valgum. The epiphyses were slightly thickened; there were pain in the limbs, languor, and pallor. In some of the cases there were also rachitical deformities dating from infancy. He believes rachitis of adolescence to exhibit more symptoms belonging to relaxation of the ligaments than to softening of the bones.

A case of rachitis of undoubtedly congenital nature has been reported by Chiari. There were but twelve teeth. There were no other alveoli, nor was there any intimation of the formation of alveoli in the shape of the jaw, which resembled very much the usual senile form of retrograde metamorphosis.

Twenty years ago I described the lesions in part of a rachitical cranium removed from an infant who lived up to her eleventh day. She was born at full term with hernia of the brain, about one-sixth of which protruded through the small fontanel. Only the cranium could be studied with regard to rachitis, and but small portions of the frontal and the anterior half of the parietal bones surrounding the large fontanel could be removed. In these few square inches of bone there were between twenty-five and thirty openings of the usual craniotabic nature, nothing but a transparent membrane being left. The bony edges of these thin portions were partly sloping off gradually, partly very steeply, and somewhat thickened. They were distributed over the whole part of the skull removed; some were found in the immediate neighborhood of the points of ossification. No recent deposits of soft rachitical bone had taken place under the periosteum. Thus, evidently, the process was of rather an early date of intra-uterine life, and had at birth run the full course of its usual development without having had an opportunity to terminate in the restitution of the normal bone.

In a case reported by Dr. F. A. Burrall the infant (female) was cyanosed at birth, and had a small head and feeble general development. The respiration was shrill and piping from birth, as though from congenital laryngismus; in a few days it became raucous. The post-mortem examination proved the larynx normal, with no obstructive growths. She was pigeon-breasted, and the last phalanx of her right finger wanting.

In the meeting of June 27, 1883, of the Société de Chirurgie of Paris, Guéniot presented a newly-born baby with well-pronounced rachitis of the extremities which had healed at the time of birth. The bones had recovered their firmness, and the characteristic deformities remained. In the meeting of December 19th he could report that the child had exhibited neither symptoms of rachitis nor of syphilis since. In regard to the latter, a very rigorous examination of the baby's whole family, made by Guéniot and Fournier, resulted in the existence of no trace of syphilis.

Kassowitz has examined many still-born infants, and also children dying at an early age, at the foundling hospital of Vienna. In a large majority of the cases he found rachitical changes in the ends of the bones. In {143} many of those who lived several weeks he found rachitis developed to such an extent that the presumption of its intra-uterine origin became conclusive. Here nothing is left but the conclusion that the cause of congenital rachitis has to be looked for in the condition of the maternal blood.

Thus, the foetal and congenital occurrence of rachitis cannot be doubted. Both forms are represented in literature. Neither requires the presence of rachitis in one or both of the parents. But the cause of the intra-uterine disease has not been found. Perhaps a disease of the mother with considerable nutritive disorders or a defective placentar supply may be found responsible. The foetal form runs its course long before the normal termination of pregnancy; the congenital may have run its full course at birth or complete it afterward. The bones are found of characteristic nature, the diaphyses suffering more than the epiphyses; even a rachitical pelvis has been met with by Fischer. Early foetal rachitis is probably dependent upon a defective development of the very first cartilaginous deposits and the first osseous nuclei; thus, many of the congenital synostoses find a ready explanation. Besides these, abnormal circulation is accounted for. For periosteal proliferation at that early period contracts the foramina carrying the blood-vessels, and, while interfering with the size of the bones, the foramen magnum also. Thus, a certain class of cretinism appears to be due to foetal rachitis, mainly of the base of the cranium, which results in early ossification of the synchondroses, particularly of the sphenoid bone. But lately I have seen a case of this description, which, however, had not terminated at the time of birth. For after birth the rachitical process developed further, and in addition to the rachitical deformity of the base of the cranium there were afterward thickening of the epiphyses, pigeon breast, and thoracic grooving and flattening.