Part 144

MORBID ANATOMY.--The lesions closely agree with those already {942} described for animals in general. The blood presents the same dark-red or black, tarry, incoagulable, or only slightly coagulable condition in the worst cases, yet this is less constant in man, as the bacteria are less constant or numerous in the blood, in keeping with the more prolonged localization of the external anthrax in man, and the more pronounced antagonism between the blood and the bacillus which results from feeding exclusively or largely on flesh. The red globules do not tend to adhere together, and the white globules are in excess and very granular. The spleen is less extensively enlarged than in animals, but is highly charged with blood, bacilli, and micrococci. The lymphatic glands too are enlarged, hyperæmic, cloudy, hemorrhagic at points, of a dark grayish, deep red, or blackish color, and highly charged with the bacillus. The surface of the skin and mucous membranes (mouth) presents hemorrhagic spots and patches, with serous vesicles and eschars. The malignant pustule when cut into presents a central slough and a surrounding hard indurated mass, both of a dark blood-red, with similar prolongations downward into the adipose tissue, and around all the characteristic oedematous infiltration, often streaked with blood. The bacillus is found in tufts or dense groups at intervals in the rete mucosum, the dermis, and the subcutaneous connective tissue. The serous membranes present the same general lesions as in animals. The walls of the stomach and bowels are the seat of cloudy red infiltration, with at intervals small hemorrhagic foci, and on the mucous surface distinct sloughs. Jelly-like exudations are also found in these membranes in the mesentery and in the retro-peritoneal tissue. The liver and kidneys are usually congested or are infiltrated with an oedematous exudate, and in these, as in all the local anthrax lesions, the characteristic bacilli are found.

DIAGNOSIS.--Malignant pustule is distinguished by its commencing from a minute red point with dark centre, and by its progressive extension from this point by a dark-red, puffy, and vesicular areola, with steadily advancing induration and gangrene. The bites of insects have a yellowish central point with red areola. A boil lacks the dark centre and the rapidly rising elevated red areola. Carbuncles and plague-boils tend to appear on clothed parts of the body, respectively on the back of the neck and shoulders and on the trunk and extremities. In carbuncle several boils rise and burst simultaneously, though they may finally slough into one sore, while in anthrax the extension is from one point. The plague-boil is usually multiple and much more painful than anthrax. The glanderous nodule is usually multiple, situated at intervals on the course of a lymphatic, the intervening portion of which is inflamed, hard, and cord-like. It is also usually associated with the specific glairy discharge from the nose, the nasal ulcers and nodules, and the enlarged painless, nodular, and indolent submaxillary lymphatic glands. As a last resort the detection of the bacillus in the indurated nucleus and the inoculability of the disease on the lower animals (rabbit, guinea-pig), may be appealed to.

Malignant anthrax oedema is less easily recognized, but may be inferred from the sudden swelling with a dusky yellow or greenish hue and a tendency to vesiculation and gangrene, the whole preceded and attended by the constitutional symptoms of anthrax, and, above all, from the presence of the bacillus in the exudate.

{943} In both of these forms much may be deduced from the known liability of the district to anthrax, from the occupation of the subject as being exposed to infection (worker in hair, wool, bristles, hides, catgut, etc.), or from his having eaten meat which was open to suspicion.

Internal anthrax is less certainly diagnosed because of the absence of local symptoms until the constitutional disorder is well advanced. Yet the reasonable suspicion of infection and the sudden and violent eruption of the disease (headache, nausea, vomiting, bloody diarrhoea, extreme anxiety, debility, dyspnoea, cyanosis, convulsions, collapse, with petechiæ, and local discharges of diffluent blood) serve to identify it. The bacillus is not always to be detected in the blood under the microscope, but its presence can usually be demonstrated by inoculation.

