Part 104

The stomach may have an hour-glass shape in consequence of a constriction separating the cardiac from the pyloric half of the organ. This constriction is sometimes congenital, sometimes caused by cicatrization of a gastric ulcer, and sometimes caused by spasmodic contraction of the muscle, which may persist after death, but disappears when the stomach is artificially distended. Hour-glass shape of the stomach has been diagnosed during life by administering an effervescing powder according to Frerichs' method.

Foreign substances of hard consistence which have been swallowed sometimes cause diverticula of the stomach.

Sometimes the fundus of the stomach is but little developed, so that the organ is long and narrow like a piece of intestine.

The stomach may be variously distorted by external pressure, as from tumors and by adhesions.

The loop-shaped stomach and vertical position of the stomach have been already considered in connection with DILATATION OF THE STOMACH (page 602).

In transposition of the viscera the stomach is also transposed. In such a case difficulties may arise in the diagnosis of pyloric cancer, as in a case described by Légroux.

The stomach may be found in hernial sacs. Mention has already been made of the presence of dilated stomachs in scrotal hernia. More frequently the stomach is found in umbilical hernias. In diaphragmatic hernia the stomach is found more frequently in the thorax than is any other abdominal viscus. In 266 diaphragmatic hernias collected by Lascher the stomach was found either wholly or partly in the thorax in 161 cases. The clinical consideration of diaphragmatic hernia, however, does not belong here.

Furthermore, the stomach may be displaced by tumors, enlargement of neighboring organs, tight-lacing, adhesions, and the weight of hernias. These displacements, however, are generally inconsiderable and of little importance.

In a case described by Mazotti the stomach, of which the pyloric portion was fixed by adhesions, was twisted around its long axis. Death was caused by uncontrollable vomiting.

{618} RUPTURE OF THE STOMACH.

Sufficient attention has already been given to perforation of the stomach in consequence of diseases of its walls, such as ulcer, cancer, abscesses, and toxic gastritis.

A healthy stomach may be ruptured by violent injury to the abdomen even when no external wound is produced. An example of rupture of the stomach from this cause is that sometimes produced when a person has been run over by a heavy vehicle.

It has been claimed that a stomach with healthy walls may burst in consequence of over-distension of the organ with solids or with gas. The older literature is especially rich in reports of so-called spontaneous rupture of the stomach. Most of these cases were examples of perforation of gastric ulcer. In a case of apparently spontaneous rupture of a stomach which had become abnormally distended with gas, Chiari found that the rupture was through the cicatrix of a simple ulcer in the lesser curvature. It is hardly conceivable that rupture of the healthy stomach from over-distension can occur so long as the orifices of the organ are unobstructed.

Lautschner reports a case of spontaneous rupture of the stomach in a woman seventy years old with an enormous umbilical hernia which contained the pyloric portion of the stomach. After drinking eight glasses of water and two cups of tea and eating meat, she was seized with vomiting, during which the stomach burst with a report which was audible to the patient and to those around her. She passed into a state of collapse and died in thirteen hours. A rent several centimeters long was found in the posterior wall of the stomach. Lautschner thinks that the pylorus was bent in the hernial sac so as to be obstructed. In the walls of the stomach he found no evidence of pre-existing disease.

There is no satisfactory proof of the possibility of the occurrence of rupture of a stomach with healthy walls except as a result of external violence.

The symptoms and treatment of rupture of the stomach are those of perforation of the stomach, and have already been described. The prognosis is fatal.

GASTROMALACIA.