PROGNOSIS.--The prognosis of malignant pustule energetically treated in its early stages is good. The disease is as yet a local one, and the germs can be extinguished by local treatment. In anthrax districts, where the disease is feared and early recognized, the mortality may be from 5 per cent. (Nicolai) to 9 per cent. (Lengyel, Koranyi). Even this mortality is mainly due to delay in treatment. In districts, on the other hand, where the malady is infrequent, and where efficient measures are applied too late, the mortality is often 30, 40, or even 50 per cent. After internal infection, and where local symptoms only appear after general infection, the case is very hopeless.

PROPHYLAXIS AND TREATMENT.--The prophylaxis of anthrax in man is to a large extent identical with that for animals. All considerations as regards soil, culture, drainage, sick and dead stock, cremation, burial, disinfection, etc. have a most important if only a secondary bearing on the protection of man. Still more important is the free use of carbolic acid, chloride of lime, or tincture of iodine for the hands of those dressing unhealthy sores in animals or handling suspicious cases of sickness or cadavers, and of those working in hides, wool, hair, horns, hoofs, guts, etc. Similarly, all products of animals with anthrax should be withheld from general use.

In external anthrax of man, before the system has been contaminated, the thorough destruction by caustic of the diseased part with its contained poison is most effectual. Where there is as yet but the preliminary papule it may be incised and thoroughly destroyed by a stick of chloride of zinc, caustic potassa, or nitrate of silver, or, if more convenient, by fuming nitric acid, muriatic or sulphuric acid, or, perhaps preferably to all others, iodized phenol. Should the parent nucleus have already formed, it should be excised with the knife or deeply incised in a crucial direction, and then thoroughly cauterized with one of the more potent escharotics (caustic potassa, strong nitric acid) or with the iodized phenol. The latter agent may be further applied on the sound skin adjacent, especially if there is the slightest swelling or redness. Should the peripheral oedema persist or reappear after the cauterization, the latter should be repeated until this tendency is overcome. Hypodermic injections of a solution of iodine and iodide of potassium may be made into the entire swelling. After the caustic has done its work the eschar may be softened and its separation favored by a warm poultice containing a small amount of carbolic acid or iodized phenol. This treatment is often highly beneficial, even after constitutional symptoms have set in, by arresting the {944} propagation of the bacillus and checking its introduction and that of its chemical products into the circulation.

Constitutional treatment is not to be forgotten. Carbolic acid may be profitably given to the extent of fifteen drops daily, iodide of potassium ten to twenty grains thrice a day, and sulphate of quinia ten grains at the same intervals. The strength should be sustained by iron (tincture of the chloride) and wine or other alcoholic beverage, both being, like the agents already named, calculated to retard if not to limit the propagation of the bacillus. The diet throughout should be nutritious and easily digested.

When a person is known to have eaten anthrax meat an emetic will be indicated, followed by a smart oleaginous purgative combined with five drops of carbolic acid, and subsequently by the constitutional treatment above recommended. In case of extensive anthrax oedema, incisions may be made into the part as far as the yellow exudate extends, and a poultice containing carbolic acid may be applied. Or, preferably, the swelling may be freely injected with a weak solution of iodized phenol (1:100 water), and then painted with the same agent or with tincture of iodine.

{945}

PYÆMIA AND SEPTICÆMIA.

BY B. A. WATSON, M.D.

HISTORY.--There is little to be learned from existing literature of the views which were maintained by the ancients, prior to the birth of Christ, in regard to the morbid conditions now designated pyæmia and septicæmia; although it is certain they were recognized by the "Father of Medicine," who reports a well-marked case of puerperal fever terminating fatally on the twentieth day of the disease, and also a case in which death was unquestionably caused by septic poisoning, as is clearly shown in the following: "Criton, in Thasno, while still on foot and going about, was seized with a violent pain in the great toe; he took to his bed the same day, had rigors and nausea, recovered his heat slightly; at night was delirious. On the second, swelling of the whole foot, and about the ankle, erythema with distension and small bullæ (phlyctænæ); acute fever; he became furiously deranged; alvine discharges, bilious, unmixed, and rather frequent. He died on the second day from commencement." Additional confirmation of the fact that Hippocrates was familiar with the phenomena of these diseases may be found in his dissertation on empyema and fevers. Prof. C. Heuter says, under the head of septic fever, "Hippocrates and Celsus observed the fever in cases of injuries which proved so dangerous that this danger could not have originated from the inflammation or from the wound alone." Jacotius, a commentator of Hippocrates, has even mentioned putrid fevers, the same as Adrianus Spigelius, who spoke of fevers which arise from putrefaction; but both authors, as well as their followers, did not discriminate between septicæmia arising from the putrescence of wounds and pyæmia. In the mean time both varieties were regarded as intermittent fever.

"Aretæus lived during the middle of the second century of the Christian era. In his remarks on pneumonia he observes that the subjects of this disease die mostly on the seventh day. 'In certain cases,' he says, 'much pus is formed in the lungs, or there is a metastasis from the side if a greater symptom of convalescence be at hand. But if, indeed, the matter be translated from the side to the intestine or bladder, the patients immediately recover from the peripneumony.' He speaks of a metastasis to the kidneys and bladder being peculiarly favorable in empyema. He ascribes suppuration of the liver to intemperance and protracted disease, {946} especially dysentery and colliquative wasting. The symptoms described by him resemble those of chronic pyæmia."

Galen and some of the other ancient physicians recognized the existence of septic poisoning, as is shown by the opinions expressed on the subject of putrid fevers. According to Galen, putrid fevers may either arise from the conversion of ephemerals, or originally from putrefaction of the fluids within the vessels.

Aetius states that they arise from constriction of the skin or viscidity of the humors, whereby the perspiration is stopped, and the quantity of vital heat so altered as to give rise to putrefaction, first of the fluids, and afterward of the fat and solid parts. When these corrupted fluids are contained within the vessels they occasion synochous fevers, but when distributed over the body they give rise to intermittents. Synesius and Constantinus Africanus give a similar account. Alexander gives an interesting and ingenious disquisition on the origin and nature of putrid fevers, one of the most common causes of which he holds to be the conversion of ephemeral fevers, and the inseparable symptoms being want of concoction in the urine and quickness of the pulse with systoles. This is the account of them given by most of the other authorities, both Greek and Arabian, so that we need not enter into any circumstantial exposition of their views. We shall merely give the brief account of those furnished by Palladius. There are, he says, two kinds of synochous fevers, the one being occasioned by effervescence, and the other by putrefaction of the blood; of these the latter are the more protracted and dangerous. In them the pulse is contracted, the heat pungent, and the urine white and putrid.

A new era in the literature of this subject dawned during the sixteenth century. Ambrose Paré and Bartholomew Maggi each published a work in which they pointed out the old errors and announced new truths. Paré's Treatise on Gunshot Wounds was published in Paris in 1551, while Maggi's treatise appeared a year later at Bologna. Paré gained his first experience in the treatment of gunshot wounds in 1536, which is described as follows: "The storming of the small mountain-fortress Villane, near Susa, probably gave him for the first time full occupation, and he followed in all things the example of older colleagues. Like them, although hesitatingly, he poured into the gunshot wounds boiling oil of elder to destroy the poison, but the oil fell short, and then he was compelled to dress the other wounded men with an ointment of oil of roses and turpentine. Fearing that the latter would soon become victims of the wound-poison, he passed a sleepless night, got up early to see the ill consequences, but was greatly surprised to find those that he had half given up free from pain and without inflammation or swelling, while those who had been treated with boiling oil lay in a state of fever, with great pain and much swelling. He therefore determined, as he tells us, never again to burn the poor subjects of gunshot wounds so cruelly." It will be seen that Paré's treatise on gunshot wounds was published fifteen years after this impressive experience at the fortress of Villane. In this work he sought to correct the prevailing idea that {947} gunshot wounds were poisonous, and was ably supported in his effort by Bartholomew Maggi; but it required all the respect which Paré enjoyed in riper years to gradually obtain consideration for the new view. The idea that gunshot wounds were poisonous is supposed to have originated in the fact that in every war there are cases of acute sepsis, developed after the infliction of these injuries, which agree in all their essential points with the results of the bites of poisonous snakes. We are even informed that during the late Franco-Prussian War there were cases which even excited suspicion among the laymen that the enemy had used poisoned missiles.