That the subject of gastromalacia should still occupy so much space in medical works the purpose of which is mainly clinical proves that many physicians still cling to the belief that this process may occur during life. It is, nevertheless, certain that the condition which, according to the ordinary and traditional use of the term, is designated gastromalacia, is always a post-mortem process and is without the slightest clinical significance. So long as the circulation of the blood in the walls of the stomach is undisturbed, self-digestion of this organ cannot occur. No one doubts {619} that parts of the gastric walls in which the circulation has been arrested, and which are exposed to the gastric juice, undergo self-digestion, as has already been set forth in the article on GASTRIC ULCER. To describe cases of this nature under the name of gastromalacia, however, is misleading, and can cause only confusion, for the long-continued discussion as to whether gastromalacia is a vital or a cadaveric process applied certainly to a different conception of the term. In some of the cases which have been published, even in recent years, in support of the vitalistic theory of gastromalacia, and in which it has been proven that perforation of the stomach occurred during life, the solution of continuity took place through parts of the gastric walls in which the circulation had already been obstructed, particularly by extensive hemorrhagic infiltration. Some of these cases are probably also examples of perforation of gastric ulcer or of rupture of cicatrices from over-distension of the stomach, in which post-mortem digestion of the edges of the ulcer or of the cicatrix obscured the real nature of the process. The subject of gastromalacia should be relegated wholly to works on physiology and on pathological anatomy.

{620}

INTESTINAL INDIGESTION.

BY W. W. JOHNSTON, M.D.

NATURE.--The term indigestion in its most common meaning refers to gastric indigestion only. This limitation has arisen from the fact that gastric digestion has been more thoroughly understood than intestinal digestion, and because the symptoms, flatulence, acidity, eructations of gas, pyrosis, and vomiting of unaltered food, are readily referred to the stomach as their source. Intestinal digestion has not been well known until within a recent date, and its phenomena in disease have been mistaken for other pathological conditions.

From the important and complex function of the intestinal juices, and the very great share they take in the solution of food, there must be many phases of departure from the normal state. The processes of intestinal digestion are more intricate than those of gastric digestion, of a higher grade, and the chemical reactions are more numerous, depending upon the participation of the bile, the pancreatic juice, and the succus entericus; while intestinal absorption is a more complex act than that of gastric absorption.

A brief review of the physiology of intestinal digestion will be of aid in making clear its pathology.

The object of all digestion is to make such a solution of the ingesta that they may pass through animal membrane and so enter the system. Mechanical disintegration and simple solution do something toward this, but for substances insoluble in water a more thorough change is brought about by ferments which convert insoluble into soluble compounds.

The process of digestion begins in the mouth. Mastication breaks up the masses of food; the saliva softens them, dissolves soluble substances, as salt and sugar, and thus the pleasures of the palate are enhanced. The ferment ptyalin acts upon starch (boiled starch being more rapidly altered than unboiled), and changes it to dextrin and grape-sugar, both of which are diffusible through animal membrane, entering lymph-spaces and blood-vessels. The greater part of the saliva secreted is swallowed with the food or in the intervals of eating. The amount formed in twenty-four hours varies from 1500 gm. (Bidder and Schmidt) to 700 gm. (Tuczek). It must therefore serve some ulterior purpose in the stomach. Ewald says that saliva converts starch into sugar in acid as well as in alkaline and neutral solutions. But Langley asserts that the ferment of {621} saliva is destroyed by the hydrochloric acid of the gastric juice. The longer food is subjected to mastication and insalivation, the more thorough is the mouth digestion and the better prepared is the mass for the action of the gastric and intestinal juices. It is asserted that fatty matters are emulsified to a certain extent by the alkaline ferments of the saliva.

When the food enters the stomach the nitrogenous (albuminoid) elements are attacked by the gastric juice, the bundles of muscular fibre are broken up, the fibrillæ are reduced to a granular mass, but not completely dissolved (Frerichs), the fat-globules are freed from their envelopes of connective tissue, milk is coagulated, and the casein is dissolved.

"The tangible, practical object of this change is to form out of a little-diffusible body (albumen) one easily diffusible (peptone), which is capable of absorption through animal membrane in a higher degree than ordinary albumen" (Ewald). Peptone is formed out of ordinary albumen, as grape-sugar is formed out of starch, by taking up water; it is therefore the hydrate of albumen.