The nature of the error which Paré and Maggi endeavored to correct is shown by the declaration made by Johannes de Vigo at the commencement of the sixteenth century, who expressed in dogmatic form the views then firmly held by physicians. "A gunshot wound is a contused wound, he says, for the bullet is round; it is burnt, for the bullet is heated; it is poisoned, for the powder is poisonous. The poisoning is the essential condition; therefore the treatment must be directed above all to counteract this."

The next step was that a poisonous substance may develop itself or settle in the wound, and especially in gunshot wounds--a substance which has nothing to do with powder or lead. Paré himself adopted this view. When he took part in the siege of Rouen many wounds sloughed and had a cadaverous smell, and on opening the bodies of those who died numerous collections of pus were found in different parts full of greenish ill-smelling ichor. Besiegers and besieged believed themselves to be wounded with poisoned bullets. Paré looked for the cause in a deterioration of the air by the large quantity of decomposing substances, and he appears to have assumed, as is done at this day, a direct action of the so-called deteriorated air upon the wound itself.

The evil influence of air vitiated by the products of decomposition, not upon wounds only, but upon the organism generally, has never been lost sight of by physicians since that time. That rotten straw, decomposing bodies of men and animals, surfaces saturated with excrement, and overcrowding of badly-ventilated hospitals give rise to infectious fevers and unhealthy state of wounds is not a result of modern observation only. That it was a question of the processes of fermentation which became communicated to the body by means of the exciters of fermentation contained in the air was a view frequently adopted. "To quote one only out of many; John Pringle, in his Observations on the Diseases of the Army, published in 1775, devotes a chapter especially to 'Diseases resulting from Bad Air,' and his forty-eight experiments on septic and antiseptic substances contain numerous hints at attempts resembling those made at the present day to determine the antiseptic power of certain things. No advance was made, however, beyond vague surmises concerning the nature of the exciters of putrefaction, and they were for the most part looked for amongst the volatile, ill-smelling products of decomposition, and were believed to be extremely subtle gaseous matters."

Ambrose Paré (1582) first taught that secondary abscesses in surgical cases, "which he had observed in the spleen, lungs, liver, and other viscera, were due to a changed condition of the fluids produced by some {948} unknown alteration in the atmosphere and determining a purulent diathesis." The following quotations force the conclusion that in the early history of medicine there was supposed to be some important relation between wounds of the head and multiple abscesses. "Nicholas Massa (1553) mentions a case of abscess of the left lung, following an injury of the head." "Valsalva (1707) was induced by his own observation to say that the viscera of the thorax were sometimes affected in wounds of the head." "Desault (1794) considered abscesses of the liver to be a very frequent sequence of head injuries." The fact that wounds of the head were frequently followed by abscesses of the lungs, liver, and other organs probably led to the opinion expressed by Desault, Barthez, Brodie, W. Phillips, Copeland, and others, that the disease had its origin in a nervous agency. "Bertrandi and Audouille (1819) sought for a mechanical explanation of the occurrence of hepatic abscesses after head injuries and in cases of apoplexy." Morgagni (1740) somewhat obscurely hinted at the doctrine of the reabsorption of pus--a doctrine which was afterward elaborated by Quesnay in 1819. Morgagni, after quoting a great number of instances of wounds of the head followed by visceral abscesses, opposes the idea of a mechanical transportation of pus thither, and states that abscesses are not confined to the liver and that they may follow wounds and ulcers of other parts besides the head. He ascribes their formation to particles of pus (not always deposited in the form of pus) resulting from the softening and suppuration of small tubercles, which, having been mixed with the blood and disseminated, are arrested in some of the narrow passages, perhaps of the lymphatic glands, and by obstructing and irritating these, as happens in the production of venereal buboes, and by retaining the humors therein, distend them and give origin to the generation of a much more copious pus than what is carried thither; and by this means, he says, we may also conceive how it is that much more pus is frequently formed in the viscera and cavities of the bodies than a small wound could have produced.

Cheston (1766) believed that the translation of matter from one point to another was a frequent occurrence after amputations of the larger limbs. John Hunter (1793), and after him Velpeau, demonstrated the existence of pus in the blood. Hunter believed that the pus was derived from the interior of the inflamed veins. He described three forms of inflammation of these vessels--viz. adhesive, suppurative, and ulcerative. Pyæmia he considered to be an aggravated form of phlebitis. Arnott (1829) concluded from his observations--1, That death does not result from the extension of the inflammation of the veins to the heart; 2, that the dangerous consequences of phlebitis have no direct relation to the extent of the vein which is inflamed; and, 3, that the presence of pus in the veins, though the principal, is not the sole, cause of the secondary affection. He accordingly opposes the idea of Abernethy, Carmichael, and others that the constitutional affection is owing to the extension of the inflammation to the heart. The publication of Arnott's and Dance's treatises led to the general opinion being held in England and in France that phlebitis and purulent infection were identical affections, or, at least, that the latter was invariably caused by the former.

{949} Cruveilhier (1829), admitting the doctrine of the formation of secondary abscesses being due to capillary phlebitis, further laid down an axiom, since proved untenable, that the foreign body introduced into the veins, whose elimination by the emunctories is impossible, will produce visceral abscesses similar to those which occur after wounds and operations, and that these abscesses are the result of capillary phlebitis of those viscera.

During the early part of the present century it was generally admitted by the best authorities that the symptoms and lesions in pyæmia were entirely due to the presence of pus in the blood, but whether absorbed from the wound or developed by an inflammation of the veins was at that time a disputed question.

Haller made the first experiments on animals with putrefying substances in the latter part of the eighteenth century, and was convinced that nothing destroys the animal fluids more powerfully than putrefaction. Gaspard (1822) published a complete work based upon his experimental research in regard to the action of putrefying substances on living organisms. He, having produced septic infection in animals by injecting into their blood pus or other putrefying substances, thus prepared the way for other experimenters, by whom he was quickly followed. Ernst R. Virchow repeated the experiments of Gaspard, and discriminated with greater precision between the surgical diseases--septicæmia with its sharply-defined group of symptoms, the opposite of pyæmia. Furthermore, "he showed that the changes in the veins which had been regarded as due to phlebitis were caused by the coagulation of the blood and by subsequent degenerative changes in the thrombi thus formed; that the infarctions and abscesses seen in the viscera were due to emboli which had become detached from softened thrombi; that, as the white blood-globules and pus-globules were identical in appearance, they could not be distinguished; and that it was improbable that pus-globules made their way into the blood."

Panum (1855) conducted a series of important experiments, and endeavored to separate the infectious substance and determine its real nature. He concludes that the real poison is not identical with any of the chemical combinations or any of the single substances which have until now been isolated by chemical analysis from the products of nitrogenous decomposition, but adds that it is probably a concealed ferment belonging to the so-called extractive matters--carbonate of ammonium, leucin, tyrosin, fatty acids, acetic acid, etc. Furthermore, that the putrid poison is stable, fixed, and non-volatile; that it is neither decomposed by boiling nor by evaporation to dryness; that it is insoluble in absolute alcohol, but soluble in water; that the albuminous substances found in putrefying liquids become venomous only because they are impregnated with the septic poison; and that washing these substances in a large quantity of water renders them innocuous; and that the energy of these putrid poisons can only be compared to the venom of serpents, curare, and other vegetable alkaloids.

The prize offered by the Faculty of Medicine at Munich for the best essay on the action of putrefying substances in the animal organism was awarded to Hemmer in 1866. His essay was distinguished for its {950} accurate delineation of the pertaining literature and for the number of experiments reported, while his conclusions bear a striking resemblance to those of Panum.